Search

The European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) long‐term survival (ELTS) score predicts disease‐specific death in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) being treated with imatinib during the chronic phase (CP) of the disease. However, it is unclear whether the ELTS score predicts CML‐related events or treatment responses. This study evaluated the predictive value of the ELTS score regarding prognosis and treatment response in patients with CML‐CP. Clinical data were retrospectively obtained from patients enrolled in the CML Cooperative Study Group (CML‐CSG), which included patients diagnosed with CML‐CP from April 2001 to January 2016, and treated with any tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as first‐line therapy. Among 342 eligible patients, the ELTS scores indicated low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk in 74%, 21%, and 5% of patients, respectively. Patients with high ELTS scores had significantly higher disease‐specific mortality and worse event‐free survival, progression‐free survival, and overall survival. Among four risk scores, including the Sokal, Hasford, EUTOS, and ELTS scores, risk stratification by the ELTS score had the highest predictive value in assessing patient prognosis, and also in treatment responses. In fact, the EUTOS and ELTS scores were able to predict the major molecular response within 12 months. Most importantly, the ELTS score was the only scoring system that predicted deep molecular response at any time, regardless of risk level (65.0%, 43.7%, and 23.5% in low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk groups, respectively). Compared to other risk scores, the ELTS score was the most sensitive risk classification tool for the four endpoints of interest in this study, as well as molecular responses in patients with CML‐CP., In this real‐world TKIs treated CML‐CP patients cohort, the EUTOS long‐term survival (ELTS) score was the most sensitive risk classification tool to predict CML‐specific deaths, EFS, PFS, and OS compared to the Sokal, Hasford, and EUTOS scoring systems. Notably, the ELTS score was the only scoring system that predicted cumulative incidence of deep molecular response.

Our study aims to highlight the critical role of the introduction of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2nd TKIs) on the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CML-CP), as determined by European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) system. Patients who were diagnosed with CML-CP before March 2009 were classified into the imatinib group, and those diagnosed after April 2009 were classified into the 2nd TKI group. EUTOS high-risk patients exhibited significantly worse outcomes in terms of event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and CML-associated death than those considered to be low-risk. Risk stratification by EUTOS score was predictive of risk-associated clinical outcomes in patients classified into the imatinib group; however, the EUTOS score failed to predict the outcomes of patients classified into the 2nd TKI group. Our data suggest that the introduction of 2nd TKIs might have improved treatment outcomes, particularly in EUTOS high-risk patients.

This study was performed to investigate the features and outcome of patients with therapy-related chronic myeloid leukemia (TR-CML) who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The analysis included 308 patients with CML in the chronic phase who were extracted from the CML Cooperative Study Group database. Of these patients, 11 (3.6%) were identified as having TR-CML. No differences in age, sex, white blood cell count, hemoglobin level, platelet count, or European Treatment and Outcome Study risk were observed between patients with TR-CML vs. de novo CML. However, the responses of TR-CML patients to TKIs (6, 3, and 2 received imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib, respectively) were excellent; all achieved major or deep molecular response. Furthermore, the outcomes of TR-CML patients were relatively favorable; the 3-year event-free survival rates in the TR-CML and de novo CML patients were 100% and 94%, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, our study showed that TR-CML patients could achieve a good clinical course with TKI therapy. Detailed investigations of TR-CML may provide new insights into CML biology.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment is the standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Even in the imatinib era, the presence of 'clonal chromosomal abnormalities' in the Philadelphia chromosome (CCA/Ph+) at diagnosis reportedly increased the risk of disease progression and predicted shorter survival. However, it remains unclear whether CCA/Ph+ is a poor prognostic marker in the era of new‑generation TKIs. The data of patients with CML in the chronic phase (CP) that were extracted from the CML Cooperative Study Group database were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 328 eligible patients, 33 (10.1%) had CCA/Ph+, including 9 major route and 24 minor route aberrations. The characteristics of patients with and without CCA/Ph+ were similar; however, the proportion of blasts was higher among patients with CCA/Ph+. Notably, the survival rate of patients with CCA/Ph+ was not inferior to that of patients without CCA/Ph+, and there were no differences in responses to TKIs. All 9 patients with major route CCA/Ph+ attained a major molecular response (MMR) with no disease progression, and 8 ultimately achieved a deep molecular response. In particular, the median interval between TKI initiation and achievement of MMR was shorter in patients initially treated with a second‑generation TKI than in those treated with imatinib (5 vs. 10 months). The present retrospective study, thus, revealed favorable treatment outcomes in CML‑CP patients with CCA/Ph+ treated with second‑generation TKIs. The data indicated that administering second‑generation TKIs as first‑line treatments is preferable in CML‑CP patients with CCA/Ph+.

Background and Aim: Treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Based on the results of the ENESTnd and DASISION studies, the European LeukemiaNet 2013 guidelines now recommend the use of TKIs, imatinib (400 mg once daily), nilotinib (300 mg twice daily), and dasatinib (100 mg once daily) as first-line treatment for patients with CML in the chronic phase (CML-CP). Compared to imatinib, the new generation TKIs, nilotinib and dasatinib, were found to have deeper and faster treatment response rates with acceptable toxicities. However, a direct comparison between nilotinib and dasatinib has never been reported previously. Our study aims to compare the outcomes and molecular responses achieved following the first-line use of these two agents in patients with CML-CP. Patients and Methods: The database of the CML Cooperative Study Group, which includes patients who were initially diagnosed with CML after the introduction of imatinib (April 2001), was reviewed, and patients who were given nilotinib or dasatinib as first-line therapy were identified. The event-free survival (EFS, defined as the loss of treatment efficacy, disease progression, or any cause of death), and rates of cumulative major molecular response (MMR), and deep molecular response (DMR, defined as the depth of MR 4.5) were compared between the nilotinib and dasatinib groups. Further, the predictive ability of the Sokal, Hasford, and European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) scoring systems for the achievement of molecular responses was also evaluated. For the analysis of molecular responses, patients who switched from their initial treatment agent to another TKI before achievement of MMR or DMR were considered to have no MMR or DMR. Results and Discussion: Out of 361 patients with CML-CP enrolled in our database, 58 and 63 were treated with conventional doses of nilotinib (300 mg twice daily) and dasatinib (100 mg once daily), respectively, as first-line therapy. Patients who had been started on a low dose TKI therapy were excluded from this analysis. The patient demographics, including age, sex, observation periods, and the Sokal, Hasford, and EUTOS scores did not show significant differences between the groups. In total, there were five events during the observation period (1 in the nilotinib group and 4 in the dasatinib group), and all events were deaths unrelated to CML, except for one in a patient in the dasatinib group who showed loss of complete cytogenetic response. The disease did not progress to the accelerated or blastic phase in any of the cases. The EFS did not differ between these two groups (p = 0.214). The MMR rates by 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 59%, 72%, 74%, and 81%, respectively, in the nilotinib group and 52%, 73%, 81%, and 86%, respectively, in the dasatinib group. The DMR rates by 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 7%, 17%, 24%, and 28%, respectively, in the nilotinib group and 3%, 16%, 25%, and 29%, respectively, in the dasatinib group. During the first 24 months of treatment, 4 (7%) patients in the nilotinib group and 11 (17%) in the dasatinib group had been switched to other TKIs (p = 0.0983). Among the three scoring systems, only the Hasford score could predict the achievement of DMR, and all of them failed to predict the achievement of MMR in the entire cohort. Our data suggest that both nilotinib and dasatinib have comparable efficacies, with high molecular response rates and promising outcomes. The validity of our findings should be tested in a randomized study, which is currently underway in Japan. Disclosures Takaku: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Tokuhira:Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Speakers Bureau. Asou:Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; SRL Inc.: Consultancy; Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Kizaki:Nippon Shinyaku,: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Kawaguchi:Novartis Pharma K.K.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the incidence of second malignancies (SMs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We analyzed data from 339 patients with CML who were extracted from the CML Cooperative Study Group database. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated to assess the risk of SMs using data from the Cancer Registries in Japan. The median follow-up was 65 months. SMs developed in 14 patients (4.1%, 10 men, 4 women) after the start of TKIs. The median age was 69 years at the time of the CML diagnosis and 72.5 years at the time of the SM diagnosis. Ten patients were treated with imatinib, three with dasatinib, and one with nilotinib as the initial treatment. The SIR for all malignancies was 1.05 (95% CI 0.50–1.93) for men and 1.08 (95% CI 0.29–2.76) for women. The difference in the overall survival (OS) of patients with or without SMs was not statistically significant (5-year OS: 82.5% vs. 92.9%; p = 0.343). A subgroup analysis of 166 patients treated with second-generation TKIs (92 dasatinib, 74 nilotinib) showed that the SIRs for all malignancies were 1.33 (95% CI 0.36–3.41) for men and 0 for women. In conclusion, the incidence of SMs in CML patients during TKI treatment was the same as that in the general Japanese population. There was no evidence of an increase in the incidence of SMs during second-generation TKI treatment. Furthermore, the occurrence of SMs during TKI treatment did not affect the survival or mortality in our cohort.

This study investigated the incidence rate and features of vascular adverse events (VAEs) in Japanese patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The analysis included 369 CML patients in the chronic or accelerated phases, selected from the CML Cooperative Study Group database; 25 events in 23 (6.2%) of these patients were VAEs. At the time of VAE incidence, nine patients were on treatment with imatinib, 12 with nilotinib, three with dasatinib, and one with bosutinib. VAE incidence comprised 13 cases of ischemic heart disease (IHD), eight of cerebral infarction (CI), and four of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). IHD incidence rate in the study population was higher than that in the age-matched general population, particularly in nilotinib-treated patients, while CI incidence rate was almost equivalent. Compared with the Suita score, the SCORE chart and the Framingham score risk assessment tools detected more patients with high or very high risk of VAEs. In conclusion, incidence of IHD requires closer monitoring in nilotinib-treated patients. More detailed investigations for determining the most useful tool to predict VAE incidence and long-term analysis of therapy-related VAE cases are needed for improving safety during TKI therapy.

ABL1-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have led to dramatic changes in treatment strategies for chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP). However, clinical studies have highlighted increasing numbers of adverse events (AE) with TKIs. Although TKI modification plays a key role in AE management, this process is poorly understood, particularly in terms of the TKI nilotinib. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed the records of 70 patients with newly diagnosed (ND)-CML-CP who were treated with nilotinib to investigate the drug potency of nilotinib and treatment management. During a median observation period of 3.4 years, 76% of patients continued nilotinib as a first-line treatment. The 1-year and overall major molecular response (MMR) rates and the overall molecular response (MR) 4.5 rate for all patients receiving first-line nilotinib therapy were 70, 84.2, and 50%, respectively. No case progressed to the accelerated or blast phase during the study. To avoid AEs during the early phase, nilotinib doses were reduced to