Search

This study identifies a group of 87 patients, who demonstrated a 'poor' response to a standard buserelin/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) regime. The subsequent outcome in 61 of these 'poor' responders when treated with a higher dose of HMG to achieve a satisfactory response was compared with 250 patients, who showed a 'good' response to the standard regime. 'Poor' responders were significantly older than 'good' responders (P less than 0.001), but no significant difference was demonstrated in the indication for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Even on higher doses of HMG, 'poor' responders took longer for their follicles to achieve maturity than the 'good' responders (P less than 0.01). 'Poor' responders produced 8.9 oocytes per oocyte collection compared to 11.8 in the 'good' responders (P less than 0.01). The fertilization rate was significantly lower in the 'poor' responders compared to the 'good' responders (P less than 0.01). Although there was no significant difference in morphometric grading between 'poor' responder embryos and 'good' responder embryos, the rate of cell division was significantly slower in embryos of the 'poor' responders than the 'good' responders (P less than 0.01). The pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval was 9% in the 'poor' responders compared to 29% in the 'good' responders (P less than 0.01). The implantation rate in the 'poor' responders was 4.4% compared to 16.1% in the 'good' responders (P less than 0.001).

Objective: To evaluate the effect of support with human chorionic gonadotrophin in the luteal phase in women taking part in an in vitro fertilisation programme after buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin were used to hyperstimulate their ovaries., Design: Controlled group comparison., Setting: Outpatient department of a private hospital., Patients: 115 Women with indications for in vitro fertilisation, all of whom had at least one embryo transferred., Interventions: After suppression of the pituitary with buserelin the ovaries of all the women were stimulated with human menopausal gonadotrophin on day 4 of the luteal phase. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (10,000 IU) was given to induce ovulation, and oocytes were recovered 34 hours later. Embryos were transferred 46 to 48 hours after insemination. Women who had received the 10,000 IU of human chorionic gonadotrophin on a date that was an uneven number (n = 61) were allocated to receive support doses of 2500 IU human chorionic gonadotrophin three and six days after that date. The remaining 54 women did not receive hormonal support., End Point: Determination of the rates of pregnancy. MEASUREMENTS and main results--Support with human chorionic gonadotrophin did not significantly alter the progesterone or oestradiol concentrations in the early or mid-luteal phase. The mean (range) progesterone concentrations in the late luteal phase in women who did not become pregnant were, however, significantly higher in those who received support (16(9-110) nmol/l nu 8(4-46) nmol/l), and the luteal phase was significantly longer in this group (14 days nu 12 days). The rate of pregnancy was significantly higher in the women who received support than in those who did not (25/61 nu 8/54)., Conclusions: When buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin are used to hyperstimulate ovaries support with human chorionic gonadotrophin in the luteal phase has a beneficial effect on in vitro fertilisation.