Search

Objective To utilize, in an individual and institutional privacy-preserving manner, electronic health record (EHR) data from 202 hospitals by analyzing answers to COVID-19-related questions and posting these answers online. Materials and Methods We developed a distributed, federated network of 12 health systems that harmonized their EHRs and submitted aggregate answers to consortia questions posted at https://www.covid19questions.org. Our consortium developed processes and implemented distributed algorithms to produce answers to a variety of questions. We were able to generate counts, descriptive statistics, and build a multivariate, iterative regression model without centralizing individual-level data. Results Our public website contains answers to various clinical questions, a web form for users to ask questions in natural language, and a list of items that are currently pending responses. The results show, for example, that patients who were taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, within the year before admission, had lower unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates. We also showed that, when adjusted for, age, sex, and ethnicity were not significantly associated with mortality. We demonstrated that it is possible to answer questions about COVID-19 using EHR data from systems that have different policies and must follow various regulations, without moving data out of their health systems. Discussion and Conclusions We present an alternative or a complement to centralized COVID-19 registries of EHR data. We can use multivariate distributed logistic regression on observations recorded in the process of care to generate results without transferring individual-level data outside the health systems.

Background The objective is to understand why physicians order tests or treatments in older adults contrary to published recommendations. Methods Participants: Physicians above the median for ≥ 1 measures of overuse representing 3 Choosing Wisely topics. Measurements: Participants evaluated decisions in a semi-structured interview regarding: 1) Screening men aged ≥ 76 with prostate specific antigen 2) Ordering urine studies in women ≥ 65 without symptoms 3) Overtreating adults aged ≥ 75 with insulin or oral hypoglycemic medications. Two investigators independently coded transcripts using qualitative analysis. Results Nineteen interviews were conducted across the three topics resulting in four themes. First, physicians were aware and knowledgeable of guidelines. Second, perceived patient preference towards overuse influenced physician action even when physicians felt strongly that testing was not indicated. Third, physicians overestimated benefits of a test and underemphasized potential harms. Fourth, physicians were resistant to change when patients appeared to be doing well. Conclusions Though physicians expressed awareness to avoid overuse, deference to patient preferences and the tendency to distort the chance of benefit over harm influenced decisions to order testing. Approaches for decreasing unnecessary testing must account for perceived patient preferences, make the potential harms of overtesting salient, and address clinical inertia among patients who appear to be doing well.

Purpose Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients experience diverse symptoms and the impact of these different symptoms varies substantially. Current disease activity measures do not account for the relative importance of the different symptoms and severity levels. In this study, we aimed to quantify the relative importance of different symptoms for IBD patients and to develop a patient preference-weighted symptom (PWS) score to assess symptom burden in IBD. Methods We performed a choice-based conjoint analysis (CBCA) survey with 129 IBD patients to estimate the relative importance of four common IBD symptoms: stool frequency, abdominal pain, blood in stools, and urgency. We then developed the PWS score using the preferences obtained from the CBCA, which we validated against existing measures. Results CBCA revealed that urgency was the most important symptom to patients, followed by abdominal pain and blood in stools. Urgency associated with incontinence received particularly high scores and was perceived to be more than 3 times as important as urgency without incontinence. Our results confirmed that different symptoms are not equally bothersome, and we showed that the relation between symptom-level and importance is not linear. The PWS score, which we developed using these estimates was highly correlated with existing disease activity measures. Conclusions We quantified the relative importance of four common IBD symptoms and developed the PWS score for IBD, which takes the relative importance of different symptoms and symptom-levels into account. The PWS score can be used to obtain a patient-centered assessment of symptom burden.

IMPORTANCE: The extent of clinician-level variation in the overuse of testing or treatment in older adults is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To examine clinician-level variation for three new measures of potentially inappropriate use of medical services in older adults. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of overall means and clinician-level variation in performance on three new measures. SUBJECTS: Adults aged 65 years and older who had office visits with outpatient primary or immediate care clinicians within a single academic medical center health system between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017. MEASURES: Two electronic clinical quality measures representing potentially inappropriate use of medical services in older adults: prostate-specific antigen testing against guidelines (PSA) in men aged 76 and older; urinalysis or urine culture for non-specific reasons in women aged 65 and older; and one intermediate outcome measure: hemoglobin A1c less than 7.0 in adults aged 75 and older with diabetes mellitus treated with insulin or oral hypoglycemic medication. RESULTS: Sixty-nine clinicians and 2009 patients contributed observations to the PSA measure, 144 clinicians and 5933 patients contributed to the urinalysis/urine culture measure, and 42 clinicians and 665 patients contributed to the diabetes measure. Meaningful clinician-level performance variation was greatest for the PSA measure (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.27), followed by the urinalysis/urine culture measure (ICC = 0.18), and the diabetes measure (ICC = 0.024). The range of possible overuse across clinician quartiles was 8–54% for the PSA measure, 3–35% for the urinalysis/urine culture measure, and 13–49% for the diabetes measure. The odds ratios of overuse in the highest quartile compared with the lowest for the PSA, urinalysis/urine culture, and diabetes measures were 99.3 (95% CI 43 to 228), 15.7 (10 to 24), and 6.0 (3.3 to 11), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Within the same health system, rates of potential overuse in elderly patients varied greatly across clinicians, particularly for the process measures examined. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-020-05748-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background Since the advent of COVID-19, accelerated adoption of systems that reduce face-to-face encounters has outpaced training and best practices. Electronic consultations (eConsults), structured communications between PCPs and specialists regarding a case, have been effective in reducing face-to-face specialist encounters. As the health system rapidly adapts to multiple new practices and communication tools, new mechanisms to measure and improve performance in this context are needed. Objective To test whether feedback comparing physicians to top performing peers using co-specialists’ ratings improves performance. Design Cluster-randomized controlled trial Participants Eighty facility-specialty clusters and 214 clinicians Intervention Providers in the feedback arms were sent messages that announced their membership in an elite group of “Top Performers” or provided actionable recommendations with feedback for providers that were “Not Top Performers.” Main Measures The primary outcomes were changes in peer ratings in the following performance dimensions after feedback was received: (1) elicitation of information from primary care practitioners; (2) adherence to institutional clinical guidelines; (3) agreement with peer’s medical decision-making; (4) educational value; (5) relationship building. Key Results Specialists showed significant improvements on 3 of the 5 consultation performance dimensions: medical decision-making (odds ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.08–2.14, p

Author(s): Yadav, Kabir; Meeker, Daniella; Mistry, Rakesh D; Doctor, Jason N; Fleming-Dutra, Katherine E; Fleischman, Ross J; Gaona, Samuel D; Stahmer, Aubyn; May, Larissa | Abstract: BackgroundAntibiotics are commonly prescribed during emergency department (ED) and urgent care center (UCC) visits for viral acute respiratory infection (ARI). We evaluate the comparative effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship intervention adapted for acute care ambulatory settings (adapted intervention) to a stewardship intervention that additionally incorporates behavioral nudges (enhanced intervention) in reducing inappropriate prescriptions.MethodsThis study was a pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial conducted in three academic health systems comprising five adult and pediatric EDs and four UCCs. Randomization of the nine sites was stratified by health system; all providers at each site received either the adapted or the enhanced intervention. The main outcome was the proportion of antibiotic-inappropriate ARI diagnosis visits that received an outpatient antibiotic prescription by individual providers. We estimated a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model comparing visits during the influenza season for 2016 to 2017 (baseline) and 2017 to 2018 (intervention).ResultsThere were 44,820 ARI visits among 292 providers across all nine cluster sites. Antibiotic prescribing for ARI visits dropped from 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]n= 4.5% to 7.9%) to 2.4% (95% CIn= 1.3% to 3.4%) during the study period. We found a significant reduction in inappropriate prescribing after adjusting for health-system and provider-level effects from 2.2% (95% CIn= 1.0% to 3.4%) to 1.5% (95% CIn= 0.7% to 2.3%) with an odds ratio of 0.67 (95% CIn= 0.54 to 0.82). Difference-in-differences between the two interventions was not significantly different.ConclusionImplementation of antibiotic stewardship for ARI is feasible and effective in the ED and UCC settings. More intensive behavioral nudging methods were not more effective in high-performance settings.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes >40,000 cancer diagnoses each year, yet vaccination rates remain low because widespread implementation of strategies to increase vaccinations has not occurred. Behavioral nudges have demonstrated efficacy in improving uptake of desired behaviors in health care settings but have not been tested for increasing HPV vaccinations. We assessed the impact of an intervention combining behavioral nudges with other proven strategies (i.e., assessment and feedback, provider communication training) on HPV vaccination rates and parental satisfaction in four Midwestern pediatric, outpatient practices. Practices were randomly assigned to receive either assessment and feedback or assessment and feedback combined with vaccine communication training and behavioral nudges in the form of vaccine commitment posters. Providers (n = 16) completed surveys regarding vaccine policies and parents (n = 215) reported on their child's vaccine history and satisfaction with the consultation. Three practices increased HPV vaccination rates (1-10%); however, there was no statistically significant difference by study arm. Most parents (M age 41.3; SD 8.1; 85% female, 68% White) indicated their child had previously initiated the HPV vaccine series (61%) and 72% indicated receipt of an HPV vaccine during the study visit. Concerns among HPV vaccine-hesitant parents (28%) included vaccine safety and believing the vaccine is unnecessary (40%). Most parents were satisfied with their consultation. Practices in both intervention groups increased vaccination rates. While some parents continue to harbor concerns about vaccine safety and necessity, parents welcomed discussions about HPV and were satisfied with their provider's communication regardless of their vaccine decisions.

There are limited data regarding direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in patients with bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ambulatory utilization of DOACs and to compare the effectiveness and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in patients with AF and BHVs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a large integrated health care delivery system in California. Patients with BHVs and AF treated with warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban between September 12, 2011 and June 18, 2020 were identified. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin were determined. Use of DOACs gradually increased since 2011, with a significant upward in trend after a stay-at-home order related to COVID-19. Among 2,672 adults with BHVs and AF who met the inclusion criteria, 439 were exposed to a DOAC and 2233 were exposed to warfarin. For the primary effectiveness outcome of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism and transient ischemic attack, no significant association was observed between use of DOACs compared with warfarin (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.48, p = 0.11). Use of DOACs was associated with lower risk of the primary safety outcome of intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and other bleed (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85, p0.001). Results were consistent across multiple subgroups in the sensitivity analyses. These findings support the use of DOACs for AF in patients with BHVs.

Background: There is a lack of evidence that long-term opioid use offers benefit for noncancer pain and an abundance of evidence of harm. Despite clinical guidelines and education, prescribing continues at a higher rate than before the opioids crisis. The objective of trial 1 of the Application of Economics & Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety (AESOPS-1) is to discourage unnecessary opioid prescribing in primary care by applying “behavioral insights”—empirically-tested social and psychological interventions that affect choice. Methods: AESOPS-1 randomizes primary care clinics in Illinois and California to behavioral intervention or control. Both arms receive opioid guideline education. Clinics randomized to the behavioral intervention arm receive nudges within the electronic health record (EHR) including: 1) an “accountable justification” entered in the chart, 2) a precommitment to address high-risk prescriptions, and 3) a “PainTracker” that broadens discussions about pain. The control arm receives no EHR-based intervention. The primary outcome is the change in weekly milligram morphine equivalents (MME) prescribed. The secondary outcome is the change in the proportion of patients prescribed at least 50 daily MME. To evaluate these outcomes, we will use a difference-in-differences mixed-effects regression model on clinician MME weekly or daily dose. The analysis will be “intent-to-treat.” The intervention period is 18-months, with a 6-month follow-up period to measure persistence of effects. Discussion: The AESOPS-1 trial will evaluate the effect of EHR-based interventions in reducing noncancer opioid prescribing in primary care. AESOPS-1 may demonstrate practical and scalable strategies to lower unnecessary population exposure to opioids.

ObjectivesAt least 30% of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions are unnecessary. Outpatient antibiotic stewardship is needed to improve prescribing and address the threat of antibiotic resistance. A better understanding of primary care physicians (PCPs) attitudes towards antibiotic prescribing and outpatient antibiotic stewardship is needed to identify barriers to stewardship implementation and help tailor stewardship strategies. The aim of this study was to assess PCPs current attitudes towards antibiotic resistance, inappropriate antibiotic prescribing and the feasibility of outpatient stewardship efforts.DesignEight focus groups with PCPs were conducted by an independent moderator using a moderator guide. Focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed and coded for major themes using deductive and inductive content analysis methods.SettingFocus groups were conducted in four US cities: Philadelphia, Birmingham, Chicago and Los Angeles.ParticipantsTwo focus groups were conducted in each city—one with family medicine and internal medicine physicians and one with paediatricians. A total of 26 family medicine/internal medicine physicians and 26 paediatricians participated.ResultsParticipants acknowledged that resistance is an important public health issue, but not as important as other pressing problems (eg, obesity, opioids). Many considered resistance to be more of a hospital issue. While participants recognised inappropriate prescribing as a problem in outpatient settings, many felt that the key drivers were non-primary care settings (eg, urgent care clinics, retail clinics) and patient demand. Participants reacted positively to stewardship efforts aimed at educating patients and clinicians. They questioned the validity of antibiotic prescribing metrics. This scepticism was due to a number of factors, including the feasibility of capturing prescribing quality, a belief that physicians will ‘game the system’ to improve their measures, and dissatisfaction and distrust of quality measurement in general.ConclusionsStakeholders will need to consider physician attitudes and beliefs about antibiotic stewardship when implementing interventions aimed at improving prescribing.

Background Outpatient antibiotic stewardship is needed to reduce inappropriate prescribing and minimize the development of resistant bacteria. We assessed primary care physicians’ perceptions of antibiotic resistance, antibiotic use, and the need for stewardship activities. Methods We conducted a national online survey of 1550 internal, family, and pediatric medicine physicians in the United States recruited from an opt-in panel of healthcare professionals. Descriptive statistics were generated for respondent demographics and question responses. Responses were also stratified by geographic region and medical specialty, with a χ 2 test used to assess for differences. Results More respondents agreed that antibiotic resistance was a problem in the United States (94%) than in their practice (55%) and that inappropriate antibiotic prescribing was a problem in outpatient settings (91%) than in their practice (37%). In addition, 60% agreed that they prescribed antibiotics more appropriately than their peers. Most respondents (91%) believed that antibiotic stewardship was appropriate in office-based practices, but they ranked antibiotic resistance as less important than other public health issues such as obesity, diabetes, opioids, smoking, and vaccine hesitancy. Approximately half (47%) believed they would need a lot of help to implement stewardship. Respondents indicated that they were likely to implement antibiotic stewardship efforts in response to feedback or incentives provided by payers or health departments. Conclusions Primary care physicians generally did not recognize antibiotic resistance and inappropriate prescribing as issues in their practice. This poses a challenge for the success of outpatient stewardship. Healthcare stakeholders will need to explore opportunities for feedback and incentive activities to encourage stewardship uptake., US primary care physicians recognize the threat of antibiotic resistance and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing nationally but not in their own practices. Healthcare stakeholders need to explore effective strategies for incentivizing stewardship implementation in these critical healthcare settings.

Objectives Little is known about the severity and long-term health and economic consequences of sarcopenia. We developed a sarcopenia index to measure severity in older Americans and estimated the long-term societal benefits generated by effective interventions to mitigate severity. Design Using a micro-simulation model, we quantified the potential societal value generated in the US in 2010–2040 by reductions in sarcopenia severity in older adults. All analyses were performed in Stata and SAS. Setting & Participants: Secondary data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (N = 1634) and Health and Retirement Study (HRS) (N = 952) were used to develop a sarcopenia severity index in older adults. Measurements Multitrait multi-method and factor analyses were used to validate and calibrate the sarcopenia severity index, which was modeled as a function of gait speed, walking without an assistive device, and moderate physical activity. Results In representative elderly populations, reducing sarcopenia severity by improving gait speed by 0.1 m/s in those with gait speed under 0.8 m/s generated a cumulative benefit of $65B by 2040 (2015 dollars). Improving walking ability in those with walking difficulty generated cumulative social benefit of $787B by 2040. Conclusions Reducing sarcopenia severity would generate significant health and economic benefits to society— almost $800B in the most optimistic scenarios. Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article at 10.1007/s12603-018-1104-7 and is accessible for authorized users.

Health outcomes may depend on which treatment is received, whether choice of treatment is given, and whether a received treatment is the preferred therapy. We examined the effects of these key factors on the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-3L) in patients with PTSD. Two hundred patients aged 18–65 years with PTSD diagnosis enrolled in a doubly randomized preference trial (DRPT) examining treatment, choice of treatment, and treatment-preference effects of prolonged exposure therapy (PE) and pharmacotherapy with sertraline (SER) (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00127673). We performed difference-in-difference analysis to estimate the treatment effects of prolonged exposure therapy (PE) as compared to pharmacotherapy with sertraline (SER), receipt of choice versus no-choice of treatment, and receipt of preferred versus non-preferred treatment on health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcome using the EQ-5D-3L completed at baseline and 10-week post-treatment. The treatment effects of PE on the EQ-5D scores in overall patients and subgroup of patients who preferred PE were 0.150 (p = 0.025) and 0.223 (p

Background Opioid-related morbidity and mortality has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet specific information about the communities most affected remains unknown. Our objective is to evaluate decedent-level associations with an opioid-related death following the implementation of stay-at-home orders in Los Angeles County. Methods This retrospective cohort study used data from the L.A. County Medical Examiner-Coroner to identify opioid-related deaths in 2019 and 2020. We used logistic regression to analyze the change in opioid-related deaths following a 30-day washout period after the start of stay-at-home orders. Independent variables included decedent age, gender, race and ethnicity, heroin or fentanyl present at the time of death, census tract-level education, and a scheduled drug prescription in the year before death. Results Opioid-related deaths in L.A. County are most common in census tracts where a small percentage of the population has a Bachelor’s degree. Following stay-at-home orders, Non-Hispanic Caucasian individuals had significantly more opioid-related deaths than Hispanic individuals (risk ratio (RR): 1.82 [95 % CI, 1.10–3.02]; P < 0.05) after adjusting for age, gender, and heroin or fentanyl use. Racial and ethnic differences in mortality were not explained by census tract-level education or recent scheduled drug prescriptions. Discussion There has been an alarming rise in opioid-related deaths in L.A. County during 2020. The increase in opioid-related overdose deaths following the onset of COVID-19 and related policies occurred most often among Non-Hispanic Caucasian individuals. Further research on this trend's underlying cause is needed to inform policy recommendations during these simultaneous public health crises.

Feedback reduces opioid prescriptions Most people addicted to opioids began taking them because they were legally prescribed. Little attention has been paid to changing physicians' prescribing behavior. Using a randomized controlled trial format, Doctor et al. monitored the effect of notifying physicians who had a patient die of opioid overdose within 12 months of a prescription. The physicians received an injunction to prescribe safely from their county's medical examiner. This intervention led to reductions in high-intensity prescribing, reductions in the likelihood that an opioid-naïve patient received a prescription, and a reduction in overall cumulative opioid intake. Science , this issue p. 588

Background Effective prevention of HPV is possible, but < 50% of adolescents in the Midwest complete the recommended vaccine series. Strategies to increase HPV vaccination rates have demonstrated efficacy, however widespread implementation of these interventions has not been realized. Behavioral nudges have demonstrated efficacy in increasing uptake of desired heath behaviors among providers (e.g. hand hygiene, judicious antibiotic prescribing). This trial assessed the impact of an assessment and feedback, communication training, and behavioral nudge (i.e. poster-sized vaccine commitment statements) intervention (T3) on adolescent vaccination rates and parental satisfaction at four Midwestern pediatric practices. Methods Practices were randomly assigned to receive either 1) assessment and feedback or 2) T3 intervention. Providers (n=16) completed surveys regarding vaccine polices and parents of vaccine eligible adolescents (n=230) reported their child’s vaccine history and satisfaction with the consultation. Practice- level vaccination rates for Tdap, Meningococcal, and HPV were calculated through billing data queries from an integrated pediatric health network. Vaccination rates and provider/ parental responses were compared by intervention arm. Results All practices evidenced increased adolescent vaccine rates, ranging from 0.8% to 3.4% for Meningococcal and 1.3% to 12.1% for Tdap. Three of the four practices had increased HPV vaccination rates (1% to 10%), however there was no statistically significant difference by study arm. Most parents (M age 41.34; SD 8.05; 85% female, 68% White) indicated their child had previously initiated the HPV vaccine series (61%) and 72% indicated receipt of an HPV vaccine during the study visit. Concerns among HPV vaccine hesitant parents (n=60) included concerns about vaccine safety and necessity. Most (97%) of parents were satisfied with their consultation. Conclusion Practices in both intervention groups evidenced an increase in adolescent vaccination rates. While some parents had concerns about HPV vaccine safety and necessity, parents welcomed discussions about HPV vaccine and were satisfied with their provider’s communication regardless of their vaccine decisions. Disclosures Brian R. Lee, MPH, PhD, Merck (Grant/Research Support)

Secure computation of equivalence has fundamental application in many different areas, including health-care. We study this problem in the context of matching an individual’s identity to link medical records across systems under the socialist millionaires’ problem: Two millionaires wish to determine if their fortunes are equal without disclosing their net worth (Boudot, et al. 2001). In Theorem 2, we show that when a “greater than” algorithm is carried out on a totally ordered set it is easy to achieve secure matching without additional rounds of communication. We present this efficient solution to assess equivalence using a set intersection algorithm designed for “greater than” computation and demonstrate its effectiveness on equivalence of arbitrary data values, as well as demonstrate how it meets regulatory criteria for risk of disclosure.

This study examines assesses inappropriate antibiotic prescribing 12 months after stopping a randomized clinical trial of a behavioral intervention intended to reduce the rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections.

Traditional health technology assessment (HTA) draws upon a data modeling and evidence synthesis framework to arrive at conclusions about the clinical efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and budg...

BACKGROUND: Behavioral economics interventions have been shown to effectively reduce the rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for acute respiratory infections (ARIs). OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of three behavioral economic interventions designed to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for ARIs. DESIGN: Thirty-year Markov model from the US societal perspective with inputs derived from the literature and CDC surveillance data. SUBJECTS: Forty-five-year-old adults with signs and symptoms of ARI presenting to a healthcare provider. INTERVENTIONS: (1) Provider education on guidelines for the appropriate treatment of ARIs; (2) Suggested Alternatives, which utilizes computerized clinical decision support to suggest non-antibiotic treatment choices in lieu of antibiotics; (3) Accountable Justification, which mandates free-text justification into the patient’s electronic health record when antibiotics are prescribed; and (4) Peer Comparison, which sends a periodic email to prescribers about his/her rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing relative to clinician colleagues. MAIN MEASURES: Discounted costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. KEY RESULTS: Each intervention has lower costs but higher QALYs compared to provider education. Total costs for each intervention were $178.21, $173.22, $172.82, and $172.52, and total QALYs were 14.68, 14.73, 14.74, and 14.74 for the control, Suggested Alternatives, Accountable Justification, and Peer Comparison groups, respectively. Results were most sensitive to the quality-of-life of the uninfected state, and the likelihood and costs for antibiotic-associated adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral economics interventions can be cost-effective strategies for reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions by reducing healthcare resource utilization.

Healthcare professionals are rapidly adopting electronic health records (EHRs). Within EHRs, seemingly innocuous menu design configurations can influence provider decisions for better or worse. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the grouping of menu items systematically affects prescribing practices among primary care providers. We surveyed 166 primary care providers in a research network of practices in the greater Chicago area, of whom 84 responded (51 % response rate). Respondents and non-respondents were similar on all observable dimensions except that respondents were more likely to work in an academic setting. The questionnaire consisted of seven clinical vignettes. Each vignette described typical signs and symptoms for acute respiratory infections, and providers chose treatments from a menu of options. For each vignette, providers were randomly assigned to one of two menu partitions. For antibiotic-inappropriate vignettes, the treatment menu either listed over-the-counter (OTC) medications individually while grouping prescriptions together, or displayed the reverse partition. For antibiotic-appropriate vignettes, the treatment menu either listed narrow-spectrum antibiotics individually while grouping broad-spectrum antibiotics, or displayed the reverse partition. The main outcome was provider treatment choice. For antibiotic-inappropriate vignettes, we categorized responses as prescription drugs or OTC-only options. For antibiotic-appropriate vignettes, we categorized responses as broad- or narrow-spectrum antibiotics. Across vignettes, there was an 11.5 percentage point reduction in choosing aggressive treatment options (e.g., broad-spectrum antibiotics) when aggressive options were grouped compared to when those same options were listed individually (95 % CI: 2.9 to 20.1 %; p = .008). Provider treatment choice appears to be influenced by the grouping of menu options, suggesting that the layout of EHR order sets is not an arbitrary exercise. The careful crafting of EHR order sets can serve as an important opportunity to improve patient care without constraining physicians’ ability to prescribe what they believe is best for their patients.

This article describes the patient-centered Scalable National Network for Effectiveness Research (pSCANNER), which is part of the recently formed PCORnet, a national network composed of learning healthcare systems and patient-powered research networks funded by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). It is designed to be a stakeholder-governed federated network that uses a distributed architecture to integrate data from three existing networks covering over 21 million patients in all 50 states: (1) VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI), with data from Veteran Health Administration's 151 inpatient and 909 ambulatory care and community-based outpatient clinics; (2) the University of California Research exchange (UC-ReX) network, with data from UC Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego; and (3) SCANNER, a consortium of UCSD, Tennessee VA, and three federally qualified health systems in the Los Angeles area supplemented with claims and health information exchange data, led by the University of Southern California. Initial use cases will focus on three conditions: (1) congestive heart failure; (2) Kawasaki disease; (3) obesity. Stakeholders, such as patients, clinicians, and health service researchers, will be engaged to prioritize research questions to be answered through the network. We will use a privacy-preserving distributed computation model with synchronous and asynchronous modes. The distributed system will be based on a common data model that allows the construction and evaluation of distributed multivariate models for a variety of statistical analyses.

Background At least 30% of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions are unnecessary. Outpatient antibiotic stewardship can improve prescribing and minimize the threat of antibiotic resistance. We assessed primary care physicians’ (PCPs) perceptions of antibiotic resistance, inappropriate antibiotic use, and the need for and impact of antibiotic stewardship activities. Methods We conducted a national survey of 1,550 internal and family medicine physicians and pediatricians recruited from a medical market research panel. Quotas were established to recruit participants by geographic region and specialty. For sample representativeness, survey weights were generated according to these characteristics using the American Medical Association’s Masterfile. Results Among respondents, 94% agreed that resistance is a problem in the United States, but only 55% felt it was a problem for their practice; 65% of respondents agreed they had seen an increase in resistant infections in their patients over the past 5 years. Responses about inappropriate antibiotic use were similar: 91% agreed that it was a problem, but 37% agreed that it is a problem in their practice. Additionally, 60% felt they prescribed antibiotics more appropriately than their peers. For antibiotic stewardship, 91% felt it was appropriate for office-based practices, but 53% believed that discussions with patients on the appropriate use of antibiotics is sufficient to address the problem. The majority of respondents indicated they were likely, very likely, or extremely likely to implement stewardship interventions in response to feedback or incentives from payers or health departments. The activities with the strongest likelihood to spur stewardship adoption included the state health department publishing local resistance patterns (82%), a payer creating a stand-alone incentive program for stewardship (80%), or a payer including it in a broader quality incentive program (76%). Conclusion PCPs feel that antibiotic resistance, inappropriate prescribing, and stewardship are important in the United States, but not for their own practices. This disconnect poses a challenge for the success of outpatient stewardship programs. Incentive or data feedback activities may help encourage stewardship uptake. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Purpose Bayesian networks (BNs) are graphical representations of probabilistic knowledge that offer normative reasoning under uncertainty and are well suited for use in medical domains. Traditional knowledge-based network development of BN topology requires that modeling experts establish relevant dependency links between domain concepts by searching and translating published literature, querying domain experts, or applying machine learning algorithms on data. For initial development these methods are time-intensive and this cost hinders the growth of BN applications in medical decision making. Further, this approach fails to utilize knowledge representation in medical fields to automate network development. Our research alleviates the challenges surrounding BN modeling in radiation oncology by leveraging an ontology based hub and spoke system for BN construction. Methods We implement a hub and spoke system by developing 1) an ontology of knowledge in radiation oncology (the hub) which includes dependency semantics similar to BN relations and 2) a software tool that operates on ontological semantics using deductive reasoning to create BN topologies (the spokes). We demonstrate that network topologies built using the software are terminologically consistent and form networks that are topologically compatible with existing ones. We do this first by merging two different BN models for prostate cancer radiotherapy prediction which contain domain cross terms. We then use the logic to perform discovery of new causal chains between radiation oncology concepts. Results From the radiation oncology (RO) ontology we successfully reconstructed a previously published prostate cancer radiotherapy Bayes net using up-to-date domain knowledge. Merging this model with another similar prostate cancer model in the RO domain produced a larger, highly interconnected model representing the expanded scope of knowledge available regarding prostate cancer therapy parameters, complications, and outcomes. The causal discovery resulted in an automatically-built causal network model of all ontologized radiotherapy concepts between a ‘Mucositis’ complication and anatomic tumor location. Conclusions The proposed model building approach lowers barriers to developing probabilistic models relevant to real-world clinical decision making, and offers a solution to the consistency and compatibility problems. Further, the knowledge representation in this work demonstrates potential for broader radiation oncology applications outside of Bayes nets. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Objective To pilot public health interventions at women potentially interested in maternity care via campaigns on social media (Twitter), social networks (Facebook), and online search engines (Google Search). Data Sources/Study Setting Primary data from Twitter, Facebook, and Google Search on users of these platforms in Los Angeles between March and July 2014. Study Design Observational study measuring the responses of targeted users of Twitter, Facebook, and Google Search exposed to our sponsored messages soliciting them to start an engagement process by clicking through to a study website containing information on maternity care quality information for the Los Angeles market. Principal Findings Campaigns reached a little more than 140,000 consumers each day across the three platforms, with a little more than 400 engagements each day. Facebook and Google search had broader reach, better engagement rates, and lower costs than Twitter. Costs to reach 1,000 targeted users were approximately in the same range as less well-targeted radio and TV advertisements, while initial engagements—a user clicking through an advertisement—cost less than $1 each. Conclusions Our results suggest that commercially available online advertising platforms in wide use by other industries could play a role in targeted public health interventions.

Background Variation in clinical decision-making could be explained by clinicians' tendency to make 'snap-decisions' versus making more reflective decisions. One common clinical decision with unexplained variation is the prescription of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections (ARIs). Objective We hypothesized that clinicians who tended toward greater cognitive reflection would be less likely to prescribe antibiotics for ARIs. Methods The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) is a psychological test with three questions with intuitive but incorrect answers that respondents reach if they do not consider the question carefully. The CRT is scored from 0 to 3, representing the number of correct answers. A higher score indicates greater cognitive reflection. We administered the CRT to 187 clinicians in 50 primary care practices. From billing and electronic health record data, we calculated clinician-level antibiotic prescribing rates for ARIs in 3 categories: all ARIs, antibiotic-appropriate ARIs and non-antibiotic-appropriate ARIs. Results A total of 57 clinicians (31%) scored 0 points on the CRT; 38 (20%) scored 1; 51 (27%) scored 2; and 41 (22%) scored 3. We found a roughly U-shaped association between cognitive reflection and antibiotic prescribing. The antibiotic prescribing rate for CRT scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 for all ARIs (n = 37080 visits) was 32%, 26%, 25% and 30% (P = 0.10); for antibiotic-appropriate ARIs (n = 11220 visits) was 60%, 55%, 54% and 58% (P = 0.63); and for non-antibiotic-appropriate ARIs (n = 25860 visits) was 21%, 17%, 13% and 18%, respectively (P = 0.03). Conclusions In contrast to our hypothesis, there appears to be a 'sweet-spot' of cognitive reflection for antibiotic prescribing for non-antibiotic-appropriate ARIs. Differences in clinicians' cognitive reflection may be associated with other variations in care.

This study describes health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of persons with haemophilia A in the United States (US) and determines associations between self-reported joint pain, motion limitation and clinically evaluated joint range of motion (ROM), and between HRQoL and ROM. As part of a 2-year cohort study, we collected baseline HRQoL using the SF-12 (adults) and PedsQL (children), along with self-ratings of joint pain and motion limitation, in persons with factor VIII deficiency recruited from six Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTCs) in geographically diverse regions of the US. Clinically measured joint ROM measurements were collected from medical charts of a subset of participants. Adults (N = 156, mean age: 33.5 ± 12.6 years) had mean physical and mental component scores of 43.4 ± 10.7 and 50.9 ± 10.1, respectively. Children (N = 164, mean age: 9.7 ± 4.5 years) had mean total PedsQL, physical functioning, and psychosocial health scores of 85.9 ± 13.8, 89.5 ± 15.2, and 84.1 ± 15.3, respectively. Persons with more severe haemophilia and higher self-reported joint pain and motion limitation had poorer scores, particularly in the physical aspects of HRQoL. In adults, significant correlations (P < 0.01) were found between ROM measures and both self-reported measures. Except among those with severe disease, children and adults with haemophilia have HRQoL scores comparable with those of the healthy US population. The physical aspects of HRQoL in both adults and children with haemophilia A in the US decrease with increasing severity of illness. However, scores for mental aspects of HRQoL do not differ between severity groups. These findings are comparable with those from studies in European and Canadian haemophilia populations.

Purpose Type 2 diabetes is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The comparative effectiveness of statin plus fibrate combination therapy and statin monotherapy in reducing risk of cardiovascular disease in real-world settings is unknown. Methods A retrospective database analysis was performed using a large managed care claims database of patients identified with type 2 diabetes based on diagnosis codes from January 2002 through December 2003 and continuously enrolled for the entire study period, 5.5 years. A statin plus fibrate combination therapy group (patients who used statins less than 6 months and augmented with fibrates for more than 6 months) and a statin monotherapy group (patients who used statins persistently) among patients with type 2 diabetes were followed for 3 years to examine the relationship between the intervention and cardiovascular events using a multivariable logistic regression model, propensity score method, and instrumental variable approach. Results The statin plus fibrate combination therapy group of 318 and the statin monotherapy group of 9928 were identified from 75 515 diabetics. After adjusting for factors that can impact cardiovascular outcomes, the combination therapy group did not significantly experience a reduction in cardiovascular disease, as compared with the statin monotherapy group (OR = 0.77; p = 0.083). The statin plus fibrate combination therapy group was significantly associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events after propensity matching (OR = 0.53; p = 0.002). Using the physician prescribing preference instrument to adjust for unmeasured confounding, we did not find evidence that subjects in the statin plus fibrate combination therapy group versus stain monotherapy group experienced a significant reduction in cardiovascular events (p = 0.124). Conclusions We did not find a difference in effectiveness regarding cardiovascular outcomes between the statin plus fibrate combination therapy and the statin monotherapy after controlling for hidden bias. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Background. Value assessments and treatment decision making typically focus on clinical endpoints, especially overall survival (OS). However, OS data are not always available, and surrogate markers may also have some value to patients. This study sought to estimate preferences for progression-free survival (PFS) relative to OS in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) among a diverse set of stakeholders—patients, oncologists, and oncology nurses—and estimate the value patients and providers place on other attributes of treatment. Methods. Utilizing a combined conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiment approach, we conducted an online prospective survey of mBC patients and oncology care providers who treat mBC patients across the United States. Results. A total of 299 mBC patients, 100 oncologists, and 99 oncology nurses completed the survey. Virtually all patients preferred health state sequences with contiguous periods of PFS, compared with approximately 85% and 75% of nurses and oncologists, respectively. On average, longer OS was significantly ( P < 0.01) preferred by the majority (75%) patients, but only 15% of nurses preferred longer OS, and OS did not significantly affect oncologists’ preferred health state. However, in the context of a treatment decision, whether a treatment offered continuous periods of stable disease holding OS constant significantly affected nurses’ treatment choices. Patients and providers alike valued reductions in adverse event risk and evidence from high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials. Conclusions. The strong preference for observed PFS suggests more research is warranted to better understand the reasons for PFS having positive value to patients. The results also suggest a range of endpoints in clinical trials may have importance to patients.

Background The majority of antibiotics in the United States are prescribed in outpatient settings and at least 30% of these antibiotics are unnecessary. Outpatient antibiotic stewardship is needed to minimize the threat of antibiotic resistance (AR). We assessed primary care physicians’ (PCPs) attitudes and perceptions of AR, inappropriate antibiotic use, and outpatient antibiotic stewardship activities. Methods We conducted eight focus groups with outpatient PCPs in four US cities: Philadelphia, PA; Birmingham, AL; Chicago, IL; and Los Angeles, CA. Two focus groups were conducted in each city—one with family medicine and internal medicine physicians and one with pediatricians. All focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for major themes in NVivo 11. Results A total of 26 family medicine/internal medicine physicians and 26 pediatricians participated. Most participants acknowledged that AR is an important public health issue but many considered it to be more of an issue in hospitals and less important in their daily practice when compared with other issues, such as obesity, diabetes, and opioids. PCPs agreed that inappropriate antibiotic use is a problem in outpatient medicine but placed responsibilities on nonprimary care settings such as urgent care and retail clinics, and on patient demand. When discussing possible stewardship activities, participants expressed concerns about measuring inappropriate antibiotic use, questioning the feasibility of assessing prescribing quality while accounting for different patient populations. Participants also argued that other physicians will “game the system” to improve scores. Their perceptions of stewardship were also influenced by their dissatisfaction with quality measurement systems in general and distrust in the accuracy of its tracking and reporting processes. In contrast, participants reacted positively to education efforts for patients and clinicians. Conclusion PCPs recognize the public health importance of AR and inappropriate antibiotic use, but are skeptical about its relative importance and the feasibility and effectiveness of stewardship activities. Addressing these perceptions and skepticism will be integral to the development of outpatient stewardship strategies. Disclosures J. Doctor, The Pew Charitable Trusts: External advisor, Honorarium for time dedicated to research project. Precision Health Economics: Consultant, Consulting fee. University of Pennsylvania Health System: Consultant, Consulting fee. J. S. Gerber, The Pew Charitable Trusts: External advisor, Honorarium for time dedicated to research project. J. A. Linder, The Pew Charitable Trusts: External advisor, Honorarium for time dedicated to research project.

Background Antibiotics are prescribed in approximately half of emergency department (ED) and urgent care center (UCC) visits for antibiotic inappropriate or presumed viral acute respiratory infection (ARI). Unnecessary antibiotic use increases adverse events, antibiotic resistance, and healthcare costs. Antibiotic stewardship in the ED and UCC requires specific implementation tailored to these unique settings. Objective. To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of patient and provider education adapted for the acute care setting (adapted intervention) to an intervention with behavioral nudges and individual peer comparisons (enhanced intervention), on reducing inappropriate antibiotic use for ARI in EDs and UCCs. Methods Pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial conducted in 3 academic health systems (1 pediatric-only, 2 serving adults and children) that included 5 adult and pediatric EDs and 4 UCCs. Sites were block randomized by health system, and providers at each site assigned to receive the adapted or enhanced intervention. Implementation science strategies were employed to tailor interventions at each site. The main outcome was the proportion of antibiotic inappropriate ARI diagnosis visits that received an antibiotic. We estimated a hierarchical mixed effects logistic regression model for visits that occurred between November and February for 2016–2017 (baseline) and 2017–2018 (intervention), controlling for organization and provider fixed effects. Results Across all sites, there were 45,160 ARI visits among 534 providers, with overall antibiotic prescribing at 2.6%; the pediatric-only system had a lower baseline rate (1.6%) compared with the other 2 systems (5.0% and 7.1%), P < 0.001). Despite the unusually low rate, we found a significant reduction in inappropriate prescribing after adjusting for health-system and provider-level effects from 2.6% to 1.4 % (odds ratio 0.52; 0.38–0.72). Reductions in prescribing between the 2 interventions were in the expected direction, but not significantly different (P < 0.062). Conclusion Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship for ARI is feasible and effective in the ED and UCC settings. The enhanced behavioral nudging methods were not more effective in high-performance settings. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Objectives: To detect errors in blood laboratory results using a Bayesian network (BN), to compare results with an established method for detecting errors based on frequency patterns (LabRespond) and logistic regression model. Methods: In Experiment 1 and 2 using a sample of 5,800 observations from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dataset, large, medium and small errors were randomly generated and introduced to liver enzymes (ALT, AST, and LDH) of the dataset. Experiment 1 examined systematic errors, while Experiment 2 investigated random errors. The outcome of interest was the correct detection of liver enzymes as “error” or “not error.” With the BN, the outcome was predicted by exploiting probabilistic relationships among AST, ALT, LDH, and gender. In addition to AST, ALT, LDH, and gender, LabRespond required more information on related analytes to achieve optimal prediction. We assessed performance by examining the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves using a 10-fold cross validation method, as well as risk stratification tables. Results: In Experiment 1, the BN significantly outperformed both LabRespond and logistic regression in detecting large (both at p < 0.001), medium ( p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively), and small ( p = 0.03 and, p = 0.05, respectively) systematic errors. In Experiment 2, the BN performed significantly better than LabRespond and multinomial logistic regression in detecting large ( p = 0.04 and p < 0.001, respectively) and medium ( p = 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) random errors. Conclusion: A Bayesian network is better at detection and can detect errors with less information than existing automated models, suggesting that Bayesian model may be an effective means for reducing medical costs and improving patient safety.

Objective: The prognosis of cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation-therapy (IMRT) is inherently uncertain, depends on many decision variables, and requires that a physician balance competing objectives: maximum tumor control with minimal treatment complications. Methods: In order to better deal with the complex and multiple objective nature of the problem we have combined a prognostic probabilistic model with multi-attribute decision theory which incorporates patient preferences for outcomes. Results: The response to IMRT for prostate cancer was modeled. A Bayesian network was used for prognosis for each treatment plan. Prognoses included predicting local tumor control, regional spread, distant metastases, and normal tissue complications resulting from treatment. A Markov model was constructed and used to calculate a quality-adjusted life-expectancy which aids in the multi-attribute decision process. Conclusions: Our method makes explicit the tradeoffs patients face between quality and quantity of life. This approach has advantages over current approaches because with our approach risks of health outcomes and patient preferences determine treatment decisions.

Interventions based on behavioral science might reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.To assess effects of behavioral interventions and rates of inappropriate (not guideline-concordant) antibiotic prescribing during ambulatory visits for acute respiratory tract infections.Cluster randomized clinical trial conducted among 47 primary care practices in Boston and Los Angeles. Participants were 248 enrolled clinicians randomized to receive 0, 1, 2, or 3 interventions for 18 months. All clinicians received education on antibiotic prescribing guidelines on enrollment. Interventions began between November 1, 2011, and October 1, 2012. Follow-up for the latest-starting sites ended on April 1, 2014. Adult patients with comorbidities and concomitant infections were excluded.Three behavioral interventions, implemented alone or in combination: suggested alternatives presented electronic order sets suggesting nonantibiotic treatments; accountable justification prompted clinicians to enter free-text justifications for prescribing antibiotics into patients' electronic health records; peer comparison sent emails to clinicians that compared their antibiotic prescribing rates with those of "top performers" (those with the lowest inappropriate prescribing rates).Antibiotic prescribing rates for visits with antibiotic-inappropriate diagnoses (nonspecific upper respiratory tract infections, acute bronchitis, and influenza) from 18 months preintervention to 18 months afterward, adjusting each intervention's effects for co-occurring interventions and preintervention trends, with random effects for practices and clinicians.There were 14,753 visits (mean patient age, 47 years; 69% women) for antibiotic-inappropriate acute respiratory tract infections during the baseline period and 16,959 visits (mean patient age, 48 years; 67% women) during the intervention period. Mean antibiotic prescribing rates decreased from 24.1% at intervention start to 13.1% at intervention month 18 (absolute difference, -11.0%) for control practices; from 22.1% to 6.1% (absolute difference, -16.0%) for suggested alternatives (difference in differences, -5.0% [95% CI, -7.8% to 0.1%]; P = .66 for differences in trajectories); from 23.2% to 5.2% (absolute difference, -18.1%) for accountable justification (difference in differences, -7.0% [95% CI, -9.1% to -2.9%]; P .001); and from 19.9% to 3.7% (absolute difference, -16.3%) for peer comparison (difference in differences, -5.2% [95% CI, -6.9% to -1.6%]; P .001). There were no statistically significant interactions (neither synergy nor interference) between interventions.Among primary care practices, the use of accountable justification and peer comparison as behavioral interventions resulted in lower rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01454947.

Objectives. We studied if both observed and unobserved maternal health in African American women in hospitals or communities were associated with cesarean delivery of infants. Methods. We examined the relationship between African American race and cesarean delivery among 493 433 women discharged from 255 Californian hospitals in 2010 using administrative data; we adjusted for patient comorbidities and maternal, fetal, and placental risk factors, as well as clustering of patients within hospitals. Results. Cesarean rates were significantly higher overall for African American women than other women (unadjusted rate 36.8% vs 32.7%), as were both elective and emergency primary cesarean rates. Elevated risks persisted after risk adjustment (odds ratio generally > 1.27), but the prevalence of particular risk factors varied. Although African American women were clustered in some hospitals, the proportion of African Americans among all women delivering in a hospital was not related to its overall cesarean rate. Conclusions. To address the higher likelihood of elective cesarean delivery, attention needs to be given to currently unmeasured patient-level health factors, to the quality of provider–physician interactions, as well as to patient preferences.

Objective To describe the development of a telephone follow-up program that addresses the needs of survivors of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their families in the year following injury. The process of developing the program is reviewed from the initial steps of identifying needs through final implementation of the program. Participants Eighty-four TBI survivors with moderate to severe injuries and their families. Results Descriptive statistics are presented including number of contacts, areas of concern for participants, and the types of interventions conducted. Case examples are provided to illustrate the impact of the telephone follow-up program. Conclusion This project demonstrated the feasibility of using the telephone as a means of providing information and support during the first year after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Telephone follow-up may enhance service provision for persons with TBI, especially those with a lack of transportation or geographic isolation.

Hoffman JM, Doctor JN, Chan L, Whyte J, Jha A, Dikmen S. Potential impact of the new Medicare prospective payment system on reimbursement for traumatic brain injury inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1165–72. Objective: To evaluate the potential impact of the new Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) on traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation. Design: Retrospective cohort study of patients with TBI. Patients were assigned to their appropriate case-mix group (CMG) based on Medicare criteria. Setting: Fourteen urban rehabilitation facilities throughout the United States. Participants: Patients with TBI admitted to inpatient rehabilitation and enrolled in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems from 1998 to 2001 (N=1807). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Cost of inpatient rehabilitation admission, length of stay (LOS), and functional outcomes. Results: The median cost of inpatient rehabilitation for patients with TBI exceeded median PPS payments for all TBI CMGs by 16%. Only 3 of the 14 hospitals received reimbursement under PPS that exceeded costs for their TBI patients. Conclusions: Compared with current costs, the new Medicare payment system may reimburse facilities significantly less than their costs for the treatment of TBI. To maintain their current financial status, facilities may have to reduce LOS and/or reduce resource use. With a decreased LOS, inpatient rehabilitation services will have to improve FIM efficiency or discharge patients with lower discharge FIM scores.

We performed a public reporting data-based intervention using social media and social network marketing campaigns to influence women in Los Angeles to seek public information on maternity care hospital quality. More than four million women give birth in the US every year, and more than three fourths of all American women will become mothers at some stage in their lives. Yet on key objective evidence-based metrics such as the proportion of women who received antenatal care within the first trimester, low birth weight infant deliveries, infant mortality, and maternal death rates, progress has either been away from or incompletely towards federal targets.We used cutting edge social media and social network listening tools to understand the extent and types of communications that pregnant women engaged in online. We leveraged these understandings to design commercial marketing campaigns to drive consumer interest through targeted communications on Facebook, Twitter and Google search platforms. Our campaigns reached a little more than 140,000 consumers each day across the three platforms, with a little more than 400 click-throughs each day. Facebook and Google search had broader reach, better click-through rates, and lower costs than Twitter. Our results suggest that commercially available 2 online advertising platforms in wide use by other industries may play a low cost role in targeted public health interventions.

Chan L, Beaver S, MacLehose RF, Jha A, Maciejewski M, Doctor JN. Disability and health care costs in the Medicare population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1196-1201. Objective: To determine the effect of activity limitations on health care expenditures. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: National survey. Participants: Data from the 1997 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (n=9298), a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries who were older than 64 years of age. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The impact of patient disability on health care costs (inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility, home health, medications). Activity limitations were determined by patient assessment of restrictions in activities of daily living (ADLs). Results: Over 20% (n=6,500,000) of the entire Medicare population had at least 1 health-related activity limitation. Total median health care costs per year (interquartile range [IQR]) increased as the number of these limitation increased (0 ADLs: $1934 [IQR, $801–$4761]; 1–2 ADLs: $4540 [IQR, $1744–$12,937]; 3–4 ADLs: $7589 [IQR, $2580–$23,149]; 5–6 ADLs: $14,399 [IQR, $5425–$33,014]). After adjusting for confounding characteristics including the impact of comorbid illnesses, Medicare enrollees incurred higher health care costs as their number of activity limitations increased (0 ADLs: cost ratio=1.0; 1–2 ADLs: cost ratio=1.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2–1.6]; 3–4 ADLs: cost ratio=1.6 [95% CI, 1.3–2.0]; 5–6 ADLs: cost ratio=2.3 [95% CI, 1.7–3.2]). The cost increases were because of an increase in the frequency of all events (eg, hospital admissions, outpatient visits) rather than an increase in the intensity or cost of those events. In addition, with increasing activity limitations, there was a significant increase in the proportional impact of home health costs such that, for those with 5 or 6 limitations, home health costs exceeded the cost of outpatient visits. Conclusions: Activity limitation is an independent risk factor for increased health care costs and appears to be more than just a proxy for chronic illness. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Clinicians make many patient care decisions each day. The cumulative cognitive demand of these decisions may erode clinicians’ abilities to resist making potentially inappropriate choices. Psychologists, who refer to the erosion of self-control after making repeated decisions as decision fatigue,1,2 have found evidence that it affects nonmedical professionals. For example, as court sessions wear on, judges are more likely to deny parole, the “easier” or “safer” option.3

Objectives Publicly available hospital quality reports seek to inform consumers of important healthcare quality and affordability attributes, and may inform consumer decision-making. To understand how much consumers search for such information online on one Internet search engine, whether they mention such information in social media and how positively they view this information. Setting and design A leading Internet search engine (Google) was the main focus of the study. Google Trends and Google Adwords keyword analyses were performed for national and Californian searches between 1 August 2012 and 31 July 2013 for keywords related to ‘top hospital’, best hospital’, and ‘hospital quality’, as well as for six specific hospital quality reports. Separately, a proprietary social media monitoring tool was used to investigate blog, forum, social media and traditional media mentions of, and sentiment towards, major public reports of hospital quality in California in 2012. Primary outcome measures (1) Counts of searches for keywords performed on Google; (2) counts of and (3) sentiment of mentions of public reports on social media. Results National Google search volume for 75 hospital quality-related terms averaged 610 700 searches per month with strong variation by keyword and by state. A commercial report (Healthgrades) was more commonly searched for nationally on Google than the federal government9s Hospital Compare, which otherwise dominated quality-related search terms. Social media references in California to quality reports were generally few, and commercially produced hospital quality reports were more widely mentioned than state (Office of Statewide Healthcare Planning and Development (OSHPD)), or non-profit (CalHospitalCompare) reports. Conclusions Consumers are somewhat aware of hospital quality based on Internet search activity and social media disclosures. Public stakeholders may be able to broaden their quality dissemination initiatives by advertising on Google or Twitter and using social media interactively with consumers looking for relevant information.

A prerequisite for studying and treating burn-related pain is the establishment of a good understanding of the nature of burn-related pain. However, in most investigations of pain, researchers have failed to examine pain over time or to create summary scores that capture differences in the nature of the pain experiences of individual patients. For 10 consecutive days, 47 patients treated for burn injuries reported on three aspects of procedural pain: worst pain, sensory pain, and affective pain. Three summary pain scores were constructed for each pain dimension: average pain, variability in pain, and linear change in pain. The authors found considerable variability in pain reports from the same patient and from different patients. Analyses indicated that pain reports decreased over time and that patients who had more trait anxiety reported more pain. Patients with larger burn injuries tended to report more affective pain and tended to have a pattern of high and low pain reports that differed from patients with less severe burn injuries. These findings suggest that adequate assessment of burn pain must occur frequently over the course of a single day, as well as for the duration of each patient's care.

For daily burn wound care procedures, opioid analgesics alone are often inadequate. Since most burn patients experience severe to excruciating pain during wound care, analgesics that can be used in addition to opioids are needed. This case report provides the first evidence that entering an immersive virtual environment can serve as a powerful adjunctive, nonpharmacologic analgesic. Two patients received virtual reality (VR) to distract them from high levels of pain during wound care. The first was a 16-year-old male with a deep flash burn on his right leg requiring surgery and staple placement. On two occasions, the patient spent some of his wound care in VR, and some playing a video game. On a 100 mm scale, he provided sensory and affective pain ratings, anxiety and subjective estimates of time spent thinking about his pain during the procedure. For the first session of wound care, these scores decreased 80 mm, 80 mm, 58 mm, and 93 mm, respectively, during VR treatment compared with the video game control condition. For the second session involving staple removal, scores also decreased. The second patient was a 17-year-old male with 33.5% total body surface area deep flash burns on his face, neck, back, arms, hands and legs. He had difficulty tolerating wound care pain with traditional opioids alone and showed dramatic drops in pain ratings during VR compared to the video game (e.g. a 47 mm drop in pain intensity during wound care). We contend that VR is a uniquely attention-capturing medium capable of maximizing the amount of attention drawn away from the 'real world', allowing patients to tolerate painful procedures. These preliminary results suggest that immersive VR merits more attention as a potentially viable form of treatment for acute pain.

To compare health maintenance procedure rates of Medicare patients with different levels of disability.Observational study analyzing data from the 1995 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS, n = 15,590). Self-reported Pap smears, mammograms, and influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were compared between groups with different levels of health-related difficulties in six activities of daily living (ADL).Compared to those without disabilities, the most severely disabled women (limitations in 5 or 6 ADL) reported fewer Pap smears (ageor =70, 23% vs 41%, p.001) and mammograms (ageor = 50, 13% vs 44%, p.001). In a controlled analysis, individuals with this high level of disability were 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33% to 72%) and 56% (95% CI, 43% to 76%) less likely to report receiving Pap smears and mammograms, respectively, compared with able-bodied women, regardless of their age, whether they were in an HMO, or whether they lived in a long-term care facility. Functional limitations were not a deterrent to receiving vaccinations. In general, patients in HMOs reported more procedures than those in fee-for-service, while those in long-term care facilities reported fewer procedures than those living in the community.Disability among Medicare patients is a significant, independent risk factor for not receiving mammograms and Pap smears. Efforts should be made to identify the most severely disabled because they are at particular risk.

Objective: To determine the extent to which job satisfaction predicts pain, psychological distress, and disability 6 months after an initial episode of low back pain (LBP). Design: A longitudinal design was used to follow an inception cohort experiencing first-episode low back pain with assessment at 2 and 6 months after pain onset. Setting: Urban medical center outpatient orthopedic clinic. Patients: The consecutive sample was comprised of 82 men with initial-onset acute LBP (T6 or below, daily pain for 6 to 10 weeks). Intervention: Usual orthopedic care. Main Outcome Measures: The primary study outcomes were pain (Descriptor Differential Scale, Visual Analog Scales); disability (Sickness Impact Profile, Quality of Well-Being); and psychological distress (Beck Depression Inventory, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire); predictor variables were orthopedic impairment (Waddell Physical Impairment Index) and job satisfaction (Job Descriptive Index, Work APGAR). Results: Measures of job satisfaction, pain, disability, and psychological distress at baseline and 6 months after pain onset were separately reduced into factors using principle components factor analysis. In hierarchical multiple regression analyses, baseline job satisfaction significantly predicted variance in outcome scores at 6 months after pain onset, beyond the variance explained by control factors (demographics; baseline pain, mood, and disability; orthopedic impairment). Zero-order correlations between job satisfaction and orthopedic impairment were small and nonsignificant, suggesting that these two variables act independently in predicting outcome. Although type of work performed (desk work or work requiring light, moderate, or heavy lifting) and social position were correlated with job satisfaction at baseline, neither contributed to the prediction of outcome at 6 months. Conclusions: Satisfaction with one's job may protect against development of chronic pain and disability after acute onset back pain and, alternatively, dissatisfaction may heighten risk of chronicity. Vocational factors should be considered in the rehabilitation of acute back injury.

Little is known concerning health outcome for patients who survive burn injuries, and how their health outcome compares with that of other medical populations. Such information is important given that the current direction of health care policy decision making is toward outcomes-driven decision models. We compared the health status of 91 patients 1 month after severe burn injury with the published reports of the health status of 39 medical comparison samples, and two reports of health status for the general population. Additionally, we collected longitudinal data on a subsample of our surviving patients with burn injuries at 1 year. Our findings suggest that people who survive a severe burn experience a stable and relatively good health status after their injury compared with other medical samples. However, their health status remains worse than that of the general population over time. Further, people who survive a major burn indicate that the areas of vocational and psychosocial functioning are often the most troublesome for therm.