Search

Background and purpose Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) can be performed without reactors due to development of cyclotron-based epithermal neutron source (C-BENS), which is optimized for treatment for deeper-seated tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of cyclotron-based BNCT with borofalan (10B) for recurrent or locally advanced head and neck cancer. Materials and methods In this open-label, phase II JHN002 trial of BNCT using C-BENS with borofalan (10B), patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma (R-SCC) or with recurrent/locally advanced non-squamous cell carcinoma (R/LA-nSCC) of the head and neck were intravenously administered 400 mg/kg borofalan (10B), followed by neutron irradiation. The tumor dose was determined passively as the mucosal maximum dose of 12 Gy-Eq. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Post-trial observational JHN002 Look Up study was planned for evaluating locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS). Results Eight R-SCC and 13 R/LA-nSCC patients were enrolled. All R-SCC patients had prior radiotherapy with a median dose of 65.5 Gy (range, 59.4–76.0 Gy). The ORR for all patients was 71%, and complete response/partial response were 50%/25% in R-SCC and 8%/62% in R/LA-nSCC. The 2-year overall survival for R-SCC and R/LA-nSCC were 58% and 100%, respectively. The median LRPFS was 11.5 months for R-SCC. Frequently observed adverse events included alopecia (95%), hyperamylasemia (86%), and nausea (81%). Conclusion These data suggest that BNCT using C-BENS with borofalan (10B) is a promising treatment option for patients with R-SCC or R/LA-nSCC of the head and neck.

Purpose This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of proton beam therapy for large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Twenty-four patients with a HCC larger than 5.0 cm were treated with proton beam therapy at our institution between 2008 and 2015. Results The clinical stage was I in 2 patients, II in 9 patients and IIIB in 13 patients. Ten of the 24 patients were not surgical candidates because of advanced HCC or old age. Median tumor size was 90 mm (range, 50-180 mm). Median total dose delivered was 72.6 Gray-equivalents (GyE) in 22 fractions (range, 60.8-85.8 GyE). Median follow-up period was 17.5 months (range, 3-70 months). Local control rate at 2 years was 87.0%. The 2-year overall survival rate was 52.4%. The predominant tumor progression pattern was new hepatic tumor development outside the irradiated field. No acute or late treatment-related toxicity of Grade 3 or higher other than dermatitis was observed. Conclusions These results demonstrate that proton beam therapy offers an effective and safe method for treating patients with large HCC. Proton beam therapy represents a promising modality for treatment of large-volume HCC.

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect and toxicity of proton beam therapy in combination with intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary gingiva. Between December 2010 and March 2016, 30 patients with T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary gingiva were treated with radiotherapy and retrograde intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy using cisplatin (20&ndash, 40 mg/m2, 4&ndash, 6 times). Radiotherapy was basically administered using boost proton beam therapy for primary tumor and neck lymph node tumors, following 36&ndash, 40 Gy photon radiation therapy delivered to the prophylactic area, to a total dose of 70.4&ndash, 74.8 Gy. The median follow-up was 33 months. The 3-year local control and overall survival rates were 69% and 59%, respectively. Major grade 3 or higher acute toxicities included mucositis, neutropenia, and dermatitis in 12 (40%), 5 (17%), and 3 (10%) patients, respectively. No grade 3 or higher late toxicities were observed. These results suggested that proton beam therapy in combination with intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy was not inferior to other treatment protocols and should be considered as a safe and effective option in patients with T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary gingiva.

Impacted supernumerary teeth of the anterior maxilla are commonly removed in conventional labial or palatal approach. However, deeply impacted supernumerary tooth of the anterior maxilla cannot be removed simply for excessive bone removal and possibility of adjacent roots injury. Therefore, we describe subspinal osteotomy for simple extraction of deeply impacted supernumerary tooth in the anterior maxilla. Subspinal osteotomy for removal of deeply impacted supernumerary tooth can allow good surgical field, minimum bone removal, simple extraction, and reduced risk of adjacent structures injury.