1. Editor's Choice – Aortic Re-operation After Replacement of the Proximal Aorta: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Author
-
Alexandra N. Schwann, Mario Gaudino, Antonino Di Franco, Jonathan W. Weinsaft, Neil K. Mehta, Jeremy R. Leonard, Richard B. Devereux, Mohamed Rahouma, Gaetano J. Scuderi, Umberto Benedetto, Michelle Demetres, Ahmed Abouarab, Christopher Lau, and Leonard N. Girardi
- Subjects
Reoperation ,Marfan syndrome ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Dissection (medical) ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Postoperative Complications ,0302 clinical medicine ,Aneurysm ,medicine.artery ,Epidemiology ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Aorta ,Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Surgery ,Aortic Dissection ,Treatment Outcome ,Meta-analysis ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Complication ,business - Abstract
The aim was to estimate risk of aortic re-operation, and re-operative morbidity and mortality, following replacement of the proximal aorta for aneurysm or dissection.A meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify all articles reporting aortic re-operation after proximal aortic replacement. The proximal aorta was defined as extending to the origin of the brachiocephalic trunk. The incidence rate for aortic re-operation (IRAR) was calculated, and stratified based on presence/absence of connective tissue disorders, as well as initial surgical indication. Pooled in hospital mortality and post-operative complication rates were estimated.In total, 7821 patients who underwent proximal aortic replacement from 47 studies were included: 8.3% (n = 649) had Marfan syndrome (MS). During a weighted mean follow up of 4.7 ± 0.3 years, 11.5% (n = 903) underwent aortic re-operation. Mean weighted time between initial surgery and re-operation was 5.2 ± 0.2 years. IRAR was 2.4% per person-year (PPY) (confidence interval [CI] 2.1-2.8%). Patients with MFS had a threefold higher IRAR (6.0% PPY, CI 4.1-8.8%) than did patients without a connective tissue disorders (2.3% PPY, CI 1.9-2.7%; p .001). IRAR was 2.5% PPY (CI 2.1-3.0%) after operation for dissection and 1.3% PPY (CI 0.9-2.0%) after operation for aneurysm (p = .004 for subgroup differences). IRAR proximal and distal to the left subclavian artery was 1.2% PPY (CI 1.0-1.5%) and 1.3% PPY (CI 1.1-1.6%), respectively. The pooled in hospital mortality and complication rates after re-operation were 14.31% (CI 11.28-17.99%) and 18.08% (CI 10.54-29.25%), respectively. On meta-regression, initial operation for dissection was the only significant predictor of aortic re-operation (beta = .030, p = .001).Aortic re-operation occurs at a mean rate of 2.4% per person-year in the five years after proximal aortic replacement and is strongly associated with initial operation for dissection.
- Published
- 2018