1. Eye irritation potential: usefulness of the HET-CAM under the Globally Harmonized System of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS)
- Author
-
Annette Mehling, Marcus Kleber, Kerstin Reisinger, Julia Scheel, W. Steiling, Elke Lehringer, and Jürgen Kreutz
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,In vitro test ,Databases, Factual ,business.industry ,Data interpretation ,Context (language use) ,Eye irritation ,General Medicine ,Chick Embryo ,Toxicology ,Animal Testing Alternatives ,Dermatology ,Chorioallantoic Membrane ,Data Interpretation, Statistical ,Irritants ,Medicine ,Classification methods ,Animals ,Draize test ,Rabbits ,business ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
Extensive research has been conducted over the past decades to develop alternatives to the rabbit eye irritation test (Draize test) used in a regulatory context to assess eye irritation potentials. Although no single in vitro test has emerged as being completely acceptable for full replacement, various tests are considered to be suitable and are regularly used to assess certain aspects. Amongst these, the Hen's Egg Test Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) has gained regulatory acceptance in various countries to classify severe eye irritants. In this retrospective study, historical eye irritation data (in vivo and in vitro) from 137 samples (approx. 75% non-irritants; 25% (severe) irritants) tested both in the HET-CAM and Draize eye test was compared with regard to the predicted eye irritation classes under the GHS and the traditional EU classification system (DSD).The overall concordance was in the range of 80-90%. A high specificity (96-98%, depending on the classification system and the chosen discrimination) but rather low sensitivity (48-65%) was observed. The study indicates that HET-CAM results are useful as part of weight-of-evidence assessments or in tiered approaches to assess eye irritation potentials rather than as stand-alone classification method.
- Published
- 2010