1. Is There a Difference Between LI-RADS 3 to LI-RADS 5 Progression Assessment Using CT Versus MR? A Retrospective, Single-Center, Longitudinal Study of Patients Who Underwent 5082 Radiologic Examinations for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Over a 43-Month Period
- Author
-
Akshay D. Baheti, Patricia I. Ojeda, Daniel S. Hippe, Achille Mileto, Rebecca J. Mieloszyk, Puneet Bhargava, Christopher S. Hall, James O. Park, Lindsay M. Hannan, and William P. Harris
- Subjects
Longitudinal study ,Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ,Radiography ,Population ,Contrast Media ,Single Center ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,In patient ,Longitudinal Studies ,education ,Retrospective Studies ,Liver imaging ,education.field_of_study ,High risk patients ,business.industry ,Liver Neoplasms ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Hepatocellular carcinoma ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,business ,Nuclear medicine - Abstract
Objective The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) has been widely applied to CT and MR liver observations in patients at high-risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We investigated the impact of CT vs MR in upgrading LI-RADS 3 to LI-RADS 5 observations using a large cohort of high-risk patients. Methods We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study of CT and MR radiographic reports (June 2013 - February 2017) with an assigned LI-RADS category. A final population of 757 individual scans and 212 high-risk patients had at least one LI-RADS 3 observation. Differences in observation time to progression between modalities were determined using uni- and multivariable analysis. Results Of the 212 patients with a LI-RADS 3 observation, 52 (25%) had progression to LI-RADS 5. Tp ranged from 64 - 818 days (median: 196 days). One hundred and three patients (49%) had MR and 109 patients (51%) had CT as their index study. Twenty-four patients with an MR index exam progressed to LI-RADS 5 during the follow-up interval, with progression rates of 22% (CI:13%-30%) at 1 year and 29% (CI:17%-40%) at 2 years. Twenty-eight patients with a CT index exam progressed to LI-RADS 5 during follow-up, with progression rates of 26% (CI:16%-35%) at 1 year and 31% (CI:19%-41%) at 2 years. Progression rates were not significantly different between patients whose LI-RADS 3 observation was initially diagnosed on MR vs CT (HR: 0.81, P = 0.44). Discussion MR and CT modalities are comparable for demonstrating progression from LI-RADS 3 to 5 for high risk patients.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF