Search

Hypertrophic scar (HTS) occurs frequently after burn injury. Treatments for some aspects of scar morbidity exist, however, dyspigmentation treatments are lacking due to limited knowledge about why scars display dyschromic phenotypes. Full thickness wounds were created on duroc pigs that healed to form dyschromic HTS. HTS biopsies and primary cell cultures were then used to study pigmentation signaling. Biopsies of areas of both pigment types were taken for analysis. At the end of the experiment, melanocyte-keratinocyte cocultures were established from areas of differential pigmentation. Heterogeneously dyspigmented scars formed with regions of hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation. Melanocytes were present in both pigment types measured by S100β quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and immunostaining, and visualized by dendritic cell presence in primary cultures. P53 expression was not different between the two pigment types. Hyperpigmented scars had upregulated levels of proopiomelanocortin (POMC), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH), stem cell factor (SCF), and c-KIT and melanocortin 1 receptors (MC1R) compared to hypopigmented regions. Many genes involved in dyspigmentation were differentially regulated by microarray analysis including MITF, TYR, TYRP1, and DCT. MiTF expression was not different upon further exploration, but TYR, TYRP1, and DCT were upregulated in intact biopsies measured by qRT-PCR and confirmed by immunostaining. This is the first work to confirm the presence of melanocytes in hypopigmented scar using qRT-PCR and primary cell culture. An understanding of the initial steps in dyspigmentation signaling, as well as the downstream effects of these signals, will inform treatment options for patients with scars and provide insight to where pharmacotherapy may be directed.

Introduction: An elevated procoagulant activity observed in trauma patients is, in part, related to tissue factor (TF) located on blood cells and microparticles. However, analysis of trauma patient plasma indicates that there are other contributor(s) to the procoagulant activity. We hypothesize that factor (F)XIa and FIXa are responsible for an additional procoagulant activity in burn patients., Methods: Multiple time-point plasma samples from 56 burn patients (total number of samples was 471; up to 20 time-points/patient collected in 3 weeks following admission) were evaluated in a thrombin generation assay using inhibitory antibodies to TF, FIXa and FXIa., Results: Due to the limited volume of some samples, not all were analyzed for all three proteins. At admission, 10 of 53 patients (19%) had active TF, 53 of 55 (96%) had FXIa and 48 of 55 (87%) had FIXa in their plasma. 34 patients of 56 enrolled (61%) showed TF activity at one or more time-points. All patients had FXIa and 96% had FIXa at one or more time-points. Overall, TF was observed in 99 of 455 samples analyzed (22%), FXIa in 424 of 471 (90%) and FIXa in 244 of 471 (52%). The concentration of TF was relatively low and varied between 0 and 2.1pM, whereas that of FXIa was higher, exceeding 100pM in some samples. The majority of samples with FIXa had it at sub-nanomolar concentrations. No TF, FXIa and FIXa activity was detected in plasma from healthy individuals., Conclusions: For the first time reported, the majority of plasma samples from burn patients have active FXIa and FIXa, with a significant fraction of them having active TF. The concentration of all three proteins varies in a wide range., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.)

Mortality rates in burn patients increase if they experience complications of infection. Frequently, the organisms associated with such infections are Staphylococci, including antibiotic-resistant species such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence factor production can further complicate treatment as a localized toxin presence may derail the healing process and allow a more invasive infection, while a toxin that becomes systemic can induce shock and cause host immune disruption. Male rats were anesthetized and subjected to full-thickness burn wounds. One day postinjury, wounds were inoculated with Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin-1-producing methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Animals were then divided into three treatment groups: vancomycin, linezolid, or positive control. For nine additional days, animals received twice-daily antibiotics and wound assessments, blood draws, and wound biopsies were performed. All animals had wound quantitative cultures that exceeded 1 × 10 colony forming units (CFU) per gram 1 day after inoculation. Linezolid treatment significantly reduced the bacterial counts in the wounds. Positive controls and vancomycin-treated animals had toxins in their wounds by day 5 and this remained throughout the study (ranging from 20-80 ng/ml). Linezolid-treated animals had significant decrease in toxin production (< 5 ng/ml), and in most cases toxins were undetectable. No animals became systemically infected with bacteria at any point during the study. Superantigen production in burn wounds has morbid consequences in terms of long-term wound healing. A S. aureus burn wound infection model was created that allowed the study of the effect of two standard-use antibiotics on local burn wound pathophysiology. Most noteworthy is that low-dose linezolid arrested toxin production in the wound.