1. Outcomes of daytime nurse practitioner–staffed versus resident-staffed nonsurgical intensive care units: A retrospective observational study
- Author
-
Li-Ying Cheng, Hsiao-Chi Chang, Min-Tsun Liao, Ting-Tse Lin, Chun-Kai Chen, and Li-Ta Keng
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,APACHE II ,Nurse practitioners ,business.industry ,Staffing ,Retrospective cohort study ,Apache II score ,Length of Stay ,Emergency Nursing ,Critical Care Nursing ,Intensive care unit ,law.invention ,Intensive Care Units ,Health evaluation ,law ,Intensive care ,Emergency medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Nurse Practitioners ,Hospital Mortality ,business ,Retrospective Studies ,APACHE - Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid developments in medical care-such as monitoring devices, medications, and working hours restrictions for intensive care personnel-have dramatically increased the demand for intensive care physicians. Therefore, nurse practitioner (NP)-staffed care is becoming increasingly important. This study was aimed to compare the outcomes of daytime NP-staffed and daytime resident-staffed nonsurgical intensive care units (ICU). METHODS We retrospectively assessed patients admitted to a nonsurgical ICU from March 2017 to December 2017. We collected basic patient data, including age, sex, admission diagnosis, transferring unit, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score. Primary endpoints were ICU mortality, hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were 48-h readmission, discharge to nonhome locations, and lengths of ICU and hospital stay. RESULTS A total of 838 subjects were analysed: 334 subjects in the NP-staffed group and 504 in the resident-staffed group. The NP-staffed group was more likely to come from inpatient units (38.3% vs 16.5% for resident-staffed group; p
- Published
- 2022