Search

Goal The aim of our prospective study was to analyze the results of endoscopic stenting to treat obstruction due to colorectal cancer and complications after colorectal resection for cancer. Background Endoscopic stenting for obstructing colorectal cancer has become a common place in clinical practice. However, there is a 2% to 5% risk of bowel perforation, and a percentage of technical failure of 2% to 10%. Materials and methods In a 15-year period (August, 1999 to December, 2013), 153 patients with colorectal cancer had endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent for treatment of an obstructing colorectal cancer (133 patients) or for treatment of complications after colorectal resection for cancer (20 patients). They were prospectively evaluated in a database and they form the basis of this report. Results There was no case of mortality or major morbidity. Overall technical success was 94.8%. After introducing the use of a pediatric nasogastroscope to pass the obstruction (71 patients), technical success was 100%. Complications in patients in whom the stent was left in place during the follow-up were frequent, requiring a close observation. We had 20 patients with fecal obstruction, 4 cases of stent dislodgment, and 8 cases of obstruction from ingrowth of the tumor. All patients were treated successfully endoscopically. Conclusions Placement of self-expandable metal stents represents a valid technique. A proper training is required.

Purpose Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) to relieve malignant colorectal obstruction has been widely accepted in clinical practice. Despite increasing experience, early and late complications occur with an incidence ranging from 4% to 20%. Materials and methods We have adopted a modification in the technique. A pediatric nasogastroscope (4.8 mm in diameter) has been used to pass the obstruction. It is possible to have a direct vision of the anatomy and pathology, and to pass the guidewire above the obstruction, through the nasogastroscope, under direct vision. Fluoroscopy was also used to follow the course of the guidewire and deployment of the stent. Results Early and late complications have been reduced with the new technique. Conclusions In the most recent experience of 64 patients, early and late complications have been reduced significantly. This new technique reduces radiation exposure by 70% for the patients and for the operators.

The aim of the present study was to analyze the results of our experience with elective placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) in patients with stage IV obstructing colorectal cancer. A systematic review of the literature was also carried out to analyze the factors influencing the results of SEMS placement and to determine if there has been any improvement in the more recent period. The results of a personal series of 100 patients were analyzed. There was no case of mortality or major morbidity. The systematic review included 27 articles published from April 2007 to December 2011. In our experience the technical success rate was 96 % and the clinical success rate was 92 %. During the follow-up period a repeat colonoscopy was needed in 31 % of the patients for recurrent symptoms of obstruction due to fecal impaction (19 %), tumor growth (8 %), or stent dislodgment (4 %). Review of the literature showed similar results, with a significant improvement in the reports of the last 6 years; procedures performed on an emergency basis had poorer results. Self-expandable metallic stent placement offers a valid alternative to surgery in patients with obstructing stage IV colorectal cancer, but careful follow-up is required.

Self-expandable metal stents can be used to treat patients with rectovaginal fistula after colorectal resection for cancer. Fifteen patients with rectovaginal fistula, after colorectal resection for cancer, were treated with endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent. In four patients, a diverting proximal stoma had been performed elsewhere. Mean age was 58 years. All patients had preoperative radiotherapy. In ten patients, the stent was placed as initial form of treatment. Four patients were referred after multiple failed operations. The control group consisted of ten patients who had rectovaginal fistula and underwent proximal diverting ileostomy and percutaneous drainage of the surrounding abscess One patient was not able to tolerate the stent, which was removed. At a mean follow-up of 22 months, the rectovaginal fistula healed in 12 patients. In the remaining two patients, the fistula has reduced significantly in size to allow a successful flap transposition. The fistula healed only in five out of the ten patients who had only a proximal ileostomy. Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stents represents a valid adjunctive to treat patients with rectovaginal fistula, after colorectal resection for cancer.

Anastomotic leak after colorectal resection for cancer is a challenging clinical problem. The postoperative quality of life in these situations is significantly impaired. We prospectively analyzed the effect of placing a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) at the level of the leak, with or without proximal diverting ileostomy, in 22 patients with symptomatic anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection. The stents were placed successfully in all 22 patients. An proximal ileostomy was created in 15 patients under general anesthesia. The anastomotic leak healed, without evidence of residual stricture or major incontinence, in 19 patients (86 %). In 3 patients, the leak did not heal; in 2 patients with recurrent rectovaginal fistula, the size of the leak decreased significantly, allowing successful flap transposition; and only 1 patient required a permanent stoma. SEMS placement is a valid adjunct to the treatment of patients with symptomatic anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), also known as virtual colonoscopy, is a recently introduced imaging modality for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance of CTC in a blinded comparison with conventional colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 66 consecutive, symptomatic patients underwent spiral computed tomography (CT) examination after standard bowel preparation. CT images were analyzed and subsequently compared with conventional colonoscopy findings. RESULTS Conventional colonoscopy detected 15 colorectal carcinomas and 52 polyps. CTC correctly identified all carcinomas, 13 of 14 polyps greater than 10.0 mm (sensitivity 92.8 %; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI); 77 - 100), 11 of 13 polyps between 6.0 and 9.0 mm (sensitivity 84.6 %; 95 % CI; 62 - 100), and six of 25 polyps smaller than 5.0 mm (sensitivity 24 %; 95 % CI; 6 - 42). The per-patient sensitivity and specificity were 93.7 % and 94.1 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Computed tomographic colonography is an accurate imaging modality for the detection of colorectal neoplasia, especially for lesions larger than 6.0 mm in diameter.

Aim To treat patients with rectovaginal fistula after anterior resection for cancer using self-expanding metal stents. Method Ten patients of mean age of 56.3 years with rectovaginal fistula after colorectal resection for cancer were treated with endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent. In three patients a diverting proximal stoma had been performed elsewhere. The rectal opening of the fistula was located from 3 to 10 cm from the anal verge (mean 6 cm). All patients had preoperative radiotherapy. In seven patients the stent was placed as the initial treatment while three referred patients had had multiple failed operations. Results There were no complications after the procedure. At a mean follow-up of 24 months the rectovaginal fistula has healed without major faecal incontinence in eight patients. In the remaining two the fistula has reduced significantly in size to allow a successful flap transposition. Conclusion Endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent is a valid adjunct to treat patients with rectovaginal fistula after colorectal resection for cancer.

observed (Fig. 3). The presented case shows theimportance of team work and selection of the optimalirradiation technique in determining diagnosis, tumorstaging, and treatment of the patient. After histologi-cal classification, high-grade primary breast lympho-mas should be treated with combinationchemotherapy with or without radiation similar tosystemic lymphomas of a similar histological type.Reports on breast lymphoma treatment include fewor no details about the target volume and applied irra-diation technique and usually mention only the totalradiation dose. The delivery of radiotherapy was a sig-nificant predictor of improved overall survival in ourcase.

Background Self-expandable metallic stents can be used to treat patients with symptomatic anastomotic complications after colorectal resection. Methods Twenty patients with symptomatic anastomotic stricture after colorectal resection were treated with endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent. Ten patients had “simple” anastomotic stricture. In the remaining 10 patients, a leak was associated with the stricture. Results The anastomotic leakage healed without evidence of residual stricture or major fecal incontinence in 8 of 10 patients. Overall, the anastomotic stricture was resolved in 14 of the 20 patients. Conclusions Self-expandable metal stents represent a valid adjunctive to treat patients with symptomatic anastomotic complications after colorectal resection for cancer. They have a complementary role to balloon dilatation in case of simple anastomotic stricture, and they improve the rate of healing when the stricture is associated with a leak.

Aim To evaluate the use of self-expandable metallic stents to treat patients with symptomatic benign anastomotic stricture after colorectal resection. Method Ten patients with a benign symptomatic anastomotic stricture after colorectal resection were treated with endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent. Results The stent was placed successfully in all 10 patients without any major morbidity. At a mean follow-up of 18 months the stenosis was resolved successfully in 7 out 10 patients (70%). The remaining three patients were subsequently treated successfully with balloon dilatation. Conclusion Self-expandable metal stents represent a valid alternative to balloon dilatation to treat patients with benign symptomatic anastomotic stricture after colorectal resection for cancer.

Self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) placement is a valid form of therapy for patients with obstructing colon rectal cancer. The procedure is not feasible for a minority of patients with a very low risk of bowel perforation. This report analyzes the results of a technical detail used for SEMS placement.In 43 patients with colon rectal obstruction, the SEMS apparatus was introduced through a guidewire passed above the obstruction in the channel of a pediatric nasogastroscope (diameter, 4.9 mm). The pediatric nasogastroscope was passed into the obstruction and above, allowing the anatomy of the colorectal lesion and the passage of the guidewire to be visualized directly.The SEMS was inserted successfully in all cases without complications. In a previous series of 82 patients who had passage of the guidewire through the obstruction blindly, four technical failures occurred (nonsignificant difference).A pediatric nasogastroscope can be useful for passing the colon rectal obstruction and guiding the passage of the guidewire under direct vision.

BACKGROUND: The authors report the final results of a prospective single-center randomized study whose aim was to compare the endoscopic placement of self-expandable stents with open surgical gastroenterostomy to relieve gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in patients with advanced antropyloric adenocarcinoma. A systematic review of the medical literature from December 1999 to December 2011 was carried out to determine the results of endoscopic stenting in patients with GOO from unresectable primary cancer of the antropyloric region. METHODS: In the prospective study, 18 patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the antropyloric region and symptoms of GOO were enrolled. In 9 patients, self-expandable stents were placed, and in 9 patients, open surgical gastroenterostomy was performed. Patients were followed until death. Six hundred seventy-two patients with primary unresectable cancer of the antropyloric region and GOO syndrome who underwent endoscopic stenting were identified from the literature. RESULTS: In the prospective study of 18 patients, there was no case of postprocedural mortality. Efficient gastric emptying resumed more quickly in patients who received stents, although 3 months after the procedures, there was no difference between the 2 groups. Mean crude survival was 258 days in patients who received stents and 283 days in those who underwent surgical gastroenterostomy (P 5 NS). In patients who underwent stent placement, there were 2 cases of stent migration and 2 cases of food impaction, which were resolved with endoscopy at a mean follow-up of 70 days. In the 672 patients from the literature, operative mortality and morbidity were very low. In prospective studies, complications related to stents were more common than previously thought. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic placement of metallic stents offers an effective therapy in patients with advanced primary adenocarcinoma of the antropyloric region and poor general condition. In patients with longer life expectancies, the form of therapy should be chosen individually, considering that surgical gastroenterostomy has fewer complications in the medium term and that in patients with endoscopic stenting, very careful follow-up is required, with the possibility of new operative endoscopy in half of the patients.

To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of low-radiation-dose computed tomographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps by using two sequential colonoscopies, with the second colonoscopy as the reference standard.The study was local ethics committee approved, and all patients gave written informed consent. Colonographic images were acquired by using a low-dose multi-detector row CT protocol (effective milliampere-second setting, 10 mAs). Three observers interpreted the CT colonographic data separately and independently by using a two-dimensional technique. Initial conventional colonoscopy was performed by an endoscopist unaware of the CT colonographic findings. Second colonoscopy performed within 2 weeks by a colonoscopist aware of both the CT colonographic and the initial colonoscopic findings served as the reference standard. The sensitivities of CT colonography and initial colonoscopy were calculated on a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. Specificities and positive and negative predictive values also were calculated on a per-patient basis.Eighty-eight patients underwent CT colonography and initial conventional colonoscopy on the same day. Per-polyp sensitivities were 62% and 83% for CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively. Sensitivities for detection of polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger were 86% and 84% for CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively. Initial colonoscopy failed to depict 16 polyps, six of which were correctly detected with CT colonography. For identification of patients with polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger, CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively, had sensitivities of 84% and 90%, specificities of 82% and 100%, positive predictive values of 70% and 100%, and negative predictive values of 91% and 95%.Low-dose CT colonography compares favorably with colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger, with markedly decreased performance for detection of polyps 5 mm in diameter or smaller.

Background & Aims: We prospectively compared the performance of low-dose multidetector computed tomographic colonography (CTC) without cathartic preparation with that of colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Methods: A total of 203 patients underwent low-dose CTC without cathartic preparation followed by colonoscopy. Before CTC, fecal tagging was achieved by adding diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium to regular meals. No subtraction of tagged feces was performed. Colonoscopy was performed 3–7 days after CTC. Three readers interpreted the CTC examinations separately and independently using a primary 2-dimensional approach using multiplanar reconstructions and 3-dimensional images for further characterization. Colonoscopy with segmental unblinding was used as reference standard. The sensitivity of CTC was calculated both on a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. For the latter, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were also calculated. Results: CTC had an average sensitivity of 95.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.1%–99%) for the identification of colorectal polyps ≥8 mm. With regard to per-patient analysis, CTC yielded an average sensitivity of 89.9% (95% CI, 86%–93.7%), an average specificity of 92.2% (95% CI, 89.5%–94.9%), an average positive predictive value of 88% (95% CI, 83.3%–91.5%), and an average negative predictive value of 93.5% (95% CI, 90.9%–96%). Interobserver agreement was high on a per-polyp basis (κ statistic range, .61–.74) and high to excellent on a per-patient basis (κ statistic range, .79–.91). Conclusions: Low-dose multidetector CTC without cathartic preparation compares favorably with colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.

Background: The aim of our study was to compare the performance of virtual computed tomographic colonography with that of conventional colonoscopy in a blinded, prospective study in 165 patients with suspected colorectal lesions. Methods: There were 165 patients, all referred for conventional colonoscopy, who underwent preliminary virtual computed tomographic colonography. Computed tomograhic images of all suspected lesions were analyzed and subsequently compared with conventional colonoscopy findings. Results: There were 30 colorectal cancers and 37 polyps identified at conventional colonoscopy. Virtual computed tomographic colonography correctly detected all cancers, as well as 11 of 12 polyps of 10 mm in diameter or larger (sensitivity, 92%); 14 of 17 polyps between 6 and 9 mm (sensitivity, 82%); and 4 of 8 polyps of 5 mm or smaller (sensitivity, 50%). The per-patient sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 97%, respectively. Conclusions: Virtual computed tomographic colonography has a diagnostic sensitivity similar to that of conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal lesions larger than 6 mm in diameter.

Introduction Ganglioneuromas are rare benign peripheral neuroblastic tumors characterized by hyperplasia of ganglion cells, nerve fibers, and supporting cells. They are not usually localized in the colon. Case presentation A 61-year-old Caucasian man was admitted to our department for colon cancer screening. A colonoscopy revealed a lipoma of 5cm in diameter, two micropolyps of less than 1cm, and one sessile polyp of 0.6cm in diameter. The polyps were removed with hot biopsy forceps. A histological examination revealed two hyperplastic polyps and one ganglioneuroma polyp. A follow-up colonoscopy showed no signs of recurrence after 16 months. Conclusions Although a few cases of lipomas associated with ganglioneuromatous syndrome have been reported, the association of an intestinal lipoma with an isolated ganglioneuroma polyp has not been described. The implications of this association are unknown.