Search

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a well-established indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), but post-OLT bile duct strictures complicate the outcome for these patients. These strictures might represent recurrent PSC (rPSC). To estimate the risk factors for post-OLT non-anastomotic bile duct strictures in PSC patients and to find their possible etiology, we performed magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) and angiography (MRA) in all PSC patients who had undergone OLT and were alive (median follow-up 6.4 years, range 1.4-15.2 years). This group of PSC patients was compared to a group of 45 non-PSC patients who had also undergone OLT. A logistic regression analysis was performed to find predictors of rPSC. Bile duct strictures were found in 19/49 PSC patients and in 4/45 non-PSC patients (P = 0.001). In the PSC group nine patients without other possible explanations for bile duct strictures than rPSC were identified, i.e., the estimated risk of rPSC was 9/49 (18%); surprisingly similar changes were also seen in one patient without a pre-transplant PSC diagnosis. Severe liver disease due to rPSC was seen in 4/9 patients (one patient died and three are being evaluated for re-OLT). Steroid-resistant rejection was the only significant predictor for rPSC. In conclusion, our study shows that by the use of MRC we found more bile duct strictures in PSC patients post-OLT compared to controls and that steroid-resistant rejections was a predictor of such changes.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a common indication for liver transplantation, but evaluation of patients and timing of liver transplantation remain as major problems. Data from PSC and control patients listed for liver transplantation from 1990 through 2000 in the Nordic countries were recorded prospectively. Outcomes from the waiting list and after transplantation have been recorded for both groups. For PSC patients, regression analyses have been performed to analyze predictors of outcome. A total of 255 PSC and 610 control patients were accepted on the liver transplantation waiting list from 1990 to 2000. In the PSC group, 223 patients (87%) received a first liver allograft, and 32 patients (13%) died without transplantation. The corresponding figures for the control group were 89% and 10%. For PSC patients, the 5- and 10-year survival from the time of acceptance was 68% and 58%, respectively. A higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and a shorter duration of PSC predicted death on the waiting list for PSC patients. PSC is a frequent indication for liver transplantation. In our material, serum bilirubin or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and PSC duration are predictors of outcome including survival of the waiting list.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) represents an important indication for liver transplantation. Selection for and timing of liver transplantation is difficult due to the disease course and the frequent occurrence of hepatobiliary malignancies. Pretransplantation screening of malignancies is difficult, but brush cytology of the biliary ducts seems to represent a possibility for early detection of some cholangiocarcinomas. Patient and graft survivals following liver transplantation are good, with 1 year patient survival exceeding 90%. Survival is also satisfactory in patients with early detected or highly limited cholangiocarcinomas. Recurrent PSC represents a particular problem, and affects as many as 20 to 40% in a long-term perspective. Few predictors of recurrent disease have been identified; severe rejections and their treatment may be of importance.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the Nordic countries. Because these patients are difficult to evaluate with regard to timing of liver transplantation, it is important to establish predictors of post-transplant survival.Data from two groups of patients receiving liver allografts during 1982-2001 were recorded: (a) PSC patients and (b) comparison patients. Outcome following transplantation has been recorded for all patients. Regression analyses have been performed for PSC patients to analyse predictors of patient and graft survival.A total of 245 PSC and 618 comparison patients received a first liver allograft in the period 1982 until the end of the study. The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year patient survival rates were 82%, 77% and 75%, and 80%, 77% and 74% in the PSC group and comparison group, respectively. Survival following transplantation has increased with time in both the PSC and the comparison group. Recent year of transplantation, no previous hepatobiliary surgery and a lower MELD score were predictors of survival following transplantation for PSC patients. PSC patients had a higher rate of re-transplantations (13% versus 8%, P = 0.01). Predictors of re-transplantation in PSC patients were an episode of early rejection and vascular thrombosis.In PSC patients, year of transplantation, previous hepatobiliary surgery and MELD score are predictors of survival following transplantation and these patients are more frequently in need of re-transplantation compared to the comparison group.

Background/Aims Hepatobiliary malignancies are frequently seen in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and they complicate the evaluation of patients and timing of liver transplantation. Methods Data from all Nordic PSC patients listed for liver transplantation during 1990–2001 were recorded prospectively. Predictors of hepatobiliary malignancy and patient survival rates have been analysed. Results Hepatobiliary malignancy was found in 52/255 (20%) patients accepted to the waiting list. Recent diagnosis of PSC, no ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment, clinical suspicion and previous colorectal-cancer were predictors of malignancy. Among 89 patients with a strong suspicion of malignancy prior to acceptance, 35 (39%) had confirmed malignancy. A clinical suspicion had been raised in 35/52 (67%) patients with malignancy. Malignancy was found in 31/223 patients who received a liver allograft. The 1-, 3- and 5-year patient survival rates following transplantation for patients with PSC and cholangiocarcinoma were 65, 35 and 35%, respectively. Conclusions Hepatobiliary malignancy is suspected in 1/3 of the PSC patients and found in 1/5. Although cholangiocarcinoma is regarded as a contraindication to liver transplantation (LTX), PSC patients with cholangiocarcinoma had a 35% 5-year survival following transplantation.

Metabolic bone disease is one of the major long-term complications in liver transplant recipients, but it remains unclear which patients are at highest risk for developing severe bone disease following transplantation.A total of 46 consecutive, adult patients with chronic liver disease accepted for a liver transplantation waiting list were prospectively included in the study. The patients were classified into two groups: group A--chronic cholestatic liver disease (n = 28), and group B--chronic non-cholestatic liver disease (n = 18). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at acceptance for the waiting list and at 3, 12 and 36 months following transplantation. Markers of bone turnover (serum-bone specific alkaline phosphatases (bALP), s-osteocalcin, s-1-collagen-C-terminal telopeptide (1-CTP) and urine N-terminal telopeptides u-Ntx) were measured at acceptance and at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months following transplantation. BMD and markers of bone turnover were compared with similar values in a matched control group of 42 healthy individuals.BMD decreased significantly during the early post-transplantation period (median bone loss femoral neck (FN) 3 months post-transplant 8.5%). BMD levels declined slightly from 3 to 12 months following transplantation and increased thereafter. The relative bone loss was greatest among group B patients (relative bone loss FN 3 months post-transplant: group A, 8% versus group B, 13%; P = 0.04). At 36 months, 8/17 group A and 2/9 group B patients had BMD levels that exceeded the pretransplant levels (P = 0.12). The early bone loss was positively correlated with an increase in resorption markers (s-1-CTP and u-Ntx). Group B had higher levels of both s-1-CTP and u-Ntx at 3 and 6 months post-transplant than group A patients (P = 0.03). Bone formation markers increased slowly from 6 months post-transplant and onwards. Relative bone loss was positively correlated to total glucocorticoid dose during the first 3 months post-transplant. There were no differences in BMD between patients receiving tacrolimus versus those receiving cyclosporin A.Bone loss following liver transplantation is considerable in patients with both cholestatic and non-cholestatic liver disease, the first group has the poorest starting-point while the latter group has the greatest bone loss following transplantation. Bone loss is closely correlated with biochemical markers of bone resorption and total dose of glucocorticoids given post-transplant.

Background. Survival after liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure has been reported to be less favorable than survival for patients with chronic liver diseases. Methods. We have studied all patients (n=229) undergoing highly urgent liver transplantation from 1990 to 2001 in the Nordic countries. The impact of patient and donor characteristics, with emphasis on donor-recipient ABO matching (identical, compatible, incompatible), has been studied. Results. One-year and 3-year patient survival rates were 73% and 70% for the total period and 86% and 78% for the last 4-year period. Patients receiving an ABO-compatible liver allograft had significantly lower patient survival rates than those receiving an ABO-identical donor organ (1-year patient survival rates 66% of vs. 79%, P=0.03). Graft survival rates varied less (1-year graft survival rates of 64% vs. 74%, P=0.09). Patients receiving an ABO-incompatible liver allograft had patient survival rates of 70% at 1 year and 60% at 3 years but low graft survival rates (40% and 30% at 1 and 3 years). In a multiple regression analysis, significant independent predictors of poor patient survival were early year of transplantation, ABO-compatible donor, high donor age, and waiting time more than 3 days and less than 9 days. Conclusion. Survival after highly urgent liver transplantation has improved and is comparable to that observed in patients receiving a liver allograft because of chronic liver disease. Patients receiving an ABO-identical donor organ had significantly higher patient survival rates compared with those receiving an ABO-compatible donor liver.

Fulminant hepatic failure is a common indication for liver transplantation. Outcomes of patients listed for a highly urgent liver transplantation have been studied, with special emphasis on etiology of the liver disease, clinical condition, and ABO blood type. Data have been collected from the Nordic Liver Transplantation Registry. All Nordic patients listed for a highly urgent primary liver transplantation during a 12-year period have been included. Of the 315 patients listed for a highly urgent liver transplantation, 229 (73%) received a first liver allograft, 50 patients (16%) died without transplantation, and 36 patients (11%) were permanently withdrawn and survived. In 43% of the patients, no definite etiology of the liver failure could be established. Paracetamol intoxication was the most frequent specific indication for listing. Patients with blood type A had no significant shorter waiting time (3.8 v 6.6 days; P = .1) but a higher rate of transplantation (82% v 66%, P = .006) as compared with blood type O patients. In a multivariate analysis, paracetamol intoxication remained the single independent predictor of an outcome without transplantation. In conclusion, a high transplantation rate was observed among patients listed for a highly urgent liver transplantation because of fulminant hepatic failure. Blood type O patients had a lower chance of receiving a liver allograft. Patients with paracetamol intoxication had both a higher mortality without transplantation and a higher withdrawal rate attributable to improved condition.