1. Manual wheelchair pushrim dynamics in people with multiple sclerosis11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated
- Author
-
Shirley G. Fitzgerald, Rory A. Cooper, Aaron L. Souza, Michael L. Boninger, Alicia M Koontz, and B T Fay
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Rehabilitation ,business.industry ,Multiple sclerosis ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Work (physics) ,Outcome measures ,Biomechanics ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Convenience sample ,Context (language use) ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Manual wheelchair ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Medicine ,business - Abstract
Fay BT, Boninger ML, Fitzgerald SG, Souza AL, Cooper RA, Koontz AM. Manual wheelchair pushrim dynamics in people with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:935–42. Objectives To define differences in pushrim dynamics during manual wheelchair propulsion by users with multiple sclerosis (MS) relative to 2 control groups of subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) and no disability (ND) and to investigate changes in propulsion biomechanics at different speeds and with fatigue. Design Case-control. Setting Biomechanics laboratory. Participants A convenience sample of 42 people, 8 women and 6 men per group. Interventions Not applicable. Main outcome measures The propulsion pattern, mean maximum speed, percentage of time in push and recovery phases, push angle, push frequency, mean maximum resultant pushrim force, mean work and push cycle, and hand-to-pushrim coupling and decoupling effects. Results The MS groups tended to use an arcing propulsion pattern more than did the control groups ( P max=.003). The MS group pushed at a lower mean maximum velocity ( v ) when allowed to choose the speed of propulsion ( v MS , .67±.20m/s; v SCI , 1.10±0.23m/s; P =.001), when asked to push at 1m/s ( v MS , .91±.26m/s; v SCI , 1.12±0.11m/s; v ND , 1.05±0.13m/s; P =.010), and were unable to maintain a self-selected speed during a 5-minute trial (Δ v MS , .15±.02m/s; Δ v ND , .03±.06m/s; P P max=.001). In general, the MS group had smaller push angles, but push frequencies similar to the controls. Statistically adjusted MS group pushrim forces and work per push measures varied depending on context, but in all trials the MS group displayed a braking effect when grasping and releasing the pushrim. The MS group had declines in most measures when pushing at a self-selected speed for 5 minutes. In all trials, the MS group was more likely to display asymmetry between right and left sides in biomechanic parameters. Conclusions Manual wheelchair users with MS have difficulty grasping and releasing the pushrim and maintaining speed during a fatigue trial. This likely leads to a slow self-selected speed of propulsion that may not be functional. Clinicians should remember these results when prescribing manual wheelchairs for people with MS.
- Published
- 2004