Search

Purpose We studied the safety, tolerability, and recommended dose of BMS-599626, an orally bioavailable inhibitor of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family of receptor tyrosine kinases. Patients and methods Patients with advanced solid tumors that expressed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and/or HER-2 were recruited and enrolled in a phase I, open-label, dose escalation trial of oral BMS-599626 starting at 100 mg/day given once daily for at least 28 days. Results Forty-five patients received BMS-599626 (100–660 mg/day). Dose-limiting toxic effects were reported at 660 mg/day (grade 3 elevation of hepatic transaminases [two patients] and QTc interval prolongation [one patient]), therefore the recommended maximum tolerated dose was 600 mg/day. The most frequent drug-related toxic effects were diarrhea (30% of patients), anorexia (13%), asthenia (30%), and cutaneous toxic effects, including skin rash (30%). Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated Cmax and exposure to BMS-599626 in patients increased with dose. Eleven patients had stable disease and received BMS-599626 for ≥4 months. Serial skin and tumor biopsies taken before and after treatment revealed expected changes in pharmacodynamic biomarkers, indicating that the EGFR and HER-2 pathways were affected. Positron emission tomography imaging showed a metabolic response in 2 of 10 patients evaluated. Conclusion BMS-599626 was generally well tolerated, with disease stabilization across a range of tumor types and doses.

Background Sequential tumour biopsies are of potential interest for the rational development of molecular targeted therapies. Patients and methods From June 2004 to July 2009, 186 patients participated in 14 phase I clinical trials in which sequential tumour biopsies (13 trials) and/or sequential normal skin biopsies (6 trials) were optional. All patients had to sign an independent informed consent for the biopsies. Results Tumour biopsies were proposed to 155 patients and 130 (84%) signed the consent while normal skin biopsies were proposed to 70 patients and 57 (81%) signed the consent. Tumour biopsies could not be carried out in 41 (31%) of the 130 consenting patients. Tumour biopsies were collected at baseline in 33 patients, at baseline and under treatment in 56 patients. Tumour biopsies were obtained using an 18-gauge needle, under ultrasound or computed tomography guidance. Only nine minor complications were recorded. Most tumour biopsy samples collected were intended for ancillary molecular studies including protein or gene expression analysis, comparative genomic hybridizartion array or DNA sequencing. According to the results available, 70% of the biopsy samples met the quality criteria of each study and were suitable for ancillary studies. Conclusions In our experience, the majority of the patients accepted skin biopsies as well as tumour biopsies. Sequential tumour and skin biopsies are feasible and safe during early-phase clinical trials, even when patients are exposed to anti-angiogenic agents. The real scientific value of such biopsies for dose selection in phase I trials has yet to be established.

Background: Sunitinib is a multitargeted, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumour and antiangiogenic activity. We investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of sunitinib in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours. Methods: Sunitinib was initially administered once daily at 37.5 mg per day on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle, in which irinotecan 250 mg m−2 was given on day 1. In a second cohort, the sunitinib dose was reduced to 25 mg per day. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic studies. Results: In the sunitinib 37.5 mg per day cohort, 3 out of 10 evaluable patients had objective responses, but dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of neutropenia, pneumococcal sepsis, and fatigue were observed. There were no DLTs in the sunitinib 25 mg per day cohort. Paired observations of pharmacokinetic parameter values of sunitinib and irinotecan alone vs the combination did not reveal significant drug–drug interactions. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as sunitinib 25 mg per day (days 1–14) with irinotecan 250 mg m−2 (day 1), but no activity was observed at this dose. Conclusion: Although a higher sunitinib dose of 37.5 mg per day (days 1–14) with irinotecan showed preliminary evidence of antitumour activity, this dose was poorly tolerated. Therefore, this particular combination will not be pursued for further studies.

L'angiogenese est un mecanisme central dans le processus de croissance tumorale et de metastases. La famille du VEGF et des recepteurs au VEGF est un des regulateurs les plus importants de l'angiogenese. Differents agents ciblant la voie du VEGF et du VEGFR sont en cours d’etude a differentes phases de developpement dans des tumeurs solides tres diverses. Les inhibiteurs de tyrosine kinases du VEGFR sont des petites molecules qui se fixent au site catalytique ATP dependant du domaine tyrosine kinase du VEGFR et permettent un blocage de la signalisation intracellulaire. Des phases II et III dans differentes tumeurs solides (cancers du rein, tumeurs stromales, cancers du poumon, melanomes, hepatocarcinomes...) etudient l'efficacite du sorafenib, du sunitinib et d'autres agents comme le valatinib, le ZD6474... Des essais randomises de phase III ont deja montre l'efficacite du sorafenib et du sunitinib dans les cancers du rein metastatiques, et les tumeurs stromales.

L'evaluation precoce et fonctionnelle des nouveaux traitements cibles en oncologie est un enjeu majeur en imagerie fonctionnelle. Actuellement, les evolutions technologiques en echographie-Doppler permettent de detecter la microvascularisation des tumeurs superficielles et profondes. L'apparition des produits de contraste echographiques augmente l'efficacite de cette technique, en particulier lorsqu'ils sont associes a des logiciels de perfusion. Cette technologie permet actuellement d'avoir acces a une imagerie fonctionnelle de type parenchymographie. Le developpement de logiciels de quantification a partir des donnees brutes avant compression au format video, donne la possibilite de quantifier de facon objective cette prise de contraste en calculant differents parametres comme l'intensite maximale de la prise de contraste, le temps de transit moyen, le temps de montee, le coefficient de la pente du wash-in ou l'aire sous la courbe. L'echographie de contraste se positionne donc maintenant comme un nouvel outil permettant de predire tres precocement la reponse au traitement en fonction des changements de la vascularisation bien avant la modification du volume tumoral.

Advances in biology have lead to the characterization of the molecular mechanisms underlying angiogenesis, a crucial process of tumor growth. Tumor cells secrete various growth factors, including VEGF, which activate endothelial cells to form new blood vessels. Numerous drugs, at present in clinical development, interfere with the molecular mediators of angiogenesis. The death of neovessels achieved by some of such compounds allows reduction in tumor size. This review describes many angiogenesic inhibitors which mechanisms of action are quite diverse.

Procarbazine (PCB) was developed in the 1960s and was rapidly recognised as an active agent in lymphoid malignancies. PCB was one of the four drugs combined in mechlorethamine, vincristine, PCB, prednisolone (MOPP), one of the first combination chemotherapy regimens to show that advanced-stage disease could be cured in humans. During the last few decades, comprehensive studies have clarified cellular pathways involved in the modes of action of PCB and its drug resistance mechanisms. However, late toxicities, especially secondary leukaemias and sterility, led to its withdrawal from combination regimens used to treat Hodgkin's lymphomas (HLs). PCB was recently reintroduced in dose-intensified regimens and yielded impressive results. These new regimens (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, PCB, and prednisone (BEACOPP) or escalated BEACOPP) are now being investigated versus the classic ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) or ABVD-like combination chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of HLs.

Temozolomide has shown activity and limited toxicity in patients with primary brain tumors at doses of 150-200 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 every 4 weeks. In this study, a new alternative dose-dense regimen of temozolomide was explored in patients with recurrent brain tumors.In this study, we evaluated the safety, dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, recommended dose and activity of temozolomide given on days 1-3 and 14-16 every 28 days (one cycle). The starting daily dose was 200 mg/m(2) in a group of at least six patients, with subsequent increments of 50 mg/m(2) in groups of at least 12 patients until unacceptable toxicity was reached. Oral ondansetron (8 mg) was given 1 h prior to temozolomide administration. McDonald's criteria were used to evaluate antitumor activity.Seventy patients with brain tumors entered this study. The median number of prior chemotherapy treatments was two (range 1-3). Patients were assigned to one of four groups to receive temozolomide at daily doses of 200 (seven patients), 250 (13 patients), 300 (38 patients) and 350 mg/m(2)/day (12 patients). The absence of dose-limiting toxicity at cycle 1 led us to establish dose recommendations based on toxicity after repeated cycles. A total of 23, 72, 192 and 83 cycles were given at daily doses of 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/m(2), respectively. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 0/7, 1/13, 5/38 and 4/12 patients treated at doses of 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/m(2)/day, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 1/7, 0/13, 3/38 and 4/12 patients treated with 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/m(2)/day temozolomide, respectively. At a dose of 350 mg/m(2), sustained grade 2-3 thrombocytopenia did not allow treatment to be resumed at day 14 in40% of patients, and this dose was considered to be the maximum tolerated dose. Thus, a dose of 300 mg/m(2)/day that was associated with20% treatment delay due to sustained hematological toxicity was considered as the recommended dose. Objective responses were reported in 13 patients.Temozolomide can be given safely using a dose-dense regimen of 300 mg/m(2)/day for 3 consecutive days every 2 weeks in patients with recurrent brain tumors.

PURPOSE: N-(3-Chloro-7-indolyl)-1,4-benzenedisulfonamide (E7070) is a novel sulfonamide anticancer agent currently in phase II clinical development for the treatment of solid tumors. Four phase I studies have been finalized, with E7070 administered at four different treatment schedules to identify the maximum-tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities. Pharmacokinetic analyses of all studies revealed E7070 to have nonlinear pharmacokinetics. A population pharmacokinetic model was designed and validated to describe the pharmacokinetics of E7070 at all four treatment schedules and to identify the possible influences of patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetic parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma concentration-time data of all patients (n = 143) were fitted to several pharmacokinetic models using NONMEM. Seventeen covariables were investigated for their relation with individual pharmacokinetic parameters. A bootstrap procedure was performed to check the validity of the model. RESULTS: The data were best described using a three-compartment model with nonlinear distribution to a peripheral compartment and two parallel pathways of elimination from the central compartment: a linear and a saturable pathway. Body-surface area (BSA) was significantly correlated to both the volume of distribution of the central compartment and to the maximal elimination capacity. The fits of 500 bootstrap replicates of the data set demonstrated the robustness of the developed population pharmacokinetic model. CONCLUSION: A population pharmacokinetic model has been designed and validated that accurately describes the data of four phase I studies with E7070. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that BSA-guided dosing for E7070 is important.

Background The aim of this study was to determine the toxicity profile, the recommended dose (RD) and the pharmacokinetic parameters, and to evaluate the antitumor activity of gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ovarian carcinoma (OC). Methods Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-min infusion followed by a 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin, repeated every 2 weeks. Doses of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin ranged from 800 to 1500 and 70 to 100 mg/m2, respectively. Results Forty-four patients (26 males, 18 females; median age 55 years) including 35 NSCLC (five platinum pretreated) and nine OC patients (all platinum pretreated) received a total of 355 cycles. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. No dose-limiting toxicity at any dose level occurred during the first two cycles; therefore, the highest dose-level of gemcitabine (1500 mg/m2) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) was considered as the RD. Hematological toxicity was moderate amongst the 22 patients treated(167 cycles) at that dose level. Thirteen cycles were associated with grade 3–4 non-febrile neutropenia in six patients, and eight cycles with grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia in two patients. Other toxicities were mild to moderate, consisting of asthenia and peripheral neurotoxicity. Four of the 35 patients treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 experienced grade 3 neurotoxicity requiring treatment discontinuation at cycle 10. In the range of the doses used, gemcitabine and its main metabolite 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyuridine appeared not to be affected by oxaliplatin 70–100 mg/m2. Of the 44 patients evaluable for activity, 12 NSCLC patients experienced objective responses (one complete and 11 partial responses) and three OC patients showed tumor stabilization lasting for 6 months with a 50% decrease of CA 125 level. Two partial responses (NSCLC) and one tumor stabilization (OC) occurred in platinum-resistant patients. Conclusions The combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin could be safely administered on an out-patient schedule in patients with advanced NSCLC and OC. The RD was gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Promising antitumor activity was reported in patients with NSCLC and platinum-pretreated OC, and thus, deserves further evaluation.

This phase II study determined response rate of patients with locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer treated with pemetrexed disodium, a new multitargeted antifolate that inhibits thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase. 35 patients with local or metastatic relapse of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (31 male, 4 female; median age 53 years) were treated with pemetrexed 500 mg m2 administered as a 10-minute infusion on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Patients received 1 to 8 cycles of therapy. 9 patients (26.5%) had an objective response, with a median response duration of 5.6 months (range 2.9–20 months). 15 (44.1%) had stable disease, and 8 (23.5%) had progressive disease. 2 patients were not assessable for response. Median overall survival was 6.4 months (range 0.7–28.1 months; 95% CI: 3.9–7.7 months). 24 patients (68.6%) experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia, with febrile neutropenia in 4 (11.4%). Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 (34.3%) and 6 (17.1%) patients, respectively. The most frequent non-haematological toxicity was grade 3/4 mucositis (17.1%; 6 patients). In conclusion, pemetrexed is active in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Although substantial haematological toxicities were experienced by patients, subsequent studies have shown that these toxicities can be proactively managed by folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

The aim of this study was to review the experience of the Institut Gustave Roussy in 163 patients with malignant mesothelioma over a 9-year period. Data from seven consecutive prospective trials, four of chemo-immunotherapy and three of chemotherapy were reviewed. The rationale, methods and results of these trials are summarised and discussed. 98 patients were included in four phase II trials of chemo-immunotherapy whose common denominator was a combination of cisplatin and alpha-interferon. The response rate ranged from 15% to 40%. High-dose weekly cisplatin combined with alpha-interferon yielded the highest response rate but the toxicity of this regimen was considered unacceptable. Neither higher doses of alpha-interferon or the addition of mitomycin C or interleukin-2 to the regimen were able to enhance the activity of this combination. 18 patients were included in a paclitaxel-cisplatin phase II trial. The response rate was only 6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0-24) and toxicity was also significant. This regimen was, therefore, considered ineffective. Of 17 patients with mesothelioma included in a phase I trial that combined raltitrexed and oxaliplatin, 6 (35%) obtained a partial response. Responses were seen even in cisplatin-refractory mesothelioma. Preliminary results of a subsequent ongoing phase II trial using raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) have confirmed this promising activity with a 30% (9/30) response rate (95% CI: 15-49). The tolerance of this outpatient regimen is acceptable (no significant haematological toxicity and no alopecia) and compares favourably with that of our previous regimens. The final results concerning response and survival are required to confirm the efficacy of this combination. The preliminary results of two studies suggest promising activity with the combination of raltitrexed-oxaliplatin in malignant mesothelioma. The efficacy/toxicity ratio of this combination compares favourably with that of our previous chemotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy regimens.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to further characterise the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of docetaxel. 43 patients were enrolled into this phase II study. Treatment consisted of a 1-h infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks without premedication with corticosteroids until progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Dose modifications were planned for adverse events. Patients were observed for 1 month after the last docetaxel infusion, to document any late adverse events, with a follow-up every 3 months until death. Response rate and duration were the major efficacy endpoints. Response status was reviewed by an external independent panel. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed during the first treatment cycle. 40 patients were evaluable for response, and all were evaluable for safety. After independent review, partial response was recorded in 6 patients (overall response rate, 15%; 95% confidence limit (CI), 7.7–29.8%) and stable disease was recorded in 15 patients (38%). The median duration of response was 5.1 months (range: 3.1–7.2). The median pain control time was 4.5 months (range: 0–8) and the median time to performance status worsening was 2.3 months (range: 0–4.5). Most patients 40 (93.0%) received a relative dose intensity of more than 70% of the planned dose. The incidence and severity of adverse events reflected the known safety profile for docetaxel. Docetaxel clearance was reduced in patients with elevated concentrations of hepatic enzymes or bilirubin. Docetaxel is an active agent for unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE To review our experience using full-dose external reirradiation given with a curative intent for patients with unresectable head and neck carcinoma (HNC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1980 and December 1996, 169 patients who presented with unresectable nonmetastatic HNC in a previously irradiated area were included in this series. The median time between the first and the second irradiation was 33 months. Reirradiation protocols were as follows: radiotherapy alone (65 Gy over 6.5 weeks at 2 Gy/d), 27 patients; Vokes protocol, ie, five to six cycles of radiotherapy (median total dose, 60 Gy; 2 Gy/d) with simultaneous fluorouracil (5-FU) and hydroxyurea, 106 patients; and bifractionated radiotherapy (median total dose, 60 Gy; 2 x 1.5 Gy/d) with concomitant mitomycin, 5-FU, and cisplatin, 36 patients. The median cumulative dose of the two irradiations was 120 Gy. Eighty-five percent of the tumors were squamous cell carcinoma, 14% undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type, and 1% adenocarcinoma. Forty-four percent were local recurrences, 23% nodal recurrences, 14% both local and nodal, and 19% second primary tumors. RESULTS Mucositis grade 3 (World Health Organization [WHO]) was found in 32% and grade 4 in 14% of cases. Four patients presented with neutropenia or thrombocytopenia (grade 3 or 4 WHO). Late toxicities (> 6 months) were as follows: cervical fibrosis (grade 2 to 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG]), 41%; mucosal necrosis, 21%; osteoradionecrosis, 8%; and trismus, 30%. Five patients died of carotid hemorrhage, apparently in complete remission. Six months after the onset of reirradiation, 37% of patients were in complete response. Patterns of failure were local only (53%), nodal only (20%), metastatic only (7%), and multiple (20%). Median follow-up time was 70 months. Overall survival rate (Kaplan-Meier) was 21% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15% to 29%) at 2 years and 9% (95% CI, 5% to 16%) at 5 years. Median survival time was 10 months for the entire population. Thirteen patients, of whom 12 were treated with the Vokes protocol, were long-term disease-free survivors. In a multivariate analysis, the volume of the second irradiation was the only factor significantly associated with the risk of death: relative risk=1.8 (95% CI, 1.13 to 5.7) (P=.01). CONCLUSION Full-dose reirradiation combined with chemotherapy was feasible in patients with inoperable HNC. The incidence and severity of late toxicity was markedly increased in comparison to that observed after the first irradiation. Median survival was better than that generally obtained using palliative chemotherapy alone. A small proportion of patients were long-term disease-free survivors.

Summary Background Vinorelbine is an active drug in the treatment of lung and breast cancers and has a favorable toxicity profile. Many clinical trials have demonstrated its antitumor activity in other tumor types including squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, previously untreated by chemotherapy. Patients and methods Seventy-one patients with locoregional recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN were treated with vinorelbine at a dose of 30 mg/m2/week i.v. by short-duration infusion on an out-patient basis. Doses were adjusted according to tolerance. Results Two complete and seven partial responses were observed among 56 evaluable patients, yielding a response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8%–28%). The overall response rate of all eligible patients (63) was 14%. The responses were seen in recurrent tumors, lymph nodes and in lung metastases, and their median duration was 19 weeks (12–63). The main toxicity, severe and reversible neutropenia (grade 3–4) occurred in 53% of the 69 evaluable (for toxicity) patients. Twelve patients developed severe bronchopulmonary infections, which caused two early deaths. Constipation was observed in 31 patients (45%). Other gastrointestinal toxicities, asthenia, acute pain syndrome and peripheral sensory neuropathy, were mild to moderate. The median number of treatments was seven cycles and the median relative dose intensity of vinorelbine was 85% (25.5 mg/m2/week). Conclusions Vinorelbine is an active drug, with acceptable toxicity, in recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, at the dose and schedule administered in the present study. Further evaluation in association with other agents and/or radiotherapy is warranted.

The aim of this phase II study was to determine the antitumour activity and safety of trans-1-diaminocyclohexane-platinum (oxaliplatin) in previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. 33 patients with unresectable and measurable NSCLC were entered into this phase II study between January 1992 and January 1994. Patients had either locoregional disease with performance status 2 (19 patients) or a stage IV disease (14 patients). Oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) was given on an out-patient basis (2-h infusion, every 21 days) without hydration. Response was assessed after every two courses. One hundred courses were administered, with a mean of three courses per patient (range 1-12). All patients were evaluable for response; 1 had a complete response, and 4 a partial response (overall response rate 15%, 95% confidence interval 5.1-31.9%). The median response duration was 5.9 months. All cycles (n = 100) were evaluable for toxicity assessment. Transient reversible, cold-related finger dysesthesias occurred in 29 patients, but were mild, and disappeared in most cases within a few days. We observed brief episodes of pharyngolaryngeal discomfort (8 patients, 11 episodes) accompanied in 4 cases (3 patients), by transient episodes of inspiratory stridor, leading 2 patients to treatment withdrawal. We conclude that oxaliplatin has activity in poor-prognosis NSCLC and that this treatment is feasible in out-patients; the absence of renal and haematological toxicity makes this drug a good candidate for further evaluation in NSCLC.

Summary Background The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin has shown great activity in many different types of tumour with an in vitro synergistic effect between 5-FU and cisplatin. A phase II study of 5-FU plus cisplatin was performed in 25 previously untreated patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract carcinoma. Patients and methods Twenty-five patients, 10 of them men and 15 women with a median age of 58, were entered into the study. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of 5-FU: 1 g/m2/day in continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion for five consecutive days, and cisplatin: 100 mg/m2/day on day 2 in a one-hour infusion with standard hyperhydration. Twenty-two patients had metastatic tumours and three had locally advanced disease. Results Of the 25 patients entered into the study, 24 were evaluable for response and 25 for toxicity. Nausea and vomiting was the main toxic side effect in 19 patients. Severe, WHO grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia or neutropenia were observed in three and seven patients, respectively. There were no toxic deaths. Of 25 patients, six had partial remissions (overall response 24%, 95% confidence interval 7%–41%). For three patients, tumour reduction permitted local radiotherapy and one of these patients with initially advanced disease is still alive six years after the beginning of treatment. Conclusions This study, one of the largest phase II trials performed in this disease, shows interesting activity of the combination of 5-FU and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract carcinoma.

CPT-11 is a derivative of camptothecin, which has a broad spectrum of antitumor activity, both in vitro and in vivo. Like camptothecin, CPT-11 is a selective inhibitor of the DNA enzyme topoisomerase I. Phase I trials were conducted in Europe with the aim of determining the recommended CPT-11 dose and schedule for evaluation in phase II trials. The phase I trials assessed the toxicity of CPT-11 in 235 patients and tested three different administration schedules. CPT-11 was administered as a single infusion once every three weeks, as a weekly infusion for three weeks out of every four, and as a daily infusion for three consecutive days every three weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 115 mg/m2 in the daily schedule and 145 mg/m2 in the weekly schedule. When the drug was administered once every three weeks, diarrhea became the dose-limiting toxicity at doses above 350 mg/m2. This schedule allowed the highest dose intensity to be obtained, was the best tolerated, and allowed ambulant treatment. Finally, using this schedule, a combination of CPT-11 with high doses of loperamide allowed the dose of CPT-11 to be increased to 750 mg/m2. An ongoing phase I trial is investigating the combination of CPT-11 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in various solid tumors. Although the MTD has not yet been reached, preliminary results have not demonstrated any pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs, contrary to the findings of a previous Japanese study. Based on the results of the three phase I trials, CPT-11 administered at a dose of 350 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once every three weeks has been recommended for assessment in phase II trials. The phase II trials started in Europe at the beginning of 1992. To date, CPT-11 has showed remarkable efficacy in colorectal cancer, even in patients resistant to 5-FU. Interesting results have also been obtained in pancreatic, cervical and lung cancer. Future trials will make it possible to assess whether there is a place for CPT-11 in combination with other cytotoxic agents or radiotherapy.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the bioavailability (F) of etoposide (E;VP-16) after oral administration of the water-soluble prodrug etoposide phosphate (EP;BMY-40481) during a phase I trial in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-nine patients received oral EP (capsules, 50 to 150 mg/m2/d of E equivalent) for 5 days in week 1 (course 1), followed every 3 weeks thereafter by a daily intravenous (i.v.) infusion for 5 days of E (80 mg/m2, 1-hour i.v. infusion; course 2); in three patients, the i.v. E course was given before oral EP. Plasma and urine E pharmacokinetics (high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC]) were performed on the first day of oral EP administration and on the first day of i.v. E. RESULTS Twenty-six of 29 patients completed two courses or more, whereas three patients received only one course due to toxicity. Myelosuppression was dose-dependent and dose-limiting, with grade 4 leukoneutropenia in four of 15 patients at 125 mg/m2 and in five of seven patients at 150 mg/m2. One patient died of meningeal hemorrhage related to grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities were infrequent and/or manageable. No objective response was observed. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) is therefore 150 mg/m2, and the recommended oral dose of EP for phase II trials in this poor-risk patient population is 125 mg/m2. Twenty-six patients had pharmacokinetic data for both oral EP and i.v. E, whereas three had pharmacokinetic data on the i.v. E course only. After oral administration of EP, the pharmacokinetics of E were as follows: mean absorption rate constant (Ka), 1.7 +/- 1.7 h-1 (mean +/- SD); lag time, 0.3 +/- 0.2 hours; time of maximum concentration (t(max)), 1.6 +/- 0.8 hours; and mean half-lives (t1/2), 1.6 +/- 0.2 (first) and 10.3 +/- 5.8 hours (terminal); the increase in the area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) of E was proportional to the EP dose. After the 1-hour i.v. infusion of E, maximum concentration (C(max)) was 15 +/- 3 micrograms/mL; mean AUC, 88.0 +/- 22.0 micrograms.h/mL; mean total-body clearance (CL), 0.97 +/- 0.24 L/h/m2 (16.2 mL/min/m2); and mean t1/2, 0.9 +/- 0.6 (first) and 8.1 +/- 4.1 hours (terminal). The 24-hour urinary excretion of E after i.v. E was significantly higher (33%) compared with that of oral EP (17%) (P < .001). Significant correlation was observed between the neutropenia at nadir and the AUC of E after oral EP administration (r = .58, P < .01, sigmoid maximum effect [E(max)] model). The mean F of E after oral administration of EP in 26 patients was 68.0 +/- 17.9% (coefficient of variation [CV], 26.3%; F range, 35.5% to 111.8%). In this study, tumor type, as well as EP dose, did not significantly influence the F in E. There was no difference in F of E, whether oral EP was administered before or after i.v. E. Compared with literature data on oral E, the percent F in E after oral prodrug EP administration was 19% higher at either low ( < or = 100 mg/m2) or high ( > 100 mg/m2) doses. CONCLUSION Similarly to E, the main toxicity of the prodrug EP is dose-dependent leukoneutropenia, which is dose-limiting at the oral MTD of 150 mg/m2/d for 5 days. The recommended oral dose of EP is 125 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 3 weeks in poor-risk patients. Compared with literature data, oral EP has a 19% higher F value compared with oral E either at low or high doses. This higher F in E from oral prodrug EP appears to be a pharmacologic advantage that could be of potential pharmacodynamic importance for this drug.

PURPOSE To compared the response rates and the toxicity of the new antifolate edatrexate (EDX) with that of methotrexate (MTX) in a randomized trial in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCC) and to compare the durations of response and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred seventy-three patients with SCC were randomized to receive either EDX or MTX as a weekly intravenous (IV) bolus injection. Doses of EDX were initially 80 mg/m2/wk, but because of the toxicity, this was later reduced to 70 mg/m2/wk. MTX was administered at a dose of 40 mg/m2/wk throughout. In both arms, two dose increments of 10% were scheduled in case of no toxicity. RESULTS Of 264 eligible patients, 131 were treated with EDX and 133 with MTX. There were five treatment-related deaths: four on EDX and one on MTX. Overall, toxicity was similar in both arms; however, stomatitis, skin toxicity, and hair loss were more pronounced on the EDX arm. The overall response rate was 21% (six complete responses [CRs] and 21 partial responses [PRs]) for EDX and 16% (nine CRs and 12 PRs) for MTX (P = .392). Responses were mainly seen in patients with locoregional disease. Tumors that originated from the hypopharynx responded poorly in comparison to tumors from other sites. The median duration of response was 6.1 months for EDX and 6.4 months for MTX (log-rank P = .262). There was no difference in overall or progression-free survival. The median survival duration was 6 months on both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Both EDX and MTX are moderately active against SCC. In this large phase III study, response rates, time to treatment failure, and overall survival appeared to be similar for both antifolates. However, EDX had more side effects than MTX and therefore cannot be recommended for routine palliative treatment of patients with SCC.

PURPOSE A phase I study was undertaken to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (CPT-11). PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-four patients meeting standard phase I eligibility criteria were included (24 women, 40 men; median age, 51 years; primary sites: colon, head and neck, lung, pleura; 60 of 64 had been previously treated). Pharmacokinetics was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS One hundred ninety CPT-11 courses were administered as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (100 to 750 mg/m2). Grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities included diarrhea (16%; three hospitalizations), nausea and vomiting (9%), asthenia (14%), alopecia (53%), elevation of hepatic transaminases (8%), and one case of skin toxicity. An acute cholinergic syndrome was observed during CPT-11 administration. Diarrhea appeared dose-limiting at 350 mg/m2, but this was circumvented by using a high-dose loperamide protocol that allowed dose escalation. Dose-dependent, reversible, noncumulative granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (nadir, days 6 to 9; median recovery time, 5 days). Grade 3 to 4 anemia was observed in 9% of patients. One patient died during the study, 8 days after CPT-11 treatment. Two complete responses (cervix, 450 mg/m2; head and neck, 750 mg/m2) and six partial responses in fluorouracil (5-FU)-refractory colon cancer were observed (260 to 600 mg/m2). Pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and active metabolite SN-38 were performed in 60 patients (94 courses). CPT-11 plasma disposition was bi- or triphasic, with a mean terminal half-life of 14.2 +/- 0.9 hours (mean +/- SEM). The mean volume of distribution (Vdss) was 157 +/- 8 L/m2, and total-body clearance was 15 +/- 1 L/m2/h. The CPT-11 area under the plasma concentration versus time curves (AUC) and SN-38 AUC increased linearly with dose. SN-38 plasma decay had an apparent half-life of 13.8 +/- 1.4 hours. Both CPT-11 and SN-38 AUCs correlated with nadir leukopenia and granulocytopenia, with grade 2 diarrhea, and with nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION The MTD of CPT-11 administered as a 30-minute IV infusion every 3 weeks is 600 mg/m2, with granulocytopenia being dose-limiting. At 350 mg/m2, diarrhea appeared dose-limiting, but high-dose loperamide reduced this toxicity and allowed dose escalation. For safety reasons, the recommended dose is presently 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; more experience must be gained to establish the feasibility of a higher dose in large multicentric phase II studies. However, when careful monitoring of gastrointestinal toxicities is possible, a higher dose of 500 mg/m2 could be recommended in good-risk patients. The activity of this agent in 5-FU-refractory colorectal carcinoma makes it unique and mandates expedited phase II testing.

Background ES-285 (spisulosine) is a novel compound derived from the marine mollusk Spisula polynoma with evidence of preclinical antitumor activity. This phase I clinical trial was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose for phase II trials (RD), as well as to evaluate the safety profile, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy data of ES-285 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods Sixty-one patients at two medical institutions were treated with a 3-h ES-285 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Nine dose levels were evaluated. Results No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed during dose escalation from 4 to 128 mg/m(2). Six patients had seven DLTs at the three highest dose levels tested: 256 mg/m(2) (n = 2), 200 mg/m(2) (n = 3) and 160 mg/m(2) (n = 1). Grade 3/4 transaminase increases (n = 3), grade 3/4 central nervous system disorders [confusion (n = 2) and ataxia (n = 1)], and grade 3 pyrexia (n = 1) were the dose-limiting toxicities found with this ES-285 administration schedule. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed ES-285 dose linearity, wide distribution and a long half-life. One non-confirmed partial response was observed in a patient with metastatic melanoma treated with ES-285 128 mg/m(2), and 18 patients showed stable disease at different dose levels, lasting longer than 3 months in six patients. Conclusion Dose level VIII (200 mg/m(2)) was considered the MTD, and dose level IX (160 mg/m(2)) was defined as the RD. Limited antitumor activity was observed.

Summary Background Advanced pancreatic carcinoma (APC) is a rapidly fatal disease and an active chemotherapy with palliative effects and impact on patient survival is needed. 5 fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) has a recognized synergjstic activity, but its activity in APC has never been well established. Methods Forty eligible patients (pts) with measurable APC were treated in a phase II trial with 5-FU 1000 mg/m2/ day from day 1 to day 5 by continuous intravenous infusion and CDDP 100 mg/m2 on day 2. Eighty percent of the pts (36/40) had metastatic disease, 32.5% (13/40) were previously treated and 65% (26/40) had performance states of 2 or 3. Results Of 38 evaluable pts, one had a complete response and 9 achieved partial responses; the overall response rate (RR) was 26.5% (95% CI: 12% to 40%). The median duration of responses was 10 months (range 4-18). The RR in non-pretreated pts was 32% A palliative effect was seen in 45% of pts (17/38). The median survival was 7 months and 12 pts (29%) were alive at 1 year. Leukopenia was the most important toxicity; 11 pts (27%) had a grade 4 leukopenia and 3 had neutropenic fever. Conclusions The combination of CDDP and 5-FU in continuous infusion seems an active and well tolerated treatment in APC and will be compared to standard therapy in a multicentric randomized trial.

From 1986 to 1990, a multicentric phase II study was conducted with pirarubicin, a new semi-synthetic anthracyclin [4′- O -tetrahydropyranyl-adriamycin (THP)]. 87 patients with advanced gynaecological cancers were treated: epidermoid cervical carcinoma ( n = 31), adenocarcinoma of the endometrium ( n = 28) and ovarian adenocarcinoma ( n = 28). THP was administered by short intravenous infusion, for 3 consecutive days, every 3 weeks. The initial dose of THP was 25 mg/m 2 day (25% of patients) which was then reduced to 20 mg/m 2 day. The average number of courses was 3.7 (range 1–10). The cumulative THP dose was 180 mg/m 2 (range 56–594) in cervix and endometrial tumours and 121 mg/m 2 (range 58–425) in ovarian tumours. Myelosuppression was the major observed toxicity with grade 3–4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in 62 and 19% of the patients, respectively. Severe general complications occurred in 6% of the patients with three fatalities due to infections. Gastro-intestinal side-effects were frequent and usually mild (7% of grade 3 vomiting). 48% of the patients showed alopecia, which was complete in 9 cases (10%). 3 patients experienced cardiac events. No significant antitumoral activity was observed in patients who had failed to respod to previous chemotherapy. Promising antitumoral activity was noticed in untreated cervico-uterine carcinomas with 19% partial responses and 12% complete responses (CR). THP activity was lower in endometrial carcinomas (9.5% CR). Results were found to be negligible in ovarian cancer patients, most of them being refractory to previous chemotherapy containing an anthracyclin compound. On the basis of these results, the definite role of THP in gynaecological cancers deserves to be studied in more favourable programmes (e.g. in combined protocols as first-line chemotherapy).

PURPOSE 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin is a new anthracycline that currently is under clinical evaluation. To improve the management of future trials, we have determined its pharmacokinetics and metabolism during a phase I/II study and have tried to relate the parameters obtained to the hematologic toxicity of the drug in terms of the survival of blood cells. PATIENTS AND METHODS The pharmacologic study included 19 patients who were entered at dose levels that ranged between 6 and 90 mg/m2; nine patients were treated at 80 mg/m2, which is close to the maximum recommended dose level. Blood sampling was performed from the end of the bolus infusion to 48 hours after treatment. Drug and metabolites were extracted and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the data were processed by nonlinear fitting to multicompartment models. RESULTS Plasma concentrations were best fitted to a three-compartment model with half-lives of 5.2 minutes, 0.79 hours, and 10.3 hours. The total body clearance and volume of distribution at steady state were high (350 L/h/m2 and 2,065 L/m2). The drug was metabolized extensively to a 13-dihydroderivative, 4'-iodo-4'-deoxy-doxorubicinol; the mean area under the curve (AUC) ratio metabolite/parent drug was the highest observed ever for an anthracycline (12.1 +/- 7.4); the metabolite was cleared from the plasma with an elimination half-life of 15.3 hours. The AUCs of the parent compound and its metabolite were related linearly to the dose administered, and showed no saturation phenomenon. Urinary excretion was studied in nine patients and showed a cumulative elimination of less than 6% of the dose administered, two thirds of which were eliminated in the first 12 hours after injection. Ninety-three percent to 100% of the elimination of fluorescent compounds occurred in the form of the metabolite. Drug concentration in five tumor samples showed a rapid uptake of the drug from plasma and a preferential uptake of the parent drug compared with the metabolite. Blood cell counts after 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin treatment showed significant correlations among the surviving fractions of both granulocytes and platelets and the AUCs of the parent drug and its metabolite; the most significant correlations were obtained for the granulocytes and the metabolite. Significant correlations between AUCs and blood-cell survivals were maintained, even if only the nine patients treated at the dose of 80 mg/m2 were taken into account for the computation. CONCLUSIONS Our results especially show that myelosuppression that is induced by 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin can be well predicted by the measure of the AUC of the drug and its metabolite. This could be used for the further development of the drug toward high-dosage schedules.

Summary Forty-seven patients with advanced and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with 10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminopterin (10-EdAM), a new analogue of methotrexate. The drug was given as a weekly i.v. bolus injection, starting at 80 mg/m2 with two dose increments of 10% if no toxicity was observed after two weeks. Only patients with tumors of the larynx, oral cavity, oropharynx and hypopharynx were included in the trial. Eighty-two percent of the patients had had prior surgery and/or radiotherapy. Forty-four patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Five CR (12%) and five PR were obtained, yielding a response rate of 24% (CR + PR). The toxicity was similar to that usually seen with methotrexate; stomatitis and skin toxicity were rather pronounced. The data suggest that 10-EdAM has activity similar to that of methotrexate in patients with head and neck cancer.

Background Masitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a pre-clinical profile suggesting greater affinity and selectivity in vitro for the wild-type c-Kit receptor and its juxtamembrane mutation than imatinib. Methods This dose-escalation study was conducted in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for orally administered masitinib over a 12-week period. Secondary objectives were a clinical assessment of masitinib's activity in cancer patients and establishment of a pharmacokinetic profile. Results Forty patients with various solid tumours (predominantly GIST, 19 patients) were treated with masitinib at doses ranging between 0.7 and 17.2mg/kg/day. Although the MTD was not formally reached, an acceptable dose for chronic use was identified at 12mg/kg/day. Treatment-related AEs were frequent (38/40 patients), however, the majority were grade 1 or 2 and demonstrated dose dependency at higher concentrations. Pharmacokinetic results showed a linear, dose-dependent increase of C max and AUC. One of two GIST patients with imatinib intolerance had a partial response at 11.1mg/kg/day. About 29% of the imatinib-resistant GIST population and 38% of the overall population had stable disease. Conclusions The safety profile of masitinib at 12mg/kg/day b.i.d . for the treatment of solid cancers appears favourable and compatible with a long-term regimen. Tumour control rate in imatinib-resistant patients was encouraging, hence, the activity of masitinib in c-Kit expressing tumours, such as GIST, warrants further exploration as first-line anticancer therapy as well as for imatinib-resistant patients.

Undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (UCNT) is known to be radiosensitive and chemosensitive, but the latter has never been studied prospectively with phase II methodology. After an intensive work-up, 49 patients with recurrent (REC) and/or metastatic (MTS) UCNT were treated with three monthly cycles of cisplatin (CDDP) 100 mg/m2 day 1; bleomycin 15 mg intravenously (IV) day 1, and 16 mg/m2/d continuous infusion (CI) days 1 to 5; and fluorouracil (5FU) 650 mg/m2/d CI days 1 to 5 (PBF). Of the 49 patients, 33 were North African. The sex ratio was three males:one female, and the median World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 1.6. In the 48 patients assessable for response, we observed nine (19%) complete responses (CRs) and 29 (60%) partial responses (PRs) (60%), for a 79% overall response rate (95% confidence interval, 68% to 90%) in the assessable group and a 78% global rate. There were eight CRs (24%) observed in the group without previous chemotherapy (33 patients) compared with one CR in the chemotherapy pretreated group (16 patients). Four patients are still alive without evidence of disease after 52+, 54+, 58+, and 58+ months, respectively. All of them had less than three bone MTS sites, and received radiation therapy in these sites. The results confirm the chemosensitivity of UCNT, and the observation of unmaintained long-term responders makes curability a possible consideration.

The oncology community usually perceives phase I oncology trials as associated with poor or limited benefits and substantial risks. There is scarce data concerning outcome and survival of patients enrolled in current phase I oncology trials.We reviewed all phase I oncology trials conducted by investigators from the Adult Phase I Unit at Institut Gustave Roussy from 2003 to 2006. We report data concerning patient demographics, treatment outcome, toxicity, survival and type of care after trial exit.We analyzed 10 trials involving 180 participants. The overall response rate was 7.2%. Disease control (objective response plus stable disease) was achieved in 48.2% of patients. The rate of toxic death was 0.5%. In all, 38% of patients had at least one episode of grade 3 or 4 toxic events. The median progression-free survival and the median overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 8.7 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a time between diagnosis of disease and inclusion in the phase I trial > or =24 months and evidence of disease control were statistically significant predictors of improved OS.Current phase I oncology trials are safe and are associated with clinical benefit in a substantial proportion of patients.

Management of advanced malignant mesothelioma (MM) still requires innovative systemic therapy as its prognosis is poorly affected by currently available chemotherapy. The combination cisplatin and alpha-interferon (alpha-INF) has synergistic antitumoral activity in preclinical models and interesting activity in phase I-II clinical trials. Weekly CDDP (60 mg/m2) and alpha-IFN (3 MUI/d: d1-d4) in combination was tested in a previous phase I-II study in 23 MM patients, with a 36% objective response rate (ORR). A trial with higher doses of alpha-IFN in the same combination schedule was conducted to explore an incrementalist hypothesis. Thirty patients with MM received the same CDDP dose (60 mg/m2/w) and doubled doses of alpha-IFN (6 MUI/d: d1-d4). The treatment protocol consisted of two cycles of 4 weeks on/4 weeks off followed by two shorter cycles of 3 weeks on/3 weeks off, in the absence of life-threatening toxicity or progressive disease. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. The main treatment-limiting side-effects were digestive intolerance (nausea, vomiting) and severe asthenia. Antitumoral efficacy was not increased (ORR = 27%). Haematological and neurological toxicities were moderate and manageable. The antitumoral activity of the CDDP-alpha-IFN combination with higher doses of the latter is similar to our previous experience, but tolerance issues make it a poorer choice for eventual comparative trials, or as a standard therapeutic indication.

PURPOSE: The objectives were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, the recommended dose, the dose-limiting toxicity, the pharmacokinetics, and the activity of E7070, a novel cell-cycle inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: E7070 was given as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks in two groups of patients with advanced solid tumors who met prespecified eligibility criteria (group A) or who met the same eligibility criteria but in addition were less heavily pretreated and had more favorable liver functions (group B). RESULTS: Forty patients (31 patients in group A and nine patients in group B) were entered. Dose escalation proceeded through eight levels (range, 50 to 1,000 mg/m2). In group A, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting toxicities occurring during the first cycle in two of seven patients treated at the doses of 700 mg/m2 and two of four patients treated at 800 mg/m2. Identical dose-limiting toxicities were observed in zero of six and two of three patients from group B at doses of 800 and 1,000 mg/m2, respectively. Other toxicities included acne-like skin eruption, mucositis, conjunctivitis, nausea, fatigue, and alopecia. At doses greater than 400 mg/m2, the area under the concentration-time curve increased disproportionately to the administered dose. Tumor stabilization lasting ≥ 6 months was observed in six assessable patients. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses of E7070 in this schedule were 700 mg/m2 (group A) and 800 mg/m2 in patients who were less heavily pretreated (group B) with a moderate tumor burden. Prolonged disease stabilization observed in this study might warrant further investigation of E7070 in selected tumor types.

Background: Cystemustine is a chloroethylnitrosourea mostly active in humans against glioma and melanoma. The present report describes the results of a new phase I trial with cystemustine administered on a weekly schedule. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of cystemustine were investigated. Patients and methods: Forty-three patients entered this study. Cystemustine was administered at dose levels ranging from 30 to 60 mg/m 2 . The drug was given on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, followed by a 4-week rest period. Results: Thrombocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity and appeared to be reversible, but probably cumulative. This toxicity appeared dose-related, both in frequency and severity. The maximum tolerated dose was 60 mg/m 2 . Nonhematological toxicity was generally mild. Three partial responses were observed at dose levels of 50 and 60 mg/m 2 . Pharmacokinetics analysis showed mono- or biphasic cystemustine blood disposition with a mean α half-life of 4 min and mean terminal half-life of 49 min. Conclusions: There was a clear linear relationship between the area under the blood drug concentration–time curve (AUC) and the dose of cystemustine (P

Aim: Although the management of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma has been profoundly modified by the identification of actionable molecular aberrations, the decision making for early-stage NSCLC still relies on the tumor stage (TNM) only. Stage 1 patients are considered of good prognosis and do not receive adjuvant therapy. However a significant proportion of those patients recur within 5 years after tumor resection. The identification of those high-risk patients through high performing molecular signature would enable to treat them preventively in order to avoid or reduce the rate of recurrence and premature death. Methods: Datasets were selected from public repositories (Director's challenge (DC) n = 402, Rousseaux n = 200, Hou n = 90, Zhu n = 143; Raponi: n = 120; Bhattacharjee; n = 125) upon the following criteria: NSCLC, stage IA-IB, no adjuvant therapy, R0 tumor resection, min 3-year follow-up. Gene expression data from various data sets were normalized using RMA and rescaled. To generate robust predictors of 3-year overall survival, an iterative feature selection framework based on predictive multivariate rules was applied on DC and on a pool of data sets composed of Hou, Zhu and Raponi (Pool) (Development sets). Only highly predictive rules in both datasets were then included in a subsequent predictive model and finally assessed for external validation in Bhattacharjee and Rousseaux (Validation sets). The predictive performances of the models were evaluated by ROC-AUC and by Kaplan Meier curves. Results: Our best model was robust across three independent datasets (all AUC > 0.50, p Conclusions: We developed a robust and highly performing gene expression predictive signature of 3-year overall survival for stage I NSCLC regardless of histology. These promising results have the potential to change the decision making at bedside for early stage lung NSCLC patients by allowing high-risk patients to receive adjuvant therapy and prevent future recurrence and death. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Summary Purpose Gemcitabine and vinorelbine are active drugs with broad spectrum of activity and manageable toxicity in clinical trials. The aims of this study were to describe the toxicity, to determine the dose-limiting toxicity, and to define the doses of gemcitabine and vinorelbine to be recommended for phase II studies in patients with advanced cancers. Patients and methods Drugs were given as 30-min infusions on day 1 and 8 (vinorelbine before gemcitabine) every 3 weeks. Thirty-six patients (male: female ratio 25:11; mean age 54, PS >60) were treated including 1 retroperitoneal sarcoma, 7 head and neck, 10 lung, 4 thyroid, 6 pancreatic, 1 bladder, 2 ovary, 2 gastric, 1 rectum, 1 unknown primary, and 1 renal cell carcinoma. Doses of gemcitabine/vinorelbine ranged from 800/20 mg/m2 to 1500/30 mg/m2. Results The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. A transient grade 2–3 elevation of transaminases was frequently observed at several dose-levels, although this toxicity did not appear to be dose dependant and was reversible at day 21 before the next cycle. Other toxicities were mild and easily manageable, consisting of fatigue and flu-like syndromes. Since the MTD was not reach at the higher dose-level, the recommended dose level of the gemcitabine-vinorelbine combination was 1500/30 mg/m2. One toxic death due to hematologic toxicity was reported in a heavily pretreated patient who underwent prior chemotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy. A total of 12 patients were treated at the recommended dose level which was associated with grade 3–4 neutropenia in 3 of 12 patients and in 22.9% of cycles. Conclusions This study estimates that the recommended dose for phase II studies of gemcitabine-vinorelbine is 1500/30 mg/m2 at day 1 and 8 every three weeks. A careful monitoring of the hematologic toxicity is recommended in heavily pretreated patients and in patients who received pelvic radiotherapy. Partial responses observed in a patient with an advanced cisplatin-5-fluorouracil-resistant pancreatic adeno-carcinoma and in a patient with mesothelioma support further evaluation of this combination in patients with tumors refractory to classical antitumor agents.

Three ongoing, dose-escalation, phase I studies are evaluating the combination of raltitrexed with oxaliplatin or anthracyclines (with and without cisplatin). In study 1, patients with advanced solid tumours received 2.0-3.75 mg/m 2 raltitrexed, followed 45 min later by 85-130 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin (2-h infusion) every 3 weeks. In study 2, patients with advanced oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma received 2.0-3.0 mg/m 2 raltitrexed with 50 mg/m 2 intravenous (i.v.) epirubicin and 60 mg/m 2 i.v. cisplatin every 3 weeks. In study 3, patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer received 2.5-3.5 mg/m 2 raltitrexed followed by 30-60 mg/m 2 i.v. doxorubicin every 3 weeks. In all studies, raltitrexed was given as a 15-min infusion. All the combinations evaluated were administered in convenient 3-weekly schedules and were generally well tolerated. Recommended doses for raltitrexed and oxaliplatin are the same in combination as for single-agent use, i.e. 3.0 mg/m 2 raltitrexed and 130 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin. The recommended dose of raltitrexed in combination with cisplatin and epirubicin is 2.5 mg/m 2 . No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during co-administration of the full single-agent doses of raltitrexed and doxorubicin (3.0 mg/m 2 and 60 mg/m 2 , respectively); dose escalation is continuing. Preliminary efficacy results were encouraging, particularly for the combination of raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in patients with mesothelioma and advanced colorectal cancer. Preliminary data from these phase I studies suggest that the combination of raltitrexed with platinum-based agents and/or anthracyclines may represent useful regimens for the treatment of patients with advanced cancer. Further studies are required to identify the most effective combinations of raltitrexed with both established and new anticancer agents.

This phase-II study was conducted to investigate the potential benefit from the addition of mitomycin to a conventional anthracycline-cisplatin- and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for recurrent and metastatic undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type (UCNT).Between July 1989 and December 1991, 44 consecutive patients (M/F 36/8; median age: 45, range 20-72; performance status (PS) 0: 20 patients, PS 1: 14 patients, PS 2: 10 patients) with recurrent or metastatic UCNT were entered in this study after complete clinical, biological, and radiological pre-therapeutic work-ups. Chemotherapy (FMEP regimen) consisted of 800 mg/m2/day 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion from day 1 to day 4 combined with 70 mg/m2 epirubicin, 10 mg/m2 mitomycin, and 100 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, every four weeks for six cycles. Mitomycin was delivered in cycles 1, 3, and 5 only. Eleven patients had isolated loco-regional recurrences, 12 patients had local recurrences associated with distant metastasis, and 21 patients had metastasis only. Toxicity and response were evaluated according to WHO criteria.Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 122 of 212 evaluable cycles (57%) and 39 of 44 patients (89%); febrile neutropenia occurred in 16 patients (36%) and 24 cycles (11.3%). Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 27 patients (61%) and 45 cycles (21%), including 27 of 45 cycles (60%) with mitomycin. Grade 3 anemia was noted in 18 patients (40%) and 23 cycles (11%), including 18 of 23 cycles (78%) with mitomycin. Grade 3-4 mucositis occurred in 25 cycles (11%) and 14 patients (32%), mainly in those previously treated with radiation therapy in the head and neck area. There were four treatment-related deaths (9%); three of them neutropenia-related, and one of cardiac toxicity.Forty-four patients were evaluable for response: There were 23 of 44 objective responses (52%), including six complete responses (13%), and 17 partial responses (38%). Additional radiotherapy was given to 13 patients after documentation of response: Nasopharyngeal tumor + cervical nodes (eight patients) and/or on bone metastasis sites (five patients); mediastinal lymph nodes (one patient). At a median follow-up of 87 months (range 71-100), five patients are alive and in continuous complete remission. The median survival time was 14 months and the median time to progression nine months.The regimen under study is active in recurrent/metastatic UCNT, but associated with excessive toxicity.

This study was designed to evaluate the activity, safety and tolerance of docetaxel (D) in a selected population with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Twenty-four patients with no prior palliative therapy were enrolled and received D 100 mg m−2 by 1 h of infusion, every 3 weeks. All but two patients had been evaluated for efficacy on lung metastatic sites. No prophylactic administration of anti-emetics or growth factors was given. A pharmacokinetic study was performed in 22 patients. Twenty-one patients were assessable for response and 24 for toxicity. One hundred and four cycles were administered with a median of 4.5 (range 1–9) per patient. The median cumulative dose was 449 mg m−2. Partial responses were achieved in five patients with a median duration of 18.7 weeks (range 13.1–50.3). The overall response rate was 20.8% with a median duration of 11.0 weeks (range 2.4–52.6). The most frequent side-effect was neutropenia (79.2% grade IV) but with a short duration (median 4 days) and no febrile neutropenia. The incidence of moderate/severe fluid retention was 29.2% with one treatment discontinuation. Other toxicities (all grades) were common (skin 75%, asthenia 50%, infection 29.2%, nausea 16.7%, diarrhoea 12.5%, stomatitis 16.7%, vomiting 8.3% and HSR 8.3%). A mean clearance of 19.6 l h−1 m−2 and an area under the curve of 6.00 μg ml−1 h−1 was found in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Docetaxel is active in this selected population with metastatic SCCHN, with a good tolerance. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign

PURPOSE To assess, on a multicenter basis, the feasibility of treating advanced cancer patients with high-dose irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-five patients who met the usual phase I criteria (26 men and nine women) were included. Primary tumor sites were colon, head and neck, unknown primary, kidney, liver, and others. All had been previously treated. Irinotecan was given at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) (600 mg/m2) or the level below (500 mg/m2) as a 30-minute infusion once every 3 weeks. RESULTS Eighteen patients were entered in the four participating centers at the MTD of 600 mg/m2. This dose level was clearly shown not to be feasible: 14 patients (78%) had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, with febrile episodes in 11 patients; grade 3 to 4 diarrhea was observed in nine patients; and one toxic death occurred. Subsequently, 17 not heavily pretreated patients were included at 500 mg/m2 and carefully monitored. The safety of this dose level was considered acceptable: 41% of patients had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, 24% experienced grade 3 to 4 diarrhea, and no febrile granulocytopenia or toxic death occurred. Six partial responses were documented in metastatic colorectal cancer, all in patients who had previously received conventional chemotherapy, four in patients who had exhibited progressive disease under fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION We plan to study the higher dose-intensity 500-mg/m2 level on good-risk and carefully monitored patients. This could enlarge the spectrum of tumors sensitive to irinotecan and improve the already good results observed in colorectal cancers.