Search

International audience; Three reports address the protection of the vulnerable population of patients with hematologic malignancies in the face of the ongoing COVID pandemic. The reports suggest that some patients who fail to mount a B-cell response to vaccine may nevertheless have protective T cell responses. As a group, these reports suggest that patients should continue to be immunized with additional doses to attempt to improve immune response but that they need to maintain the precautions recommended for the unvaccinated.

International audience; Objectives: To assess the contribution of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS) in addition to skeletal survey (SS) in detecting traumatic bone lesions and soft-tissue injuries in suspected child abuse.Methods: In this prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy study, children less than 3 years of age with suspected physical abuse were recruited. Each child underwent SS, BS and WBMRI. A blinded first review was performed in consensus by five paediatric radiologists and three nuclear medicine physicians. A second review investigated discrepancies reported between the modalities using a consensus result of all modalities as the reference standard. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity and corresponding 95% confidence interval for each imaging modality (SS, WBMRI and BS) and for the combinations [SS + WBMRI] and [SS + BS].Results: One hundred seventy children were included of which sixty-four had at least one lesion. In total, 146 lesions were included. The sensitivity and specificity of each examination were, respectively, as follows: 88.4% [95% CI, 82.0-93.1] and 99.7% [95% CI, 99.5-99.8] for the SS, 69.9% [95% CI, 61.7-77.2] and 99.5% [95% CI, 99.2-99.7] for WBMRI and 54.8% [95% CI, 46.4-63.0] and 99.7% [95% CI, 99.5-99.9] for BS. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 95.9% [95% CI, 91.3-98.5] and 99.2% [95% CI, 98.9-99.4] for the combination SS + WBMRI and 95.2% [95% CI, 90.4-98.1] and 99.4% [95% CI, 99.2-99.6] for the combination SS + BS, with no statistically significant difference between them.Conclusion: SS was the most sensitive independent imaging modality; however, the additional combination of either WBMRI or BS examinations offered an increased accuracy.Key points: • SS in suspected infant abuse was the most sensitive independent imaging modality in this study, especially for detecting metaphyseal and rib lesions, and remains essential for evaluation. • The combination of either SS + BS or SS + WBMRI provides greater accuracy in diagnosing occult and equivocal bone injuries in the difficult setting of child abuse. • WBMRI is a free-radiation technique that allows additional diagnosis of soft-tissue and visceral injuries.

To design a simple and reproducible classifier predicting the overall survival (OS) of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ≥60 years of age treated with 7 + 3, we sequenced 37 genes in 471 patients from the ALFA1200 (Acute Leukemia French Association) study (median age, 68 years). Mutation patterns and OS differed between the 84 patients with poor-risk cytogenetics and the 387 patients with good (n = 13), intermediate (n = 339), or unmeasured (n = 35) cytogenetic risk. TP53 (hazards ratio [HR], 2.49; P = .0003) and KRAS (HR, 3.60; P = .001) mutations independently worsened the OS of patients with poor-risk cytogenetics. In those without poor-risk cytogenetics, NPM1 (HR, 0.57; P = .0004), FLT3 internal tandem duplications with low (HR, 1.85; P = .0005) or high (HR, 3.51; P < 10−4) allelic ratio, DNMT3A (HR, 1.86; P < 10−4), NRAS (HR, 1.54; P = .019), and ASXL1 (HR, 1.89; P = .0003) mutations independently predicted OS. Combining cytogenetic risk and mutations in these 7 genes, 39.1% of patients could be assigned to a “go-go” tier with a 2-year OS of 66.1%, 7.6% to the “no-go” group (2-year OS 2.8%), and 3.3% of to the “slow-go” group (2-year OS of 39.1%; P < 10−5). Across 3 independent validation cohorts, 31.2% to 37.7% and 11.2% to 13.5% of patients were assigned to the go-go and the no-go tiers, respectively, with significant differences in OS between tiers in all 3 trial cohorts (HDF [Hauts-de-France], n = 141, P = .003; and SAL [Study Alliance Leukemia], n = 46; AMLSG [AML Study Group], n = 223, both P < 10−5). The ALFA decision tool is a simple, robust, and discriminant prognostic model for AML patients ≥60 years of age treated with intensive chemotherapy. This model can instruct the design of trials comparing the 7 + 3 standard of care with less intensive regimens.

This multicenter prospective phase 2 trial analyzed disease-free survival (DFS) in myelofibrosis patients receiving ruxolitinib for 6 months before transplantation. Seventy-six patients were recruited. Age-adjusted dynamic international prognostic scoring system was intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high in 27 (36%), 31 (41%), and 18 (24%) patients. All patients received ruxolitinib from inclusion to conditioning regimen (fludarabine-melphalan) or to progression. A donor was found in 64 patients: 18 HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD), 32 HLA-matched unrelated (UD10/10), and 14 HLA mismatched unrelated donor (UD9/10. Among 64 patients with a donor, 20 (31%) achieved a partial response before transplantation and 59 (92%) could be transplanted after ruxolitinib therapy (18/18 MSD, 30/21 UD10/10, 11/34 UD9/10), of whom 19 (32%) were splenectomized. Overall survival from inclusion was 68% at 12 months. One-year DFS after transplantation was 55%: 83%, 40%, and 34% after MSD, UD10/10 or UD9/10, respectively. Cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 66% and non-relapse-mortality was 42% at 12 months. Short course of ruxolitinib before transplantation is followed by a high rate of transplantation. With the platform used in this protocol, outcome was much better in patients transplanted with HLA-matched sibling donor as compared to unrelated donor.

Contains fulltext : 245127.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is a complex, potentially fatal therapy featuring a myriad of complications. Triggering event(s) of such complications vary significantly, but often a so-called "multi-organ failure" (MOF) is reported as the leading cause of death. The identification of the exact trigger of MOF is critical towards early and disease-specific intervention to improve outcome. We examined data from 202 alloHCT patients reported to have died of MOF from the EBMT registry aiming to determine their exact cause of death focusing on veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) due to its life-threatening, often difficult to capture yet preventable nature. We identified a total of 70 patients (35%) for whom VOD/SOS could be considered as trigger for MOF and leading cause of death, among which 48 (69%) were previously undiagnosed. Multivariate analysis highlighted history of hepatic comorbidity or gentuzumab use and disease status beyond CR1 as the only significant factors predictive of VOD/SOS incidence (OR = 6.6; p = 0.001 and OR = 3.3; p = 0.004 respectively). VOD/SOS-related MOF was widely under-reported, accounting for 27% of deaths attributed to MOF of unknown origin without a previous VOD/SOS diagnosis. Our results suggest most missed cases developed late VOD/SOS beyond 21 days post-alloHCT, highlighting the importance of the newly revised EBMT criteria.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) represents the most beneficial treatment for patients with active relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. Recently, sequential regimens combining debulking chemotherapy followed by reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) have shown encouraging results for these patients. In this retrospective study, we report the extended results of a sequential regimen of clofarabine, cytosine arabinoside, and RIC in 131 adults with active R/R myeloid disease at transplant. Conditioning consisted of clofarabine (30 mg/m2/day) and cytosine arabinoside (1 g/m2/day) for 5 days, followed, after a rest of 3 days, by an RIC combining cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg) for 1 day, iv busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day) for 2 days, and anti-thymocyte globulin (2.5 mg/kg/day) for 2 days. Between 2007 and 2016, 131 patients (males n = 75, median age: 52.6 years) were identified from the SFGM-TC registry. There were 111 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and 20 cases with myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative syndrome. Status at transplant was known for all but 4 patients and was primary refractory (n = 81) and 1st or 2nd relapse (n = 46). All patients received allo-SCT from a matched donor (sibling n = 64, unrelated n = 67). Engraftment was observed in 105/122 (86%) evaluable cases and 63% of the patients achieved complete remission (CR) after transplant. The 1-year overall survival, disease-free survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and graft-versus-host disease-free/relapse-free survival were 39.2%, 28.1%, 41.0%, 30.8%, and 22.2%, respectively. This study confirms that this sequential clofarabine-based regimen provides a high CR rate in this critical population, although relapse remains a matter of concern.

BackgroundClozapine is mainly used in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and may lead to potentially severe haematologic adverse events, such as agranulocytosis. Whether clozapine might be associated with haematologic malignancies is unknown. We aimed to assess the association between haematologic malignancies and clozapine using Vigibase®, the WHO pharmacovigilance database.MethodsWe performed a disproportionality analysis to compute reporting odds-ratio adjusted for age, sex and concurrent reporting of antineoplastic/immunomodulating agents (aROR) for clozapine and structurally related drugs (loxapine, olanzapine and quetiapine) compared with other antipsychotic drugs. Cases were malignant lymphoma and leukaemia reports. Non-cases were all other reports including at least one antipsychotic report.ResultsOf the 140 226 clozapine-associated reports, 493 were malignant lymphoma cases, and 275 were leukaemia cases. Clozapine was significantly associated with malignant lymphoma (aROR 9.14, 95% CI 7.75–10.77) and leukaemia (aROR 3.54, 95% CI 2.97–4.22). Patients suffering from those haematologic malignancies were significantly younger in the clozapine treatment group than patients treated with other medicines (p < 0.001). The median time to onset (available for 212 cases) was 5.1 years (IQR 2.2–9.9) for malignant lymphoma and 2.5 years (IQR 0.6–7.4) for leukaemia. The aROR by quartile of dose of clozapine in patients with haematologic malignancies suggested a dose-dependent association.ConclusionsClozapine was significantly associated with a pharmacovigilance signal of haematologic malignancies. The risk-benefit balance of clozapine should be carefully assessed in patients with risk factors of haematologic malignancies. Clozapine should be used at the lowest effective posology.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) status pre-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has been shown to predict transplant outcomes. We investigated the effect of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) on acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) relapse by pretransplant MRD status. AML patients undergoing allo-HCT in first complete remission from either a matched sibling or unrelated donor during the 2006–2017 period were selected. Outcomes of 1509 patients (MRD+, n = 426) were studied. ATG was used in 561 (52%) and 239 (58%) patients within the MRD− and MRD+ cohorts, respectively. In MRD− patients, ATG did not affect relapse incidence (RI) (HR = 0.80, p = 0.17), but was associated with reduced incidence of grade II–IV acute GVHD, grade II–IV and chronic GVHD, reduced nonrelapse mortality (HR = 0.66, p = 0.05), improved leukemia-free survival (HR = 0.74, p = 0.02), overall survival (HR = 0.69, p = 0.01), and GVHD-relapse free survival (HR = 0.62, p

Background The present study evaluated the relative survival benefits associated with enasidenib and current standard of care (SoC) therapies for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutation who are ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Methods Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis compared survival outcomes observed with enasidenib 100 mg daily in the phase I/II AG221‐C‐001 trial and SoC outcomes obtained from a real‐world chart review of patients in France. Results Before matching, enasidenib (n = 195) was associated with numerically improved overall survival (OS) relative to SoC (n = 80; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61–1.11). After matching and adjusting for covariates (n = 78 per group), mortality risk was significantly lower with enasidenib than with SoC (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47–0.97). The median OS was 9.26 months for enasidenib (95% CI, 7.72–13.24) and 4.76 months for SoC (95% CI, 3.81–8.21). Results remained robust across all sensitivity analyses conducted. Conclusions PSM analyses indicate that enasidenib significantly prolongs survival relative to SoC among patients with R/R AML and an IDH2 mutation who are ineligible for HSCT. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings using other data sources and to assess the comparative efficacy of enasidenib for other treatment outcomes., Overall survival was improved with enasidenib compared with SoC. Enasidenib may be an important advance in treatment for patients with R/R acute myeloid leukemia associated with IDH2 mutations who are ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of corticosteroids on outcomes of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring oxygen without mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We used routine care data from 51 hospitals in France and Luxembourg to assess the effectiveness of corticosteroids at 0.8 mg/kg/day eq. prednisone (CTC group) versus standard of care (no-CTC group) among adults 18 to 80 years old with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia requiring oxygen without mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was intubation or death by day 28. In our main analysis, characteristics of patients at baseline (i.e., time when patients met all inclusion criteria) were balanced by using propensity-score inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Among the 891 patients included in the analysis, 203 were assigned to the CTC group. Use of corticosteroids was not significantly associated with risk of intubation or death by day 28 (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.39) or cumulative death rate (wHR 1.03, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.98). However, use of corticosteroids was associated with reduced risk of intubation or death by day 28 in the prespecified subgroups of patients requiring oxygen ≥ 3 L/min (wHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.85) or C-reactive protein level ≥ 100 mg/L (wHR 0.44, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.85). Number of hyperglycaemia events was higher for patients with than without corticosteroids, but number of infections was similar. CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between the use of corticosteroids and intubation or death in the broad population of patients 18 to 80 years old with COVID-19 hospitalized in non-intensive care unit settings. However, the treatment was associated with reduced risk of intubation or death for patients with ≥ 3 L/min oxygen or C-reactive protein level ≥ 100 mg/L at baseline. Further research need to confirm the right timing of corticosteroids for patients with COVID-19 requiring oxygen only.

Quizartinib improved outcome compared to chemotherapy in the QuANTUM-R study (median overall survival (OS): 6.2 months for quizartinib vs. 4.7 in the chemotherapy group; hazard ratio 0.76, p = 0.02...

Ischemic heart disease is a leading cause of mortality due to irreversible damage to cardiac muscle. Inspired by the post-ischemic microenvironment, we devised an extracellular matrix (ECM)-mimicking hydrogel using catalyst-free click chemistry covalent bonding between two elastin-like recombinamers (ELRs). The resulting customized hydrogel included functional domains for cell adhesion and protease cleavage sites, sensitive to cleavage by matrix metalloproteases overexpressed after myocardial infarction (MI). The scaffold permitted stromal cell invasion and endothelial cell sprouting in vitro. The incidence of non-transmural infarcts has increased clinically over the past decade, and there is currently no treatment preventing further functional deterioration in the infarcted areas. Here, we have developed a clinically relevant ovine model of non-transmural infarcts induced by multiple suture ligations. Intramyocardial injections of the degradable ELRs-hydrogel led to complete functional recovery of ejection fraction 21 days after the intervention. We observed less fibrosis and more angiogenesis in the ELRs-hydrogel-treated ischemic core region compared to the untreated animals, as validated by the expression, proteomic, glycomic, and histological analyses. These findings were accompanied by enhanced preservation of GATA4+ cardiomyocytes in the border zone of the infarct. We propose that our customized ECM favors cardiomyocyte preservation in the border zone by modulating the ischemic core and a marked functional recovery. The functional benefits obtained by the timely injection of the ELRs-hydrogel in a clinically relevant MI model support the potential utility of this treatment for further clinical translation.

International audience

A multistage model instructed by a large dataset (knowledge bank [KB] algorithm) has recently been developed to improve outcome predictions and tailor therapeutic decisions, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We assessed the performance of the KB in guiding HSCT decisions in first complete remission (CR1) in 656 AML patients younger than 60 years from the ALFA-0702 trial (NCT00932412). KB predictions of overall survival (OS) were superior to those of European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 risk stratification (C-index, 68.9 vs 63.0). Among patients reaching CR1, HSCT in CR1, as a time-dependent covariate, was detrimental in those with favorable ELN 2017 risk and those with negative NPM1 minimal residual disease (MRD; interaction tests, P = .01 and P = .02, respectively). Using KB simulations of survival at 5 years in a scenario without HSCT in CR1 (KB score), we identified, in a similar time-dependent analysis, a significant interaction between KB score and HSCT, with HSCT in CR1 being detrimental only in patients with a good prognosis based on KB simulations (KB score ≥40; interaction test, P = .01). We could finally integrate ELN 2017, NPM1 MRD, and KB scores to sort 545 CR1 patients into 278 (51.0%) HSCT candidates and 267 (49.0%) chemotherapy-only candidates. In both time-dependent and 6-month landmark analyses, HSCT significantly improved OS in HSCT candidates, whereas it significantly shortened OS in chemotherapy-only candidates. Integrating KB predictions with ELN 2017 and MRD may thus represent a promising approach to optimize HSCT timing in younger AML patients.

International audience; In patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated by intensive chemotherapy (IC), prognostic significance of co-occurring genetic alterations and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are of particular interest with the advent of IDH1/2 mutant inhibitors. We retrospectively analyzed 319 patients with newly diagnosed AML (127 with IDH1, 135 with IDH2R140, and 57 with IDH2R172 mutations) treated with IC in 3 Acute Leukemia French Association prospective trials. In each IDH subgroup, we analyzed the prognostic impact of clinical and genetic covariates, and the role of HSCT. In patients with IDH1 mutations, the presence of NPM1 mutations was the only variable predicting improved overall survival (OS) in multivariate analysis (P< .0001). In IDH2R140-mutated AML, normal karyotype (P = .008) and NPM1 mutations (P = .01) predicted better OS. NPM1 mutations were associated with better disease-free survival (DFS; P = .0009), whereas the presence of DNMT3A mutations was associated with shorter DFS (P = .0006). In IDH2R172-mutated AML, platelet count was the only variable retained in the multivariate model for OS (P = .002). Among nonfavorable European LeukemiaNet 2010-eligible patients, 71 (36%) underwent HSCT in first complete remission (CR1) and had longer OS (P = .03) and DFS (P = .02) than nontransplanted patients. Future clinical trials testing frontline IDH inhibitors combined with IC may consider stratification on NPM1 mutational status, the primary prognostic factor in IDH1- or IDH2R140-mutated AML. HSCT improve OS of nonfavorable IDH1/2-mutated AML and should be fully integrated into the treatment strategy.

The phase 3 ALFA-0701 trial demonstrated improved outcomes with fractionated-dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) combined with standard chemotherapy vs. standard chemotherapy alone in adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We examined post-transplant outcomes and occurrence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) in patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as follow-up therapy in ALFA-0701. Patients aged 50–70 years were randomized to standard chemotherapy with or without GO (3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, and 7 of induction and day 1 on each of two consolidation courses). Allogeneic HSCT was recommended for patients in first complete remission with matched (related or unrelated) donor, except those with core-binding factor AML or normal karyotype and either NPM1+/FLT3-ITDwt or CEBPA+ AML. Eighty-five patients (GO: n = 32; control: n = 53) received HSCT in first complete remission or after relapse/primary induction failure. Three patients (GO: n = 2; control: n = 1 [received GO as follow-up therapy]) developed VOD/SOS after HSCT or conditioning. Post-transplant survival, non-relapse mortality, and relapse were not different between arms. Results indicate fractionated-dose GO as part of induction and consolidation chemotherapy for AML does not induce excess post-transplant VOD/SOS or mortality and thus does not preclude the use of HSCT as consolidation treatment.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only potentially curative therapy for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia. In the absence of an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor (MRD or MUD), the best alternative donor source remains controversial. Umbilical cord blood and haploidentical donors offer a time advantage when considering the duration from treatment indication to transplantation. This retrospective multicenter study of a French registry compares overall survival for alternative donor transplants in the 18 months following decision to transplant in the absence of a MRD between four groups of transplanted patients: MUD (control); HLA-mismatched MUD (mMUD); umbilical cord blood (UCB); and haploidentical (haplo). Between March 2012 and July 2016, 1302 patients were transplanted with MUD (n=803), mMUD (n=219), UCB (n=153) and haplo (n=127) donors. Multivariate analyses were conducted for overall survival 18 months after registration, overall survival after transplant, and transplant-related mortality, with adjustment for the several variables. After adjustment, the type of donor did not influence any of the three endpoints. Our results confirmed the significant negative impact of a longer time interval between registration and transplant: HR=1.04 [1.02–1.06] (p

International audience; The prognostic value of IL7-receptor pathway (IL7Rp) mutations in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) remains unclear. We performed a comprehensive study of 200 adult patients with TALL included in the GRAALL2003/2005 protocols to address the clinical significance of IL7Rp mutations. Next-generation sequencing of the IL7Rp (IL7R/JAK1/ JAK3/STAT5B) revealed that IL7Rp mutations were frequent in adult TALL (28%) particularly in immature/early T-cell progenitor (ETP)-ALL. They were associated with mutations of NOTCH-pathway, PHF6, and PRC2 components but not with K/NRAS. IL7Rp mutated (IL7Rp mut) TALL were slow-responders, with a high rate of M2/M3 day-8 marrow compared with IL7Rp non-mutated (IL7Rp WT) TALL (p = 0.002) and minimal residual disease positivity at 6-weeks (MRD1) (p = 0.008) but no difference in MRD2 positivity at 12-weeks. Despite this, no adverse prognosis was evidenced when censored for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In time-dependent analysis, HSCT did not benefit IL7Rp mut patients whereas it was of marked benefit to IL7Rp WT cases. IL7Rp-mutations identify a subgroup of slow-responder T-ALLs which benefit from post-induction chemotherapy regimens but not from HSCT. Our data suggest that prior knowledge of the mutation status of IL7Rp may influence HSCT decision and help to guide therapy reduction.

The combination of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) as conditioning regimen prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who are eligible for transplantation. The replacement of carmustine with bendamustine (BeEAM) was described as a promising alternative in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the BeEAM with the BEAM regimen in MCL patients in the frontline setting. Sixty and 108 patients were included in the BeEAM and the BEAM groups, respectively. At 3 years, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in the BeEAM than in the BEAM group (84% [73-96] vs. 63% [51-79], p = 0.03). The overall survival was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.2). In multivariable analysis, BeEAM regimen remained associated with higher PFS (HR = 0.377, 95% CI, 0.146-0.970; p = 0.043). Subgroup analyses in patients treated with prior rituximab-aracytine induction alone showed that BeEAM improved the PFS compared with BEAM regimen (p = 0.04). Despite the high rate of acute renal failure KDIGO III (32%), treatment-related mortality was not increased with the BeEAM regimen. A prospective randomized trial will be necessary to confirm the beneficial effect of the BeEAM regimen in MCL patients undergoing ASCT.

International audience; Patients undergoing treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at risk for thrombosis, in part due to the use of L-asparaginase (L-ASP). Antithrombin (AT) replacement has been suggested to prevent VTE and thus might increase exposure to ASP. We report herein the results of the prophylactic replacement strategy in the pediatric-inspired prospective GRAALL-2005 study. Between 2006 and 2014, 784 adult patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative ALL were included. The incidence rate of VTE was 16% with 69% of them occurring during induction therapy. Most patients received AT supplementation (87%). After excluding patients who did not receive L-ASP or developed thrombosis before L-ASP, AT supplementation did not have a significant impact on VTE (8% versus 14%, OR: 0.6, p=0.1). Fibrinogen concentrates administration was associated with an increased risk of VTE (17% versus 9%, OR 2.2, p=0.02) whereas transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma had no effect. Heparin prophylaxis was associated with an increased risk of VTE (13% versus 7%, OR 1.9, p=0.04). Prophylactic measures were not associated with an increased risk of grade 3-4 bleeding complications. The rate of VTE recurrence after L-ASP reintroduction was 3% (1/34). In ALL patients receiving L-ASP therapy, the use of fibrinogen concentrates may increase the risk of thrombosis and should be restricted to rare patients with hypofibrinogenemia-induced hemorrhage. Patients developed VTE despite extensive AT supplementation which advocates for additional prophylactic measures. While this large descriptive study was not powered to demonstrate the efficacy of these prophylactic measures, it provides important insight to guide future trial design. NCT00327678.

In this study, we aimed to refine prognostication of older with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after intensive chemotherapy. Five hundred and nine patients aged 60 years or older (median age, 68 years) were prospectively enrolled in the intensive Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA)-1200 trial between 2012 and 2016, and 471 patient samples were submitted to multigene analysis. Mutations in any of 8 genes frequently altered in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), including ASXL1, SRSF2, STAG2, BCOR, U2AF1, EZH2, SF3B1, and ZRSR2, defined a secondary AML (sAML)-like disease, as reported. Of the samples analyzed, 48% included sAML-like gene mutations. These mutations were associated with a shorter event-free survival, both overall (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.79; P < .001) and within the European LeukemiaNet (ELN)-2017 intermediate-risk subgroup (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.28; P = .044), which excludes ASXL1-mutated cases by definition. We therefore included patients with intermediate-risk AML carrying sAML-like mutations in a single high-risk patients group together with adverse-risk patients with AML, whereas other intermediate-risk patients were included in a standard-risk group together with favorable-risk patients (high-risk/standard-risk patient ratio, 1.00). Using this 2-class risk assessment, we observed that transplantation prolonged overall survival from remission in patients with high-risk AML only, not in patients with standard-risk AML. Routine analysis of sAML-like gene mutations may thus improve the definition of high-risk older patients with AML, and better identify the half of older patients who clearly derive survival benefit from allogeneic transplantation in first remission. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01966497.

CERVOXY/LDM-TEP COLL; International audience; This was the first-in-humans clinical study of 18F-fludarabine, which is a radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging in lymphoma, for which many issues remain controversial with the standard radiotracer 18F-FDG. Methods: 18F-fludarabine PET or PET/CT was performed on 10 patients: 5 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 5 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The tumor uptake, biodistribution, and radiation dosimetry of 18F-fludarabine were evaluated. Six successive partial-body PET scans were acquired for 250 min after an intravenous 4 MBq/kg bolus of 18F-fludarabine. SUVs were recorded for each involved lymph node territory and for several extranodal sites, with particular reference to the liver. To assess the time-related uptake profile of 18F-fludarabine, PET images were analyzed by delineating volumes of interest over the uptake sites on the optimal scan for visual observation and were projected onto all coregistered scans of the same subject. Physical examination, laboratory studies, and contrast-enhanced CT were performed on all patients. For the DLBCL group, 18F-FDG PET was also considered. Results: In DLBCL patients, increased 18F-fludarabine uptake was observed in sites considered abnormal by CT or 18F-FDG, with SUVs significantly higher in involved lesions than in physiologic nontarget sites. Nonetheless, the comparison of 18F-fludarabine and 18F-FDG PET showed discrepancies in 2 patients. In chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients, the uptake of 18F-fludarabine coincided with sites expected to be involved (including splenic invasion) according to conventional clinical and CT staging and was significant in hematopoietic bone marrow. No uptake was observed, whatever the disease group, in cardiac muscle or brain. The mean effective dose from a mean injected 18F-fludarabine activity of 305 ± 76 MBq was 3.07 ± 0.81 mSv. Conclusion: 18F-fludarabine PET might well be a promising tool for lymphoproliferative diseases. The radiation dose of this radiopharmaceutical is below that of 18F-FDG. The specificity of this PET probe for lymphoid cells, its absence of accumulation in reactive tissues, and its feasibility for detection of bone marrow infiltration might play an innovative role in lymphoma imaging.

Despite great improvements in the outcome of patients with lymphoma, some may still relapse or present with primary refractory disease. In these situations, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a potentially curative option, this is true particularly in the case of after autologous stem cell transplantation if remission can be achieved. Recently, novel agents such as anti-PD1 and BTK inhibitors have started to challenge the use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory lymphoma. During the 2016 annual workshop of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC), we performed a comprehensive review of the literature published in the last 10 years and established guidelines to clarify the indications and transplant modalities in this setting. This section specifically reports on our conclusions regarding diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Despite great improvements in the outcome of patients with lymphoma, some may still relapse or present with primary refractory disease. In these situations, allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative option, in particular in the case of relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation. Recently, novel agents such as anti-PD1 and BTK inhibitors have started to challenge the use of allo-HCT for relapsed or refractory lymphoma. During the 2016 annual workshop of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC), we performed a comprehensive review of the literature published in the last 10 years and established guidelines to clarify the indications and transplant modalities in this setting. This manuscript reports on general considerations regarding allo-HCT for lymphoma and elaborates on the use of alternative donors in this setting.

Despite great improvements in the outcome of patients with lymphoma, some may still relapse or present with primary refractory disease. In these situations, allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation is a potentially curative option, in particular in the case of relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation. Recently, novel agents such as anti-PD1 and BTK inhibitors have started to challenge the use of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory lymphoma. During the 2016 annual workshop of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC), we performed a comprehensive review of the literature published in the last 10 years and established guidelines to clarify the indications and transplant modalities in this setting. This manuscript specifically reports on our conclusions regarding Hodgkin's lymphoma as well as rarer entities, such as T cell lymphomas.

Despite great improvements in the outcome of patients with lymphoma, some may still relapse or present with primary refractory disease. In these situations, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a potentially curative option, this is true particularly the case of relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation. Recently, novel agents such as anti-PD1 and BTK inhibitors have started to challenge the use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory lymphoma. During the 2016 annual workshop of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC), we performed a comprehensive review of the literature published in the last 10 years and established guidelines to clarify the indications and transplant modalities in this setting. This paper specifically reports on our conclusions regarding indolent lymphomas, mainly follicular lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

This paper explores the purchasing practices adopted by restaurants and cafés operating in France to observe how the owner/operator(s) attitudes towards sustainable business practice impact on the choice of fresh food suppliers. A two-stage cluster analysis revealed the presence of two clusters: conventional buyers and green buyers that showed significant differences in the adoption of sustainable purchasing practices, the perceived benefits derived from the adoption of sustainable business practices, and barriers to the adoption of green purchasing. In making the decision to operate as a green restaurant, the personal beliefs of the owner/operator(s) were paramount, guided in part by the belief that in order to prepare and present the best-tasting food to patrons, executive chefs needed to procure the very best ingredients. In procuring the best quality fresh food ingredients, executive chefs preferred to deal with many small suppliers with whom they had developed a long-term relationship based on their reputation for delivering premium quality products in season.

Introduction Anemia is a common complication of hematological chemotherapy for acute leukemia and following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Exposure to allogeneic blood transfusions has been associated with unfavorable outcome in several studies in a non-surgical settings. Retrospective studies in hematological intensive unit have suggested that single red blood cell (RBC) unit transfusion policy may reduce the number of RBC used in comparison with a classical double RBC unit transfusion policy, without clinical impact. The aim of the study was to demonstrate that single RBC transfusion was non inferior to the standard double RBC transfusion arm in terms of severe complication or mortality for inpatient with hematological malignancies. Key secondary endpoint, was the comparison of the numbers of RBC units transfused in each arm. Method In a phase 3 multicenter randomized trial, 245 adults' patients with acute leukemia requiring intensive chemotherapy or patients receiving autologous or allogeneic HSCT were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either single RBC unit (1 RBC arm, n=125) per transfusion or double RBC (2 RBC arm, n=120) per transfusion when hemoglobin level was below 8g/dL. The primary composite endpoint was the percentage of patients who developed a grade ≥3 complications defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, elevated troponin level, intensive care unit transfer, death, new pulmonary infiltrates, and/or transfusion-related infections during hospital stays. The secondary endpoint was the number of red cell units transfused per patient per hospital stay. The primary endpoint was compared between groups by non-inferiority analysis for the proportion risk difference using Farrington-Manning method with a non-inferiority margin of 0.1, in ITT dataset. Results Hematological disease were as followed: AML (59%), ALL (13.1%), Lymphoma (16.4%), others (11.5%). The median age was 55 years. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms (Figure 1A). A total of 981 and 592 transfusions have been necessary in the 1 RBC arm and 2 RBC arm, respectively. The median of RBC unit per transfusion was 1(1-1) and 2(2-2) in the 1 RBC and 2 RBC arm, respectively. The mean pre transfusion hemoglobin level was 7.49 +/- 0.83 g/dL in the 1 RBC arm and 7.46 +/- 0.67 g/dL in the 2 RBC arm (p=0.275). Hemoglobin level at discharge was 9.35 +/-1.14 g/dL in the 1 RBC arm and 9.58 +/-1.13 g/dL in the 2 RBC arm (p=0.118). The median (IQR) of red-cell units transfused per patient was 7 (4-12) in the single arm and 8 (4-12) in the double arm (p=0.65). The median number of platelet transfusion event was 7 (3.5-11.5) in the 1 RBC arm and 7 (3-13) in the 2 RBC arm (p=0.69). The median (IQR) number of red cell unit transfused per cycle and per day was 7 (3-9) and 0.28 (0.17-0.37) in the 1RBC arm and 6 (4-10) and 0.27 (0.20-0.38) in the 2 RBC arm (p=0.61 and p=0.47). The predefined non-inferiority criteria was achieved with 28 patients developing a serious complication in the 1 CGR arm (22.4%) and 28 patients in the 2 RBC arm (23.3%) (Risk difference 0.009; 95% Confidence interval [-0.0791- 0.0978] (Figure 1B). Conclusion: Single RBC transfusion policy is non inferior to double RBC transfusion policy in hematological intensive care unit for patient receiving a bone marrow transplant or intensive chemotherapy. Single RBC unit transfusion can be used safely in daily clinical practice. The single RBC transfusion policy does not reduce the number of RBC transfusion. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jardin: Genexpath: Patents & Royalties: The author is a potential inventor on a patent application for the LymphoSign, which has been licensed for by Genexpath Patents & Royalties. .

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative therapy in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib, a JAK-inhibitor, has been approved in myelofibrosis patients and is effective to alleviate symptoms of the disease in a substantial proportion of patients. In a French phase 2 study, the use of ruxolitinib as a bridge to HSCT was followed by a high transplantation rate, with one third of patients presenting clinical improvement before HSCT (partial response or spleen size reduction) (BMT 2021, Robin et al). The aim of the current study is to compare post-transplantation outcomes between patients who received ruxolitinib before HSCT and those who did not. Methods: This retrospective study includes patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis registered in the SFGM-TC registry including patients from France, Belgium and Switzerland. Patients who received HSCT between July 2010 and December 2019 with available information regarding ruxolitinib treatment were included. The impact of ruxolitinib was analyzed by multivariable Cox regression and a propensity score. Results: 305 patients could be included, of whom 143 received ruxolitinib prior to HSCT (RuxoG). All patient characteristics are given in RuxoG followed by no ruxolitinib group (noRuxo). The diagnosis before HSCT was primary myelofibrosis (83% vs 75%), secondary myelofibrosis (13% vs 19%) or transformed into AML (4% vs 6%). Karnofsky score at transplant was < 70% in 9% and 11%. In RuxoG. median age was older (60.29 vs. 58.75, p=0.069) and delay from diagnosis longer (20.42 vs 13.26 months, p=0.040). RuxoG patients had less frequently anemia < 10 g/dl (84% vs 98%, p=0.027) or thrombocytopenia < 50 G/L (22% vs 32%, p=0.066) and presented more frequently splenomegaly or pre-graft splenectomy (83% vs 63%, p=0.0007). DIPSS score was well balanced in both groups, being high or intermediate-2 in 100 patients (79% vs 86%, p=0.23), from the 235 patients with available data. Myeloablative conditioning regimen was used in 16% vs 26% (p=0.049), and conditioning regimen consisted of on fludarabine-busulfan in 33% vs 61%, fludarabine-melphalan in 47% vs 22% or other in 20% vs 16% (p Conclusion: Patients who received ruxolitinib before HSCT were at higher risk of acute GVHD and post-transplant mortality, but this was not observed in patients responding to ruxolitinib and it does not translate into higher risk of chronic GVHD. Main hypotheses to explain these finding could be: 1) specific disease, patient or transplant characteristics in RuxoG; 2) the longer delay to transplantation or 3) a specific effect of ruxolitinib. This study suggests that myelofibrosis patients responding to ruxolitinib should have the transplant without waiting disease progression. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Forcade: Novartis: Other: travel grant. Loschi: AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; CELGENE/BMS: Honoraria; Gilead: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Novartis: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Servier: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Duléry: Takeda Gilead Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Robin: NEOVII MEDAC NOVARTIS: Research Funding.

Introduction Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (allo-HCT) has proved its efficiency in reducing Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) recurrence, although it was associated with high rates of complications especially in older patients. The worldwide number of allo-HCT has increased within 35 years, from 10.000 transplantations before 1985 to over a million in 2012. The decision to perform transplantation depends on the estimated risk-benefit ratio. High-risk prognostic factors include cytogenetics, age at diagnosis, presence of comorbidities and the response to treatment. By using combination of risk factors, international recommendations have been published to harmonize AML care and maximize the benefit of using allo-HCT. The principal aim of this study is to describe real life AML care management in all consecutive patients diagnosed and registered on 3 regional cancer registries in France, to analyze their outcome after different therapeutic strategies, following or not the international recommendations. Method This retrospective study included all AML patients diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2016 reported to the French population data-based of regional cancer registries specialized in hematological malignancies. Allo-HCT data were extracted from the Société Française de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC) registry. Two groups of patients were defined according to the treatment received: i) group 1, patients who have received the best recommended care including allo-HCT considering HLA compatibility and best donor choice or best conventional treatment according to therapeutic guidelines based on individuals and clinical characteristics from The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation guidance; ii) group 2, patients who received a treatment outside the recommendations. To study the impact of therapeutic decision on overall survival, a case-control study was performed using a one for one matching between group 1 and group 2. An exact matching on individual and disease characteristics (cytogenetic risk, Charlson score class, age group at diagnosis, subtype AML and response to treatment) allowed to pair-match patients following or not the international recommendations for therapeutic strategy. Net survival was estimated until five-year using non-parametric Pohar-Perme estimator (survival distribution compared using Grafféo test). Results A total of 1039 AML patients diagnosed from 2012 to 2016 were identified, 449 (43 %) received a curative treatment and 540 patients a non-curative treatment (hypomethylating agents, low dose of cytarabine or other palliative treatment, best supportive care combined to no effective treatment). Based on available clinical data, 430 patients were included in the study. Group 1 included 296 patients (68%), 167 males and 129 females with 54 receiving allo-HCT (32 geno-identical and 22 unrelated). Group 2 included 134 patients (31%), 72 males and 62 females with 94 receiving allo-HCT (14 geno-identical, 50 unrelated and 30 mismatched). In patients for whom allo-HCT represented the best option according to the recommendations (Figure B, n = 44), a very significant lower survival was observed in patients who did not receive allo-HCT when they were compared to patients who received allo-HCT, with a 5 year-overall survival probability of 7 % and 50 % respectively (p= 0.019). In patients for whom allo-HCT was not recommended (Figure A, n = 42), we did not observe any significant difference of survival between patients transplanted or not. Conclusion This analysis shows the importance of allo-HCT decision in AML patients, especially when following international guidelines. Although individual risks factors have been previously studied, our analysis sums up theses factors and allow to understand the importance of integrating allo-HCT in the therapeutic strategy of AML and to re-evaluate current practices and its impact on patient outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pigneux: Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Forcade: Novartis: Other: travel grant. Mohty: Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria. Dulery: Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; Gilead: Other: Travel support and registration fees for scientific meetings .

INTRODUCTION Immunocompromised patients have been excluded from initial trials evaluating SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines and there is a critical need to warrant vaccine efficacy in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. In this study, we evaluated antibody responses to 2 doses mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in allogeneic HSCT recipients. METHODS We retrospectively enrolled successive hematopoietic cell transplant recipients across France who completed the 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) between January 1 st and July 15 th 2021. All included patients had an available semi-quantitative antispike serologic testing after the second dose (from Roche, DiaSorin, Abbott or Siemens). We excluded patients with a prior COVID-19 confirmed by serology or PCR. For detectable antibody, we calculated the binding antibody units per milliliter (BAU/mL) according to the WHO International Standard by applying conversion factors given by the manufacturers (Kristiansen et al. , The Lancet 2021). Antibody response was categorized as "weak" or "good" with a threshold of 264 BAU/mL which has been associated to an estimate of 80% of mRNA vaccine-induced protection against symptomatic COVID-19 in immunocompetent patients (Feng S. et al., medRxiv 2021). We built a multivariate logistic regression model to assess factors independently associated with the absence of antibody response after the second dose of mRNA vaccination. RESULTS Overall, 620 allogeneic HSCT recipients from 12 hospitals across France were included in the analysis (60% male with a median age of 59 years old [IQR 47-66]), most with a myeloid (69%) or lymphoid (26%) malignancies. Donors were matched unrelated for 51%, HLA-identical sibling for 31% and haplo-identical for 18%. Thirty-one percent of HSCT recipients underwent a myeloablative conditioning, while 69% received a reduced intensity conditioning. The two doses of vaccines were given one month apart and the median time between transplantation and the initiation of vaccination was 29 months [IQR 14-58]. At a median of 33 [IQR 27-50] days after dose 2, an antibody response was detectable in 496 patients (80% [95CI: 77 to 83%]). Median [IQR] antibody levels was 243 BAU/mL [29.4-1391]. We classified detectable antibody responses as "weak" in 189 patients (30% [95CI 27 to 34%]) and as "good" in 306 (49% [95CI: 45 to 53%]). In the multivariate analysis including 533 patients (420 with detectable antibodies), factors associated with the absence of humoral responses were a time-interval from HSCT < 12 months (ajusted Odds-Ratio (aOR) 2.8 [95CI 1.6 to 4.8]), absolute lymphocyte count CONCLUSION After 2 dose mRNA vaccination, the majority of allogeneic HSCT recipients developed an antibody response although a significant proportion of these responses may be insufficient. Studies are still needed to investigate the effect of a third vaccine dose in patients with a null or weak humoral response. Disclosures Loschi: Servier: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Novartis: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Gilead: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; CELGENE/BMS: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria.

On behalf of the GRAALL group. Introduction. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved the outcome of patients diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In a previous randomized trial (GRAAPH-2005; Chalandon Y., Blood 2015), our group demonstrated that anthracycline and cyclophosphamide could be safely omitted during the first Hyper-CVAD chemotherapy cycle when combined to imatinib. In the present GRAAPH-2014 trial, we investigated whether the use of nilotinib, a 2 nd generation TKI, would allow further decreasing chemotherapy intensity through the omission of high-dose cytarabine (HD-AraC) during consolidation cycles 2 and 4. Methods. From March 2016, patients aged 18-60 years old were randomized frontline to receive 4 cycles (1=3, 2=4) of chemotherapy combined with continuous nilotinib 400 mg bid. Cycle 1 and 3 were similar in both arms, identical to the less-intensive first cycle of the previous GRAAPH-2005 trial with weekly vincristine and dexamethasone and nilotinib instead of imatinib. Cycle 2 and 4 differed between control arm A (MTX 1 g/sqm over 24h, HD-AraC 3 g/sqm/12h for 2 days) and experimental arm B (MTX 1 g/sqm over 24h only). Marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by both BCR-ABL1 and IG-TCR qPCR after each cycle (MRD1-4). Patients in complete remission (CR) after cycle 4 were eligible to receive allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Non allografted patients had the option to receive autologous SCT (autoSCT) if a major molecular response (MMolR) (MRD4 BCR-ABL1 40y) and BCR-ABL1 breakpoint region (M/m-bcr). MMolR rate at MRD4 was the primary endpoint of this non-inferiority study, with a margin set at 0.15. In February 2019, the study DSMB decided to stop the randomizations after an unplanned analysis demonstrating a significant excess of relapse in arm B (without HD-AraC). An intention-to-treat analysis is provided. All patients gave informed consent. The study is registered at EudraCT under the number: 2014-002146-44. Results. A total of 156 patients were randomized (77 in arm A, and 79 in arm B). Median age was 47.1 years old (range 18.1-59.9). One-hundred and ten patients had the m-bcr (70.5%) and 46 (29.5%) the M-bcr. An IKZF1 intragenic deletion was found in 87/153 (56.9%). Median follow-up was 2.8 years (95%CI 2.6-3.1). All evaluable patients reached CR after a maximum of two cycles. Three patients died during cycle 1 (2 in arm A, 1 in arm B), and 2 during cycle 2 (1 per arm). Most patients received the 4 scheduled cycles (n=143, 91,7%). AlloSCT was performed in 91 patients (58.3%), whereas 41 patients received an autoSCT (26.3%) with no difference in allo/autoSCT rates between arms. A non-inferiority in late MRD response (MRD4) between the two arms was observed (primary endpoint). MMolR was reached in 55/75 (73.3%) and 61/78 (78.2%) of CR patients in arm A and B, respectively, with an estimated 95% CI of difference of -11% to +16% (-9.2% to +20.8% in the ITT analysis treating missing data as failures). At 3 years, overall survival (OS) was 86.0% in arm A versus 74.2% in arm B (p=.08, Figure A). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 79.6% in arm A versus 57.2% in arm B (p=.008, Figure B). Thirty-one patients experienced hematological relapse (8 in arm A and 23 in arm B). Twenty-height out of 31 relapsed patients were tested for the acquisition of BCR-ABL1 mutations, 20/28 (71%) had at least one mutation and 10/28 (36%) had a T315I mutation. At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 21.3%, significantly higher in arm B than in arm A (30.8% vs 10.6%, p=.007). When analyzing the CIR considering alloSCT as a competing event for relapse, a significant higher CIR was still observed in arm B as compared to arm A (Figure C). Conclusion. Four cycles of the combined administration of nilotinib and chemotherapy is very efficient for bridging younger adults with Ph-positive ALL to SCT. However, omitting HD-AraC is associated with a higher relapse incidence despite non-inferior levels of BCR-ABL1 MRD4. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chalandon: Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Amgen, Jazz, Astra Zenec: Other: Travel EXpenses, Accomodation; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen: Other: Advisory Board. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor; Celgene: Other: Advisor; BMS: Other: Advisor; Amgen: Other: Advisor; Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Vincent: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vey: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; BIOKINESIS: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Consultancy; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Raffoux: PFIZER: Consultancy; CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy; ASTELLAS: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy. Boissel: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; SANOFI: Honoraria; PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria; JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Dombret: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Nilotinib as a therapy for PH-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Background IG/TR-based minimal residual disease (MRD) is a faithful marker of response to therapy and the strongest predictor of relapse in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL, MRD is commonly monitored by BCR-ABL1 transcript quantification, although its prognostic significance has not been compared to IG/TR MRD to date. Recently, it has been shown that BCR-ABL1 rearrangement may be found and persist in non-lymphoblastic cells in some patients. In the prospective GRAAPH-2014 trial, using a dual IG/TR and BCR-ABL1 MRD monitoring, we aimed to study the biological and clinical significance of persistent BCR-ABL1 clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in adults with de novo Ph+ ALL. Patients and Methods The study comprised 156 adults with de novo Ph+ ALL randomized in the GRAAPH-2014 trial. Bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) follow-up (FU) samples were collected after each treatment cycle and before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). MRD monitoring was performed by quantification of both BCR-ABL1 transcripts and IG/TCR clonal rearrangements on all available samples and MRD quantification of genomic BCR-ABL1 breakpoint fusion was also performed for 37 patients. MRD results were considered discordant if more than one log10 difference or positivity/negativity discordance on the same FU sample was evidenced. Cell fractions from 14 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) samples (T-cells, B-cells and monocytes) were FACS-sorted and evaluated for BCR-ABL1 expression. Achievement of major molecular response (MMR) defined as Results Quantification of BCR-ABL1 transcripts and IG/TR MRD levels on 876 samples from 156 patients (456 BM and 542 PB) identified 54 out of 142 (38%) evaluable patients with consistently discordant MRD results in at least 3 different timepoints, suggesting the persistence of non-lymphoblastic BCR-ABL1-positive cells in these patients and BCR-ABL1 CH. Possible bias related to variable BCR-ABL1 expression was ruled out by genomic BCR-ABL1 quantification on 263 FU samples (r s=0.89, p We then evaluated the clinical significance of BCR-ABL1 CH. Unexpectedly, CH+ patients had a significant lower cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (panel A, hazard ratio (HR) 0.37, 95% CI [0.15-0.90], p=0.03). However, this lower CIR did not translate into longer disease-free survival (DFS) (panel B, HR=0.85, 95% CI [0.44-1.63], p=0.63). Since an imbalance in alloSCT was observed between CH+ and CH- patients, we tested if the observed difference in CIR may be related to different alloSCT outcomes. When censoring patients at alloSCT, the difference in CIR was indeed no longer significant (subhazard ratio (SHR) 0.48, 95% CI [0.16-1.43], p=0.19). More interestingly, the benefit of alloSCT was restricted to CH- patients. Using alloSCT as a time-dependent variable, DFS was indeed improved by alloSCT in CH- (SHR 0.40, 95% CI [0.17-0.91], p=0.03, panel C) but not in CH+ patients (SHR 1.12, 95%CI [0.32-3.87], p=0.86, panel D) despite a non-significant interaction between CH status and alloSCT. Conclusion More than one third of adults with de novo Ph+ ALL displays persistent measurable BCR-ABL1 signal during therapy, likely related to BCR-ABL1 CH. Strikingly, this condition is not associated with a higher risk of relapse nor with poorer overall outcomes in the GRAAPH-2014 trial. Moreover, our results suggest that patients with BCR-ABL1 CH may not be good candidates for alloSCT. By contrast, IG/TR MRD may allow to identify patients with the higher risk of relapse. These results highlight the need for implementation of IG/TR MRD in adult Ph+ ALL to guide therapeutic decisions. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chalandon: Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Amgen, Jazz, Astra Zenec: Other: Travel EXpenses, Accomodation. Straetmans: Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor; Celgene: Other: Advisor; BMS: Other: Advisor; Amgen: Other: Advisor; Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Dombret: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. Boissel: SANOFI: Honoraria; CELGENE: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Introduction: In 2010 the French Health Agency opened a compassionate patient named program of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, Mylotarg®) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Of note, since 2012, it was recommended to use GO at the dose of 3 or 6 mg/m 2 in addition to chemotherapy. We conducted a retrospective trial (NCT03287128) to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of GO-based regimen in R/R adult AML patients. Patients and methods: We retrospectively collected data of patients older than 18 years treated with GO-based regimen for AML in first relapse or for refractory AML, defined by failure after a prior standard intensive chemotherapy, in 18 French centers between December 15, 2011 and November 10, 2016. The primary objective was to assess the response to GO-based regimen. Patients were considered in response if reaching complete remission (CR), CR without platelet recovery (CRp) or CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi). Secondary objectives were the cumulative incidence of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and the safety of the use of GO-based regimen. Results: Three hundred and thirty-five adult patients with R/R AML were included. Median age was 58 years (20 to 80 years). At diagnosis, cytogenetics was favorable in 50 (17%) patients, intermediate in 173 (59%) and adverse in 60 (20%). ELN distribution was favorable: 35%, intermediate: 42% and unfavorable: 23%. NPM1 mutation was present in 29% of patients and FLT3 mutation in 23%. Most patients had de novo AML (84%). Two hundred and thirty-eight patients (79%) were in first relapse and 65 (21%) had a refractory AML. The time between first diagnosis of AML and treatment with GO-based regimen was 4 to 16 months (median 9.4 months). Most patients (88%) received GO in combination with various intensive chemotherapy scheme including "7+3" with anthracycline/cytarabine (n=39 patients), intermediate and high-dose cytarabine (n=68), cytarabine in continuous intravenous infusion (n=78), mitoxantrone/cytarabine (n=49) and fludarabine/cytarabine and/or amsacrine and/or etoposide chemotherapy (n=35). Median follow-up time was 11 months. Among the 305 patients, 191 responded to GO-based regimen: 110 (36%) were in CR, 62 (20%) were in CRp and 19 (6%) in CRi for an overall response rate (CR+CRp+CRi, ORR) of 63%. In multivariate analysis, response was associated with age Regarding safety of GO-based regimen, early deaths occurred within Conclusion. Our study is the first to report efficacy data in the real-world setting of R/R AML adult patients treated with GO-based regimen. In our cohort of 305 patients, response rate was 63% and GO-based regimen appears as a valuable bridge-to-transplant option. Safety analysis showed toxicities consistent with the known safety profile of GO and chemotherapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lambert: ASTELLAS: Consultancy; CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy. Pautas: PFIZER: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy. Raffoux: ASTELLAS: Consultancy; PFIZER: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy. Legrand: Servier: Consultancy. Gastaud: PFIZER: Consultancy; CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy. Pigneux: Amgen: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mathilde: SERVIER: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy. Dombret: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Castaigne: PFIZER: Consultancy.

Introduction Failure to respond to steroid therapy for intestinal acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is associated with limited further therapeutic options. Fecal microbiotherapy is defined as the perfusion of treated stool from one or several healthy donors via the upper or lower gastrointestinal (GI) route aiming at improving microbial diversity and functionality. Here we report clinical outcomes from a 76-patient cohort with steroid refractory (SR) GI-aGvHD treated with the pooled allogenic fecal microbiotherapeutic MaaT013. Twenty-four patients were treated in the prospective, single-arm, phase IIa, HERACLES study (NCT03359980) while 52 patients were treated in an expanded access program (EAP). Patients and methods For HERACLES, 24 patients with grade III-IV SR-GI-aGvHD were treated with MaaT013 in 26 European sites, as a 2 nd line therapy after SR diagnosis and evaluable for treatment response. In EAP, 52 patients with steroid-dependent or SR-GI-aGvHD (classical n=41, late onset n=3, overlap syndrome n=8) were treated. These patients had previously received and failed 1 to 6 lines (median 3; 40/52 received ruxolitinib) of GvHD systemic treatments. GI-GvHD response was evaluated weekly and 28 days after day (D) 0 (inclusion for HERACLES or 1st dose for EAP). For all patients, GI-overall response rate (ORR) at D28 was defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR), compared to D0, without the use of additional systemic therapy. Other endpoints included the best overall response (BOR) achieved at any time, and overall survival (OS). Prepared under GMP, MaaT013 is characterized by a highly consistent richness of 455 ±3% OTUs and an Inverse Simpson index > 20. Treatment comprised 3 MaaT013 doses, each composed of 30 g of feces in 150 mL volume of inoculum (total 90 g of feces from 4 to 8 healthy donors) administered by enema (except for 2 EAP patients by nasogastric tube). All patients received at least 1 MaaT013 dose, 92% (HERACLES) and 87% (EAP) at least 2 doses, and 50% (HERACLES) and 71% (EAP) the full treatment course. In HERACLES, the reasons for not applying the 3 rd dose were death (n=5), physician decision to introduce salvage therapy (n=5), and ICU hospitalization (n=2)). Results In HERACLES, the GI-ORR was 38% including 5 CR, 2 VGPR and 2 PR. In EAP, positive GI-response was achieved in 31/52 patients (60% with 16 CR, 11 VGPR and 4 PR). Considering the GI-BOR, 13/24 (54%) and 35/52 (67%) achieved at least a PR in HERACLES and EAP respectively. In HERACLES, OS was 29% at month (M) 6 and 25% at M12. OS was significantly higher in responding (R) patients (achieving at least PR at D28) compared to non-responding (NR) (44% vs 20% at M6 and 44% vs 13% at M12, logrank p=0.047). In EAP, OS was 48% at M6 and 37% at M12, and significantly higher in R patients compared to NR (71% vs 17% at M6 and 62% vs 6% at M12, logrank p In HERACLES, treatment with MaaT013 was characterized by excellent tolerance: 252 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) were reported for the 24 patients, the majority being infections (79%) and GI disorders (62%), as expected in GvHD patients. Of these 252 TEAE, only 2% (5 serious events in 2 patients) could not reasonably be excluded from being related to MaaT013 by the investigators. Shotgun sequencing in these 5 TEAE revealed that the causative infectious agents could not be detected in the administered MaaT013. In EAP, the safety profile of MaaT013 was considered satisfactory for all patients. 16S microbiome analyses were performed in the HERACLES population and showed that MaaT013 produced an early increase in α-diversity at genus level with a significant increase in Richness index at all evaluated timepoints (p Conclusion We herein report the treatment of 76 SR-GI-aGvHD patients using a full ecosystem, pooled-donor, high-richness biotherapeutic. The D28 GI-ORR was 38% and 60% in HERACLES and EAP respectively and this clinical benefit positively and significantly impacted OS (44% and 62% M12 in HERACLES and EAP R patients respectively). MaaT013 was shown to be safe and effective in these heavily immunocompromised patients, warranting further exploration of this approach. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Malard: JAZZ pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Biocodex: Honoraria; Therakos/Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Loschi: CELGENE/BMS: Honoraria; AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Gilead: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Novartis: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Servier: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Cluzeau: Agios: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: travel, accommodations, expenses. Huynh: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Holler: MaaT Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vehreschild: SocraTec R&D GmbH: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Ferring: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Farmak International Holding GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bio-Mérieux: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Basilea: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Arderypharm: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Alb Fils Kliniken GmbH: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Seres Therapeutics: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Organobalance: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck/MSD: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MaaT Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immunic AG: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glycom: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Evonik: Research Funding; Da Volterra: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biontech: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; 3M: Research Funding. Gasc: MaaT Pharma: Current Employment. Plantamura: MaaT Pharma: Current Employment. Mohty: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria.

Introduction Based on the results of the ALFA-0701 trial (Castaigne et al. Lancet 2012), the addition of fractionated doses of the anti-CD33 antibody drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, Mylotarg®) to conventional chemotherapy has been approved in 2017 for frontline treatment of adults with CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Prolonged event-free survival (EFS) was observed in patients with AML of favorable or intermediate risk, while not in those with adverse cytogenetics. Nevertheless, more frequent added toxicities could make the addition of GO a questionable option in patients over 60-65 years of age. In this ALFA-1401/Mylofrance 4 trial (NCT02473146), we investigated if the replacement of the anthracycline by GO might also improve EFS in older patients. Methods Between January 2016 and March 2019, 225 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive an experimental GO-cytarabine combination (154 patients) or a standard anthracycline-cytarabine treatment (71 patients). Patients aged 65 to 80 years old (later extended to patients aged 60-64 years old), with previously untreated de novo AML of favorable or intermediate cytogenetics were eligible for the trial. Standard treatment arm consisted in a 7+3 using idarubicin at 12 mg/m 2/d on day 1 to 3 and cytarabine 200 mg/m 2/d on day 1 to 7. Experimental arm (GO arm) consisted of two doses of GO 3 mg/m 2/d on day 1 and 4 and cytarabine 200 mg/m 2/d on day 1 to 7. Post-remission therapy comprised two courses of intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC) at 1.5 g/m 2/12h on day 1, 3 and 5. In the GO arm, a third dose of 3mg/m 2/d GO was administered on day 1 of the first IDAC course. The first IDAC course could serve as second induction in patients not responding to the first one. The decision to perform allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in first remission was left to the discretion of the physician. The efficacy analysis was conducted in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population excluding patients who did not meet the cytogenetic eligibility criteria. The primary study endpoint was EFS. Secondary endpoints were response rate defined by complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete platelets recovery (CRp) and CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi), early mortality, relapse incidence, overall survival (OS) and safety. Results Among the 225 randomized patients, 214 (71 standard arm, 143 GO arm) were included in the mITT population. There were 126 men and 88 women. Median age was 70 years (61-80). Cytogenetics was of favorable and intermediate risk in 14 and 200 patients, respectively. One hundred and eighty-one patients reached CR/CRp/CRi, 64 (90%) in standard arm and 117 (82%) in GO arm (p=0.17). Median follow-up time was 38 months. At 2 years, estimated EFS was 38% [95% CI, 28-51] in the standard arm vs. 29% [22-37] in the GO arm (Hazard Ratio (HR), 1.37 [0.98-1.93]; p= 0.067) (Figure 1A). Overall, 118 patients relapsed, 36 (51%) in standard arm and 82 (57%) in GO arm. At 2 years, estimated cumulative incidence of relapse was 48% [36-61] in standard arm vs. 61% [52-70] in GO arm (csHR, 1.32 [0.90-1.93]; p= 0.078). Overall, 122 patients died, 38 (54%) in standard arm, 84 (59%) in GO arm. Sixty-day mortality was 4% in standard arm vs. 10% in GO arm (p=0.13). At 2 years, estimated OS was 65% [55-77] in standard arm vs. 52% [45-61] in GO arm (HR, 1.27 [0.86-1.87]; p= 0.23). In subgroup analysis for EFS (Figure 1B), we found a significant interaction with gender, GO having a detrimental effect in women which persisted after adjustment on known prognostic factors. A total of 33 patients received allo-HSCT in first remission, 19 (30%) in standard arm and 14 (12%) in GO arm (p=0.006). When censoring these patients at transplant time, HR of GO on EFS was 1.27 ([0.88-1.83]; p=0.19). Regarding safety, 76% and 80% of patients had at least one grade 3 to 5 adverse event (p=0.81), including infection in 30% vs. 21% and bleeding in 7% vs. 29% in standard arm and GO arm respectively. Serious adverse events were reported in 34% of patients in standard arm vs. 49% in GO arm (p=0.031). Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome occurred in 2 patients in the GO arm. Conclusion Frontline use of GO instead of idarubicin, when combined to cytarabine, does not benefit older patients with de novo standard-risk AML. At the reduced dose schedule used in this study, GO remains associated with significant toxicities while non-significant higher relapse incidence, shorter EFS and shorter OS were observed. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lambert: ASTELLAS: Consultancy; CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy. Pautas: ABBVIE: Consultancy; PFIZER: Consultancy. Gastaud: PFIZER: Consultancy; CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy. Barbieux: ASTRA-ZENECCA: Consultancy. Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Castaigne: PFIZER: Consultancy. Dombret: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria.

The following article seeks to establish a genealogy of a cultural public policy with regard to a new issue: the emergence of information technology in a historically constituted area of culture an...

Background Branch pulmonary artery (BPA) stenosis is frequently associated with congenital heart disease. Management of BPA stenosis is challenging for surgeons due to a high rate of recurrence. The purpose of this study was to assess the results of intraoperative pulmonary artery stenting associated with or without surgical angioplasty. Methods We included 33 children from our center between January 2008 and July 2014. Patients had pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect (13), tetralogy of Fallot (10), troncus arteriosus (4), double outlet right ventricle (2), and single left or right ventricle (4). A total of 44 balloon-expandable stents (mean diameter, 9.5 mm; range, 4 to 16 mm) were deployed in left or right PA under direct visualization, without the use of fluoroscopy, after branch angioplasty for 28 of them (64%). The mean age at surgery was 4.3 ± 4.3 years (range, 6 days to 15 years) and the mean weight was 14.3 ± 11.9 kg (range, 2.8 to 63 kg). Results Postoperative mortality was 9% (3 patients), but only 1 death was related to the stenting procedure. Twenty-five patients underwent angiographic control after a mean follow-up of 22 months after surgery. All stents were well positioned. The mean stented BPA Z-score increased from –2.6 ± 1.8 to –0.4 ± 1.6 ( p 0.0001). Eleven patients experienced intrastent proliferation (44%). Among them, 2 patients required a reoperation for severe intrastent stenosis, whereas the 9 others had mild intrastent neointimal proliferation, which was successfully managed by balloon expansion. Conclusions Intraoperative stenting of BPA is a safe and effective option to treat BPA stenosis and prevent recurrence.

Background: A European Marketing Authorization Application for ivosidenib (IVO) is currently under review for the indication of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) R132 relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adult patients (pts) who have received ≥ 2 prior regimens, including ≥ 1 standard intensive chemotherapy (IC) regimen, or are not candidates for IC and have received ≥ 1 prior non-intensive regimen. IVO is an oral, potent, targeted inhibitor of mIDH1 and was approved by the FDA for the treatment of mIDH1 R/R AML in 2018, and in newly diagnosed AML in adults ≥ 75 years of age or pts ineligible for IC in 2019, based on the results of the open-label AG120-C-001 (NCT02074839) study. Aims: To evaluate the comparative benefit of IVO within the proposed EU indication, matched pt analyses were conducted using data on mIDH1 R/R AML pts from the AML Study Group (AMLSG) registry (NCT01252485) and a real-world chart review study (RWD) from France, Germany, UK, and Spain. Methods: Individual pt data from Arm 1+ of the AG120-C-001 study (n = 159) was compared to a historical control (HC), combining individual pt data from the AMLSG registry (n = 127) and the RWD (n = 148). A medical review was conducted to identify Arm 1+ IVO pts in the AG120-C-001 study and HC pts who fell within the proposed EU indication. Treatment with IVO was compared with the most recent therapy received by HC pts. HC pts treated with IC as their most recent therapy were excluded, as IVO pts, based on the AG120-C-001 study's eligibility criteria, were not considered candidates for IC. Propensity score-based matching/weighting methods were used to adjust for imbalances in baseline prognostic factors between the 2 cohorts (optimal full matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting [IPTW]). A literature review and data availability led to the inclusion of 6 baseline prognostic factors for estimation of propensity scores (age, history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, number of prior regimens for AML, nature of AML, cytogenetic risk, and primary refractory status). Balance between populations was assessed pre- and post-match via comparison of (weighted) standardized differences (SDs) for each covariate. Time-to-event data were summarized via Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimators with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cox regression analysis, using the key prognostic factors as covariates, was applied to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of overall survival (OS), and the corresponding 95% CI was estimated using the sandwich estimator. Complete remission (CR) rates were also compared between IVO pts and RWD non-IC HC pts (AMLSG pts were excluded as the response data did not allow for identification of CRs distinct from other response types). Results: One hundred and nine IVO pts and 60 HC pts fell within the proposed EU indication. The IPTW-matched dataset was selected for analysis, as it more strongly minimized the absolute weighted SDs between cohorts as compared with optimal full matching, with all SDs < 0.05. Median OS was 8.1 months (mo) (95% CI: 5.7, 9.8) with IVO compared with 2.9 mo (95% CI: 1.9, 4.5) in the HC pts. The HR for OS was 0.396 (95% CI: 0.279, 0.562), strongly in favor of IVO (p < 0.0001). There was clear and early separation of the IVO and HC KM curves, reflecting the early and sustained benefit of IVO treatment in this setting (Fig). Six- and 12-mo survival rates in the IVO cohort were 57.7% (95% CI: 48.2, 67.2) and 35.0% (95% CI: 25.7, 44.3), respectively, representing improvements versus 6- and 12-mo survival rates in the HC cohort of 29.1% (95% CI: 17.4, 40.8) and 10.8% (95% CI: 2.7, 18.9), respectively. The IVO cohort also demonstrated higher rates of CR than the HC cohort, with an observed CR rate of 18.3% (95% CI: 11.6, 26.9), compared with 7.0% (95% CI: 1.5, 19.1). Conclusion: IVO monotherapy demonstrated prolonged OS and the potential to increase CR rates vs standard of care therapies in a HC population. Disclosures Paschka: Amgen: Other; AbbVie: Other: Travel, accommodation or expenses, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations or expenses; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Consultancy; Janssen Oncology: Other; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BerGenBio ASA: Research Funding. Dombret:Novartis: Consultancy; Cellectis: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Immunogen: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Menarini: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodation expenses; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodation expenses; Celyad: Consultancy. Montesinos Fernandez:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vyas:Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau. Kreuzer:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Hexal: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Heuser:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy; Astellas: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; BerGenBio ASA: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; PriME Oncology: Honoraria. Metzeler:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Otsuka Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Astellas: Honoraria. Quesnel:Abbvie: Other: travel expenses; Daichii Sankyo: Other: travel expenses, Research Funding. Mohty:Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. De Botton:Pierre Fabre: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Syros: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Döhner:Pfizer: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Arog: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. Milkovich:RJM Group LLC: Current Employment. Reitan:RJM Group LLC: Current Employment. MacDonald:IQVIA: Current Employment. Casso:IQVIA: Current Employment. Storm:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Liu:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Kapsalis:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Attar:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Winkler:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Döhner:Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Oxford Biomedicals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Helsinn: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Arog: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sunesis: Other, Research Funding.

In spite of CR rates of 75-80% currently achieved with anthracycline-cytarabine regimens in younger patients with favorable and intermediate-risk AML, relapse remains a major issue. The French AML intergroup launched the BIG-1 trial in 2015 in order to test different strategies aiming at reducing relapse rate and improving survival. All patients with previously untreated non-APL and non-CBF AML aged 18-60 years are eligible for trial participation which is still ongoing. The trial design includes several randomizations (R): Idarubicin vs daunorubicin for induction (R1), HDAC vs IDAC for consolidation (R2), post-transplant GVHD prophylaxis modalities (R3). R4 consists of nested randomized phase 2-3 trials testing the addition of new drugs to the IDAC or HDAC backbones during the consolidation phase. The protocol was designed to allow the sequential evaluation of several new agents over the trial period. Vosaroxin (VOS) has shown antileukemic activity (Advani, Clin Cancer Res 2010). The combination of VOS and IDAC showed higher CR rate and a non-significant OS benefit as compared to a placebo-IDAC arm in a large phase 3 trial in patients with refractory/relapsed AML (Ravandi Lancet Oncol 2015). We hypothesized that the addition of VOS to IDAC would improve LFS as compared to IDAC alone when given during the consolidation phase. Methods. Eligibility criteria in the BIG-1 trial include: previously untreated AML according to WHO 2016 classification (AML secondary to an untreated myelodysplastic syndrome allowed), age 18-60, ECOG PS 0-2, no cardiac contra-indication to anthracyclines. Patients with APL and patients with CBF-AML are excluded. Eligibility criteria for R4 randomization were: Patients in first CR/CRp/CRi following 1 or 2 courses of induction chemotherapy according to the BIG-1 protocol; ELN2010 favorable- and intermediate-risk groups; ECOG PS ≤ 3; Absence of severe uncontrolled infection. Patients were scheduled to receive Cytarabine: 1.5 gr/m² twice daily on D1, 3, 5 with or without Vosaroxin: 70 mg/m² on D1 and D4 per cycle for a maximum of three cycles at 4-6 weeks intervals. Patients scheduled for allo-SCT or those who had reached CR after 2 induction cycles were to receive only 2 cycles of VOS-IDAC/IDAC. R4-VOS sub-trial was designed to detect an increase of the 18-month LFS from 55% to 75% using a two-step phase 2-3 study. With type I and II errors set at 20% and using a one-sided test, 70 patients had to be randomized. If the predefined statistical objectives were met, study would resume recruiting 130 additional patients in the phase 3 part for a total of 200 patients. Results. 70 patients (35 in each arm), median age 47, ELN 2010 favorable and intermediate risk groups, have been included. 94% had de novo AML with NPM1 mutations in 46% and FLT3-ITD in 20%. As shown in the Table, patients and disease characteristics were not different between the 2 arms except for slightly more patients in CRi in the VOS-IDAC arm. Patients received a median of 4 chemotherapy cycle (including induction; range 3-4) without difference between the treatment arms. 13 patients (18.5%) received an alloSCT (VOS-IDAC: 5, IDAC: 8). Time between cycle 1 and cycle 2 was significantly longer in the VOS-IDAC arm (p= 0.017). Hematologic toxicity was higher in the VOS-IDAC group with a significantly longer neutropenia duration after each cycle, a greater number of RBC and Platelet transfusions, a significantly greater number of days with antibiotics and antifungal therapies and days with fever (during cycle 1). There were also significantly more cutaneous toxicity, mild nausea/vomiting and diarrhea in the VOS-IDAC arm. With a median follow-up of 19 months, 14 and 15 patients relapse in the VOS-IDAC vs IDAC arms respectively. The study primary endpoint has not been reached and LFS was not significantly higher in the VOS-IDAC arm (18-month LFS of 51% vs 46% for VOS-IDAC vs IDAC respectively; see Figure) even after accounting for allo-SCT as a time-dependent variable (p-value=.49). The 2-year CIR was 51% vs 46% (p=NS) and 2-year OS was 88% vs 68% (p=NS). Conclusion, the study's primary endpoint has not been met and results fail to show a significant improvement of 18-month LFS with the addition of VOS to IDAC consolidation of favorable/intermediate-risk AML in first CR. The phase 3 part of the trial will not open. The BIG-1 trial is still ongoing and uses the same design to tests addition of other drugs to the IDAC/HDAC consolidation backbone. Disclosures Guieze: abbvie: Honoraria, Other: advisory board, travel funds; janssen cilag: Honoraria, Other: advisory board, travel funds; roche: Other: travle funds; gilead: Honoraria, Other: travel funds; astrazanecka: Honoraria, Other: advisory board. Dombret:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nova: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Menarini: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Cellectis: Consultancy; Shire-Baxalta: Consultancy; Immunogen: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Hunault:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Diachi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansen: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Branch pulmonary artery stenosis complicates the management of congenital heart diseases. Surgical branch pulmonary artery angioplasty is associated with a high reintervention rate. As an alternative, percutaneous or intraoperative branch pulmonary artery stents have been implanted to improve efficiency, but long-term evaluations are limited.To describe the long-term evolution of branch pulmonary artery stents.We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Tours University Hospital. All stents implanted by surgery or catheterization in branch pulmonary arteries with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and at least one catheterization control were included. The primary endpoint combined cardiovascular mortality, surgical or percutaneous reintervention for stent complication or new stent implantation.Between 2007 and 2017, 76 stents in 51 patients were included (62 stents implanted by surgery, 14 by catheterization). At implantation, the patients' mean age and weight were 4.7years (interquartile range 4.2years) and 17.3kg (interquartile range 11.0kg), respectively. Mean branch pulmonary artery minimum diameter was 4.1±2.1mm (mean Z-score-4.9±2.9), and mean initial stent diameter was 9.1±3.1mm. During a follow-up of 5.3years (range 0-11.2 years), freedom from primary endpoint was 86.8% (95% confidence interval 79.6-94.8%) at 1 year, 71.5% (95% confidence interval 61.9-82.7%) at 5years and 69.6% (95% confidence interval 59.6-81.2%) at 10 years. We did not identify any factors associated with major adverse cardiovascular events. Among stents without major adverse cardiovascular events, the mean branch pulmonary artery diameter Z-score at last evaluation had increased by +4.8±3.2 compared with the initial diameter (P0.001). After stent implantation, a median of 2 re-expansions were performed for each stent (range 0-7).Stent implantation should offer a good long-term solution for branch pulmonary artery stenosis, although iterative re-expansions are required.

International audience

International audience; No abstract available

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a highly heterogeneous disease both in terms of genetic background and response to chemotherapy. Although molecular aberrations are routinely used to stratify AML patients into prognostic subgroups when receiving standard chemotherapy, the predictive value of the genetic background and co-occurring mutations remains to be assessed when using newly approved antileukemic drugs. In the present study, we retrospectively addressed the question of the predictive value of molecular events on the benefit of the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to standard front-line chemotherapy. Using the more recent European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 risk classification, we confirmed that the benefit of GO was restricted to the favorable (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.98) and intermediate (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-1.00) risk categories, whereas it did not influence the outcome of patients within the adverse risk subgroup (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.61-1.43). Interestingly, the benefit of GO was significant for patients with activating signaling mutations (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28-0.65), which correlated with higher CD33 expression levels. These results suggest that molecular aberrations could be critical for future differentially tailored treatments based on integrated genetic profiles that are able to predict the benefit of GO on outcome.

Background and objective Chronic total occlusion (CTO) guidewire have been recently reported as an alternative to radiofrequency for perforating atretic pulmonary valve. Since procedure failures or perforation of the right ventricle still occurred with CTO, we tried to enhance the stability, steering, and pushability of the wire using a microcatheter in order to improve the safety and efficacy of the procedure. Methods We performed pulmonary valve perforation with CTO guidewire and microcatheter in five consecutive newborns with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PA-IVS) under fluoroscopic and echocardiographic control. Results The valve was easily perforated at the first attempt for all patients. After perforation, the microcatheter positioned in the main pulmonary artery allowed the exchange of the CTO guidewire for a more flexible wire, avoiding lesion and facilitating manipulation in the distal pulmonary branch arteries. The pulmonary valve was then dilated with balloons of increasing size as usually performed. We did not experience any procedural or early complications. Blalock-Taussig shunt was performed in 2 children because of a persistent cyanosis, 4 and 10 days after perforation. Conclusions The combined use of a CTO guide and a microcatheter appears to be a safe and reliable technique for perforating the pulmonary valve of newborns with PA-IVS. Further procedures with this approach are needed to confirm this first experience.

Background : Point mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes are seen in 20% of adult patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Prognostic significance of each IDH1/2 mutation (mut) analyzed with co-occurring mutations treated with intensive chemotherapy (IC) remains inconsistent, particularly with the advent of IDH inhibitors. Furthermore, the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in IDH-mutated without favorable-risk features is not known. Patients & Methods: Between 2009 and 2016, 262 pts with IDH1/2 mutated AML (101 IDH1mut, 115 IDH2R140Qmutand 46 IDH2R172mut) were treated with IC in younger ALFA-0702 (NCT00932412, n = 133) and older ALFA-1200 (NCT01966497, n = 129) prospective trials. Median age was 50 [42-54] and 67 y [64-71], respectively (resp). Targeted 37-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) information was available for all pts. According to ELN 2010 classification, non-favorable CR/CRp pts were eligible for SCT if they had a sibling or matched unrelated donor. Correlation between IDHmutand covariates was realized by Pearson correlation coefficient and point biserial correlation for continuous and dichotomic variables, resp. Impact on response and survival was assessed for all covariates present in at least 10% of patients. SCT was considered as a time-dependent variable. Informative variables selected by LASSO were included in multivariate logistic regression for response and multivariate Cox model for survival. All analyses were stratified on the clinical trial. Results: IDH1 mut was significantly associated with NPM1mut(p=0.025), DNMT3Amut(p=0.009) and mutually exclusive with TET2mut(p=0.009). 80% (81/101) of IDH1 mutated pts achieved CR/CRp [96 % (46/48) if concomitant NPM1mut vs 66% (35/53) if not (p=0.0009)]. With a median FU of 39 months, overall median OS was not reached and median EFS was 15 months (Fig 1A). Presence of NPM1mutwas the only variable associated with longer OS (HR=0.33, p=0.001) and EFS (HR = 0.4, p = 0.001) in multivariate analysis. At 5 years, OS was estimated at 68% and 35% and EFS at 55% and 26%, resp (Fig 1B). Effect of concomitant NPM1mutwas reinforced in the absence of DNMT3Amut(HR=0.14, p=0.0006 and HR=0.16, p IDH2R140Q mut was significantly associated with NPM1mut(p=0.0004) and SRSF2mut(p IDH2R172K mut was significantly associated with DNMT3Amut(p=0.0004) and BCORmut(p Finally, in non-favorable ELN 2010 pts (74, 74 and 46 with IDH1mut, IDH2R140Qmutand IDH2R172Kmut, resp), SCT in first CR only benefited to pts with IDH1mut(p=0.004 for OS) or with IDH2R172Kmut(p=0.03 for EFS). Conclusion: In a large prospective series, NPM1mutis the main better risk factor in the IDH1mutand IDH2R140Qmutsubgroups and may be used as stratification factor in clinical trials testing frontline specific IDH inhibitors with IC. Allogeneic SCT in first CR appears to improve the outcome of pts with non-favorable IDH1 or IDH2R172K mutated AML. Figure 1 Disclosures Micol: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. Thomas:ABBVIE: Honoraria; DAICHI: Honoraria; INCYTE: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria. Braun:Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS): Research Funding. Ades:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Helsinn Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Silence Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Berthon:PFIZER: Other: DISCLOSURE BOARD; JAZZPHARMACEUTICAL: Other: DISCLOSURE BOARD; CELGEN: Other: DISCLOSURE BOARD. Boissel:NOVARTIS: Consultancy. Vey:Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pigneux:Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daichi: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria. Recher:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dombret:CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria; AGIOS: Honoraria; Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS): Research Funding. De Botton:Daiichi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Pierre Fabre: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Forma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Syros: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a curative treatment for many hematological diseases. However, this procedure causes the patient to be susceptible to infection. Prophylactic treatments are administered in clinical practice even thought the level of evidence of their effectiveness is not always high. In addition, changes in the transplantation procedures - use of reduced intensity conditioning, development of alternative graft sources - must lead to a rethinking of attitudes towards prophylaxis. Our working group based its recommendations on a review of referential articles and publications on the subject found in the literature. These recommendations concern the prophylaxis of infections caused by HSV1, HSV2, varicella zoster, and hepatitis B, as well as anti-bacterial and digestive decontamination prophylaxis, prevention of pneumocystis, toxoplasmosis, tuberculosis, as well as prophylaxis of fungal infections. Other infectious agents usually involved in infections post-allotransplant have been the subject of another set of recommendations from the French Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.