1. Plyometrics Did Not Improve Jump-Landing Biomechanics in Individuals With a History of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Author
-
Hyunjae Jeon, Steven J. Pfeiffer, Abbey C. Thomas, and Sean Krysak
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Rehabilitation ,Biomechanics ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,musculoskeletal system ,law.invention ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Medicine ,Plyometrics ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,business ,Jump landing - Abstract
Second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury has similar biomechanical risk factors as primary injury. Standard of care rehabilitation does not adequately mitigate these biomechanical risks. This study examined the effectiveness of a 4-week plyometric intervention on biomechanical risk factors of second ACL injury versus no intervention in patients with a history of ACL reconstruction. Thirty adults post-ACL reconstruction received 12 sessions of plyometric (age: 19.9 ± 1.62 years; body mass index: 23.9 ± 2.6 kg/m2; months postoperative: 35.7 ± 24.2) or no (age: 21.3 ± 3.5 years; body mass index: 27.7 ± 4.8 kg/m2; months postoperative: 45.3 ± 25.4) exercise intervention. Hip and knee biomechanics were quantified during a jump-landing task before and after the intervention. Individual response to the intervention was evaluated via minimal detectable change. Hip flexion angle had the greatest response to plyometric training. Overall, focused plyometric intervention did not adequately mitigate biomechanical risk factors of second ACL injury; thus, development of interventions capable of modifying biomechanics known to contribute to ACL injury risk remains necessary.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF