Search

Internet of Things (IoT) solutions are a concrete answer to many needs in the healthcare framework since they enable remote support for patients and foster continuity of care. Currently, frail elderly people are among end users who most need and would benefit from IoT solutions from both a social and a healthcare point of view. Indeed, IoT technologies can provide a set of services to monitor the healthcare of the elderly or support them in order to reduce the risk of injuries, and preserve their motor and cognitive abilities. The main feature of IoT solutions for the elderly population is ease of use. Indeed, to fully exploit the potential of an IoT solution, patients should be able to autonomously deal with it. The remote-monitoring validation engineering system (ReMoVES) described here is an IoT solution that caters to the specific needs of frail elderly individuals. Its architecture was designed for use at rehabilitation centers and at patients’ homes. The system is user-friendly and comfortably usable by persons who are not familiar with technology. In addition, exergames enhance patient engagement in order to curb therapy abandonment. Along with the technical presentation of the solution, a real-life scenario application is described referring to sit-to-stand activity.

The identification and modification of risk factors for stroke and their appropriate management can lead to reduction of stroke incidence. The real impact on recurrences of risk factors associated with lifestyles has not been thoroughly investigated, and the possible role of their modification in secondary prevention is principally extrapolated from primary prevention studies. On the other hand, several pathological conditions such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation, carotid stenosis, and diabetes are known to favour the risk of recurrence. Available antiplatelet regimens offer only partial protection against stroke and more efficacious antithrombotic agents would be useful. There is no doubt that warfarin is effective in preventing recurrence in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation. However, a careful etiological subtyping of stroke is recommended before starting treatment.

The clinical efficacy and safety of vigabatrin (VGB) as add-on therapy for pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsies is well established. However, for an objective evaluation, the effects of the drug in the monotherapy of newly diagnosed subjects should be determined. With this aim, VGB was compared, in a randomized, response conditional cross-over study, with carbamazepine (CBZ), the most widely prescribed drug in focal epilepsies. Fifty-one patients with complex partial (CP) seizures were randomly assigned to either the VGB or the CBZ group and evaluated after an initial 4 month period. The cross-over to the alternative drug was carried out, for an analogous period, only in cases with persisting seizures or in the presence of intolerable side effects. Patients who did not respond to either drug were subsequently treated with a combination of VGB and CBZ. No significant difference was revealed in the efficacies of VGB and CBZ; a complete control of seizures was obtained in 17 37 patients (45.9%) treated with GVB and in 20 39 patients (51.3%) treated with CBZ. The side effects were somewhat more frequent (41%) and severe with CBZ than with VGB (21.6%). The power to detect a 20% difference between the two drugs was 75%. The combination of the two drugs suppressed the seizures in 5 out of 14 resistant cases. The preliminary results in this small number of patients are encouraging and suggest that VGB may be considered as a first-line drug for epilepsy with CP seizures and as a valid alternative when other monotherapies are ineffective or poorly tolerated.

Studies examining the use of vigabatrin as monotherapy for the treatment of epilepsy are relatively scarce, and of the few that have been reported, only two were of sufficient size to provide definitive data. In both trials, vigabatrin was compared with carbamazepine for efficacy and safety. In one of these studies, carbamasepine was found to be more effective than vigabatrin in reducing seizure frequency, and the two were found to be comparably efficacious in the other study. What differed significantly, however, was vigabatrin's favorable safety profile. Vigabatrin appears to be a reasonable choice for single-drug therapy in the treatment of certain types of seizures. In other patients, it remains useful as an adjunct to other antiepileptic drugs.

A generalized tonic status epilepticus persisting for 5 months in a young adult previously affected only by tonic-clonic seizures is described. The syndromic classification of the case remains unsettled.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) constitutes an adjunctive, modern management of medically intractable seizures, especially when surgery is inadvisable. Objective: To evaluate the long-term results as regards efficacy, safety and tolerability of VNS in epileptic subjects, with focal and/or generalised seizures, refractory to old and new AEDs, without indication for resective surgery. Patients: 51 epileptic subjects (30 males, 21 females), aged 7–49 years, have been implanted so far. Results: The results refer to the 47 subjects with a follow-up longer than 6 months. 22 (46.8%) of them had a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency, with a more than 75% reduction in 6. No significant difference was found in relation to type of seizures. The efficacy maintained steadily over time during the follow-up (mean 26.4 months). Twelve out of the 47 subjects had an improvement in alertness, attention and psychomotor activity. Complications were observed in 5 cases, leading to removal of the stimulator in 2. A moderate vocal hoarseness (40.4%), paresthesia (6.3%), pharingodinia and cough (4.3%) were the registered adverse events. Conclusions: Our results confirm that VNS is effective, safe and well tolerated and constitutes an alternative treatment for pharmacoresistant epileptic seizures.

The definition of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is elusive and still controversial owing to some unresolved questions such as: how many drugs should be tried before a patient is considered intractable; to which extent side-effects may be acceptable; how many years are necessary before establishing drug resistance. In some cases, the view of epilepsy as a progressive disorder constitutes another important issue. Despite the use of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), intractable epilepsy represents about 20-30% of all cases, probably due to the multiple pathogenetic mechanisms underlying refractoriness. Several risk factors for pharmacoresistance are well known, even if the list of clinical features and biological factors currently accepted to be associated with difficult-to-treat epilepsy is presumably incomplete and, perhaps, disputable. For some of these factors, the biological basis may be common, mainly represented by mesial temporal sclerosis or by the presence of focal lesions. In other cases, microdysgenesis or dysplastic cortex, with abnormalities in the morphology and distribution of local-circuit (inhibitory) neurons, may be responsible for the severity of seizures. The possible influence of genes in conditioning inadequate intraparenchimal drug concentration, and the role of some cytokines determining an increase in intracellular calcium levels or an excessive growth of distrophic neurites, constitute other possible mechanisms of resistance. Several hypotheses on the mechanisms involved in the generation of DRE have been indicated: (a) ontogenic abnormalities in brain maturation; (b) epilepsy-induced alterations in network, neuronal, and glial properties in seizure-prone regions such as the hippocampus; (c) kindling phenomenon; (d) reorganization of cortical tissue in response to seizure-induced disturbances in oxygen supply. Such hypotheses need to be confirmed with suitable experimental models of intractable epilepsy that are specifically dedicated, which have until now been lacking.

• A case of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) occurred in which the skin manifestations predominated over the neurologic symptoms. The skin changes included cyanosis, anhidrosis, alopecia, nail dystrophy, and episodes of acute necrosis. Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common neuropathy accompanying nerve compression. The results of therapy depend on early diagnosis and the rapid relief from compression. Dermatologists should be well aware of this syndrome, which is almost entirely ignored in the major textbooks of dermatology. (Arch Dermatol1984;120:517-519)