1. With or Without Residual C-Peptide, Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Realize Glycemic Benefits from Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Author
-
Tomas C. Walker, Peter Calhoun, Ryan R. Bailey, and Christy Chao
- Subjects
Adult ,Blood Glucose ,medicine.medical_specialty ,endocrine system diseases ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Type 2 diabetes ,Gastroenterology ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Endocrinology ,Diabetes mellitus ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Hypoglycemic Agents ,Insulin ,Glycemic ,Glycated Hemoglobin ,Blood glucose monitoring ,C-Peptide ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Continuous glucose monitoring ,business.industry ,C-peptide ,Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring ,Basal insulin ,nutritional and metabolic diseases ,medicine.disease ,Medical Laboratory Technology ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ,chemistry ,Disease Progression ,business - Abstract
Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) is superior to blood glucose monitoring (BGM) for adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D); however, the utility of C-peptide levels for predicting the magnitude of the glycemic benefits is controversial. Data were from a subset of 147 participants in the MOBILE study (NCT03566693) who were treated with basal-only insulin and who had baseline C-peptide levels ≥0.5 ng/mL. Participants were randomized to treatment with either RT-CGM (n=100) or BGM (n=47). Between-group differences in HbA1c and time in range (TIR) changes were assessed. The between-group difference in HbA1c favored the RT-CGM group (by 0.58 percentage points, P=0.004 at 3 months and by 0.42 percentage points, P=0.04 at 8 months). TIR was 16% higher, and time >180 mg/dL was 16% lower, in the RT-CGM group at 8 months (P=0.002 for each). In T2D managed with basal insulin, RT-CGM benefits occur for those with residual insulin secretory capacity.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF