Search

Purpose: High tumor mRNA levels of the EGFR ligands amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG) are associated with anti-EGFR agent response in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, ligand RNA assays have not been adopted into routine practice due to issues with analytic precision and practicality. We investigated whether AREG/EREG IHC could predict benefit from the anti-EGFR agent panitumumab. Experimental Design: Artificial intelligence algorithms were developed to assess AREG/EREG IHC in 274 patients from the PICCOLO trial of irinotecan with or without panitumumab (Ir vs. IrPan) in RAS wild-type mCRC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were RECIST response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Models were repeated adjusting separately for BRAF mutation status and primary tumor location (PTL). Results: High ligand expression was associated with significant PFS benefit from IrPan compared with Ir [8.0 vs. 3.2 months; HR, 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37–0.79; P = 0.001]; whereas low ligand expression was not (3.4 vs. 4.4 months; HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74–1.49; P = 0.78). The ligand-treatment interaction was significant (Pinteraction = 0.02) and remained significant after adjustment for BRAF-mutation status and PTL. Likewise, RECIST RR was significantly improved in patients with high ligand expression (IrPan vs. Ir: 48% vs. 6%; P < 0.0001) but not those with low ligand expression (25% vs. 14%; P = 0.10; Pinteraction = 0.01). The effect on OS was similar but not statistically significant. Conclusions: AREG/EREG IHC identified patients who benefitted from the addition of panitumumab to irinotecan chemotherapy. IHC is a practicable assay that may be of use in routine practice.

This study leveraged a gene-protein assay to assess MYC and PTEN status at prostate cancer biopsy and examined the association with adverse outcomes after surgery. MYC gain and PTEN loss were simultaneously assessed by chromogenic in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, respectively, using 277 Grade Group 2 needle biopsies that were followed by prostatectomy. The maximal size of cribriform Gleason pattern 4 carcinoma (CRIB), the presence of intraductal carcinoma (IDC), and percentage of Gleason pattern 4 carcinoma at biopsy were also annotated. MYC gain or PTEN loss was present in 19% and 18% of biopsies, respectively, whereas both alterations were present in 9% of biopsies. Tumors with one or both alterations were significantly more likely to have non–organ-confined disease (NOCD) at radical prostatectomy. In logistic regression models, including clinical stage, tumor volume on biopsy, and presence of CRIB/IDC, cases with MYC gain and PTEN loss remained at higher risk for NOCD (odds ratio, 6.23; 95% CI, 1.74–24.55; P = 0.005). The area under the curve for a baseline model using CAPRA variables (age, prostate-specific antigen, percentage of core involvement, clinical stage) was increased from 0.68 to 0.69 with inclusion of CRIB/IDC status and to 0.75 with MYC/PTEN status. Dual MYC/PTEN status can be assessed in a single slide and is independently associated with increased risk of NOCD for Grade Group 2 biopsies.

PURPOSE: Understanding the molecular landscape of glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly important in the age of targeted therapy. O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and EGFR amplification are markers that may play a role in prognostication, treatment, and/or clinical trial eligibility. Quantification of MGMT and EGFR protein expression may offer an alternative strategy towards understanding GBM. Here, we quantify baseline expression of MGMT and EGFR protein in newly diagnosed GBM samples using mass spectrometry. We correlate findings with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification statuses and survival. METHODS: We retrospectively identified adult patients with newly diagnosed resected GBM. MGMT and EGFR protein expression were quantified using a selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry assay. Protein levels were correlated with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification and survival data. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant association between MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation status (p=0.02) as well as between EGFR protein expression and EGFR amplification (p

111 Background: High tumor mRNA levels of the EGFR ligands, AREG and EREG are associated with anti-EGFR agent response in patients (pts) with RAS-wt mCRC, regardless of tumor location. However, ligand RNA assays have not been adopted into routine clinical practice due to issues with analytical precision and practicality. Here we test whether AREG and EREG expression assessed by IHC can predict benefit from Pan. Methods: A retrospective biomarker study within the PICCOLO trial (NCT00389870; irinotecan [Ir] ± Pan in fluoropyrimidine-resistant RAS-wt mCRC). AREG and EREG positive tumor cells were assessed by IHC in all RAS-wt patients with available tumor tissue. Pathologists annotated tumor areas on digital images of glass slides. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms calculated the percentage of tumor cells staining positive for AREG and EREG within the tumor areas. More than 50% AREG and/or EREG tumor cell positivity was regarded as high ligand expression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints were RECIST response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Results: 274 RAS-wt pts had available tumor tissue. High ligand expression (n = 132) was associated with significant PFS benefit from IrPan compared with Ir (8.0 vs 3.2 months; HR 0.54 [0.37-0.79]; p = 0.001); whereas low ligand expression (n = 142) was not (3.4 vs 4.4 months; HR 1.05 [95% CI, 0.74-1.49]; p = 0.78). The ligand-treatment interaction was significant (p = 0.02) and independent of BRAF-mutation status and primary tumor location. Likewise RR was significantly improved in pts with high ligand expression (IrPan vs Ir: 48% vs 6%; risk ratio, 7.8 [2.90-20.69]; p < 0.0001) but not those with low ligand expression (IrPan vs Ir: 25% vs 14%; risk ratio, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.89-3.65]; p = 0.10) (interaction p = 0.01). Lesser effect was seen on OS. Conclusions: IHC assessment of AREG and EREG identified pts who did or did not benefit from Pan, as has been previously demonstrated through mRNA quantification. IHC represents a more practicable technique as it can be provided at the point of care and is associated with shorter turn-around times. AREG and EREG IHC may be of use in routine practice to identify patients who would benefit from anti-EGFR therapy and those for whom alternative treatment strategies should be explored.

579 Background: Immune contexture shapes oncogenesis, tumor progression and response to therapy. Traditional techniques for studying the microenvironment, such as flow cytometry, are limited by low throughput. Recently, computational methods using transcriptomic data have enabled deconvolution of tumor immune landscape, particularly in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the immune profiles of other GI and HN cancers remain unclear. We proposed that elucidating the immune compositions in those cancers would reveal biological insights and potentially therapeutic targets. Methods: 464 GI tumors with RNA-Seq data (∼200x106reads per tumor) from a commercial database were available for analysis. Tumors were categorized into CRC, gastroesophageal (GE), HN, and biliary cancer. A curated panel of 122 genes that discriminate between 28 immune subsets was identified. For each of these immune signatures, a database containing 1880 unselected tumors was used to define a distribution of expression. The study samples were then scored for their deviances within such distributions.In addition to immune deconvolution, each of the 464 tumors were assigned to one of the colorectal Consensus Molecular subtypes (CMS). Significant enrichment for immune subsets between locations and CMS was analyzed. Results: Unsupervised clustering revealed 2 clusters with distinct immune profiles, which largely separated CRC from HN/GE tumors (silhouette coefficient = 0.14). Eosinophils are more abundant in GI cancers than others. HN/GE tumors were characterized by abundant NK and Tregs (adj. p < 0.001), and were predominantly classified as the immune-active CMS1 (adj. p < 0.001). CRC was significantly associated with high eosinophils and fibroblasts (adj. p < 0.0001). Biliary tumors spanned both immune-type clusters, and were frequently classified as the stromal-rich CMS4 (adj. p < 0.0001). Immature dendritic cells were sparse in GI tumors, especially GE. Conclusions: Upper and lower GI tumors have distinct immune contextures, which may differentially impact the efficacy of immunotherapy. Comprehensive immune profiling may facilitate the identification of targetable immune subsets.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7 months and median overall survival (OS) of 15 months. Standard treatment at diagnosis consists of surgery, radiation and temozolomide (TMZ). O-6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) modulates TMZ effect and MGMT promoter methylation status is used to predict outcomes and guide treatment decisions. However, standard testing is limited by poor inter-assay reproducibility and a weak correlation between methylation status and MGMT expression. We quantitated MGMT protein by mass spectrometry in 32 GBM patients to assess its relationship to PFS and OS after upfront TMZ treatment. We obtained archived tumor samples from newly diagnosed GBM patients prior to treatment with surgery, radiation and TMZ. Tumor cells were microdissected and solubilized, and MGMT protein was quantitated using mass spectrometry. PFS (determined by RANO) and OS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Of the 32 patients (66% male; median age: 63 years),15 expressed MGMT protein. While methylation status agreed with absence of MGMT protein in 8/9 cases, 9/23 samples with unmethylated MGMT had undetectable MGMT protein, indicating poor agreement between methylation status and protein expression. Patients with MGMT levels below 150 amol/ug of total protein had longer PFS than those with higher MGMT levels (HR: 0.51; p=0.0399; median PFS: 303 vs. 260 days). Similarly, MGMT level below 150 amol/ug was associated with longer OS (HR: 0.49; p=0.0311; median OS: 659 vs. 534 days). Discordance between MGMT methylation status and protein expression was found in 31% of GBM samples. MGMT protein expression below 150 amol/ug correlated with longer PFS and OS in TMZ-treated patients. Mass spectrometry-based MGMT quantitation provides a direct readout of protein expression and may be more reliable than methylation testing.

Background: Chemotherapy represents the cornerstone of treatment for patients with advanced sarcomas. Anthracyclines are the first line of treatment; however, other agents such as gemcitabine, topotecan, taxanes and temozolomide have shown clinical activity in sarcoma patients. While no biomarker for chemotherapy has been approved for clinical use, a growing body of literature has identified tumor molecular characteristics predictive of response or resistance to chemotherapy. These include expression of the proteins ERCC1 (platinum), TUBB3 (taxane), TOP2A (anthracyclines), TOP1 (irinotecan, topotecan), hENT1/RRM1 (gemcitabine) and MGMT (temozolomide). Our goal was to assess the landscape of chemotherapy biomarkers in several sarcoma subtypes to identify potentially beneficial treatment regimens. Methods: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from clinical samples of sarcoma representing 5 subtypes were microdissected and assayed with the GPS Cancer molecular test. The test combines whole-genome sequencing, RNA-seq, and proteomic expression analysis of 30 biomarker proteins using mass spectrometry. Results: Seventy-five sarcoma samples were characterized (Table 1). Expression of protein biomarkers varied by sarcoma subtype. Of interest, approximately two-thirds of leiomyosarcomas lacked resistance markers for platinum (ERCC1) and taxanes (TUBB3). Of osteosarcomas, 93% expressed the response marker for gemcitabine (hENT1), while only 14% expressed the protein marker of gemcitabine resistance (RRM1). The vast majority of Ewing's sarcomas expressed MGMT, a marker of temozolomide resistance. Conclusions: In clinical sarcoma samples, proteomic analysis can identify distinct patterns of expression that are predictive of response or resistance to chemotherapies. Additional analysis is in progress; correlation between expression of chemotherapeutic biomarkers and clinical outcomes in a subset of sarcoma patients will be presented. Table 1. Proportions of sarcoma patients (N=75) with tumor expression of chemotherapeutic biomarker proteinsMarkers of response (agent)Markers of resistance (agent)Sarcoma subtypeTOP1(topotecan, irinotecan)TOP2A(doxorubicin)hENT1(gemcitabine)ERCC1(platinum)TUBB3(taxane)RRM1(gemcitabine)MGMT(temozolomide)Leiomyosarcoma (n=25)4133228321658Liposarcoma (n=13)1504654621667Ewing's sarcoma (n=12)3383383504288Osteosarcoma (n=14)779346571467Rhabdomyosarcoma (n=11)36278264456488Tumor expression is defined as quantitated protein above the threshold determined to be indicative of clinical response/resistance. The thresholds (in attomoles per microgram of total tumor protein) are as follows: TOP1: 1340, TOP2A: 1570, hENT1: 100, ERCC1: 75, TUBB3: 850, RRM1: 700, MGMT: 200. Citation Format: Sheeno P. Thyparambil, Shankar Sellappan, Dongyao Yan, Fabiola Cecchi, Antoine Italiano, Todd A. Hembrough. The molecular landscape of sarcoma can inform selection of personalized chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1628.

6053Background: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer of secretory glands accounting for 10% of salivary gland cancers and 1% of head and neck cancers. ACC rarely responds to chemotherapy...

8574Background: Even with standard platinum doublet therapy, most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) survive < 1 year. For those with refractory or relapsed disease, second-line, single-ag...

708 Background: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a common adjuvant treatment for stage III and high-risk stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). However, about 20% of patients relapse within 48 months of treatment with 5-FU, even when combined with oxaliplatin. To improve patient selection, tumor biomarkers that predict sensitivity to 5-FU have been proposed. These include proteins involved in 5-FU activation or metabolism such as uridine-cytidine kinase 2 (UCK2) and thymidylate synthase (TYMS). We used multiplexed mass spectrometry to evaluate the utility these biomarkers in the archived tumor samples of patients with stage II/III CRC. Methods: Tumor samples were from 143 patients with stage II/III CRC who received adjuvant 5-FU, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin during 2000-2014; 83% of patients received 12 cycles and the others received ≤ 11 cycles. Tumor cells were microdissected and solubilized, and 67 candidate biomarkers were quantitated using mass spectrometry. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Protein expression by tumor stage, lymph node (LN) status, tumor sidedness was compared using the Student’s t-test. Results: Of 143 patients, 45 had recurrence and 98 patients did not. UCK2 was detected in all samples, ranging from 187 to 1606 attomoles per microgram of total protein (amol/µg). Patients with UCK2 expression above 335 amol/μg (n = 109) had significantly longer OS than patients with lower expression (n = 34; HR: 0.42; p= 0.009). There was no significant difference in RFS (HR: 0.6; p= 0.088). UCK2 expression did not differ by disease stage, LN metastasis status, or tumor sidedness. TYMS expression was not associated with survival in this cohort. Analysis of other biomarkers associated with response to 5-FU and platinum is in progress. Conclusions: In stage II/III CRC, UCK2 expression above 335 amol/μg identifies a subgroup of 5-FU-treated CRC patients with longer survival, suggesting that quantitated UCK2 has potential for use in selecting patients for treatment. These findings warrant validation in larger cohorts.

Osteoarthritis, a debilitating degenerative joint disease predominantly found in elderly individuals, has become the principal source of physical disability resulting in increased health care costs and impaired quality of life in the United States. The pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA) involves the progressive deterioration of cartilage tissue, but many of the underlying biochemical and pathophysiological mechanisms involved in cartilage degradation and the induction of pain in this process remain largely unknown. Recent literature has focused on understanding many of these processes, with the intention of developing novel therapies aimed at slowing and/or reversing cartilage degradation and inducing symptomatic relief. This chapter provides an overview of several biochemical mediators involved in OA, with an emphasis on reviewing pertinent factors mediating cartilage breakdown and the induction of pain in degenerative conditions.

Introduction: Degeneration of the interverterbral disk is as a cause of low-back pain is increasing. To gain insight into relationships between biological processes, structural alterations and behavioral pain, we created an animal model in rats. Methods: Disk degeneration was induced by removal of the nucleus pulposus (NP) from the lumbar disks (L4/L5 and L5/L6) of Sprague Dawley rats using a 0.5-mm-diameter microsurgical drill. The degree of primary hyperalgesia was assessed by using an algometer to measure pain upon external pressure on injured lumbar disks. Biochemical and histological assessments and radiographs of injured disks were used for evaluation. We investigated therapeutic modulation of chronic pain by administering pharmaceutical drugs in this animal model. Results: After removal of the NP, pressure hyperalgesia developed over the lower back. Nine weeks after surgery we observed damaged or degenerated disks with proteoglycan loss and narrowing of disk height. These biological and structural changes in disks were closely related to the sustained pain hyperalgesia. A high dose of morphine (6.7 mg/kg) resulted in effective pain relief. However, high doses of pregabalin (20 mg/kg), a drug that has been used for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain, as well as the anti-inflammatory drugs celecoxib (50 mg/kg; a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2)) and ketorolac (20 mg/kg; an inhibitor of COX-1 and COX-2), did not have significant antihyperalgesic effects in our disk injury animal model. Conclusions: Although similarities in gene expression profiles suggest potential overlap in chronic pain pathways linked to disk injury or neuropathy, drug-testing results suggest that pain pathways linked to these two chronic pain conditions are mechanistically distinct. Our findings provide a foundation for future research on new therapeutic interventions that can lead to improvements in the treatment of patients with back pain due to disk degeneration.