Search

Rationale. Topical antiinflammatory medications such as inhaled corticosteroids are recommended for therapy of asthma, but no formulation suitable for administration to infants and young children is available in the United States. Methods. This was a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and safety of four dosing regimens of bude-sonide inhalation suspension (BIS) or placebo in 480 asthmatic infants and children (64% boys), ages 6 months to 8 years, with moderate persistent asthma. Approximately 30% of children were previously on inhaled corticosteroids that were discontinued before the study. Active treatments were comprised of BIS 0.25 mg once daily (QD), 0.25 mg twice a day (BID), 0.5 mg BID, or 1.0 mg QD. Efficacy was assessed by twice daily recording at home of asthma symptom scores and use of rescue medication, and discontinuation from the study because of worsening asthma and/or a requirement for systemic steroids. Peak flow measurements were recorded twice daily on diary and spirometry was recorded at clinic visits for those children able to perform these tests. Safety was assessed by reported adverse events and by cortisol testing (adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation) in a subset of patients. Results. Patients enrolled had an average duration of asthma of 34 months; the mean asthma symptom score was ∼1.3 (scale of 0–3). All dosing regimens with BIS produced statistically significant improvement in various clinical efficacy measures for asthma control compared with placebo. The lowest dose used, 0.25 mg QD, was efficacious but with fewer efficacy parameters than seen with the other doses administered. Separation between active treatment and placebo in daytime and nighttime symptom scores were observed by week 2 of treatment for all BIS treatment regimens. A significant increase in peak flow measurement was observed in most active treatment groups compared with placebo in the subset of children able to do pulmonary function testing. All treatment groups showed numerical improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second but only the 0.5-mg BID dose was significantly different from placebo. Adverse events for the entire group and response to adrenocorticotropic hormone in a subgroup of children who underwent cortisol testing before and at the end of the treatment period were no different in budesonide-treated patients in comparison to placebo. Conclusion. Results of this study demonstrate that BIS is effective and safe for infants and young children with moderate persistent asthma in a multiple dose range, and that QD dosing is an important option to be considered by the prescribing physician.

Aspirin desensitization is indicated for patients who have aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease and whose asthma and/or rhinosinusitis is suboptimally controlled with inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene-modifying drugs. In this practice paper, the general requirements for aspirin desensitization are presented, the locations where desensitizations can be safely performed are outlined, prechallenge patient preparation is discussed, an oral aspirin challenge protocol is presented, treatment of adverse reactions is reviewed, and maintenance of aspirin desensitization is discussed.

Facilitated asthma-specialist care delivered by allergists was compared to generalist care on the rate of relapse of asthma emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations and on asthma control in a prospective, controlled study of San Diego Kaiser Health Plan members with asthma. Subjects with asthma between the ages of 6 and 59 years presenting for acute ER care for asthma were systematically assigned by alternating, consecutively, the day of their ER visit to receive either (1) facilitated referral to an asthma specialist within the allergy department and concomitant comprehensive ongoing asthma care (intervention group, n = 149) or (2) continued outpatient management from generalist physicians (control group, n = 160). The course of their asthma was evaluated blindly during the subsequent 6 months by review of medical records, initial and follow-up questionnaires, and spirometry. Compared to the control group, the intervention group noted (1) a 75% reduction in the number of, and percent of, subjects with asthma awakenings per night (p less than or equal to 0.0001), (2) an almost 50% reduction in asthma ER relapses (p = 0.017) resulting from a reduction in the frequency of multiple relapse (p = 0.005), and (3) a greater use of inhaled corticosteroids (p less than 0.00001) and cromolyn (p = 0.002). Thus, facilitated referral of subjects with asthma to specialists in asthma therapy after acute ER therapy appears to reduce asthma ER relapses and to improve asthma outcome.

An improved protocol was developed for the use of troleandomycin (TAO) in severe, steroid-requiring subjects with asthma. Compared to previous reports, this protocol uses a lower starting dose of TAO and a rapid steroid taper. Fifteen patients were treated with TAO following the new guidelines. Steroid requirements in the 15 patients dropped by 68% within 2 weeks, and 13 of the 15 patients were able to be maintained on alternate day steroids. In spite of rapid steroid taper, both FEV1 and mean FVC increased significantly (p less than 0.001). There was a low incidence of side effects and, in contrast to previous reports on TAO, no patient had even a transient increase in cushingoid appearance. Glucose intolerance was observed initially in three patients but resolved with continued steroid taper. Transient liver-enzyme elevation was noted in four patients and in each case reversed with a reduction in TAO dosage. The revised protocol is associated with an improved risk-benefit ratio. New guidelines are presented for the use of TAO in severe steroid-requiring subjects with asthma.