Search

Background: The relative effectiveness of early excision and autografting (EG) for deep-partial thickness burns needs to be updated through comparison to initial non-operative (INO) treatment using modern interactive antimicrobial (IA) dressings in a South-Asian burn patient population., Objective: To compare the outcome of early tangential excision and autografting (EG) to initial non-operative (INO) treatment using interactive antimicrobial dressing., Methods: Records of 106 adult burn survivors with predominantly deep-partial thickness thermal burns of TBSA ≤ 30 % were retrospectively reviewed (53 patients each in EG-arm and INO-arm). EG-arm patients underwent excision and autografting within 7 days. INO-arm patients, who had opted against surgical excision, received interactive antimicrobial dressing (hydrofiber with ionic silver). Outcomes measured include percentage of wound healed on days 14 and 21, days to complete wound healing, duration of hospital stay, complications (on 12 months' follow-up) and patient satisfaction scores. Patients were analyzed as treated., Result: Patients in each arm had similar TBSA and demographic profiles. In EG-arm patients, 15-20 % of TBSA were grafted on 5.02 ± 0.71 post-burn day. Thirty percent of EG-arm patients required a second session of grafting for the remaining burn wound, which occurred on 6.873 ± 0.34 post-burn day. On the 21st post-burn day the EG-arm, compared to the INO-arm, had a higher percentage of wound epithelization (98.60 ± 4.03, versus 76.16 ± 7.02, P < 0.01), less days to complete healing (17.60 ± 5.83, versus 40.16 ± 9.09, P < 0.01), and shorter hospital stays (19.62 ± 6.85 days, versus 35.56 ± 7.77 days, P < 0.01). Twenty-five (47 %) INO-arm patients underwent delayed grafting on post-burn day 25.42 ± 0.49. The INO-arm suffered significantly more complications, such as hypertrophic scar, dyspigmentation and functional disability (P < 0.05). EG-arm patients were more satisfied than INO-arm patients (P < 0.01)., Conclusion: We report superior outcomes in the early tangential excision and autografting-arm as compared to the initial non-operative treatment arm. The dogma of early excision and autografting remains valid despite significant advances in wound dressing materials., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Burns Injuries. All rights reserved.)

Aim: This study aims to develop an experimental treatment model effective against oxidative stress in the acute period of severe burns and to analyze the mechanisms of healing large wound defects., Methods: Five rats, including 2 females and 3 males, were used as donors to obtain adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) from the inguinal fat pad. The stem cells were labeled with green fluorescent protein. The study included four groups of 17 rats, each with grade 3 scalding burns on 30 % of their body surface, and a control group of 10 rats with an equal number of males and females. After early excision, 10 6 ADSC-derived stem cells were administered subdermally to the burned wound and autografted to the stem cell group (n = 17). The early excision group (n = 17) received early excision and autograft, with 2 ml of normal saline injected subdermally into the burn wound edge. The PLM group (n = 17) was treated with a polylactic membrane (PLM) dressing after the burn. No treatment was given to the burn group (n = 17). Ten rats from all groups were sacrificed on the 4th day post-burn for oxidative stress evaluation. The control group (n = 10) was sacrificed on day 4. Blood and tissue samples were collected post-sacrifice. Oxidative stress and inflammation in the blood, as well as cell damage in the skin, liver, kidneys, and lungs, were investigated histopathologically and biochemically on the 4th day post-burn. On the 70th day after burn, wound healing was examined macroscopically and histopathologically., Results: On the 4th day, oxidative stress results showed that the levels of Total Oxidative Capacity (TOC) in the blood were lowest in the stem cell (7.4 [6-8.8]), control (6.7 [5.9-7.6]), and early excision (7.5 [6.6-8.5]) groups, with no significant difference between them. The burn group (14.7 [12.5-16.9]) had the highest TOC levels. The PLM group (9.7 [8.6-10.7]) had lower TOC levels than the burn group but higher levels than the other groups. Histopathological examination on the 4th day revealed low liver caspase-3 immunoreactivity in the stem cell and early excision groups among the burn groups. Caspase-3 immunoreactivity levels were as follows: stem cell group (20 [10-30]), early excision group (25 [15-50]), PLM group (70 [50-100]), control group (0), and burn group (80 [60-120]). Other oxidative stress and end-organ damage outcomes were consistent with these results. All rats in the stem cell group had burn wounds that healed completely by the 70th day. Examination of the skin and its appendages from the stem cell group with an immunofluorescence microscope demonstrated green coloration, indicating incorporation of stem cells., Conclusion: Stem cells may have the potential to form new skin and its appendages, providing better healing for large skin defects. Early excision treatment, by removing local necrotic tissues after extensive and deep burns, can prevent end-organ damage due to systemic oxidative stress and inflammation. We also believe that when these two treatments are used together, they can achieve the best results., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None, (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Burns Injuries. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: While the benefits of early excision in burn surgery are clear, the advantages may be lost in low income countries with limited resources. It is important to identify the right timing of excision in different groups of patients, particularly those in low-income countries (LIC), as the burden of disease contributes to the highest global mortality and has the least resources. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the timing of excision in LICs and the outcomes associated with surgery: (1) mortality, (2) sepsis and (3) length of stay (LOS) compared to high income countries (HICs)., Methodology: The PRISMA guidelines and MOOSE checklist were followed for this review. Publications in English from year 1990 to 2017 that included data on the timing and type of burn surgery and outcomes were included. Searches were done using Web of Science, Cochrane collaboration and Pubmed using keywords "Burn and surgery", "Burn and excision", "Burn and excision and grafting" and "burn and skin grafting". Trial quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Outcomes compared for early and late excisions were length of stay (LOS), sepsis and mortality between LICs and HICs., Results: From 278 citations, we selected 41 for full text evaluation, and identified 16 eligible trials. LOS is shorter in early excision compared to late excision in both LICs and HICs. Mortality is lower in late excision compared to early excision in both LICs and HICs. Further subgroup analysis of elderly patients in HICs confirmed that mortality is lower in late excision and unchanged if the elderly are excluded. Early excision reduces sepsis in both LIC and HIC., Discussion: The variable definitions of age, timing of excision, variable nature of % TBSA comparison, mixed inclusion of inhalation injury, co-morbidities and unquantified access to resources make the data difficult to interpret and it is not possible to draw accurate conclusions on the role of early excision for burns in low-middle income countries. A prospective study is needed in order to answer this question., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is a common, well-known and established recommendation to excise burn wounds within 24-72 h in order to mitigate the systemic inflammatory and immunomodulatory response, shorten length of hospitalization through early grafting and optimize patient survival. Despite this apparent consensus, surprisingly few systematic studies have evaluated the actual adherence to this practice and its implications on patient outcomes. In this registry study, we sought to objectify the current status of early burn wound excision, its influencing factors and impact on patient outcomes for all German burn centers., Methods: The German burn registry ('Deutsches Verbrennungsregister') was queried for 3 consecutive years for all patients, who received at least one surgical intervention. Patients were stratified based on whether the first surgical procedure was performed early (EE, within 72 h) or late (LE, after 72 h) post-burn. Descriptive statistics and univariate regressions were performed to quantify fraction of EE vs. LE and to evaluate factors which might favor one over the other (i.e. age, inhalation injury, burn severity by total body surface area (TBSA), scald vs. other burns, obesity, time of admission). Key patient outcomes were analyzed for each group (i.e. mortality, length of hospitalization, number of surgeries) and multifactorial regression analyses were carried out to model the impact of EE on mortality. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05., Results: After initial screening, 1494 complete records were included for final analysis and were stratified into EE and LE. Only 670 (44%) underwent EE within 72 h. Increasing TBSA burned (i.e. [TBSA > 30%]: 53.8% EE, [TBSA < 30%]: 43.5% EE, p < 0.01) and admission on a weekday between Sunday and Wednesday were associated with higher probability of EE (51.5% EE) versus Thursday to Sunday (37.3%, p < 0.001). Age, inhalation injury, cause of burn, and obesity had no effect on EE vs. LE. Patients with EE had significantly shorter median lengths of hospitalization (EE: 18 d, LE: 21 d, p < 0.01). The median number of operations was comparable for both groups. Gross mortality appeared higher in the EE group, but turned out to be comparable to LE after correction for age, TBSA and sex in multifactorial regression analysis., Conclusion: Despite apparent consensus among burn physicians, early excision of burn wounds is performed in less than 50% of cases in German burn centers. The relationship of EE to TBSA burned is expected and clinically sound, while a dependence on admission weekday raises administrative and infrastructural questions, especially when patients who receive EE have significantly shorter hospital stays. More analyses from other burn repositories are needed to compare and benchmark the international status quo of early burn wound excision., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.)

Background: Severe burns are accompanied by an acute and prolonged hypermetabolic response typified by elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines and acute phase proteins. When persistent, this inflammatory response can result in multi-organ dysfunction and death. Regarded as the standard of care, early removal of devitalised tissue and eschar mitigates this hypermetabolic response. Ascertaining the optimal time point for early excision, which remains controversial, has several clinical implications., Methods: This retrospective observational study included 836 adult thermal burns patients with total burned surface area ≥20% from all Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand (BRANZ) Hospital sites, including the Victorian Adult Burns Service (VABS), from July 1 2009 to June 30 2018. Patients were divided into two groups, "early" and "delayed", based on a 24-hour excision cut-off from when the injury occurred. Outcome measurements included mortality, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, ventilation requirements and the incidence of positive blood cultures., Results: Among all patients at BRANZ sites, excision within 24 h was associated with reduced mean length of ICU stay (6.6 ± 8.1 vs. 9.2 ± 10.6 days; p = 0.008) and lower mean mechanical ventilator hourly use (94.9 ± 160.8 vs. 159.2 ± 219.1 h; p = 0.001) in the 20-29% TBSA sub-group. Beyond this, no significant differences were observed in outcome measurements., Conclusions: While it is physiologically important to perform early burn wound excision to mitigate the inflammatory response, delaying excision beyond 24 h for surgical planning, possibly up to 72 h after injury, may be a reasonable approach for certain patient groups., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.)

In the conventional method of microskin autografting, aggressive early excision is adopted, followed by coverage with a microskin-allograft complex to close extensive burn wounds. However, early excision is always associated with a defect of viable tissue, resulting in massive blood loss and causing high risk to aged patients or those with other systemic diseases. We developed a new method in which an eschar thinning operation was first adopted, followed by raising granulation tissue and microskin autografting, which was covered by a Vaseline-based moisture dressing. A total of 52 patients were included in this study and randomly assigned to the control group (n=26) and the experimental group (n=26) for the conventional method and the new method, respectively. The re-epithelisation rate on the 21st day after autografting indicated that there was no significant difference between both groups. There was also no significant difference between the two groups when the re-epithelialisation rate was compared with the type of organisms cultured. However, the Vancouver Burn Skin Score (VBSS) results demonstrated a significant improvement of cosmetic appearance in the experimental group (score=2.1) as compared to the control group (score=3.9). The new method also showed other advantages, including less blood loss, shorter surgical duration and lower cost of surgery. From this prospective study, it can be concluded that the new method can be an alternative to the conventional microskin autografting procedure., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.)

The study of burn flora is helpful in determining current antibiotic susceptibilities and locating development of multidrug resistant bacterial strains among the unit's usual flora. In this study, we aimed to determine the bacteriological pattern of blood, urine and sputum infections and their correlation with burn wound infections. We used data from our burn registry program. All data on demographics, burn wounds and burn wound infection, bacteria isolated, sensitivity to different antibiotics, burn wound culture, sputum culture, urine culture and catheter tip culture were recorded. We had 1721 hospitalized burn patients. Mean age was 26.3+/-20.25 years old. Mean hospital stay was 14.41 days (range 0-64 days). Mean (SD) TBSA was 16.48 (20.67) years. Mortality rate was 5.9%. Burn wound infection was present in 38.54%. The most frequent species was Staphylococcus spp. (55.1%), followed by Pseudomonas (14.29%), Enterococcus (12.24%), E. coli (4%), Klebsiella and Proteus (both 2%). Urine culture was positive in 27.9%, sputum culture was positive in 1.14%, catheter tip culture was positive in 12.3% and blood culture was positive in 7.6% of the cases. There were correlations between positive wound culture and blood and urine culture, most of them with one bacteria species. The most frequent disseminated bacteria was Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the most sensitive antibiotic was Amikacin. More than 39.2% of our positive culture patients had 3 or more positive cultures, and 36.5% had similar culture results for one bacteria, which was a sign of disseminated infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aims: This meta-analysis sought to establish if early excision and grafting is better or equivalent to the conservative treatment of burns in both children and adults with minor or major burns. The outcomes of interest are mortality, wound healing time, duration of sepsis, operating hours, complications of surgery, length of hospital stay, blood transfusion requirements and long term morbidity like joint contractures and hypertrophic scarring. Methods: We searched MEDLINE (1966–July 2004), EMBASE (1980–August 2004) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) with the keywords ‘early excision’ and ‘burns’. This yielded 441 articles of which 15 were randomized controlled trials. Only six trials met the inclusion criteria. Results: There was a significant reduction in mortality with early excision of burns when compared with traditional treatment only in patients without inhalational injury (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.65). The blood transfusion requirement is significantly higher in the early excision group but the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (WMD −8.89, 95% CI −14.28 to −3.50). There was no conclusive evidence on the difference between the two groups in terms of duration of sepsis, wound healing time and skin graft take. Conclusion: Early excision of burns is beneficial in reducing mortality (in patients without inhalational injury), length of hospital stay. The only drawback is the greater volume of blood loss. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Introduction: Early excision and skin grafting has become the standard of good burn management, but it is associated with major blood loss.Aim: To determine the haemostatic effect of terlipressin compared with placebo.Material and methods: Fifty-one patients with burns of 10–20% total body surface area had early excision and split skin grafting of deep burns. The surface area of the burn wound and of the healed graft were measured by planimetry. The patients were randomly allocated to medication, either terlipressin or placebo. Blood loss and number of transfused units of blood were recorded.Results: Twenty-one patients received terlipressin, 13 received terlipressin late (cross-over) and 17 received placebo. Six out of 21 patients exposed to terlipressin were transfused with eleven units of packed red blood cells. Seven out of 13 patients crossed over from placebo to terlipressin (late terlipressin) were transfused with 17 units of blood. Eight out of 17 patients exposed to the placebo were transfused with 22 units of blood (P<0.05). Graft healing was 1055±609 cm2 out of 1452±811 cm2 in terlipressin and 914±633 cm2 out of 1288±720 cm2 in the placebo group (n.s.).Conclusion: Terlipressin reduced the need for blood transfusion by a factor of 2.5 compared to a placebo without impairment of graft healing. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]