Search

Risk assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) mainly relies on (cyto-)genetic and morphologic features. Nonetheless, further markers are needed to allow for accurate risk stratification. Type I Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs) such as CD16, CD32, and CD64 play an important role in mediating immunomodulatory functions in different myeloid cell types as well as NK and B cells. We here evaluated expression of the three FcγR on peripheral blood AML blasts. Using flow cytometry, we found heterogeneous expression of the FcγR throughout the patient cohort. Correlation of expression levels with disease outcome revealed significantly shorter OS in patients with CD16+ blasts at first diagnosis. CD32 and CD64 expression showed no association with survival but correlated with a mature phenotype and FAB M6. Our data provide clear evidence for the value of immunophenotyping FcγR expression on leukemic cells using peripheral blood, which is rapidly available and improves risk stratification in AML.

Several genetic and molecular markers are general predictors of outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but only few are predictive of outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Novel markers are needed to improve treatment decisions regarding HSCT. CD105 (endoglin) is a type I transmembrane protein capable of activating endothelial cells. Moreover, CD105 mediates stem cell properties of hematopoietic stem cells and enables repopulation within the bone marrow. Expression of CD105 on vessels of solid tumors and on AML blasts is correlated with poor prognosis. We recently demonstrated that CD105 expression is an independent predictor of overall survival in AML. However, its role in patients receiving intensive treatment with consecutive allogenic transplantation has not been assessed. Using flow cytometry, we analyzed primary samples of 41 patients who underwent HSCT. Using the previously defined SFI cut-off of 5.2, we identified differences in CD105 expression regarding FAB classification and NCCN risk score. Moreover, we detected differences regarding transplant indication and WHO classification with regards to CD105 surface levels. In patients undergoing HSCT high CD105 expression correlated significantly with poor overall survival. We identify CD105 expression in AML as prognostic marker for outcome after HSCT in AML.

Bispecific antibodies (bsAb) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells allow for antibody guided recruitment of T cells against tumors. Both are successfully used for treatment of CD19 expressing leukemias, but may cause cytokine release syndrome (CRS) as a major dose-limiting side effect. For CRS prevention, steroids are recommended prior to bsAb treatment, despite their well-known lymphotoxic activity. The IL-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab is established for treatment of CRS induced by CAR T cells, but was not considered for CRS prevention in bsAb therapy. We here compared the influence of dexamethasone and tocilizumab on bsAb-mediated T cell proliferation and tumor lysis in vitro and in vivo and found that dexamethasone profoundly inhibited T cell proliferation and antitumor activity as induced by two different bsAb, particularly at low effector:target ratios, whereas tocilizumab did not affect efficacy. When we applied tocilizumab early during treatment of three patients with a newly developed PSMAxCD3 bsAb, significant CRS attenuation despite high IL-6 serum levels was observed. Thus, early IL-6 blockade may reduce the undesired sequelae of CRS upon bsAb therapy without affecting therapeutic activity, allowing in turn for safe application of effective doses.

Genetic and morphological markers are well-established prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, further reliable markers are urgently needed to improve risk stratification in AML. CD318 (CDCP1) is a transmembrane protein which in solid tumors promotes formation of metastasis and correlates with poor survival. Despite its broad expression on hematological precursor cells, its prognostic significance in hematological malignancies so far remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the role of CD318 as novel prognostic marker in AML by immunophenotyping of leukemic blasts. Flow cytometric evaluation of CD318 on leukemic cells in 70 AML patients revealed a substantial expression in 40/70 (57%) of all cases. CD318 surface levels were significantly correlated with overall survival in patients receiving anthracycline-based induction therapy or best available alternative therapy. Using receiver-operating characteristics, we established a cut-off value to define CD318lo and CD318hi expression in both cohorts. Notably, high CD318 expression correlated inversely as prognostic marker in both treatment cohorts: as poor prognostic marker in patients receiving intense therapy, whereas upon palliative care it correlated with better outcome. In conclusion, FACS-based determination of CD318 expression may serve as novel prognostic factor depending on implemented therapy in AML patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00277-020-03907-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin-containing solutions (OCS), sampled during patient treatment with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), was assessed by well-established continuous impedance-based real-time cell analysis (RTCA)ex vivo. HIPEC treatment was replicated by exposing OAW-42 cancer cells to OCS for 30 or 60 minutes at 42 °C. In contrast to previous observations with continuous exposure, where cytotoxicity was proven, identical OCS obtained during HIPEC did not induce cell death reproducibly and showed strongly attenuated effects after only 30 minutes of application. Based on these unexpected findings, spike-ins of oxaliplatin (OX) into peritoneal dialysis solution (PDS) or dextrose 5 % in water (D5W) were used to replicate HIPEC conditions, as used in either our own protocols or the recently presented randomized controlled PRODIGE 7 trial, where OX HIPEC for 30 minutes failed to produce survival benefits in colorectal carcinoma patients. With OX-spiked into D5W or PDS at identical concentrations as used for PRODIGE 7 or conforming with own HIPEC protocols, we did not observe the expectable cytotoxic effects in RTCA, after replicating OX HIPEC for 30 minutes. These results were corroborated for both solvents at relevant drug concentrations by classical end-point assays for cytotoxicity in two cancer cell lines. Further results suggest that penetration depth, drug dosage, exposure time and drug solvents may constitute critical factors for HIPEC effectiveness. Accordingly, we witnessed substantial cell shrinkage with both PDS and D5W, potentially contributing to reduced drug effects. Based on these results, intensified pharmacological research seems warranted to establish effective HIPEC protocols.Key PointsOxaliplatin (OX)-containing solutions obtained during patient treatment with Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) unexpectedly showed low cytotoxicity in an impedance-basedex vivocytotoxicity cell assay.OX cytotoxicity under HIPEC conditions could be enhanced by extending drug exposure to one hour by an impedance-basedex vivocytotoxicity cell assay.HIPEC failed to show survival benefits in the randomized controlled PRODIGE 7 trial and was questioned in the aftermath.Clinically relevant OX concentrations applied in conjunction with hyperthermia (42 °C) for 30 minutes, as used either at our own medical center or according to the PRODIGE 7 trial, proved predominantly ineffective, when used according to HIPEC routines in an impedance-basedin vitrocytotoxicity cell assay.Respective findings were corroborated in two different cell lines and by two established end-point assays, showing that 50 % cell death could not be reached by the same HIPEC treatment with OX, in contrast to continuous drug exposure.As potentially relevant factor, the thickness of the exposed cell layer was identified, requiring at least ~100 µm penetration depth for our model to indicate effectiveness.Additionally, we show relevant cell shrinkage by two drug diluents used either at our own medical center or according to the PRODIGE 7 trial, potentially associated with fluid shifts out of the cell and impaired drug effects.Our own as well as recent findings by Ubinket al.(Br J Surg. 2019. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11206) support the notion that lacking effectiveness of OX HIPEC may explain the negative PRODIGE 7 trial results.