Search

Increased ambient temperatures during the care of severely burned patients are essential for mitigating hypothermia and minimizing the impact of consecutive hypermetabolism. For involved medical staff, those conditions may lead to impaired concentration, possibly negatively affecting optimal patient care. Yet, alleviation strategies are lacking. As a novel coping strategy, cooling wear may be an effective means. This explorative study aimed to investigate the effect of high ambient temperatures on the concentration capacity and cooling wear to alleviate thermal stress. The effects of high ambient temperatures and the additional use of cooling wear on the concentration capacity of medical staff were investigated in six subjects during two simulated burn surgeries. Each individual served as his/her own control undergoing one simulation with and one without cooling wear. Concentration capacity was measured before and after each simulation with a standardized test. The results suggested that high ambient temperatures, as used in burn medicine, negatively affect human concentration capacity. The initial assessment of concentration capacity yielded homogenous values. After heat exposure, subjects wearing cooling wear showed a higher concentration capacity and a lower error rate compared to subjects without cooling wear. Summing up, temperature-related decrements in vigilance and performance among medical personnel may impair the patients' outcome. As an opportunity to withstand thermal stress and improve medical care and safety, cooling wear showed promising results and may be used as a heat alleviator. Burn medicine may particularly benefit from further development and rigorous investigation of cooling strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Burn injuries are to this day a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially within low- and middle-income countries. Understanding the etiology of burn injury and epidemiologic- and hospital-specific factors associated with burns is vital for allotting resources for prevention and treatment. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a profile of epidemiological differences in burn care and the ideal burn dressing among the different continents based on a global online survey. This analysis evaluated trends in demographics, epidemiology of burn care, burn incidence, infection, related mortality and burn treatment (e.g., dressing changes and materials). The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the epidemiological profile of burn injury/care amongst the continents and a global control group to determine their utility for guiding evidence-based burn care and identify differences and/or similarities in their clinical practice. A retrospective analysis of data was performed that was acquired during a previous study investigating the ideal burn dressing on a global perspective. The data was analyzed depending on the continent, on which the respondent indicated their hospital to be (Africa, Australia & New Zealand, Asia, Europe, Middle and South America, North America). Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate patient and hospital demographics and variables associated with burn injuries and their treatment. Outcomes of interest also included infections, mortality, length of stay on the ICU and important burn dressing characteristics. Healthcare providers in different areas of the world share similar views and needs regarding burn care management and on what constitutes an ideal burn dressing. We found significant differences in the various continents regarding hospitalization and length of stay on the ICU, with Australia taking the lead. Africa, with a high proportion of low-income-countries, reported the highest rate of burn infections, mortality, and a disproportionally high number of burn incidences amongst children. In general, men were mostly obtaining burn injuries amongst all continents. We found no significant differences regarding the most important characteristics of an ideal burn dressing. Our results suggest significant epidemiological differences regarding burn injuries and care amongst the continents, possibly resulting from the different infrastructure and/or circumstances on the various continents. Future scientific studies need to focus on adequate pain management and designing longer lasting materials that contain the "ideal" properties, by also taking individual regional needs/desires and the patient's perspective and economic boundaries into account. This analysis has delivered valuable insights into the epidemiological differences and/or similarities amongst the various continents. • Burn care is vital on a global scale, however, priorities differ in different regions. • Pain reduction, anti-infectiveness, pain-free dressing changes are of high importance. • The choice of burn dressing can significantly influence the outcome of burn injury. • Men were mostly obtaining burn injuries amongst all continents. • Hospitalization and Length of hospital stay (ICU) differ amongst all continents. • Africa reports the highest rate of burn infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this review is to map and summarize the experiences of various burn centers worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to enable future strategies with regard to the most effective measures in burn care during pandemics and to detect possible gaps in knowledge. Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a major impact on economies, social interactions, and health systems worldwide. Burn units all over the world face a new challenge in maintaining the care of acute burn wounds and follow-up treatments while dealing with constantly changing regulations. Infrastructural changes, the establishment of efficient triage systems, protective measures, personnel resources, in addition to the maintenance of efficient patient care and the guarantee of supply chains, are challenging tasks to be addressed. This review provides an overview of recent developments regarding different strategies and methods used by burn units worldwide to safely overcome the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. Methods: A scoping review of the literature was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed and Google Scholar. Publications were screened for the following key terms: burns, burn injuries, thermal injuries, burn center, burn unit, burn ward, in combination with COVID-19, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, Corona, and Coronavirus. Articles dealing with the management of burn units during the pandemic were further analyzed and included. Results: Of the 136 publications, 10 were considered relevant to the key question and were included in the present review. Results were divided into six major topics, such as infrastructural and personnel management, triaging, severe burns and emergencies, elective surgeries, patient and visitor management, and outpatient management. Conclusion: Only a few studies about managing burn units during the COVID-19 pandemic have been published. Personnel resources and equipment needed to be redistributed to cope with country-specific challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and to maintain adequate burn care. Since all of these articles refer to the period of the initial outbreak, a lack of clinical studies exists regarding the prevention measures taken by burn units during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we identified gaps in knowledge about the impact of implemented measures on burn patient outcomes in the published literature. Further studies are mandatory in order to provide generally applicable guidelines regarding COVID-19 prevention measures at a burn unit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Burn care is a highly relevant medical specialty in every part of the world. Different infrastructure, healthcare systems and access to medical supplies lead to different needs, treatment strategies and outcomes. A fundamental tool in a burn care provider's armamentarium is the use of different dressings. Several studies have investigated the question of the ideal burn dressing, but none could achieve a proper global perspective. With advanced dressings being on the rise, we conducted this study to get a global understanding of the actual use and idea of the ideal burn dressing.Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the understanding of an 'ideal burn dressing' on a global scale.Materials and Methods: A questionnaire about burn care and the ideal burn dressing has been created and translated to five of the most spoken languages world-wide (English, Spanish, French, Chinese, Indonesian). It has been uploaded to an online survey platform and sent out to burn experts worldwide. The voluntary participation was possible for a period of four weeks.Results: In total, 196 respondents from 49 countries participated in the study, yielding a response rate of 24.5%. The most important burn dressing characteristics in a cumulative ranking were (1) lack of adhesion (80.54%), (2) pain-free dressing change (79.87%), (3) requirement of fewer dressing changes, while in a linear ranking they were (1) anti-infective (35.14% 1st), pain-reduction (24.14% 2nd), and high absorbency (23.49% 3rd). Silver-based dressings are the most used dressings for superficial (45.21%) and deep (52.78%). 94.81% believe that the choice of burn dressing affects the outcome.Conclusion: This investigation has delivered valuable insights into the global perspective of the ideal burn dressing. Yet, the question of the ideal burn dressing is still inconclusive. Wound dressing research is of fundamental interest for patients, healthcare providers and healthcare systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The first half of the year 2020 has been shaped by quarantines and lock-downs all over the world. The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a pandemic, that slowed down not only social interactions and economy, but also medical and health care. Governments and hospitals were forced to create ad hoc emergency plans maintaining the balance between an adequate participation in collective response of shutting-down to avoid a further spreading of the virus, while preserving the ongoing acute care and simultaneously being able to react to an imminent overextension with a collapse of capacities. The University Hospital Graz is one of the largest hospitals in Austria. As transregional trauma and burn centre it provides care for people from all over Austria and faced special challenges. We present the strategy of the University Hospital Graz in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic and the way back to (new) normality. The strategy includes infrastructural, patient-centred and staff-centred measures. The continuously low numbers of new infections in Austria allowed a loosening of the lock-down measures already. Particular attention has to be paid to attentive screening of patients and triaging of surgeries during the re-boot. The re-boot needs to be slow and steady to reduce the risk of an infectiological relapse. Once this pandemic is defeated, a careful re-evaluation of the different internationally applied strategies should be performed to be prepared for the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]