1. Prevalence of Bovine Aortic Arch Variant in Patients with Aortic Dissection and its Implications in the Outcome of Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection
- Author
-
Marius Ante, Arthurs Barkans, Jan Brunkwall, Spyridon N. Mylonas, Dietmar Böckler, and Jens Wippermann
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Aortic arch ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Multivariate analysis ,Computed Tomography Angiography ,Vascular Malformations ,Bovine arch ,Aorta, Thoracic ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Aortography ,Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Germany ,medicine.artery ,Prevalence ,medicine ,Humans ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aortic dissection ,business.industry ,Mortality rate ,Endovascular Procedures ,Retrospective cohort study ,Odds ratio ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Aortic Aneurysm ,Surgery ,Aortic Dissection ,Treatment Outcome ,Female ,030101 anatomy & morphology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Objective/Background To investigate the prevalence of bovine arch (BA) among patients with type A and B aortic dissection, and to provide insight into the implication of this variation on the outcome of patients with acute or subacute type B aortic dissection (a/sTBAD). Methods This retrospective cohort analysis includes patients with a/sTBAD admitted between January 2006 and December 2016. Computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) of patients referred because of type A aortic dissection were also re-evaluated with regard to the presence of BA. As a control group, 110 oncological patients who had undergone a chest CTA for disease staging during the study period were enrolled. A total of 154 patients with a/sTBAD and 168 with type A aortic dissection were identified during the study period. Results An overall prevalence of 17.6% for BA variants was revealed. The comparison between patients with aortic dissection and the control group showed no statistically significant difference in BA prevalence (17.7% vs. 17.3%; p = 1.0). No statistically significant difference in BA prevalence was observed when comparing patients with type A aortic dissection with those with type B aortic dissection (16.6% vs. 18.8%; p = .66). During a median follow-up period of 27.8 months, 30 patients died. The mortality rate among patients presenting a BA variant was 34.5%, whereas among patients without, it was 16.0% (p = .04). Multivariate analysis revealed the presence of a BA as an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2–9.8). Conclusion The BA should be considered as a predictor of the outcome for patients with type B aortic dissection.
- Published
- 2018