Search

Successful establishment of a tumour relies on a cascade of interactions between cancer cells and stromal cells within an evolving microenvironment. Both immune and nonimmune cellular components have key roles in this process. Here, we review the major anti‐ and pro‐tumour factors in the early tumour microenvironment and discuss how understanding this process may be exploited in the clinic., Successful establishment of a tumour relies on a cascade of interactions between cancer cells and stromal cells within an evolving microenvironment. Both immune and nonimmune cellular components are key factors in this process, and the individual players may change their role from tumour elimination to tumour promotion as the microenvironment develops. While the tumour–stroma crosstalk present in an established tumour is well‐studied, aspects in the early tumour or premalignant microenvironment have received less attention. This is in part due to the challenges in studying this process in the clinic or in mouse models. Here, we review the key anti‐ and pro‐tumour factors in the early microenvironment and discuss how understanding this process may be exploited in the clinic.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Venous tumor thrombus (VTT) extension occurs in 4-15% cases of renal cell cancer (RCC). Although surgery is performed with curative intent, mortality is high (5-15%). The...

Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular biology of gastric and oesophageal cancers have shown that gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma should be considered as one disease spectrum. Clinical management of these cancers is challenging, with poor outcomes in both early and late disease settings. Certain molecular subsets of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma demonstrate features that suggest immunotherapy could be an effective treatment. Immunogenetic markers, including mismatch repair deficiency, PD-L1 status and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes influence overall prognosis. They may also determine the response to adjuvant and neoadjuvant conventional chemotherapy. Initial results from immunotherapy trials for gastroesophageal cancer have however been mixed, with poor overall responses in the first- and second-line settings. This review aims to discuss how better understanding of these immune and genetic interactions may lead to better selection of patients for conventional and immune based therapies, and therefore improve patient outcomes. We also discuss the challenges in implementing this new understanding in routine practice, and the current limitations of immune based treatments for gastroesophageal cancer.

Despite their abilities to elicit immune responses, both syngeneic tumors and the half-mismatched placenta grow in the host, unlike a tissue allograft that is aggressively rejected. This is because of local and systemic factors that contribute to the immunologic privilege of tumors and the placenta. Checkpoint blockade immunotherapies subvert this privilege, with spectacularly beneficial outcomes in subsets of patients with certain types of cancer. A challenge for the community of scientists and clinicians is to replicate these successes in pregnant patients with cancer, without harm to the placenta. Here we compare and contrast the immunology of cancers and the placenta, and suggest that immunotherapy for pregnant patients with cancer may be a reasonable option, but that this should be explored systematically.