Search

Rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals is a cornerstone for the control of virus spread. The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection by RT-PCR is similar in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs. Rapid molecular point-of-care tests in saliva could facilitate, broaden and speed up the diagnosis. We conducted a prospective study in two community COVID-19 screening centers to evaluate the performances of a CE-marked RT-LAMP assay (EasyCoV) designed for the detection of SARS-CoV2 RNA from fresh saliva samples, compared to nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, to saliva RT-PCR and to nasopharyngeal antigen testing. Overall, 117 of the 1718 participants (7%) tested positive with nasopharyngeal RT-PCR. Compared to nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the RT-LAMP assay in saliva were 34% and 97%, respectively. The Ct values of nasopharyngeal RT-PCR were significantly lower in the 40 true positive subjects with saliva RT-LAMP (Ct 25.9) than in the 48 false negative subjects with saliva RT-LAMP (Ct 28.4) (p = 0.028). Considering six alternate criteria for reference tests, including saliva RT-PCR and nasopharyngeal antigen, the sensitivity of saliva RT-LAMP ranged between 27 and 44%. The detection of SARS-CoV-2 in crude saliva samples with an RT-LAMP assay had a lower sensitivity than nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, saliva RT-PCR and nasopharyngeal antigen testing.Registration number: NCT04578509.

Nasopharyngeal sampling for nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is the standard diagnostic test of coronavirus disease 2019. Our objectives were to assess, in real-life conditions, the diagnostic accuracy of a nasopharyngeal point-of-care antigen (Ag) test and of saliva NAAT for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in ambulatory care. This was a prospective cohort study from 19 October through 18 December 2020 in two community COVID-19 screening centers in Paris, France. Two nasopharyngeal swabs and one saliva sample were simultaneously collected. Diagnostic accuracies of nasopharyngeal Ag testing and of three saliva NAAT methods were assessed as compared to nasopharyngeal NAAT. A total of 1452 ambulatory children and adults were included. Overall, 129/1443 (9%) participants tested positive on nasopharyngeal NAAT (102/564 [18%] in symptomatic and 27/879 [3%] in asymptomatic participants). Sensitivity was 94%, 23%, 96%, and 94% for the three different protocols of saliva NAAT and for the nasopharyngeal Ag test, respectively. Estimates of specificity were above 95% for all methods. Diagnostic accuracy was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Diagnostic accuracy of nasopharyngeal Ag testing and of saliva NAAT is similar to that of nasopharyngeal NAAT, subject to compliance with specific protocols for saliva. Registration number: NCT04578509 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10096-021-04327-x.

BackgroundRapid identification of SARS-Cov-2 infected individuals is a cornerstone in strategies for the control of virus spread. The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection by RT-PCR is similar in saliva and nasopharyngeal swab. Rapid molecular point-of-care tests in saliva could facilitate, broaden and speed up the diagnosis.Objectives and methodsWe conducted a prospective study in two community COVID-19 screening centers to evaluate the performances of a CE-marked RT-LAMP assay (EasyCoV™) specifically designed for the detection of SARS-CoV2 RNA from fresh saliva samples, compared to nasopharyngeal RT-PCR (reference test), to saliva RT-PCR and to nasopharyngeal antigen testing.ResultsOverall, 117 of the 1718 participants (7%) were tested positive with nasopharyngeal RT-PCR. Compared to nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the RT-LAMP assay in saliva were 34% (95%CI: 26-44) and 97% (95%CI: 96-98) respectively. The performance was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic participants. The Ct values of nasopharyngeal RT-PCR were significantly lower in the 40 true positive subjects with saliva RT-LAMP (Ct 25.9) than in the 48 false negative subjects with saliva RT-LAMP (Ct 28.4) (p=0.028). Considering six alternate criteria for reference test, including saliva RT-PCR and nasopharyngeal antigen, the sensitivity of saliva RT-LAMP ranged between 27 and 44%.ConclusionIn the ambulatory setting, the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from crude saliva samples with the RT-LAMP assay had a lower sensitivity than nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, saliva RT-PCR and nasopharyngeal antigen testing.Registration numberNCT04578509Funding SourcesFrench Ministry of Health and the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Foundation.

BackgroundNasopharyngeal sampling for nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is the current standard diagnostic test for of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the NAAT technique is lengthy and nasopharyngeal sampling requires trained personnel. Saliva NAAT represents an interesting alternative but diagnostic performances vary widely between studies.ObjectiveTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of a nasopharyngeal point-of-care antigen (Ag) test and of saliva NAAT for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), as compared to nasopharyngeal NAAT.DesignProspective participant enrollment from 19 October through 18 December 2020.SettingTwo community COVID-19 screening centers in Paris, France.Participants1452 ambulatory children and adults referred for SARS-CoV-2 testing.InterventionsNAAT on a saliva sample (performed with three different protocols for pre-processing, amplification and detection of SARS-CoV-2) and Ag testing on a nasopharyngeal sample.MeasurementsPerformance of saliva NAAT and nasopharyngeal Ag testing.ResultsOverall, 129/1443 (9%) participants tested positive on nasopharyngeal NAAT (102/564 [18%] in symptomatic and 27/879 [3%] in asymptomatic participants). Sensitivity was of 94% (95% CI, 86% to 98%), 23% (CI, 14% to 35%), 94% (CI, 88% to 97%) and 96% (CI, 91% to 99%) for the nasopharyngeal Ag test and the three different protocols of saliva NAAT, respectively. Estimates of specificity were above 95% for all methods. Diagnostic accuracy was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.LimitationsFew children (n=122, 8%) were included.ConclusionIn the ambulatory setting, diagnostic accuracy of nasopharyngeal Ag testing and of saliva NAAT seems similar to that of nasopharyngeal NAAT, subject to strict compliance with specific pre-processing and amplification protocols.Registration numberNCT04578509Funding SourcesFrench Ministry of Health and the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Foundation.

Acrodysostosis is a very rare congenital multisystem condition characterized by skeletal dysplasia with severe brachydactyly, midfacial hypoplasia, and short stature, varying degrees of intellectual disability, and possible resistance to multiple G protein-coupled receptor signalling hormones. Two distinct subtypes are differentiated: acrodysostosis type 1 resulting from defects in protein kinase type 1-α regulatory subunit and acrodysostosis type 2 caused by mutations in phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D). Most cases are sporadic. We report on a rare multigenerational familial case of acrodysostosis type 2 due to a novel autosomal dominantly inherited PDE4D mutation. A 3.5-year-old boy presented with short stature, midfacial hypoplasia, severe brachydactyly, developmental delay, and behavioural problems. Laboratory investigations revealed mild thyrotropin resistance. His mother shared some characteristic features, such as midfacial hypoplasia and severe brachydactyly, but did not show short stature, intellectual disability or hormonal resistance. Genetic analysis identified the identical, novel heterozygous missense mutation of the PDE4D gene c.569C>T (p.Ser190Phe) in both patients. This case illustrates the significant phenotypic variability of acrodysostosis even within one family with identical mutations. Hence, a specific clinical diagnosis of acrodysostosis remains challenging because of great interindividual variability and a substantial overlap of the two subtypes as well as with other related Gsα-cAMP-signalling-linked disorders.

ContextKallmann syndrome (KS) is a genetically heterogeneous developmental disorder that associates hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and anosmia. Various causative genes have been identified, but their respective involvement in different world regions is poorly documented.ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the prevalence of mutations in five routinely analyzed KS genes between Maghrebian and European patients.MethodsBlood samples from 120 presumably unrelated Maghrebian patients were collected for DNA sequencing by the Sanger technique. The prevalence of the non-synonymous mutations inKAL1,FGFR1,FGF8,PROKR2, andPROK2was determined for each gene, and compared with those previously obtained from the analysis of 712 European patients.ResultsDiverse mutations inPROKR2, a gene involved both in monogenic recessive and digenic/oligogenic KS transmission modes, were found in 23.3% of the Maghrebian patients, but only in 5.1% of the European patients (Fisher's exact test,PKAL1,PROK2,FGF8, from 6.6 to 0.8%; Fisher's exact test,P>0.4 for all comparisons) or at a lower frequency in Maghrebian patients (FGFR1, 5.0 vs 11.7%; Fisher's exact test,PPROKR2mutations in the Maghrebian patients.ConclusionsThe great prevalence ofPROKR2mutations in Maghrebian patients has practical consequences for molecular diagnosis of the disease and genetic counseling in the Maghrebian population.

Background Clinical phenotype varies among cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with identical CF transmembrane conductance regulator ( CFTR )genotype, suggesting that genetic modifiers exist. Transgenic mice that overexpress SCNN1β present CF-like lung disease symptoms. Mutations or variants in SCNN1 β may therefore potentially modulate the clinical phenotype in CF patients. Methods We analysed by DHPLC SCNN1β and SCNN1γ genes in 56 patients with classical CF. Patients were classified into two groups according to their CFTR genotype and their severity: 38 patients with severe genotype and an unexpectedly mild lung phenotype, and 18 patients with mild genotype and a severe lung phenotype. Results We found 3 patients out of 56 carrying at least one missense mutation. Two were novel (p.Thr313Met in SCNN1β , p.Leu481Gln in SCNN1γ ) and two were previously described (p.Gly589Ser in SCNN1β and p.Val546Ileu in SCNNγ ). p.Thr313Met has been identified in a CF patient with mild genotype and severe lung phenotype suggesting that it could act in increasing ENaC activity. The three other variants have been identified in CF patients with severe genotype and mild lung phenotype suggesting that they might decrease ENaC activity. However, the function of ENaC in the nasal epithelia of these patients, evaluated by nasal potential difference measurements, did not support the fact that these variants were functional, at least in nasal epithelium. Conclusion Our results suggest that genetic variants in ENaCβ and γ genes do not modulate disease severity in the majority of CF patients.