1. What Do We Really Know about the Effectiveness of Glaucoma Interventions?
- Author
-
Tianjing Li, Carlo Alberto Cutolo, Verena Prokosch-Willing, João Barbosa Breda, Gianni Virgili, Andreas Katsanos, Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Gerhard Garhöfer, Steven J. Gedde, Manuele Michelessi, David C. Musch, Miriam Kolko, Marta Pazos, Ali Ahmed Al Rajhi, Riaz Qureshi, and Flora Lum
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Intraocular pressure ,Trabeculoplasty ,genetic structures ,Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,010102 general mathematics ,Glaucoma ,General Medicine ,Evidence-based medicine ,medicine.disease ,01 natural sciences ,eye diseases ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Prostaglandin analog ,Systematic review ,030221 ophthalmology & optometry ,medicine ,Trabeculectomy ,sense organs ,0101 mathematics ,Intensive care medicine ,business - Abstract
Purpose To identify systematic reviews of interventions for glaucoma conditions and to assess their reliability, thereby generating a list of potentially reliable reviews for updating glaucoma practice guidelines. Design Cross-sectional study. Participants Systematic reviews of interventions for glaucoma conditions. Methods We used a database of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vision research and eye care maintained by the Cochrane Eyes and Vision United States Satellite. We examined all Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions for glaucoma conditions published before August 7, 2019, and all non-Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions for glaucoma conditions published between January 1, 2014, and August 7, 2019. Main Outcome Measures We assessed eligible reviews for reliability, extracted characteristics, and summarized key findings from reviews classified as reliable. Results Of the 4451 systematic reviews in eyes and vision identified, 129 met our eligibility criteria and were assessed for reliability. Of these, we classified 49 (38%) as reliable. We found open-angle glaucoma (22/49) to be the condition with the most reviews and medical management (17/49) and intraocular pressure (IOP; 43/49) to be the most common interventions and outcomes studied. Most reviews found a high degree of uncertainty in the evidence, which hinders the possibility of making strong recommendations in guidelines. These reviews found high-certainty evidence about a few topics: reducing IOP helps to prevent glaucoma and its progression, prostaglandin analogs are the most effective medical treatment for lowering IOP, laser trabeculoplasty is as effective as medical treatment as a first-line therapy in controlling IOP, the use of IOP-lowering medications in the perioperative or postoperative periods to accompany laser (e.g., trabeculoplasty) reduces the risk of postoperative IOP spikes, conventional surgery (i.e., trabeculectomy) is more effective than medications in reducing IOP, and antimetabolites and β-radiation improve IOP control after trabeculectomy. The evidence is weak regarding the effectiveness of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries. Conclusions Most systematic reviews evaluating interventions for glaucoma are of poor reliability. Even among those that may be considered reliable, important limitations exist in the value of information because of the uncertainty of the evidence as well as small and sometimes unimportant clinical differences between interventions.
- Published
- 2021