Search

Purpose The use of intercostal nerve cryoablation (INC) has been an effective modality for treating pain in patients undergoing pectus excavatum (PE) repair. This study sought to evaluate if PE patients undergoing Nuss procedures with INC and intercostal nerve block (INB) could safely be discharged the same day of surgery. Methods A prospective study with IRB approval of 15 consecutive patients undergoing PE Nuss repair with INC, INB, and an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was conducted. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay (LOS) in hours. Secondary variables included same day discharge, postoperative complications, emergency department (ED) visits, urgent care (UC) visits, opioid use, and return to the operating room (OR). Results LOS averaged 11.9 h amongst 15 patients. Ten patients (66.7%) went home on postoperative day (POD) 0, and the rest went home on POD 1. No patients stayed in the hospital due to pain. Reasons for failure to discharge included urinary retention, drowsiness, vomiting, and anxiety, but not pain. No patients were readmitted to the ED. One patient visited UC for constipation. One patient had bar migration requiring return to the OR for revision. Ten (66.7%) patients did not use opioids after discharge. Conclusions Same day discharge is feasible and safe in PE patients undergoing Nuss procedure with INC and INB. INC with INB can adequately control pain without significant complications. Same day discharge can be safely considered for PE patients undergoing Nuss procedure with INC with INB. Type of study Prognosis study Level-of-evidence rating Level II

Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can provide an effective analgesia for managing pain after thoracic surgery and compare the efficacy of ESPB with that of other regional analgesic techniques. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Setting PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Participants Patients undergoing thoracic surgeries. Intervention Erector spinae plane block with local anesthetics for postoperative analgesia. Measurement and Main Results Seventeen studies, including 1,092 patients, were included in the final analysis. Erector spinae plane block reduced 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption (mean difference [MD] –17.49, 95% CI –26.87 to –8.12), pain score at rest (MD –0.82, 95% CI –1.31 to –0.33), and pain score at movement (MD –0.77, 95% CI –1.20 to –0.3) compared to no block. Compared with other regional blocks, various results have been observed. Although statistical results showed that ESPB is inferior to thoracic paravertebral block and intercostal nerve block and superior to serratus anterior plan block in postoperative analgesia, clinical differences remain unclear. The incidence of hematoma was lower in the ESPB group than in the other groups (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.73). Conclusion Erector spinae plane block may provide effective analgesia after thoracic surgery. Compared with other techniques, it is a safer method, without clinically important differences, for postoperative pain control. Therefore, ESPB may be considered as a valuable option for postoperative pain management after thoracic surgery.

Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation (INC) has significantly improved pain control following the Nuss repair of pectus excavatum (PE). This study sought to evaluate patients undergoing the Nuss repair with INC compared to the Nuss repair with an ERAS protocol, INC, and intercostal nerve blocks (INB).In June 2020, a new protocol was implemented involving surgery, anesthesia, nursing, physical therapy, and child life with the goal of safe same day discharge for patients undergoing the Nuss repair. They were compared to a control group who underwent the Nuss repair with INC alone in 2017-2019. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay (LOS) in hours, secondary outcomes were number of patients discharged on postoperative day (POD) 0, and returns to the emergency department (ED), urgent care (UC), and operating room (OR).The characteristics between the groups were the same (Table 1). The mean LOS was 11.8 h in the INB group versus 58.2 h in the INC group, p 0.01. 10 of 15 patients in the INB group went home on POD 0 (average of 5.5 h postop), versus 0 patients in the INC only group, p 0.01. Five patients in the INB stayed overnight. Two patients stayed owing to anxiety, one owing to urinary retention, one owing to nausea, and one owing to drowsiness. None stayed for pain control. Four patients in the INC group returned to the ED for pain control, versus 0 in the INB group, and 1 patient in the INB returned to UC for constipation.The majority of patients undergoing the Nuss repair of PE with a multidisciplinary regimen of pre and postoperative nursing education, precise intraoperative anesthesia care, performance of direct vision INB and INC, as well as careful surgery can go home on the day of surgery without adverse outcomes or unanticipated returns to the hospital.Level II.

Purpose: To determine the safety and clinical outcomes of epidural anaesthesia (EA) relative to internal intercostal nerve block (INB) in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were undergoing non-intubated thoracoscopic lobectomy.Methods: Chinese patients with NSCLC (stage I or II) with no evidence of metastasis were given either EA or INB, with equal number of patients in both groups. The peri-operative outcomes determined were duration of anaesthesia /duration of surgery, SpO2/PaCO2 levels, cases of hypotension, and blood loss. The post-operative outcome indices measured were pain score (determined using visual analogue scale (VAS), post-operative complications, chest drainage, duration of hospital stay, and deaths/mortality.Multiple regression analysis was used to confirm the results obtained in this study by adjusting potential covariates. Peri-operative and post-operative complications were compared between the two groups. The results obtained from 220 patients were subjected to statistical analysis.Results: Peri-operative results showed that patients who underwent INB had shorter duration of anaesthesia (12.3 vs 31.4 min, p < 0.05) and shorter duration of surgery (164.4 vs 197.2 min, p < 0.05) than patients who underwent EA for non-intubated lobectomy. Post-operative results showed that patients who underwent INB had significantly lower number of post-operative complications than those who received EA (29 vs 44 %, p < 0.05). The most common post-operative complications among patients in both treatment groups were nausea, vomiting, emphysema and pulmonary complications. Patients who underwent INB had shorter hospital stay than those who underwent EA (5.1 vs 7.5 days, p < 0.05). These results were confirmed through multiple regression analysis.Conclusion: These findings favour the use of INB for regional anaesthesia in NSCLC patients undergoing non-intubated lobectomy.

Introduction: Pain is important morbidity following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Various adjunctive procedures such as intercostals nerve block (ICNB) have been described to reduce post-operative pain. The aim of this review was to determine the analgesic efficacy of ICNB in PNL patients. Materials and Methods: Systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant publications. We followed preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines while conducting this review. Results: In this review, five randomized studies with 319 patients were included. The analgesic requirement was statistically similar in ICNB and control group (Standard mean difference (SMD) -0.48 confidence interval (CI)[-1.4, 0.44] p=0.31) whereas analgesic requirement was lower for peritubal infiltration group (PTI) as compared to ICNB (SMD 0.85 CI[0.25,1.44] p=0.005). Also, time to first analgesic requirement was similar between ICNB and PTI (SMD 0.86 CI[-9.3,11.0]), p=0.87). Pain according to VAS (visual analog scale) and Dynamic VAS (DVAS) at 24 hours was lower in ICNB group as compared to the control group; however, only DVAS at 24 hours was statistically significant. DVAS and VAS at 24 hours were similar for both ICNB and PTI. Conclusions: Intercostal nerve block in terms of analgesic requirement appears to be inferior to peritubal block and no better than control group. Also, mean pain scores for ICNB were similar to control group and peritubal block. Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Intercostal nerve block, Peritubal block, PNL, PCNL.

Objectives To examine how postoperative pain control after robotic thoracoscopic surgery varies with liposomal bupivacaine (LipoB) versus 0.5% bupivacaine/1:200,000 epinephrine (Bupi/Epi) intercostal nerve blocks within the context of an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS) protocol. Design A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing robotic thoracoscopic procedures between September 1, 2018 and October 31, 2019 was conducted. Setting University of Miami, single-institutional. Participants Patients. Interventions Two hundred fifty-two patients had either LipoB intercostal nerve blocks (n = 129) or Bupi/Epi intercostal nerve blocks (n = 123) when undergoing robotic thoracic surgery. Measurements and Main Results Comparative analysis of patient-reported pain levels, in-hospital and post-discharge opioid requirements, 90-day operative complications, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs was performed. Data were stratified to either anatomic lung resection or pulmonary wedge resection/mediastinal-pleural procedures. Bupi/Epi patients reported significantly more acute postoperative pain than LipoB patients, which correlated with higher in-hospital and post-discharge opioid requirements. There were no differences in postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, or hospital costs between the two groups. Conclusions As part of an ERATS protocol, infiltration of intercostal spaces and surgical wounds with LipoB for robotic thoracoscopic procedures afforded better postoperative subjective pain control and decreased opioid requirements without an increase in hospital costs as compared with use of Bupi/Epi.

Yunxiao Zhang,1 Wanpu Yan,2 Yanyun Chen,1 Zhiyi Fan,1 Jiheng Chen1 1Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), The First Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jiheng ChenKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fucheng Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86 10 88196553Fax +86 10 88122437Email jihengchen@bjmu.edu.cnPurpose: To compare the efficacy of a lower dose background infusion of oxycodone for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with the conventional dose, following intercostal nerve block, for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. In total, 155 patients scheduled for elective radical lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopy were recruited from December 2018 to July 2019, of whom 140 were ultimately included in the study population. Patients were randomized to receive either oxycodone 0.25 mg/h (low-dose group, n=70) or oxycodone 0.5 mg/h (control group, n=70) as a background infusion for PCIA, following ropivacaine intercostal nerve block, for postoperative pain management. The primary endpoints were rest and dynamic visual analogue scale (VAS) scores within 72 h of the operation. The secondary endpoints were patient satisfaction scores, consumption of postoperative analgesics, times of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and adverse events.Results: All 140 enrolled patients completed the study requirements and were included in the final analysis. The rest and dynamic VAS scores at 4 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h postoperative were comparable between the low-dose group and the control group (P> 0.05). However, the low-dose group had statistically significantly higher patient satisfaction scores (P< 0.001) and lower postoperative analgesic consumption (P< 0.001) as well as lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (P< 0.05). The times of PCA was not statistically significantly different between the two groups, and no serious adverse events occurred in either group (P> 0.05).Conclusion: A low-dose background infusion of oxycodone for postoperative PCIA can achieve a comparable analgesic effect to the conventional dose after thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Furthermore, the low-dose regimen was associated with reduced consumption of oxycodone and increased patient satisfaction.Keywords: oxycodone, postoperative analgesia, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, radical resection of lung cancer

Objectives The present study was performed to investigate the possible association between intercostal nerve block (INB) and postoperative glycemic control in patients with diabetes undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. Design A retrospective study. Setting Single-center tertiary academic hospital. Participants Patients with diabetes, ages 18 to 79 years, who had undergone elective video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection (segmentectomy or lobectomy) from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Interventions Postoperative blood glucose levels and insulin dosage were extracted from the record. Measurements and Main Results Patients with diabetes who received INB before closure of surgical incisions were compared with those who did not receive INB. The primary outcome was the daily blood glucose (BG) level. Univariate analyses and multivariate regression analysis were performed to explore risk factors of hyperglycemia within 48 hours after the surgery. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Patients who received INB had a lower maximum BG level and amplitude of glycemic excursion from zero-to-24 hours after surgery (p = 0.007 and p = 0.041, respectively) and lower maximum and minimum BG levels from 24-to-48 hours after surgery (p = 0.023 and p = 0.006, respectively). Meanwhile, the daily insulin dose increment during zero-to-24 hours and 24-to-48 hours after surgery decreased (p = 0.010 and p = 0.003, respectively), the white blood cell counts within 48 hours after surgery were lower (p = 0.021), and the length of postoperative stay decreased in the INB group (p = 0.044). Multivariate regression analysis further confirmed that INB was an independent protective factor of postoperative hyperglycemia (Nagelkerke R2 value 0.229; odds ratio 0.298; 95% confidence interval 0.099-0.901; p = 0.032). Conclusion INB, performed before closure of surgical incisions, was associated with improved glycemic control in patients with diabetes within 48 hours after video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.

Background Spinal nerve block is difficult with minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS), because of the risk of serious bleeding complications due to full heparinization. Continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block (CEINB) is a postoperative pain treatment for intercostal thoracotomy, with fewer complications. Here, we report a case in which imaging evaluation of CEINB with contrast medium was conducted to anatomically confirm the spread of local anesthetics after MICS. Case presentation A 65-year-old woman with severe mitral regurgitation underwent mitral valve plasty under general anesthesia via right-sided mini-thoracotomy. A CEINB catheter was placed before the incision was closed, without creating a conventional extrapleural pocket. We conducted an imaging evaluation with a contrast medium via the inserted catheter and confirmed sufficient spread around the intercostal nerve area. In addition, postoperative pain was well controlled by the nerve block. Conclusions Imaging evaluation of CEINB with contrast medium could increase analgesic quality and decrease complications post-MICS.

Aim:Traumatic rib fractures are a common injury in the trauma population and may cause severe pain in cases of both isolated rib fractures and chest injuries. The aim of our study was to compare the early pain control of intercostal block with that of intravenous analgesia + intercostal nerve block in patients with rib fractures admitted to the emergency department due to blunt thoracic trauma.Materials and Methods:Patients admitted to the emergency department due to blunt thoracic trauma in a tertiary medical facility were evaluated retrospectively. Forty-eight patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: on in which only intercostal nerve block was performed and another in which intravenous analgesia + intercostal block were performed concurrently.Results:Nine patients (18.7%) were given only intercostal block, while 39 patients (81.3%) were given intravenous analgesia + intercostal nerve block. Considering the early pain results of group A (intercostal nerve block) and group B (intravenous analgesia + intercostal nerve block), significant improvement was observed in group B in terms of pain results after the first 15 minutes.Conclusion:We conclude that the combination of intravenous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or opioid derivatives and intercostal nerve block would be an effective combination in pain control in patients with rib fractures. In addition, intercostal nerve block would be beneficial in pain control and increase respiratory efficiency in patients with rib fractures, since it is both easy to apply and accelerates healing by providing effective analgesia. Due to these positive effects, we believe that it reduces the duration of hospital stay and would offer great advantages in terms of efficiency and cost.

Rib fractures are the most common injuries in blunt chest trauma. Rib fractures can cause a lung injury or may occur in the form of an isolated rib fracture. Isolated rib fractures that are broken in single point are usually followed at home with analgesic treatment. In our study, we aimed to investigate the effect of intercostal nerve blockage on pain, quality of life, return to work, and grip strength in patients with isolated single point rib fracture that did not cause lung damage. Between March 2020 and August 2020, a total of 61 patients with the diagnosis of isolated rib fractures were included and divided into two groups. Group 1 (n=29) received one session of intercostal nerve blockage (0.5% bupivacaine 3mL and 5 μg epinephrine) and acetaminophen 500 mg b.i.d. +celecoxib 100 mg b.i.d., while group 2 (n=32) received acetaminophen 500 mg b.i.d. +celecoxib 100 mg b.i.d. Pain severity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale quality of life using the Short Form-36, and grip strength using a hand dynamometer at baseline, 1 week, and 1 month. On the second day of evaluation, the patients with Visual Analog Scale score of

Objectives Patients presented with penetrating trauma are immediately given an initial x-ray scan followed by the desired treatment. Intercostal nerve block in chest trauma patients is effective in pain management. The aim of this study is to investigate the need of second chest x-ray in penetrating chest trauma patients, following intercostal nerve block and evaluation of pain and other clinical parameters. Method In this a randomized controlled trail, 100 patients with thoracic trauma were examined from June 2019–December 2019. All patients who entered the study underwent an intercostal nerve block by 5 mg of lidocaine. The results from normal and abnormal chest x-ray groups were compared following the block, in terms of the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) score and hemodynamic parameters. Result Among the two groups, normal second x-ray vs delayed hemopneumothorax, systolic blood pressure, rate of respiration and heart rate were not significantly at the time of admission and the time following the nerve block. However, this difference was significant in terms of visual analog scale score among the two groups.We also report that the VAS difference of more than 2.5 points has the specify of 76.5 and a sensitivity of 92.8 for the diagnosis of normal/stable patients. Conclusions Intercostal nerve block reduces pain in patients who are not presented with hemopneumothorax, whereas, patients otherwise are presented with the significant pain. Second x-ray in patients with reduced pain in response to the nerve block, might not be necessarily required.

Background Recently, robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is increasingly applied to lung or mediastinal tumor surgery. However, appropriate methods of postoperative analgesia for RATS have not been studied. Methods Patients who underwent RATS at a single university hospital between January, 2017 and March, 2018 were studied retrospectively. Patients were anesthetized with either general anesthesia alone or combined general and thoracic epidural anesthesia. Accordingly, postoperative analgesia was managed with either intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl or thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) with morphine and levobupivacaine. Patients were thus divided into 2 groups (PCA and TEA) according to methods of postoperative analgesia, and analgesic efficacies were compared between the groups with regard to pain scores evaluated on a 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, rescue analgesic requirements within 24 h, side effects of anesthesia and analgesia, including respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea, pruritus, and urinary retention, time to ambulation after surgery, and hospital stay after surgery. Results Data from 107 patients (76 in Group PCA and 31 in Group TEA) were analyzed. NRS pain scores at 6, 18, and 48 h were significantly less or tended to be less in Group TEA than in Group PCA (1.8±2.0 vs. 2.6±1.8, P=0.045; 1.7±1.5 vs. 2.4±1.8, P=0.047; and 1.9±1.4 vs. 2.5±1.6, P=0.063, respectively). The number of patients who required rescue analgesics within 24 h was significantly less in Group TEA than in Group PCA [4/31 (12%) vs. 32/76 (42%), P=0.004]. The other parameters were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions Compared with PCA, TEA provided better analgesia after RATS in terms of less pain scores, less rescue analgesic requirements, and similar side effect profiles. TEA with a hydrophilic opioid and local anesthetic seemed an appropriate method of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing RATS.

Za unerwienie i zaopatrywanie w składniki odżywcze ścian klatki piersiowej odpowiada powrózek naczyniowo-nerwowy. W swoim przebiegu charakteryzuje się on układem, w którym to żyła międzyżebrowa jest strukturą najbardziej chronioną. Poniżej żyły znajduje się znacznie bardziej narażona na uszkodzenia tętnica międzyżebrowa, natomiast nerw międzyżebrowy jest strukturą, która jako pierwsza ulega uszkodzeniom w przypadku ran kłutych klatki piersiowej. Pomimo tak nietypowego układu struktur w pęczku, możliwe jest wykorzystanie tej wiedzy w praktyce klinicznej do przeprowadzenia zabiegów takich jak torakocenteza, torakotomia, czy też blokada nerwu międzyżebrowego.

Background and Aim: To assess the quality and effectiveness of postoperative pain relief after fast-tracking tracheal extubation in cardiac surgery intensive care unit, effected by a single-shot modified parasternal intercostal nerve block compared with routine in-hospital analgesic protocol, when administered before sternotomy. Design: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded interventional study. Setting: Single-center tertiary teaching hospital. Participants: Ninety adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass. Materials and Methods: Patients were randomized into two groups. Patients in the parasternal intercostal block group (PIB) (n = 45) received ultrasound-guided modified parasternal intercostal nerve block with 0.5% levobupivacaine after anesthesia induction at 2nd–6th intercostal space along postinduction using standardized anesthesia drugs with routine postoperative hospital analgesic protocol with intravenous morphine. Patients in the group following routine hospital analgesia protocol (HAP) (n = 45) served as controls, with standardized anesthesia drugs and routine hospital postoperative analgesic protocol with intravenous morphine. The primary study outcome aimed to evaluate pain at rest and when doing deep breathing exercises with spirometry, coughing expectorations using a 11-point numerical rating scale. Results: The postoperative pain score at rest and during breathing exercises was compared between the two groups at different time durations (15 min after extubation and every 4th hourly for 24 h). Patients in the PIB group had significantly lower pain scores and better quality of analgesia during the entire study period at rest and during breathing exercise (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the side effect profile and need of rescue analgesics were better in the PIB group than the HAP group at different time intervals. Conclusion: PIB is safe for presternotomy administration and provided significant quality of pain relief postoperatively, as seen after tracheal extubation for a period of 24 h, on rest as well as with deep breathing, coughing, and chest physiotherapy exercises when compared to intravenous morphine alone after sternotomy. This study further emphasizes the role of preemptive analgesia in mitigating postoperative sternotomy pain and it's role as a plausible safe analgesic adjunct facilitating fast tracking with sternotomies on systemic heparinization.

BACKGROUND Intercostal nerve blocks with liposomal bupivacaine are commonly used for thoracic surgery pain management. However, dose scheduling is difficult because the pharmacokinetics of a single-dose intercostal injection of liposomal bupivacaine has never been investigated. The primary aim of this study was to assess the median time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) following a surgeon-administered, single-dose infiltration of 266 mg of liposomal bupivacaine as a posterior multilevel intercostal nerve block in patients undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy. METHODS We chose a sample size of 15 adults for this prospective observational study. Intercostal injection of liposomal bupivacaine was considered time 0. Serum samples were taken at the following times: 5, 15, and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. The presence of sensory blockade, rescue pain medication, and pain level were recorded after the patient was able to answer questions. RESULTS Forty patients were screened, and 15 patients were enrolled in the study. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) Tmax was 24 (12) hours (confidence interval [CI], 19.5-28.5 hours) with a range of 15 minutes to 48 hours. The median (IQR) peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was 0.6 (0.3) μg/mL (CI, 00.45-0.74 μg/mL) in a range of 0.3-1.2. The serum bupivacaine concentration was undetectable (

Background We examined how intercostal nerve block (ICNB) with standard bupivacaine and ICNB with extended-release liposomal bupivacaine, compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), were associated with postoperative opioid pain medication consumption and hospital length of stay (LOS) after thoracic surgery. Methods We studied 1935 patients who underwent thoracic surgery between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2017, at a tertiary academic center. Primary and secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption expressed as morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) at 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery, the LOS, and total MME consumption from surgery to discharge. Results Of these patients, 888 (45.9%) received TEA, 730 (37.7%) ICNB with standard bupivacaine, 127 (6.6%) ICNB with liposomal bupivacaine, and 190 (9.8%) no regional analgesia. Compared with epidural analgesia, in 2017, ICNB liposomal bupivacaine provided similar pain control in terms of MME consumption at 24 and 72 hours, but decreased MME consumption at 48 hours (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33; confidence interval [CI] = 0.14-0.81) and at discharge (OR = 0.28; CI = 0.12-0.68) and was associated with a higher likelihood for a shorter LOS (hazard ratio = 3.46; CI = 2.42-4.96). Compared with TEA, ICNB with standard bupivacaine and no regional analgesia use showed varying impact on MME consumption between 24 and 72 hours after surgery, and their use was not associated with a significantly reduced MME consumption at discharge but with a shorter hospital LOS. Conclusions Multimodal analgesia involving regional anesthetic alternatives to TEA could help manage postoperative pain in thoracic surgery patients.

Background: Liposomal bupivacaine (LipoB), delivered via intercostal nerve blocks (ICNBs), is increasingly being used for postoperative pain control in thoracic surgery patients, but there is limited data on its effectiveness when compared to standard bupivacaine. Objective: We sought to compare postoperative opioid use, pain control, and length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing thoracic surgery with LipoB ICNBs vs patients undergoing thoracic surgery with ICNBs using standard bupivacaine. Study Design: A retrospective analysis. Setting: Research took place in a tertiary academic medical center. Methods: A transition in the standard of care from standard bupivacaine to LipoB for ICNBs in March of 2014 allowed us to compare 2 cohorts: patients who received bupivacaine ICNBs from January 2013 through February of 2014 and patients who received LipoB ICNBs from March 2015 through November 2017. We included patients who underwent thoracic surgery for lung cancer using robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), or traditional open thoracotomy, and documentation of ICNB in the operative note. We collected data on pain scores (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and opioid consumption (converted to oral morphine equivalents [OMEs]) intraoperatively, on postoperative day (POD) 0, POD 1, POD 2, and POD 3. We also analyzed data on length of stay [LOS]. A primary analysis was performed on the effects of LipoB vs bupivacaine across all surgery types on opioid consumption, pain scores, and LOS with a secondary analysis on the same endpoints per individual surgery type. Results: A total of 129 patients were included from the predefined study periods (n = 62 LipoB and n = 67 standard bupivacaine). Across all surgery types, LipoB decreased opioid utilization vs standard bupivacaine (P < .01). Post-hoc testing revealed that this difference existed intraoperatively (55 ± 5 vs 69 ± 4 mg OME, P = .03) and on POD 0 (44 ± 6 vs 68 ± 6 mg OME, P < .01). Surgical subtype analysis revealed that this difference was mostly driven by lower opioid consumption in patients undergoing RATS. When compared across all surgery types, LipoB vs bupivacaine did not affect postoperative pain scores. However, subgroup analysis showed that pain scores were lower in the LipoB vs standard bupivacaine group undergoing VATS on POD 0, 1, and 2. The LOS across all thoracic surgery types was lower in the LipoB group when compared to the standard bupivacaine group (median, 4 days [IQR 2.0-6.0] vs median, 5 days [IQR 3.0-8.0], P < .01). Subgroup analysis showed that the LOS in patients undergoing VATS with LipoB ICNBs was shorter compared to patients receiving bupivacaine ICNBs. Limitations: The retrospective nature of this study makes it prone to several types of bias. Conclusion: ICNBs with LipoB for thoracic surgery leads to lower opioid consumption and shorter LOS when compared to ICNBs with standard bupivacaine. The benefit of LipoB over standard bupivacaine for ICNBs appears especially relevant in VATS or RATS procedures. Key words: Intercostal nerve block, liposomal bupivacaine, RATS, regional anesthesia, roboticassisted thoracoscopic surgery, thoracotomy, VATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Background. Regional analgesia for tubeless, uniport, thoracoscopic wedge resection of benign peripheral nodules is generally performed by intercostal nerve block (INB). We examined the effectiveness of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB), in comparison to the traditional intercostal blocks, for the procedure. Methods. Between July 2016 and December 2016, 20 consecutive patients with solitary benign peripheral lung nodules underwent tubeless uniport thoracoscopic wedge resection using thoracic PVB (PVB group). The clinical outcomes were compared with those of 20 other consecutive patients who underwent the same procedure under the conventional INB, between January 2016 and July 2016 (INB group). In both groups, the procedures were performed without endotracheal intubation, urinary catheterization, or chest tube drainage. Results. The clinical data of patients in both groups were comparable in terms of demographic and baseline characteristics, operative and anesthetic characteristics, puncture-related complications, and postoperative anesthetic adverse events. No puncture-related complications occurred during the perioperative period in either group. The threshold values for mechanical pain at postoperative hours 4 and 8 were significantly higher in the PVB group than in the INB group. Furthermore, the incidence of nausea or vomiting in the PVB group was significantly less than that in the INB group. None of the patients required reintervention or readmission to our hospital. Conclusions. Tubeless uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection for solitary benign peripheral lung nodules using thoracic PVB for regional analgesia is a feasible and safe procedure. Moreover, we found that thoracic PVB is less painful than INB.

Background This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effect between ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (Group S, SAPB) and intercostal nerve block (Group I, ICNB) after single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (S-VATS) in primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Methods In this prospective randomized controlled study, 54 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Patients in Group S underwent the SAPB before the surgical drape by an anesthesiologist, and in Group I, ICNBs were performed just before the wound closure after S-VATS by an attending thoracic surgeon. The primary outcome was the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) score given by the patients for pain at the surgical incision site. NRS was assessed during resting and coughing statuses at 3, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively and at the time of the chest tube removal. The secondary outcomes included the number of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioid administration until time to chest tube removal. Results There were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding age, body mass index, duration of operation, duration of anesthesia, and average NRS scores for the assigned time periods. There was no statistical significance in the number of opioid injections; however, NSAIDs were administered 2.8 times per patient in Group I, and 1.9 times per patient in Group S (p = 0.038). Conclusion In the patients who underwent S-VATS with primary spontaneous pneumothorax, the SAPB provided similar postoperative pain relief with reducing the NSAIDs consumption compared with ICNB.

Background and Aims: Post-thoracotomy pain can be severe and disabling. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of intercostal nerve block when used as adjunct to thoracic epidural analgesia in patients undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy. Methods: This was a parallel-group randomised patient and assessor-blinded study carried out at a tertiary-referral cancer center. We included 60 adult patients undergoing elective lung resection under general anaesthesia with thoracic epidural analgesia. In addition, the intervention arm received single-shot intercostal blocks with 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine at the level of and two levels above and below the thoracotomy. We assessed post-operative pain scores at 2 to 4 hours and 18 to 24 hours after surgery, peri-operative fentanyl requirement, percentage of patients who needed fentanyl PCA and maximum volume achieved on bedside spirometry 18 to 24 hours after surgery. Groups were compared using the unpaired t-test for continuous data and the chi square test for categorical data at a 5% level of significance. Results: 2 to 4 hours post-operatively, mean pain scores at rest were 3.0 in both groups (difference 0.04, 95% CI -1.1 to + 1.1) and on coughing were 4.6 (ICB group) and 4.9 (C group) (difference 0.32, 95% CI -1.0 to + 1.6). There were no differences between the groups for any of the other outcomes. Conclusion: Addition of intercostal block to epidural analgesia does not confer any benefit in terms of post-operative pain, fentanyl requirements or volume achieved on spirometry.

The study was to determine the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block (ICNB) and single-injection erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in comparison with multiple-injection paravertebral block (PVB) after thoracoscopic surgery.Randomized, controlled, double- blinded study.Operating room, postoperative recovery room and ward.Seventy-five patients, aged 18-75 years, ASA I-II and scheduled for elective thoracoscopic partial pulmonary resection surgery were enrolled in the study. Seventy-two patients were left for final analysis.Patients were randomly assigned into the three groups (PVB group, ICNB group or ESPB group). After anesthesia induction, a single anesthesiologist performed PVB at T5-T7 levels or ICNB at T4-T9 levels or ESPB at T5 level under ultrasound guidance using 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. Patients were connected to the patient-controlled morphine analgesia device after surgery.Cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h postoperatively as primary outcome was compared. Visual analog scale pain scores at rest and while coughing at 0, 2, 4, 8, 24 and 48 h postoperatively, cumulative morphine consumption at other observed time and rescue analgesia requirement were also recorded.There was a significant difference in median [interquartile range, IQR] morphine consumption at 24 h postoperatively among the three groups (PVB, 10.5 [9-15] mg; ICNB, 18 [13.5-22.1] mg; ESPB, 22 [15-25.1] mg; p = 0.000). This difference was statistically significant for PVB group vs ESPB group (median difference, -7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], -12 to -4.5; p = 0.000) and PVB group vs ICNB group (median difference, -6; 95% CI, -9 to -3; p = 0.001), but not for ICNB vs ESPB (median difference, -3; 95% CI, -6 to 1.5; p = 0.192). PVB group had significantly lower VAS scores at rest and while coughing than ESPB group at 0, 2, 4, 8 h postoperatively and than ICNB group at 8 h postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the VAS scores between ICNB group and ESPB group at all time. Median VAS scores at rest and while coughing at all time were low (4) in all groups. More rescue analgesia was needed in ESPB group during 48 postoperative hours (PVB vs ICNB vs ESPB; 13% vs 29% vs 46%; p 0.05).Ultrasound-guided multiple-injection PVB provided superior analgesia to ICNB and single-injection ESPB, while ICNB and single-injection ESPB were equally effective in reducing pain after thoracoscopic surgery.

Rib fracture is almost recovered with conservative management including oral medication. Pain is easily controlled with medication, but physiologic function is not readily evaluated. This study is aimed to investigate the factors influencing to recovery of pulmonary function test (PFT) and changes according to times after rib fracture. From August 2015 to January 2018, medical records of patients with rib fracture were reviewed retrospectively. Factors may influencing to recovery of PFT (age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, numbers of fractures, intercostal nerve block) were evaluated, and serial (initial, 1 month, 2 months) changes of parameters PFT (forced vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV1], total lung capacity [TLC], vital capacity [VC]) for 2 months were observed. Total patients were 60, and PFT was completed 38 and 27 patients after 1 month and 2 months respectively. Mean age was 55.1 years (20-84 years) and mean numbers of fracture were 3.98 (1-11). Intercostal nerve block and rib fixation were performed in 32 cases and 2 cases respectively. Age, numbers of fracture and intercostal nerve block were not significant factors to changes of PFT. But chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was significant factor to recovery of FEV1 in 1 month. PFT was improved in FVC, FEV1 through 2 months, and improved in TLC, VC in 1 month. This study showed the evidence and prognosis of physiologic recovery after rib fracture. And we could tell about physiologic recovery to rib fracture patients with this study.

Purpose: Surgical stimulation causes many pathophysiological changes which are not conducive to the recovery of patients, this trail aims to investigate whether intercostal nerve block can reduce the perioperative stress response and postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy.Patients and methods:40 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to Test groupand Blank group.Results: Our study found that the catecholamine and cortisol levels in two groups were higher than the baseline value after pneumoperitoneum, (P＜0.05), while the catecholamine level was lower in Test groupthan in Blank group (P＜0.05), and there is no differences of cortisol levels was observed in two groups. The catecholamines and cortisol levels of two groups were basically restored to the preoperative level after 24 hours surgery, The concentration of IL-6 and IL-10 in two groups increased at 24 hours after surgery, but there was no differences was observed between the two groups at the same point. And the usage of analgesic during operation was less in the Test group than Blank group (P＜0.05).Conclusion : Intercostal nerve block can reduce the stress response of patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy and reduce the usage of perioperative analgesics.Tial registration statement : This trial has been applied by the ethics Association of Chongqing cancer hospital.

Key Points Question Is the use of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) analgesia safe and beneficial for adults undergoing thoracic surgery? Findings In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 66 studies including 5184 adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery, the use of ICNB was associated with a clinically and statistically relevant analgesic benefit during the first 24 hours after thoracic surgery, with outcomes that were superior to systemic analgesia and noninferior to other techniques. Although ICNB was associated with a reduction in postoperative opioid consumption, the extent of this reduction was inferior to that of thoracic epidural and paravertebral block analgesia. Meaning This study found that ICNB was safe and beneficial for adults undergoing thoracic surgery, providing a reduction in pain during the first 24 hours after thoracic surgery; ICNB may be most beneficial for cases in which thoracic epidural or paravertebral block analgesia are not indicated., Importance The use of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) analgesia with local anesthesia is common in thoracic surgery. However, the benefits and safety of ICNB among adult patients undergoing surgery is unknown. Objective To evaluate the analgesic benefits and safety of ICNB among adults undergoing thoracic surgery. Data Sources A systematic search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases using terms for ICNB and thoracic surgery (including thoracic surgery, thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, nerve block, intercostal nerves). The search and results were not limited by date, with the last search conducted on July 24, 2020. Study Selection Selected studies were experimental or observational and included adult patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery in which ICNB was administered with local anesthesia via single injection, continuous infusion, or a combination of both techniques in at least 1 group of patients. For comparison with ICNB, studies that examined systemic analgesia and different forms of regional analgesia (such as thoracic epidural analgesia [TEA], paravertebral block [PVB], and other techniques) were included. These criteria were applied independently by 2 authors, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. A total of 694 records were selected for screening. Data Extraction and Synthesis This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Data including patient characteristics, type of surgery, intervention analgesia, comparison analgesia, and primary and secondary outcomes were extracted independently by 3 authors. Synthesis was performed using a fixed-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures The coprimary outcomes were postoperative pain intensity (measured as the worst static or dynamic pain using a validated 10-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain) and opioid consumption (measured in morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]) at prespecified intervals (0-6 hours, 7-24 hours, 25-48 hours, 49-72 hours, and >72 hours). Clinically relevant analgesia was defined as a 1-point or greater difference in pain intensity score at any interval. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications and pulmonary function. Results Of 694 records screened, 608 were excluded based on prespecified exclusion criteria. The remaining 86 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 20 of those articles were excluded. All of the 66 remaining studies (5184 patients; mean [SD] age, 53.9 [10.2] years; approximately 59% men and 41% women) were included in the qualitative analysis, and 59 studies (3325 patients) that provided data for at least 1 outcome were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Experimental studies had a high risk of bias in multiple domains, including allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, and blinding of outcome assessors. Marked differences (eg, crossover studies, timing of the intervention [intraoperative vs postoperative], blinding, and type of control group) were observed in the design and implementation of studies. The use of ICNB vs systemic analgesia was associated with lower static pain (0-6 hours after surgery: mean score difference, −1.40 points [95% CI, −1.46 to −1.33 points]; 7-24 hours after surgery: mean score difference, −1.27 points [95% CI, −1.40 to −1.13 points]) and lower dynamic pain (0-6 hours after surgery: mean score difference, −1.66 points [95% CI, −1.90 to −1.41 points]; 7-24 hours after surgery: mean score difference, −1.43 points [95% CI, −1.70 to −1.17 points]). Intercostal nerve block analgesia was noninferior to TEA (mean score difference in worst dynamic panic at 7-24 hours after surgery: 0.79 points; 95% CI, 0.28-1.29 points) and marginally inferior to PVB (mean score difference in worst dynamic pain at 7-24 hours after surgery: 1.29 points; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.41 points). The largest opioid-sparing effect of ICNB vs systemic analgesia occurred at 48 hours after surgery (mean difference, −10.97 MMEs; 95% CI, −12.92 to −9.02 MMEs). The use of ICNB was associated with higher MME values compared with TEA (eg, 48 hours after surgery: mean difference, 48.31 MMEs; 95% CI, 36.11-60.52 MMEs) and PVB (eg, 48 hours after surgery: mean difference, 3.87 MMEs; 95% CI, 2.59-5.15 MMEs). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, single-injection ICNB was associated with a reduction in pain during the first 24 hours after thoracic surgery and was clinically noninferior to TEA or PVB. Intercostal nerve block analgesia had opioid-sparing effects; however, TEA and PVB were associated with larger decreases in postoperative MMEs, suggesting that ICNB may be most beneficial for cases in which TEA and PVB are not indicated., This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the benefits and safety associated with intercostal nerve block analgesia compared with systemic analgesia and other local analgesia techniques among adults undergoing thoracic surgery.

Background: Mastectomy is sometimes performed in transgender patients, which may damage the regional nerves such as the pectoral and intercostobrachial nerves, leading to postoperative pain. An ultrasound-guided nerve block can be used to track and block the nerves properly. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the ultrasound-guided type-II pectoral nerve block with the blind (conventional) intercostal nerve block (ICNB) for pain control after breast tissue reconstruction surgery in transgender patients. Methods: In the present single-blind randomized clinical trial, 47 patients were randomly divided into two groups: (A) Ultrasound-guided type-II pectoral nerve block (n = 23) and (B) blind intercostal nerve block (n = 24). After nerve block in both groups, pain intensity at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery, upper limb paresthesia, frequency of nausea and vomiting, shortness of breath, hematoma, and the length of hospital stay were assessed. Results: Patients who received the ultrasound-guided type-II pectoral nerve block had a greater reduction in pain intensity (24 h after surgery), opioid use (24 h after surgery), nausea, vomiting, and hospital stay than those who received ICNB, whereas the recovery time did not differ between the study groups. Conclusions: The pectoral nerve block under ultrasound guidance, compared to the intercostal nerve block, in transgender patients can reduce the required dosage of opioids within 24 hours, pain intensity within 24 hours after surgery, the incidence of postoperative nausea, and vomiting, and the hospital stay of patients.

Background: Thoracotomy is one of the most painful surgeries, and failure to alleviate patients' pain can have dangerous consequences. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine in the intercostal block for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing thoracotomy. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 74 patients aged 18 to 60 years with ASA class I or II, BMI less than 40, and no severe systemic problems referred to a teaching hospital in Ahvaz to undergo thoracotomy were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups. After surgery, an ultrasound-guided intercostal block was done with ropivacaine (5 cc of 0.25% solution; group R) or ropivacaine (5 cc of 0.25% solution) plus dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg; group RD) per dermatome. Two dermatomes above and two dermatomes below the level of surgical incision were used. Pain, total opioid consumption, length of ICU stays, time to first rescue analgesic, and time to get out of bed were compared between the two groups. Results: The intercostal block significantly reduced pain in both groups (P < 0.0001). The pain was lower in the RD group than in the R group from six hours after the intervention up to 24 hours after (P < 0.001). The number of patients who needed rescue analgesia at 12 hours was significantly lower in the RD group (P < 0.05). The RD group also had lower total opioid consumption and a longer time to receive the first rescue analgesia (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of hospitalization and the time to get out of bed. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine is an effective and safe choice to be used as an adjunct to ropivacaine in ICB, and it extends the duration of analgesia in combination with ropivacaine after thoracotomy.

Intercostal neuralgia is a complex painful disorder characterized by intense, sharp shooting, or burning pain, along the distribution of intercostal nerve. It is difficult to treat condition in which pharmacological modalities of treatment often fail. We report a case of a 56-year-old female with postoperative sternal wound infection, following coronary artery bypass grafting, involving the left costochondral junction and left anterior ends of 7th, 8th, and 9th ribs. She presented with severe excruciating pain over left T7, T8, and T9 dermatomes for 3 months. Conservative management failed to provide significant improvement in pain relief. Hence, intercostal nerve block was performed and it provided good pain relief for 3 weeks. It was then followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) that provided good symptomatic pain relief at 9-month follow-up. Thus, ultrasound-guided RFA can be effectively and safely used in patients suffering from resistant intercostal neuralgia for providing quick and long-term pain relief.

A 46-year-old woman presented with pain in the lateral side of the left chest wall and a sensation of fullness and pulling in the epigastric region, which started 4 weeks following diaphragmatic plication for left diaphragmatic eventration. The patient was diagnosed as suffering from post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS). A diagnostic intercostal nerve block relieved the chest wall pain, but not the epigastric pain. After a detailed evaluation, the epigastric pain was postulated to be of diaphragmatic origin and hence a diagnostic phrenic nerve block was performed which relieved the epigastric pain. Combined intercostal nerve neurolysis and phrenic nerve block relieved her pain completely. The phrenic nerve may play a role in pain transmission and the genesis of chronic pain following diaphragmatic surgery. Diaphragmatic pain following surgery may contribute to the development of chronic pain. Phrenic nerve blockade provides diagnostic information regarding the etiology of pain as well as being effective in providing analgesia. The technique of phrenic nerve block is presented and its role in the diagnosis and treatment of pain following thoracic surgery is reviewed. J Med Cases. 2020;11(4):94-96 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc3436

Background and Aims: Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery is centred around multimodal analgesia which is becoming increasingly feasible with the advent of safer regional analgesic techniques such as fascial plane blocks. We designed this prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled study to compare the efficacy of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), pectoral nerves (Pecs) II block, and intercostal nerve block (ICNB) for post-thoracotomy analgesia in cardiac surgery. Methods: 100 adults posted for cardiac surgery through a thoracotomy were randomly allocated to one of the three groups: SAPB, Pecs II or, ICNB wherein the patients received 2.5 mg/kg of 0.5% ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided block after completion of surgery. Postoperatively, intravenous (IV) paracetamol was used for multimodal and fentanyl was employed as rescue analgesia. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was evaluated at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-extubation. Results: The early mean VAS scores at 2, 4 and 6 hours were comparable in the 3 groups. The late mean VAS (8, 10 and 12 hours) was significantly lower in the SAPB and Pecs II group compared with that of the ICNB group (P value

Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation (TDH) with thoracic radiculopathy alone is an extremely rare condition. Here, we report a rare case of TDH in a 52-year-old man who presented with medically refractory severe right flank pain. Based on pain distribution, pain intensity changes according to truncal position, ineffectiveness of intercostal nerve block, and radiological findings, his pain was determined to be caused by TDH at T9-10 level. Symptomatic TDH often requires invasive surgery. However, TDH with radiculopathy alone can be treated via a posterior approach without spinal cord manipulation or spinal fusion. We could eliminate the pain by removing TDH with hemilaminectomy and microdiscectomy using an O-arm-based navigation system.

Background: National data demonstrate a trend toward outpatient same-day mastectomy. The possible drivers of this change include the costs related to hospital admission and effective management of postoperative pain. We retrospectively analyzed our single-institution experience with outpatient same-day mastectomy that incorporates a multimodal pain management regimen. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent same-day mastectomy at a single academic hospital. All patients received a multimodal, perioperative pain management regimen consisting of the intraoperative administration of 1,000 mg of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen and 30 mg of IV ketorolac, combined with the operating surgeon performing a 4- to 5-level, midaxillary, intercostal nerve block using liposomal bupivacaine. All patients were discharged with a prescription for acetaminophen with codeine, along with options for nonnarcotic alternatives as needed for pain. Results: We reviewed the data on 72 patients who underwent mastectomies: 11 (15.3%) bilateral and 61 (84.7%) unilateral. The average age was 57 years, and average body mass index was 30 kg/m2. The average length of stay of 4 to 6 hours was a marked reduction compared to a 23-hour observational period or an inpatient hospital stay. The average follow-up was 20.1 weeks. Five patients presented to the emergency department (ED) within the 30-day postoperative period, with 2 patients (2.8%) requiring readmission to the hospital for non–pain-related issues. The other 3 patients (4.2%) were evaluated for specific pain-related issues but did not require admission and were discharged home from the ED. Conclusion: Our data support outpatient same-day mastectomy incorporating a multimodal, perioperative pain management regimen as a safe and feasible treatment option. Potential additional benefits may include decreased oral opioid use and cost savings for the hospital.

Introduction Better sensation in the reconstructed breast improves the quality of life. Sensory nerve coaptation is a valuable addition to autologous breast reconstruction. There are few publications concerning the sensory nerves of the breast and the nipple‐areola complex and reports are contradictory, so it is unknown which nerve is best suited as a recipient for coaptation. The current study serves as a proof of concept. Materials and Methods The areas innervated by the anterior cutaneous branches (ACBs) of the intercostal nerves (ICNs) were studied on two separate occasions in two healthy women. First, the ACBs of ICNs 2–5 were individually blocked using ultrasound. Next, the ACBs of all levels were blocked simultaneously. Sensation was measured using Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments. The numbed areas corresponding to the ICNs were drawn in a raster of 2 × 2 cm. Results The largest area was supplied by the ACB of the 4th ICN, located in the upper (UIQ) and the lower (LIQ) inner quadrants of the breast. The 2nd‐largest area was supplied by the ACB of the 3rd ICN. Blockage of ACBs 2–5 affected sensation in the nipple and the areola. Conclusions Blockage of all levels 2–5 partially affected sensation in the nipple‐areola complex, suggesting innervation by a nerve plexus consisting of both ACBs and lateral cutaneous branches (LCBs). ACB4 supplied the largest area of the breast in the UIQ and LIQ and could be best suited for sensory nerve coaptation to optimize sensation in the autologously reconstructed breast.

BACKGROUND Multiple fracture ribs following trauma is one of the common problems managed in a surgical casualty. Pain in rib fracture can be managed by different modes of analgesia. Superior analgesia provides superior improvement in lung compliance after rib fracture thereby reducing morbidity and mortality due to secondary pulmonary complications. METHODS Patients with evidence of rib fracture who received intercostal nerve block along with non-opioid drugs were grouped into Group A and those who received non-opioid drugs alone were grouped into Group B. The effect on pain score and lung compliance were measured by using Visual Analogue Scale and a respirometer respectively before therapy, soon after therapy, 12 hours after therapy and 24 hours later (in both groups). RESULTS In patients who received both intercostal nerve block as well as non-opioid therapy, the pain score decreased, and respirometer score increased progressively. In patients who received non-opioid therapy alone, only a mild decrease in pain score and mild increase in respirometer score till 12 hours and even worsening of mean score 24 hours post therapy were noted. Also, the incidence of development of pulmonary complications of rib fractures was significantly low in the former group compared to the latter. CONCLUSIONS Intercostal nerve block along with non-opioid drugs provide superior pain relief compared to that provided by non-opioid drugs alone in patients suffering from rib fracture. Lung compliance was better and complications lesser in patients who received intercostal nerve block.

The aim of this study was to compare the relative efficacy of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), pectoral nerves (Pecs) II block, and intercostal nerve block (ICNB) for the management of post-thoracotomy pain in pediatric cardiac surgery.A prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparative study.Single-institution tertiary referral cardiac center.The study comprised 108 children with congenital heart disease requiring surgery through a thoracotomy.Children were allocated randomly to 1 of the 3 groups: SAPB, Pecs II, or ICNB. All participants received 3 mg/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided block after induction of anesthesia. Postoperatively, intravenous paracetamol was used for multimodal and fentanyl was used for rescue analgesia.A modified objective pain score (MOPS) was evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours post-extubation. The early mean MOPS at 1, 2, and 4 hours was similar in the 3 groups. The late mean MOPS was significantly lower in the SAPB group compared with that of the ICNB group (p0.001). The Pecs II group also had a lower MOPS compared with the ICNB group at 6, 8, and 10 hours (p0.001), but the MOPS was comparable at hour 12 (p = 0.301). The requirement for rescue fentanyl was significantly higher in ICNB group in contrast to the SAPB and Pecs II groups.SAPB and Pecs II fascial plane blocks are equally efficacious in post-thoracotomy pain management compared with ICNB, but they have the additional benefit of being longer lasting and are as easily performed as the traditional ICNB.

Slipping rib syndrome is an often unrecognized and underdiagnosed condition caused by the increased mobility of the anterior ends of the costal cartilages of the false ribs. Patients usually present with severe intermittent abdominal pain that is exacerbated by various physical movements. Diagnosis of slipping rib syndrome is mainly clinical and can be confirmed by a physical examination technique termed the "Hooking Maneuver." Treatment includes conservative therapy, intercostal nerve block and surgical operation. Hence, the management and care plan of each patient must be individualized as per the presenting symptoms and medical history. Early recognition and prompt intervention necessitate that physicians be more aware of the symptomatology and prognosis of this condition. This study presents a rare case of a patient with slipping rib syndrome and offers medical insight to the clinical diagnosis and therapeutic modalities of this condition, in light of the current existing literature.

We studied acute and chronic pain in pediatric patients who underwent thoracotomy for benign disease with a follow-up of at least three months. A telephone interview investigated about the presence of pain and the analgesic therapy in progress. The results were compared with the anesthetic technique, postoperative pain and the adequacy of pain therapy, both during the first week after surgery and at the time of interview. Fifty-six families consented to the study. The mean age of the children at surgery was 2.9 ± 4.5 years, while at the time of the interview was 6.5 ± 4.4 years. We performed different anesthetic strategies: Group A: general anesthesia (36 pts), Group B: general anesthesia and thoracic epidural (10 pts), Group C: general anesthesia and intercostal nerve block (10 pts). During the immediate postoperative period, 21 patients (37.5%) had at least one painful episode. At the time of interview, 3 children (5.3%) had moderate chronic neuropathic (burning) pain on surgical scar. There was no statistically significant difference between the type of anesthesia and the incidence and severity of acute post-operative pain. Despite its limitations, this study confirms the low incidence of chronic post-thoracotomy pain syndrome in children.

Background Recent guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surgery recommend multimodal pain management to decrease opioid use. We evaluated the effect of multimodal pain management including parasternal intercostal nerve block on pain control and opioid use in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) requiring sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. Study Design Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent CABG from 2018 to 2019 at Huntington Hospital were retrospectively queried. Patients were divided in 2 groups based on whether an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pain management protocol including parasternal intercostal nerve blocks was employed. Outcomes, including length of stay, pain scores, and opioid use, were compared. Results There was no difference in length of stay (days) 5.43 vs. 5.38 ( P = .45 and average pain score 2.23 vs. 3.27 ( P = .137) for patients in the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. Maximum pain score, 7.74 to 6.15 ( P = .015), and opioid use (total morphine mg equivalent), 149.64 to 32.01 ( P < .01), were reduced in the ERAS group. Conclusion The ERAS multimodal pain management protocol utilizing intraoperative parasternal blocks appears to reduce pain and decrease opioid use after CABG.

Intercostal nerve blocks are indicated for multiple chronic pain and acute pain conditions including rib fractures, herpes zoster, post-thoracotomy pain syndrome, and intercostal neuralgia. Intercostal neuralgia is a type of neuropathic pain that is in the distribution of intercostal nerves. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the different techniques used to perform intercostal nerve blocks and review their efficacy and safety including blind technique using anatomical landmarks, and fluoroscopically guided and ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve blocks. Literature search was performed with the keywords including intercostal neuralgia, treatment, intercostal nerve blocks, and radiofrequency ablation on PubMed and Google Scholar. Three studies and one case report were identified. Literature review revealed that ultrasound-guided techniques and fluoroscopically guided techniques are superior to landmark-based technique in terms of efficacy. There was no difference in efficacy and complication rates between ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance. Ultrasound-guided techniques and fluoroscopically guided techniques can both be performed safely and effectively for various chronic pain conditions. Ultrasound guidance has its advantages of direct visualization of nerves, vessels, muscles, and the lung. It is potentially a superior technique in terms of improving accuracy and decreasing complications. Further large population randomized control studies should be conducted to compare the efficacy of intercostal nerve blocks performed under ultrasound and fluoroscopy.

INTRODUCTION Locoregional analgesia (LRA) remains underused in patients with chest wall injuries. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) offers an opportunity to deliver surgeon-directed LRA under direct visualization at the site of surgical intervention. We hypothesized that a single-dose liposomal bupivacaine (LB) intercostal nerve block provides comparable analgesia to an indwelling, peripheral nerve plane analgesic catheter with continuous bupivacaine infusion (IC), each placed during SSRF. METHODS Noninferiority, single-center, randomized clinical trial (2017-2020) was performed. Patients were randomized to receive either IC or LB during SSRF. The IC was tunneled into the surgical field (subscapular space), and LB involved thoracoscopic intercostal blocks of ribs 3 to 8. The primary outcome was the Sequential Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Function score, measured daily for 5 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included daily narcotic equivalents and failure of primary LRA, defined as requiring a second LRA modality. RESULTS Thirty-four patients were enrolled: 16 IC and 18 LB. Age, Injury Severity Score, RibScore, Blunt Pulmonary Contusion Score, and use of nonnarcotic analgesics was similar between groups. Duration of IC was 4.5 days. There were three failures in the IC group versus one in the LB group (p = 0.23). There was no significant difference in Sequential Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Function score between the IC and LB groups. On postoperative days 2 to 4, narcotic requirements were less than half in the LB, as compared with the IC group; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Average wholesale price was US $605 for IC and US $434 for LB. CONCLUSION In this noninferiority trial, LB provided at least comparable and potentially superior LRA as compared with IC among patients undergoing SSRF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, level II.

Introduction: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), a common endourologic procedure for removal of renal stones is associated with significant pain. Regional blocks are being used for postoperative analgesia after PCNL. Aim: To compare the analgesic efficacy of intercostal nerve block and fluoroscopic guided peritubal infiltration in terms of duration of analgesia, postoperative pain scores and total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours. Materials and Methods: This was a randomised clinical trial conducted from May 2018 to October 2018 on total of eighty patients, randomly allocated to two groups of 40 each. Group IC received intercostal nerve block and group IF received fluoroscopy guided peritubal infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine. Duration of analgesia was assessed from postoperative pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during rest and coughing). Total analgesic consumption for 24 hours was also noted. Data was analysed using Chi-square test for categorical variables and independent Student’s t-test for quantitative variables. Results: The duration of analgesia was 702.00±140.022 minutes in Group IC and 346.50±129.566 minutes in group IF which was significant statistically with a p-value of

BackgroundUltrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block is rarely used for postoperative analgesia, and its value remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy for mediastinal mass resection.MethodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, enrolled 41 participants aged 18–65 years. The patients scheduled for mediastinal mass resection by median sternotomy were randomly assigned were randomized into 2 groups, and preoperatively administered 2 injections of ropivacaine (PSI) and saline (control) groups, respectively, in the 3rd and 5th parasternal intercostal spaces with ultrasound-guided (USG) bilateral parasternal intercostal nerve block. Sufentanil via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all participants postoperatively. Pain score, total sufentanil consumption, and postoperative adverse events were recorded within the first 24 h.ResultsThere were 20 and 21 patients in the PSI and control group, respectively. The PSI group required 20% less PCIA-sufentanil compared with the control group (54.05 ± 11.14 μg vs. 67.67 ± 8.92 μg,P ConclusionsUSG bilateral parasternal intercostal nerve block effectively reduces postoperative pain and adjuvant analgesic requirement, with good patient satisfaction, therefore constituting a good option for mediastinal mass resection by median sternotomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours among women. In this study, we compared the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided rhomboid intercostal nerve block, erector spinae plane (ESP) block and serratus plane block (SAB) after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) of unilateral breast cancer. METHODS This study involved a double-blind clinical trial that was carried out in the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University on 23 September 2020. The inclusion criteria were the following: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade needed to be 1-2, the patients needed to be between 18 and 80 years old, and MRM needed to be proposed in our hospital. The exclusion criteria were patients with contraindications related to nerve block. Ninety patients were randomly divided into three groups receiving US-guided SAB, ESP block and rhomboid intercostal block (RIB). All groups received 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine. Within 24 hours after the operation, the patients received an intravenous injection of tramadol 1-2 mg/kg in the surgical ward for pain relief. RESULTS The dosage of tramadol 24 hours after the operation in the RIB (269.67 ± 48.75 mg) and ESP block groups (273.67 ± 36.90 mg) was significantly lower than that in the SAB group (314.33 ± 18.88 mg) (P < .001). There was no statistical difference in tramadol consumption between the ESP block and RIB groups within 24 hours (P = .676). The numerical rating scale (NRS) scores in the ESP block and RIB groups at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after the operation once patients were active were significantly lower than that in the SAB group (P < .05 for all comparisons); however, the NRS scores of the RIB and ESP block groups did not differ significantly within 24 hours after surgery when patients were active. CONCLUSIONS US-guided rhomboid intercostal block (US-RIB) and ESP block can effectively reduce the dosage of tramadol within 24 hours after MRM, and they can effectively relieve pain within 24 hours after MRM compared with SAB.

Rhomboid intercostal block is a type of plane block used for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate the effects of ultrasound-guided continuous rhomboid intercostal block (CRIB) on the global Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) scores and postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.A total of 66 adult patients scheduled for elective unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to group C and group CRIB. In group C, patients were administered patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with sufentanil after operation. Patients in group CRIB received patient-controlled analgesia with ropivacaine CRIB. All patients completed the QoR-40 test during the preoperative evaluation and again 24 hours after the operation. Information on 48-hour postoperative pain and adverse events was recorded.The QoR-40 scores of group C were significantly lower than the scores of group CRIB (155.4 ± 6.1 vs 172.6 ± 6.3; P.001), with a mean difference of -17.2 (95% CI, -20.4 to -13.9) 24 hours after operation. The postoperative numeric rating scale scores in group CRIB at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after the surgical procedure, when patients were at rest, were significantly lower than the scores in group C (all P.05). The postoperative numeric rating scale scores in group CRIB at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 hours after surgical procedure, when patients were moving, were significantly lower than the scores in group C (all P.05).In patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, CRIB led to improved quality of recovery and postoperative analgesia.

Simple Summary Postoperative analgesia is very important because pain causes various negative effects that prevent patient recovery. Our study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of subarachnoid anaesthesia combined with intercostal nerve block compared with a constant-rate infusion of sufentanyl citrate in cats undergoing unilateral mastectomy. This study demonstrated that the use of spinal anaesthesia with anaesthetic block of intercostal nerves, using levobupivacaine, guarantees long-lasting and high-quality analgesic coverage and minimises the post-surgical pain inevitably associated with invasive surgical procedures such as radical mastectomy. This study stemmed from a general trend towards increasing attention on postoperative pain after spaying procedures in cats. Since veterinarians are becoming more focused on relieving surgical pain, anaesthetists are expected to use better protocols that can minimise pain and therefore optimise surgical results. This method, considering the relative simplicity of its execution, can be used in daily clinical practice. Abstract Unilateral mastectomy is a common surgical procedure in feline species and requires postoperative pain management. Our study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of subarachnoid anaesthesia combined with an intercostal nerve block, in comparison with the use of sufentanyl citrate administered as a constant-rate infusion (CRI). Twenty cats were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10/group) based on the analgesic protocol used: the first received loco-regional anaesthesia with levobupivacaine (LR group), and the second received a CRI of sufentanyl (SUF group). The evaluation criteria during surgery were the need for a bolus of fentanyl in the event of an increased heart rate or increased blood pressure. In the postoperative period, the levels of comfort/discomfort and pain were used to obtain a score according to the UNESP-Botucatu multimodal scale. Subjects who scored above seven received analgesic drug supplementation. Intraoperative analgesia was satisfactory, with good haemodynamic stability in both groups. Four patients in the LR group required an extra dose of methadone after they achieved the sternal decubitus position, whereas those in the SUF group required many more doses. The analgesia achieved in the LR group was more satisfactory than that in the SUF group.

Background The necessity of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) during minimally invasive surgery remains unclear. We investigated TEA efficacy in minimally invasive surgery vs. thoracotomy and the non-inferiority of a preemptive intercostal nerve block (ICNB) to TEA in minimally invasive surgery. Methods We investigated 393 patients who underwent lung resection, with and without TEA, between 2014 and 2019 (242 minimally invasive surgery, 151 thoracotomy) and 93 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery with ICNB between 2019 and 2020. To address selection bias, 70 TEA and 70 ICNB patients were propensity-score-matched. Endpoints were 1) pain score during hospitalization, 2) postoperative complications, 3) duration of operating room use, 4) analgesia-related adverse effects, and 5) use of supplemental pain medication. Results One-third of patients with minimally invasive surgery discontinued TEA on postoperative day 1 or earlier; those with early TEA discontinuation reported worse pain the next day. TEA was associated with lower pain scores compared to non-TEA, regardless of surgical invasiveness, and a lower complication risk in patients with thoracotomy, but not minimally invasive surgery. For minimally invasive surgery, ICNB was associated with equivalent pain score on postoperative day 1, lower average pain score during hospitalization, shorter duration of operation room use, less frequent use of supplemental pain medication, and similar risk of postoperative complication and analgesia-related adverse effects compared to TEA after matching. Conclusions Given early TEA discontinuation after minimally invasive surgery and ICNB’s non-inferior pain relief, preemptive ICNB can be an alternative for TEA in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery.

Not applicable.

Background: Postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) affects patients&rsquo, recovery, postoperative complications, and length of stay (LOS). Despite its relevance, there are no guidelines on optimal perioperative pain management. This study aims to analyse the effects of an additional intercostal catheter (ICC) in comparison to a single shot intraoperative intercostal nerve block (SSINB). Methods: All patients receiving an anatomic VATS resection between June 2019 and May 2020 were analysed retrospectively. The ICC cohort included 51 patients, the SSINB cohort included 44 patients. Results: There was no difference in age, gender, comorbidities, or duration of surgery between cohorts. Pain scores on the first postoperative day, after chest drain removal, and highest pain score measured did not differ between groups. The overall amount of opioids (morphine equivalent: 3.034 mg vs. 7.727 mg, p = 0.002) as well as the duration of opioid usage (0.59 days vs. 1.25 days, p = 0.005) was significantly less in the ICC cohort. There was no difference in chest drain duration, postoperative complications, and postoperative LOS. Conclusions: Pain management with ICC reduces the amount of opioids and number of days with opioids patients require to achieve sufficient analgesia. In conclusion, ICC is an effective regional anaesthesia tool in postoperative pain management in minimally invasive thoracic surgery.