Search

PURPOSE This Provisional Clinical Opinion update presents a clinically pragmatic approach to hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening and management. PROVISIONAL CLINICAL OPINION All patients anticipating systemic anticancer therapy should be tested for HBV by 3 tests—hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) total immunoglobulin (Ig) or IgG, and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen—but anticancer therapy should not be delayed. Findings of chronic HBV (HBsAg-positive) or past HBV (HBsAg-negative and anti-HBc–positive) infection require HBV reactivation risk assessment. Patients with chronic HBV receiving any systemic anticancer therapy should receive antiviral prophylactic therapy through and for minimum 12 months following anticancer therapy. Hormonal therapy alone should not pose a substantial risk of HBV reactivation in patients with chronic HBV receiving hormonal therapy alone; these patients may follow noncancer HBV monitoring and treatment guidance. Coordination of care with a clinician experienced in HBV management is recommended for patients with chronic HBV to determine HBV monitoring and long-term antiviral therapy after completion of anticancer therapy. Patients with past HBV infection undergoing anticancer therapies associated with a high risk of HBV reactivation, such as anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies or stem-cell transplantation, should receive antiviral prophylaxis during and for minimum 12 months after anticancer therapy completion, with individualized management thereafter. Careful monitoring may be an alternative if patients and providers can adhere to frequent, consistent follow-up so antiviral therapy may begin at the earliest sign of reactivation. Patients with past HBV undergoing other systemic anticancer therapies not clearly associated with a high risk of HBV reactivation should be monitored with HBsAg and alanine aminotransferase during cancer treatment; antiviral therapy should commence if HBV reactivation occurs. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines .

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of both lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma demonstrating clear benefit over traditional chemotherapy alone in the metastatic setting. While the overwhelming majority of ICI trial participants have been White patients, results of these trials have been broadly applied to patients of all ethnic/racial backgrounds. It has, therefore, not been well defined if response to ICIs differs between ethnic/racial populations or socio-economic groups.We reviewed response to ICI of 208 patients with diagnoses of lung or head and neck cancers treated with ICI between 2015 and 2020 at one of three clinical pavilions associated with the Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, TX. Two of these pavilions (Harris Health System and the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center) serve large minority patient populations and provide equal access of care to patients regardless of means. Of the 208 patients, 175 had a diagnosis of lung cancer [non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) or small cell lung cancer (SCLC)] and 33 had a diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); 38% self-identified as Black, 45% as non-Hispanic White, and 18% as Hispanic. The objective response rate (ORR) was similar for lung cancer (31.4%) and HNSCC patients (27.3%) (p=0.894). Statistically, the ORR for Hispanic and Black patients did not differ compared to non-Hispanic White patients (H 23.7%, B 28.6%, W 35.5%; H vs. W p=0.189; B vs. W p=0.338). When considering patients treated with ICI monotherapy, the ORR for Hispanic patients dropped to 13.3% and was significantly lower than the ORR of the non-Hispanic White patients while the ORR of Black and non-Hispanic White patients remained about the same (B 29.3% and W 34.6%, H vs. W p=0.0285; B vs. W p=0.5131). Immune related adverse events (irAEs) were the lowest in the Hispanic population occurring in only 30% of patients compared to 50% of patients exhibiting irAEs in the Black and non-Hispanic white cohorts.ICIs demonstrate comparable anti-tumor effects in lung cancer (NSCLC + SCLC) and HNSCC during routine clinical practice regardless of race or ethnicity. The significantly lower ORR observed in our cohort for Hispanic patients, particularly when used as monotherapy, is an unexpected finding and will require additional study to identify potential biological and non-biological confounders which could contribute to reduced ICI effectiveness in this patient population.

Background: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the only nationally integrated healthcare delivery system in the United States. The vertical and horizontal integration of the VHA make it an ideal environment for development of tools designed to streamline cancer diagnosis and treatment. Head and neck cancer (HNC) remains a difficult disease to diagnose and treat. Delivery of multimodality treatment for advanced HNC is challenging at both academic centers and in the community setting. This problem is magnified by the increased incidence of HNC, powered by an epidemic increase in the incidence of human papilloma virus (HPV)–associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Objective: To develop a non–resource-intensive approach to improving: (1) time to treatment initiation and (2) compliance with optimal treatment package time for HNC patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 300 patients with a diagnosis of HNC from the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (MEDVAMC) was used to generate baseline data (2000–2010) for: (1) time to treatment (surgery, 24 days; radiation, 48 days) and (2) treatment package time Results: Implementation of the tracking tool reduced diagnosis to treatment start (mean, 44 days; median, 26 days). Compliance with treatment package time Conclusions: It is possible to improve: (1) time to diagnosis, (2) time to treatment initiation, and (3) treatment completion rates for complex HNC requiring multimodality treatment without additional resource utilization. However, appropriate implementation requires a robust multidisciplinary treatment team, with appropriate “buy in” from all participants and is facilitated by the presence of a fully integrated health care delivery system.

Objectives Veterans with laryngeal and oropharyngeal cancer remain an understudied patient population despite a high incidence of disease and decreased survival compared to the general population. Our objective was to evaluate treatment patterns for laryngeal and oropharyngeal cancer in patients treated at one of the Veterans Health Administration's busiest cancer centers in order to generate some basic benchmarks for treatment delivery in the veteran population. Methods We reviewed 338 patients treated at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center between 2000 and 2012. Results Oropharyngeal site and advanced age were associated with worse overall and disease-free survival. Treatment periods (mean) were as follows: 1) referral-diagnosis, 26 days; 2) diagnosis-surgery, 29 days; and 3) diagnosis-radiation, 58 days. Adjuvant radiation was initiated within 6 weeks of surgery in 42% of patients and 68% of patients had a total treatment package time ≤100 days. Time from diagnosis to treatment initiation, surgery to adjuvant radiation interval and total treatment package time did not impact survival. Conclusions This study establishes basic benchmarks for laryngeal and oropharyngeal cancer treatment delivery in veterans. Additional efforts are warranted to improve consistency and provide treatment in line with NCCN recommendations and literature consensus. Level of Evidence 2b.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically expanded the therapeutic landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a previous study, gender, smoking history, and PD-L1 status were found to influence the efficacy of single-agent ICI in NSCLC. This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical and molecular factors that could predict a benefit from adding ICIs to first-line chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. Patients and Methods: The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among the selected subgroups were analyzed using the random effects model. The correlation between PD-L1 expression and outcome was analyzed by meta-regression. Results: Seven phase III randomized controlled trials comparing chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) with chemotherapy in untreated stage 4 NSCLC were included. CIT evenly improved PFS irrespective of age, gender, histology, smoking history, and performance status. Among patients with baseline hepatic metastasis treated with Atezolizumab-containing CIT, PFS improvement was only detected with the addition of Bevacizumab. Whereas patients with EGFR/ALK-driven cancer exhibited greater PFS with the addition of ICI to a Bevacizumab (BEV)-based regimen, the derived benefit was no longer statistically significant among those treated with non-BEV-based regimens. Although the superior PFS conferred by CIT was noticeable across all PD-L1 expression subgroups, this benefit correlated with PD-L1 level and was more pronounced in the "PD-L1 high" cohort. Except for patients harboring EGFR/ALK aberrations or squamous histology, CIT consistently improved OS across the other selected subgroups. Conclusions: The survival advantage associated with first-line CIT in metastatic NSCLC was observed in different patient populations, including those for which single-agent ICI has marginal therapeutic benefit. Our findings support the role of chemotherapy with or without VEGF blockade as enhancers of ICI activity in NSCLC.

e20564 Background: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) patients historically have poor outcomes, but immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising results in certain patients. We aimed to retrospectively assess efficacy and safety with use of anti-PD-1 monotherapy (aPD-1 Tx) in patients with MM at our institution from Dec 2015 to Dec 2020. Methods: We identified patients with MM treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Clinical details including demographics, efficacy, and toxicity were collected. Efficacy was characterized based on overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and intergroup comparisons were performed with the log-rank test. Univariable Cox regression analysis was used to determine whether variables were associated with survival. Results: We identified 61 patients treated with aPD-1 Tx for MM. Majority of patients (90%) had malignant pleural mesothelioma. Forty-two (69%) patients were male. The median age of initiation was 65 years (range: 30-84). Most patients (66%) had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-1. Known asbestos exposure was noted in 19 (31%) patients. Most patients had received prior chemotherapy (74%) and treated with nivolumab (89%). Only 66% of patients with known PD-L1 had positive expression ( > = 1%). There were 43 (70%) patients with epithelioid histology. Median follow-up was 22.2 months. ORR was 33% with stable disease in 25% of patients. In first-line aPD-1 Tx, ORR was 50%. PFS and OS at 12 months were 26% and 65%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 5.1 and 15.6 months, respectively. PD-L1 positivity was not associated with improved PFS or OS. Univariable analysis demonstrated that ECOG PS 0-1 had significantly better OS with hazard ratio (HR) 0.40 (95% CI 0.20 – 0.83; p = 0.01). Immune-related adverse events (irAE) were seen in 33% of patients with 13 patients with grade 3 or higher (nephritis, pneumonitis, arthritis, leukocytosis, dermatitis, colitis, type 1 diabetes mellitus, tongue angioedema, and thrombocytopenia). One patient had grade 5 irAE due to severe thrombocytopenia. Patients who developed an irAE had significantly improved median OS (32.1 vs 12.1 months, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Anti-PD-1 monotherapy showed clinical efficacy and safety in malignant mesothelioma as both a first-line treatment and in pre-treated patients based on our real-world experience. The development of irAE may predict benefit, although fatal side effects can occur.

Checkpoint inhibitors have become standard therapy for multiple cancers, and their use will increase in the next year as regulatory approvals for additional indications are expected. It is essential for clinicians to be aware of the potential for rare immune-related adverse effects. Here, we report the case of a new diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) after the use of nivolumab for squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder. A review the literature identified 10 cases of MG diagnosed after programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor therapy. This is the first case, to our knowledge, reported in association with bladder cancer. The precise diagnosis of MG has important implications on management, as treatment with steroids can transiently worsen myasthenia in nearly 50% of cases.

Nivolumab is a standard treatment option in several advanced malignancies, but safety and efficacy are still unknown in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. We describe a case series of people living with HIV (PLWH) receiving nivolumab in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) and report responses and toxicities. We identified all PLWH who received nivolumab at any VA facility since 2000 in the Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), which provides nationwide research access to VA electronic medical records. We identified 16 HIV-infected nivolumab recipients. The median number of nivolumab doses received was 6 (range, 1-32). Changes in CD4 count during therapy were variable, with 70% (7/10) of patients experiencing increases. Half of PLWH were treated for non-small-cell lung cancer; 2 for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), 2 for renal cell carcinoma, and 4 for off-label cancers. For non-small-cell lung cancer, 7 patients had evaluable responses. Although 5 of 7 patients immediately progressed, 1 had a partial response and 1 had stable disease, which were both durable. Two of 16 (14%) PLWH had complete responses; both with HL (2/2 HL, 100%). The prevalence of immune-related adverse effects was 40% overall (6/15); 27% (4/15) had pneumonitis. To our knowledge, this is the largest case series reporting outcomes with nivolumab in PLWH. Outcomes were comparable with those seen in studies of HIV-uninfected patients, and particularly interesting for HL. The reason for the high proportions of immune-related adverse effects is unclear, but needs to be confirmed in larger studies.

e20595 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the landscape of NSCLC therapy. In previous study, gender, smoking history, and PD-L1 status were found to influence the efficacy of ICI monotherapy in NSCLC. This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical and molecular factors predictive of benefit from the addition of ICIs to first-line (1L) chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Using the random effect model, we computed and compared the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among the selected subgroups. The correlation between PD-L1 expression level and outcome was analyzed by meta-regression. Results: 7 phase III randomized trials comparing CIT vs. chemo in the 1L treatment of stage 4 NSCLC were included. CIT evenly improved the PFS irrespective of age, gender, histology, smoking history and ECOG performance status (PS). While patients (pts) with liver metastasis or ALK/EGFR aberration had greater PFS with the addition of ICI to Bevacizumab (BEV) based chemo regimen, the derived benefit was no longer statistically significant among pts treated with non-BEV-based regimens. Whereas the PFS superiority conferred by CIT was noticed across all PD-L1 expression subgroups, the benefit correlated with PD-L1 level and was more pronounced in the “PD-L1 high” subset. Except for pts with EGFR/ALK abnormalities, squamous histology or liver metastasis, CIT yielded a consistent amelioration of OS across the other selected subgroups. Conclusions: Survival advantage associated with 1L CIT in metastatic NSCLC was observed in different pts population including those for which single-agent ICI has limited therapeutic benefit. Our findings support the role of chemo +/- VEGF blockade as enhancer of ICIs activity even in “less immunogenic” context. [Table: see text]

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in the HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected veteran populations. WHAT IS NEW: Most clinical trials highlighting checkpoint inhibitors excluded people living with HIV (PLWH). This is the first study to report equivalent nivolumab tumor response rates in PLWH, but higher rates of pneumonitis.METHODS: We searched the Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) to identify all HIV-positive patients who used the Veterans Health Administration (VA) between 2000 and 2016. For this cohort of 46,916 PLWH, we obtained a 4:1 age-matched HIV-negative control cohort. We used pharmacy database to identify all nivolumab recipients through July 26, 2017. We reviewed patients' electronic medical records using Compensation and Pension Records Interchange (CAPRI) to obtain age, sex, geographic location, cancer type, number of nivolumab doses received, previous cancer therapy, adverse events, and response to therapy. We calculated summary descriptive measures for both groups and compared the proportion of patients experiencing adverse event or pneumonitis in groups by HIV status, using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Sixteen PLWH and 68 HIV-negative controls received nivolumab during the study period. Only 51 controls had accessible data. Median age at nivolumab initiation was 65 years in both groups (range, 47-85 [IQR, 59-68] in PLWH; range, 42-79 [IQR 59-68] in controls); all patients were male. Overall, 63% received nivolumab for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 8/16 (50%) in PLWH, 34/51 (67%) in controls. Other indications in PLWH included renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (2/16 [13%]), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (2/16 [13%]), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (2/16 [13%]). Other indications in controls were RCC (9/51 [18%]), melanoma (5/51, [10%]), and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (3/51 [6%]).Regardless of HIV status, the median number of prior lines of therapy was 1, median number of nivolumab doses received was 6, and median progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC was 2.75 months. Half of each NSCLC group received radiation; fewer PLWH had COPD (50%, vs. 82% of controls). PLWH had a trend towards more adverse events (AEs) (6/15 [40%], vs. 13/51 [26%] of controls, p=0.28). A significantly higher proportion of PLWH experienced pneumonitis (4/15 [27%], vs. 2/51 [4%] of controls, p=0.007).Other AEs among PLWH were rash, hypothyroidism, and autoimmune diabetes mellitus. Other AEs among controls were fatigue, colitis, rash, hypothyroidism, arthritis, and hepatitis (1-3 patients each). CONCLUSION: Among veteran PLWH, rates of nivolumab administration, and PFS in NSCLC, were comparable to those of HIV-uninfected counterparts. Pneumonitis was significantly more frequent in PLWH. Further studies should investigate the mechanism of pneumonitis in this population, confirm the high frequency in larger cohorts of PLWH, and identify clinical risk factors for pneumonitis. Citation Format: Elaine Chang, Aaron P. Thrift, Donna L. White, Jennifer Kramer, Anita L. Sabichi, Christine Hartman, Kathryn E. Royse, Peter A. Richardson, Elizabeth Y. Chiao. Nivolumab efficacy and safety in veterans with and without HIV infection [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 617.

Purpose An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (PCO) offers timely clinical direction to ASCO's membership following publication or presentation of potentially practice-changing information. This PCO addresses recommendations for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection screening in patients receiving cytotoxic or immunosuppressive chemotherapy for treatment of malignant diseases. Clinical Context The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued Recommendations for Identification and Public Health Management of Persons with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, recommending screening for hepatitis B infection (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg], antihepatitis B core antigen [anti-HBc], and antibodies to HBsAg [anti-HBs]) for “persons receiving cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy (eg, chemotherapy for malignant diseases…).” Provisional Clinical Opinion The evidence is insufficient to determine the net benefits and harms of routine screening for chronic HBV infection in individuals with cancer who are about to receive cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy or who are already receiving therapy. Individuals with cancer who undergo certain cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapies and have HBV infection or prior exposure to HBV may be at elevated risk of liver failure from HBV reactivation. As such, HBV screening requires clinical judgment. Physicians may consider screening patients belonging to groups at heightened risk for chronic HBV infection or if highly immunosuppressive therapy is planned. Highly immunosuppressive treatments include, but are not limited to, hematopoietic cell transplantation and regimens including rituximab. Screening based on a high risk of prior HBV exposure or risk of reactivation due to planned therapeutic regimens should include testing for HBsAg as a serologic marker for HBV infection. In some populations, testing for anti-HBc should also be considered. There is no evidence to support serologic testing for anti-HBs in this context. When evidence for chronic HBV infection is found, antiviral therapy before and throughout the course of chemotherapy may be considered to reduce the risk of HBV reactivation, although evidence from controlled trials of this approach is limited. Screening and/or treating HBV infection should not delay the initiation of chemotherapy. NOTE. ASCO's provisional clinical opinions (PCOs) reflect expert consensus based on clinical evidence and literature available at the time they are written, and are intended to assist physicians in clinical decision-making and identify questions and settings for further research. Due to the rapid flow of scientific information in oncology, new evidence may have emerged since the time a PCO was submitted for publication. PCOs are not continually updated and may not reflect the most recent evidence. PCOs address only the topics specifically identified in the PCO and are not applicable to interventions, diseases or stages of disease not specifically identified. PCOs cannot account for individual variation among patients, and cannot be considered inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other treatments. It is the responsibility of the treating physician or other health care provider, relying on independent experience and knowledge of the patient, to determine the best course of treatment for the patient. Accordingly, adherence to any PCO is voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding its application to be made by the physician in light of each patient's individual circumstances. ASCO PCOs describe the use of procedures and therapies in clinical practice and cannot be assumed to apply to the use of these interventions in the context of clinical trials. ASCO assumes no responsibility for any injury or damage to persons or property arising out of or related to any use of ASCO's PCOs, or for any errors or omissions.

e15091Background: Given the recent clinical introduction of ICIs, their application, efficacy, predictive markers, and adverse effects are actively being elucidated. Here we describe the use, respo...

e21110Background: Anti-programmed cell death (anti–PD-1) response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) varies greatly. Higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or lower adva...

Purpose: The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of fenretinide in preventing tumor recurrence in patients with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder. Experimental Design: We conducted a multicenter phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of fenretinide (200 mg/day orally for 12 months) in patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder TCC (stages Ta, Tis, or T1) after transurethral resection with or without adjuvant intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Patients received cystoscopic evaluation and bladder cytology every 3 months during the 1-year on study drug and a final evaluation at 15 months. The primary endpoint was time to recurrence. Results: A total of 149 patients were enrolled; 137 were evaluable for recurrence. The risk of recurrence was considered to be “low” in 72% (no prior BCG) and intermediate or high in 32% (prior BCG) of the evaluable patients. Of the lower-risk group, 68% had solitary tumors and 32% had multifocal, low-grade papillary (Ta, grade 1 or grade 2) tumors. The 1-year recurrence rates by Kaplan-Meier estimate were 32.3% (placebo) versus 31.5% (fenretinide; P = 0.88 log-rank test). Fenretinide was well tolerated and had no unexpected toxic effects; only elevated serum triglyceride levels were significantly more frequent on fenretinide (versus placebo). The Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommended study closure at 149 patients (before reaching the accrual goal of 160 patients) because an interim review of the data showed a low likelihood of detecting a difference between the two arms, even if the original accrual goal was met. Conclusions: Although well tolerated, fenretinide did not reduce the time-to-recurrence in patients with Ta, T1, or Tis TCC of the bladder.

Purpose To conduct a phase III trial of adjuvant 13-cis-retinoic acid (13cRA) plus interferon alfa (IFN-α) for preventing tumor recurrence and second primary tumors (SPTs) of skin squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) among patients with aggressive skin SCC. Patients and Methods Sixty-six patients with aggressive skin SCC were randomly assigned to receive either 6 months of combined 13cRA (1 mg/kg/d orally) and IFN-α (3 × 106 U subcutaneously three times per week) or no adjuvant therapy (control group) after SCC surgery and/or radiation. Results At 21.5 months median follow-up, treatment did not improve the time to tumor recurrence and SPT versus control (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.53 to 2.41), time to tumor recurrence (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.43 to 2.72), or time to SPT (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.27 to 2.93). Adjuvant 13cRA and IFN-α was moderately tolerable; 29% of patients in the treatment arm required dose reductions for grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Conclusion Results of this phase III trial do not support 13cRA plus IFN-α for adjuvant therapy of aggressive skin SCC. With high rates of tumor recurrence and SPTs, patients with aggressive skin SCC continue to have an unmet medical need, with devastating mortality, morbidity, and financial consequences. Promising agents with preclinical and early clinical results relevant to aggressive skin SCC deserve a high priority for future clinical drug development.

Purpose This updated provisional clinical opinion presents a revised opinion based on American Society of Clinical Oncology panel consensus in the context of an evolving database. Context Despite the 2010 provisional clinical opinion recommendation, there is still evidence of suboptimal hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening among patients at high risk for HBV infection or HBV reactivation after chemotherapy. This updated provisional clinical opinion introduces a risk-adaptive strategy to identify and treat patients with HBV infection to reduce their risk of HBV reactivation. Provisional Clinical Opinion Medical providers should screen by testing patients for HBV infection before starting anti-CD20 therapy or hematopoietic cell transplantation. Providers should also screen patients with risk factors for HBV infection. Screening should include both hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), because reactivation can occur in patients who are HBsAg positive/anti-HBc positive or HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive. Either total anti-HBc or anti-HBc immunoglobulin G (not immunoglobulin M) test should be used. Clinicians should start antiviral therapy for HBsAg-positive/anti-HBc–positive patients before or contemporaneously with cancer therapy and monitor HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc–positive patients for reactivation with HBV DNA and ALT levels, promptly starting antivirals if reactivation occurs. Clinicians can initiate antivirals for HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc–positive patients anticipating cancer therapies associated with a high risk of reactivation, or they can monitor HBV DNA and ALT levels and initiate on-demand antivirals. For patients who neither have HBV risk factors nor anticipate cancer therapy associated with a high risk of reactivation, current evidence does not support HBV screening before initiation of cancer therapy. Two panel members provided a minority viewpoint, involving a strategy of universal HBsAg and selective anti-HBc testing.

To compare the survival of women and men with transitional cell bladder cancer.We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database to identify patients aged 35 years or older diagnosed with bladder cancer between 1991 and 2001 actively followed up. We excluded cases diagnosed by autopsy or death certificates and those of unknown race. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to analyze survival in patients with advanced disease.Of the 31,009 patients meeting eligibility criteria, 26.7% were women. Median age at diagnosis for women and men was 72 and 70 years, respectively. Regional disease was diagnosed in 20.3% of white women and 35.5% of African-American women, compared with only 17.6% of white men and 25.9% of African-American men (P.001). Increased age, African-American race, and being female significantly increased the hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.037, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1,034-1.041; HR 1.402, 95% CI 1.187-1.656; and HR 1.842, 95% CI 1.158-2.931).Women with bladder cancer, particularly African-Americans, have shorter survival. This is partially explained by higher risk of diagnosis with poorly differentiated tumors, advanced stage, and advanced age. Women should be targeted for timely diagnosis.II-2.

Background: Evidence of the chemopreventive effects of the dietary antioxidants α-tocopherol (vitamin E) and l-selenomethionine (selenium) comes from secondary analysis of two phase III clinical trials that found treatment with these antioxidants reduced the incidence of prostate cancer. To determine the effects of selenium and vitamin E in blood and prostate tissue, we undertook a preoperative feasibility study complementary to the currently ongoing Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial.Methods: Forty-eight patients with clinically localized prostate cancer enrolled on this 2 × 2 factorial design study were randomized to take selenium, vitamin E, both, or placebo for 3 to 6 weeks before prostatectomy. Sera were collected from patients before and after dietary supplementation. Thirty-nine patients were evaluable, and 29 age-matched disease-free men served as controls. Mass profiling of lipophilic serum proteins of lower molecular weight (2-13.5 kDa) was conducted, and mass spectra data were analyzed using custom-designed software.Results: Weighted voting analyses showed a change in sera classification from cancerous to healthy for some patients with prostate cancer after dietary intervention. ANOVA analysis showed significantly different treatment effects on prediction strength changes among the four groups at a 95% confidence level. Eliminating an outlying value and performing post hoc analysis using Fisher's least significant difference method showed that effects in the group treated with the combination were significantly different from those of the other groups.Conclusion: In sera from patients with prostate cancer, selenium and vitamin E combined induced statistically significant proteomic pattern changes associated with prostate cancer–free status.

Supported by NIH Specialized Programs of Research Excellence Grant in Genitourinary Cancer CA91846, and National Cancer Institute Grants CA16672, CA066723, and CA85078.

Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-inhibiting and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) show promise for preventing and treating bladder and prostate cancers. In contrast to the strong NSAID epidemiology in colorectal cancer, the epidemiologic data on NSAIDs and genitourinary (GU) cancers are limited and mixed. However, a substantial body of preclinical in vitro and in vivo animal model data shows consistent NSAID activity in treating, and in some cases preventing, GU cancers and begins to address the mechanisms behind this activity (eg, involving Akt and ERK2 in the prostate). Many preclinical and clinical NSAID studies currently under way are helping to resolve the best type (selective or nonselective COX inhibitors or non-COX inhibitors), dose and duration of NSAID treatment for prevention in the GU setting. Future studies likely will focus on clarifying the NSAID mechanisms behind and developing NSAID combinations for both treating and preventing GU cancers.

Patients who have bladder cancer with superficial disease are at high risk for recurrence but low risk for progression to muscle invasive disease and are regularly monitored with cystoscopy to detect recurrent tumors. This clinical setting (high recurrence rate, excellent surveillance, and low risk of progression in stage) provides an ideal setting for secondary chemoprevention. Vitamins, difluoromethylornithine, and cyclooxygenase inhibitors have demonstrated activity in preclinical models of bladder cancer. Limited clinical data suggests that vitamins and their analogs may be useful for decreasing the rate of tumor recurrence in patients with superficial bladder cancer. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring the roles of fenretinide, difluoromethylornithine, and celecoxib in the treatment of patients with a history of superficial bladder cancer.

Several studies have shown an association between high nuclear grade or necrosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions and the risk of local disease recurrence in patients with DCIS treated surgically with less than mastectomy. Although criteria for separating low from high nuclear grade lesions have been published, no information exists regarding interobserver reproducibility (IR). To assess IR in the classification of DCIS, six surgical pathologists from four institutions used the Lagios grading system to grade 125 DCIS lesions. Before meeting to evaluate the cases, a training set of 12 glass slides, including cases chosen to present conflicting cues for classification, was mailed to the participants with a written criteria summary. This was followed by a working session in which criteria were reviewed and agreed on. The pathologists then graded the lesions independently. The area of interest was marked on each slide before grading. After initial grading, the pathologists met again to resolve discrepant lesion classifications. A complete agreement among raters was achieved in 43 (35%) cases, with five of six raters agreeing in another 45 (36%) cases. In no case did two raters differ by more than one grade. The pairwise kappa agreement values ranged from fair to substantial (0.30 to 0.61). Generalized kappa value indicated moderate agreement (0.46, standard error = 0.02). Kappa statistics for the distinction between grades 1 and 2 and 2 and 3 were 0.29 and 0.48, respectively, (standard error = 0.02). Only one of the six raters differed significantly in scoring. With adherence to specific criteria, IR in the classification of DCIS cases can be obtained in most cases. Although these pathologists made a few grading system modifications, further refinements are needed, especially if grading will influence future therapy.

Bladder cancer is strongly related to tobacco use and is estimated to cause 54,500 new cancer cases and 11,700 deaths in the United States in 1998. Approximately two thirds of new US cases will be superficial tumors, predominantly low-grade papillary. After standard therapeutic resection (with or without intravesical therapy), the superficial bladder tumor recurrence rate is 30% to 70% within 12 months of resection. Morbidity is substantial, with frequent cystoscopy, recurrence, resections, and possible cystectomy for progression to invasive cancers. Therefore, new approaches, including chemoprevention, are needed. Data suggest that bladder carcinogenesis is a multi-step, multifocal (field effect) process, possibly involving the spread of premalignant clones--all of which are prerequisites for effective chemopreventive approaches. To date, retinoids are the best-studied chemopreventive agents in this site, achieving mixed clinical results (with 13-cis-retinoic acid and etretinate) in superficial bladder tumors. This review includes the epidemiology and biology of bladder carcinogenesis in addition to preclinical and clinical retinoid data, and focuses on the most promising avenue of current retinoid chemoprevention in the bladder: the potent apoptosis-inducing retinoid fenretinide (4-HPR), which currently is in three phase III trials.

Context Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease, resulting in a very low 5-year survival. Screening may reduce the risk of death from lung cancer. Objective To conduct a systematic review of the evidence regarding the benefits and harms of lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). A multisociety collaborative initiative (involving the American Cancer Society, American College of Chest Physicians, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network) was undertaken to create the foundation for development of an evidence-based clinical guideline. Data Sources MEDLINE (Ovid: January 1996 to April 2012), EMBASE (Ovid: January 1996 to April 2012), and the Cochrane Library (April 2012). Study Selection Of 591 citations identified and reviewed, 8 randomized trials and 13 cohort studies of LDCT screening met criteria for inclusion. Primary outcomes were lung cancer mortality and all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included nodule detection, invasive procedures, follow-up tests, and smoking cessation. Data Extraction Critical appraisal using predefined criteria was conducted on individual studies and the overall body of evidence. Differences in data extracted by reviewers were adjudicated by consensus. Results Three randomized studies provided evidence on the effect of LDCT screening on lung cancer mortality, of which the National Lung Screening Trial was the most informative, demonstrating that among 53 454 participants enrolled, screening resulted in significantly fewer lung cancer deaths (356 vs 443 deaths; lung cancer−specific mortality, 247 vs 309 events per 100 000 person-years for LDCT and control groups, respectively; relative risk, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73-0.93; absolute risk reduction, 0.33%; P = .004). The other 2 smaller studies showed no such benefit. In terms of potential harms of LDCT screening, across all trials and cohorts, approximately 20% of individuals in each round of screening had positive results requiring some degree of follow-up, while approximately 1% had lung cancer. There was marked heterogeneity in this finding and in the frequency of follow-up investigations, biopsies, and percentage of surgical procedures performed in patients with benign lesions. Major complications in those with benign conditions were rare. Conclusion Low-dose computed tomography screening may benefit individuals at an increased risk for lung cancer, but uncertainty exists about the potential harms of screening and the generalizability of results.

Significant morbidity and expense result from frequent recurrences of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after standard treatment, and carcinoma in situ (Tis) is a poor prognostic factor. Predicated on observational and preclinical data strongly supporting cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in the pathogenesis, and the activity of COX-2 inhibitors, in bladder cancer, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether celecoxib could reduce the time-to-recurrence (TTR) in NMIBC patients at high risk for recurrence. A total of 146 patients were randomized to celecoxib (200 mg) or placebo orally twice daily for at least 12 months. The average treatment duration was 1.25 years. Primary intent-to-treat analysis revealed celecoxib did not statistically significantly prolong TTR compared with placebo (P = 0.17, log rank) with a median follow-up of 2.49 years. The recurrence-free rate at 12 months with celecoxib was 88% (95% CI: 0.81–0.96) versus 78% (95% CI: 0.69–0.89) with placebo. After controlling for covariates with Cox regression analysis, recurrence rates did not differ between the two study arms (HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.37–1.29). However, celecoxib had a marginally significant effect on reducing metachronous recurrences (vs. placebo) with HR of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.3–1.06; P = 0.075). Celecoxib was well tolerated, with similar adverse events and quality-of-life in both arms. Our clinical trial results do not show a clinical benefit for celecoxib in preventing NMIBC recurrence but further investigation of COX-2 inhibitors in this setting is warranted. Cancer Prev Res; 4(10); 1580–9. ©2011 AACR.

In 2001, we reported that mortality may have been higher with isotretinoin (30 mg/d for 3 years) than with placebo in the subgroup of current smokers among the 1,166 patients with definitively resected early-stage non–small cell lung cancer who participated in the randomized, controlled Lung Intergroup Trial. We report the overall and cause (cancer, cardiovascular disease, or other)-specific mortality associated with long-term isotretinoin after an extended median follow-up of 6.2 years that included the capture of cause-of-death data from 428 deceased patients. Overall mortality was 36.7% in each of the two trial arms, about two thirds related to cancer and one third to other or unknown causes. Overall and cancer deaths increased in current smokers in the isotretinoin arm during the treatment and the extended follow-up period. No mortality end point increased among never smokers and former smokers taking isotretinoin, and cancer deaths decreased marginally in this combined subgroup. Isotretinoin also increased deaths from cardiovascular disease in current smokers. The present analysis supports the safety of protracted isotretinoin use in the combined group of never smokers and former smokers, which has important public health implications, for example, for treating acne in young people. The increased mortality in current smokers in this study is further evidence of the multifaceted danger of active smoking. The overall indications of this study have public health implications for treating acne in young people and other uses of retinoids in smokers. Cancer Prev Res; 3(6); 738–44. ©2010 AACR.

We previously showed that low-dose fenretinide (200 mg/d) had limited activity in retinoid-resistant oral leukoplakia (34% response rate) possibly because serum drug levels were insufficient to induce retinoid receptor–independent apoptosis. Therefore, we designed the single-arm phase II trial reported here to investigate whether higher-dose fenretinide would improve leukoplakia response over that of our previous study. Leukoplakia patients received fenretinide (900 mg/m2 twice daily) in four 3-week cycles (1 week on drug followed by 2 weeks off). At week 12, clinical responses were determined and blood samples were collected for serum drug level assessments. A planned interim futility analysis led to early trial closure after the initial 15 (of 25 planned) patients because only 3 (20%) had a partial response (stopping rule: ≤4 responses in first 16 patients). Fenretinide was well tolerated—only one grade 3 adverse event (diarrhea) occurred. Serum fenretinide levels changed from 0 (baseline) to 0.122 ± 0.093 μmol/L (week 12). In correlative in vitro studies, high-dose fenretinide inhibited the growth of head and neck cancer cells more and oral leukoplakia cells less than did lower doses of fenretinide. This result is consistent with our clinical finding that high-dose fenretinide did not improve on the historical response rate of lower-dose fenretinide in our previous oral leukoplakia trial.

OBJECTIVES To develop a population-based clinical model of bladder cancer (BC) care costs and identify cost drivers. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 4863 patients with BC identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database, aged at least 65 years and diagnosed between 1994 and 1996. We collected the records of Medicare reimbursements (a surrogate of costs) through 1998 and classified them into clinically relevant intervals and care types by disease invasiveness to derive the cumulative costs of care. We calculated the incremental resource use costs using sex and age-matched controls from a 5% general population sample and compared similarly matched patients with other cancer (OC). We inflated all costs to 2006 U.S. dollars. RESULTS The annual cost of care for all patients with muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) was $35.72M (95% confidence interval $35.69M to $35.75M), 70% more than the $21.03M (95% confidence interval $21.00M to $21.05M) for patients with non-MIBC. The major cost drivers, regardless of disease stage, were diagnostic/surveillance and complications, accounting for up to 43% and 37% of BC care costs, respectively. Comorbidity-adjusted incremental annual resource costs per patient with MIBC were more than four times greater than those for patients with non-MIBC, similar to those of OC controls (P = 0.490-0.913), except for inpatient (P = 0.002) and hospice (P

Purpose: Epidemiologic and clinical data suggest that selenium could prevent prostate cancer, but it has not been shown that supplemental selenium leads to an increased concentration of selenium in prostate tissue compared with adjacent tissue. Experimental Design: We conducted a randomized, controlled, short-term trial of l-selenomethionine (SeMet) versus observation in men with organ-confined prostate cancer. The primary endpoint was the measurement of selenium concentration in prostate tissue and seminal vesicle (SV). We assessed baseline selenium levels in serum and in toenail specimens (reflecting long-term intake) and post-intervention selenium levels in serum, and in prostate and SV tissues using hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectroscopy. Results: Sixty-six eligible patients were randomly assigned to the SeMet (n = 34) or observation (n = 32) arm; both arms had similar baseline patient characteristics. Baseline serum selenium was similar in the two groups (P = 0.64). Baseline toenail selenium levels were slightly higher in the SeMet group than in the control group (P = 0.07). After the intervention, the mean serum selenium level increased 15% in the SeMet arm and was higher than in the observation arm (P = 0.001). The selenium concentration in prostate tissue was 22% higher in the SeMet arm (n = 26) than in the observation arm (n = 25; 1.80 versus 1.47 ppm; P = 0.003, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and remained significantly higher after adjusting for chronic selenium intake (P = 0.021, ANCOVA). SV selenium concentration was similar in both groups (P = 0.384) and was lower than in prostate tissue. Conclusions: The present study is the first to show that selenium taken as oral supplementation accumulates preferentially in the human prostate gland as opposed to the SV. These findings support the hypothesis that oral selenium supplementation may contribute to the cancer preventive effects of selenium.

Selective COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib and NS-398 are being evaluated as chemopreventive and therapeutic agents for bladder and other cancers. We investigated the effects of these nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents on a panel of bladder cancer cell lines, and assessed their effects on anchorage-dependent and -independent growth, cell cycle, apoptosis and morphology. The human bladder cancer cell lines UM-UC-1, -3, and -6 were assayed for COX-2 expression by Western analysis using a monoclonal antibody to COX-2. UM-UC-1, -3, and -6 cells were grown in the presence of increasing concentrations of NS-398 and celecoxib, and cell growth was quantitated over 7 days by crystal violet elution. The cell lines were treated with NS-398 and celecoxib for 48 h and analyzed by flow cytometry with propidium iodide staining and Br-dUTP staining for apoptosis. Anchorage-independent growth was assessed using an agarose growth assay. Western analysis demonstrated that COX-2 expression in UM-UC-1, -6, and -3 was high, low, and undetectable, respectively. NS-398 and celecoxib produced dose-dependent growth inhibition of UM-UC-1 and -6. Both NS-398 and celecoxib also inhibited anchorage-dependent and -independent growth of UM-UC-3 in a dose-dependent fashion, despite the low basal expression of COX-2 in this cell line. Cell cycle analyses of UM-UC-1 and -6 revealed a 50% reduction in S-phase in the presence of 100 microM NS-398 whereas a smaller reduction in S-phase was noted in UM-UC-3 cells. Furthermore, treatment with 100 microM celecoxib resulted in significant apoptosis in all three cell lines, which was associated with downregulation of Bcl-2. COX-2 selective inhibitors NS-398 and celecoxib produced dose-dependent growth inhibition of bladder cancer cells associated with a significant reduction in S-phase. Induction of apoptosis in all three cell lines by celecoxib was associated with downregulation of Bcl-2. These changes occur independently of COX-2 expression levels suggesting the presence of a COX-2 independent pathway.

Objectives To estimate the lifetime cost of bladder cancer and the contribution of complications to the total costs. Methods We reviewed the medical records of a retrospective cohort of 208 patients with bladder cancer who registered at our comprehensive cancer center from 1991 to 1999. We multiplied the number of resources used during management of bladder cancer by their unit charges. We converted charges into costs using the Medicare cost-to-charge ratio and inflated these to 2005 U.S. dollars. We estimated future costs by creating two extreme hypothetical scenarios. In the best-case scenario, we assumed patients with superficial disease developed recurrences at the cohort’s mean rate and that patients with muscle-invasive disease were disease free after definitive therapy. Survival was based on the U.S. life expectancy in both cases. In the worst-case scenario, we assumed patients with superficial disease developed muscle-invasive disease and that all patients subsequently died of bladder cancer. Results The average cost of bladder cancer was $65,158 among the cohort patients. Sixty percent of this cost ($39,393) was associated with surveillance and treatment of recurrences, and 30% ($19,811) was attributable to complications. The lifetime cost of bladder cancer was lower for the worst-case scenario ($99,270) than for the best-case scenario ($120,684). However, a greater proportion of the costs were attributable to complications with the worst-case scenario (43%, $42,290) compared with the best (28%, $34,169). Conclusions The management of bladder cancer and its associated complications results in a major economic burden. More cost-effective surveillance strategies and approaches for preventing complications are crucial to minimizing the disease’s clinical and economic consequences.

Background The incidence of second primary lung cancers (SPLC) after resection of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is estimated to be 1% to 4% per patient year. The overall effect of SPLC on survival after resection of stage I NSCLC is unknown. Here we report the incidence, management, and outcome of SPLC in a large prospective cohort of patients who underwent careful follow-up. Methods National Cancer Institute Intergroup Trial NCI #I91-0001 examined the effectiveness of isotretinoin A for chemoprevention of second primary tumors, the primary endpoint in that trial. Prospective data from patients randomly assigned to the placebo arm were analyzed. Results Five hundred sixty-nine patients underwent complete resection of pathologic stage I NSCLC. The median follow-up was 5.9 years. Second primary tumors developed in 88 (15%) patients. Of these, 49 (56%) were SPLC (incidence = 1.99/100 patient-years), with a median interval from initial surgery of 4.2 years. Second primary lung cancer never developed in patients who had never smoked (n = 44, p = 0.046; never versus ever smokers). Current smokers had a higher incidence of SPLC than former smokers (hazard ratio=1.91, p = 0.03). Age, sex, stage, histology, tumor location and initial surgery had no effect on SPLC development. Despite semiannual follow-up with chest radiographs, 12 (24%) patients had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis of SPLC. Surgical resection was performed in 31 (63%) SPLC patients. Median survival was 4.1 years in those who underwent surgery and 1.4 years in those who did not ( p = 0.003). Overall SPLC-related mortality in the original cohort was 3.7%. Conclusions Patients who undergo surgery for SPLC can achieve prolonged survival. Despite close follow-up however many patients with SPLC present with advanced disease. That indicates a need for continued lifelong postoperative surveillance.

Bladder tumors from Egyptian patients with a high prevalence of bilharziasis were immunohistochemically analyzed for the expression of cytokeratin 20 (CK20), AN43, prostaglandin dehydrogenase (PGDH), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). The tumors included 26 transitional cell carcinomas (TCC), 10 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and 2 tumors of mixed TCC/SCC histology. Of the 28 TCC tumors, 21 (75%) expressed CK20 and 25 (89%) expressed AN43. CK20 was not expressed in any of the 10 SCC tumors and AN43 was expressed in 2 of them. PGDH was expressed in 18 (64%) of the 28 tumors with TCC histology and 1 of the 10 SCC. A subset of 21 tumors (16 TCC and 5 SCC) was tested for COX-2 expression. COX-2 was detected in 69% of the 16 TCC tumors examined but was not seen in the SCC tumors. As tumors increased in stage, the expression of these proteins changed. CK20, AN43 and PGDH decreased but COX-2 expression increased in higher stage tumors. The histologic phenotype of these cancers is reflected in their expression of these proteins and is modified further as tumors progress in stage.

Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer incidence in the United States, accounting for an estimated 172,000 new cases in 1994 (Boring et al., 1994). Lung cancer incidence in males is second only to prostate cancer, and in females, it is second only to breast cancer (Miller et al., 1992a). Unfortunately, despite recent advances in oncologic therapy, survival from lung cancer remains poor, as indicated by an overall 5-yr relative survival rate of 13% (Miller et al., 1992a). As a result, lung cancer is the chief cause of cancer mortality in both men and women, accounting for an estimated 153,000 cancer deaths in 1994 (Boring et al., 1994). Further, lung cancer is likely to remain a leading cause of both cancer incidence and cancer mortality well into the next century (Gaffney et al., 1988).

5520 Background: In EGFR over expressing cell lines, higher doses of erlotinib block downstream signaling more effectively (e.g., MAPK) than lower doses, despite a similar degree of EGFR phosphoryl...

5515 Background: We have conducted a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy (CT) consisting of 3 treatment cycles with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 day 1; ifosfamide 1000 mg/m2 IV daily x 3; and carbopla...