1. Participatory Interventions for Sexual Health Promotion for Adolescents and Young Adults on the Internet: Systematic Review
- Author
-
Philippe Martin, Serge Gottot, Lorraine Cousin, Aurélie Bourmaud, Corinne Alberti, Elise de La Rochebrochard, Institut national d'études démographiques (INED), Santé et droits sexuels et reproductifs (Unité Ined - Inserm - Université Paris Sud - UVSQ) (UR14), Epidémiologie Clinique et Evaluation Economique Appliquées aux Populations Vulnérables (ECEVE (U1123 / UMR_S_1123)), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-AP-HP Hôpital universitaire Robert-Debré [Paris]-Université de Paris (UP), Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Paul Brousse, Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie, ANRT, First, we would like to thank the National Association for Research and Technology, which funded this project. We would like to thank all members of the Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm) Unit 1123 and Ined-Inserm-Univ. Paris-Sud-UVSQ (Université Versailles Saint-Quentin) Unit 14 teams for their support of our work. We also thank the following librarians for their research articles and methodological support: Catherine Sluse (Ined), Catherine Le Huu Nho (Paris Diderot University), and Fabienne Warin (Paris Diderot University). We also thank all Ined members for their feedback in workshops. We would like to thank our translator Duncan Fulton for proofreading the article. Finally, we thank all the authors included in our review who sent us their publications. and the joint authors of this article, according to their respective roles: PM for all stages of the project, EDLR and CA for participation in the design of the project, LC for his reading of the journals, and all authors for analyzing results and writing the article., Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-AP-HP Hôpital universitaire Robert-Debré [Paris], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Université de Paris (UP), and Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Paul Brousse-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris-Saclay
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,REVIEWS_ARTICLE ,Adolescent ,020205 medical informatics ,Sexual health ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Applied psychology ,Psychological intervention ,Health Informatics ,Sex Education ,02 engineering and technology ,lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ,law.invention ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Promotion (rank) ,Condom ,law ,Intervention (counseling) ,ADOLESCENTS ,Methods ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Humans ,Social media ,030212 general & internal medicine ,SEX_EDUCATION ,INTERNET ,Reproductive health ,media_common ,Participatory interventions ,Original Paper ,business.industry ,4. Education ,lcsh:Public aspects of medicine ,lcsh:RA1-1270 ,3. Good health ,Adolescents and young adults ,Health promotion ,lcsh:R858-859.7 ,Female ,[SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie ,The Internet ,HEALTH ,business ,Psychology ,YOUTHS - Abstract
Background The World Health Organization recommends the development of participatory sexuality education. In health promotion, web-based participatory interventions have great potential in view of the internet’s popularity among young people. Objective The aim of this review is to describe existing published studies on online participatory intervention methods used to promote the sexual health of adolescents and young adults. Methods We conducted a systematic review based on international scientific and grey literature. We used the PubMed search engine and Aurore database for the search. Articles were included if they reported studies on participatory intervention, included the theme of sexual health, were conducted on the internet (website, social media, online gaming system), targeted populations aged between 10 and 24 years, and had design, implementation, and evaluation methods available. We analyzed the intervention content, study implementation, and evaluation methods for all selected articles. Results A total of 60 articles were included, which described 37 interventions; several articles were published about the same intervention. Process results were published in many articles (n=40), in contrast to effectiveness results (n=23). Many of the 37 interventions were developed on websites (n=20). The second most used medium is online social networks (n=13), with Facebook dominating this group (n=8). Online peer interaction is the most common participatory component promoted by interventions (n=23), followed by interaction with a professional (n=16). Another participatory component is game-type activity (n=10). Videos were broadcast for more than half of the interventions (n=20). In total, 43% (n=16) of the interventions were based on a theoretical model, with many using the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model (n=7). Less than half of the interventions have been evaluated for effectiveness (n=17), while one-third (n=12) reported plans to do so and one-fifth (n=8) did not indicate any plan for effectiveness evaluation. The randomized controlled trial is the most widely used study design (n=16). Among the outcomes (evaluated or planned for evaluation), sexual behaviors are the most evaluated (n=14), followed by condom use (n=11), and sexual health knowledge (n=8). Conclusions Participatory online interventions for young people’s sexual health have shown their feasibility, practical interest, and attractiveness, but their effectiveness has not yet been sufficiently evaluated. Online peer interaction, the major participatory component, is not sufficiently conceptualized and defined as a determinant of change or theoretical model component. One potential development would be to build a conceptual model integrating online peer interaction and support as a component.
- Published
- 2020