Search

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate how LBBB and CRT modify RV free wall function by direct ventricular interaction., Background: Right ventricular (RV) function influences prognosis in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). There is, however, limited insight into how LBBB and CRT affect RV function., Methods: In 24 patients with LBBB with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, RV and left ventricular (LV) strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography was measured before and after CRT. Underlying mechanisms were studied in 16 anesthetized dogs with ultrasonic dimension crystals and micromanometers., Results: Patients with LBBB demonstrated distinct early systolic shortening in the RV free wall, which coincided with the typical abnormal early systolic septal shortening. In animals, this RV free wall contraction pattern resulted in reduced myocardial work as a large portion of the shortening occurred against low pressure during early systole, coinciding with abnormal leftward septal motion. RV systolic function was maintained by vigorous contraction in the late-activated LV lateral wall, which pushed the septum toward the RV. CRT reduced abnormal septal motion and increased RV free wall work because there was less inefficient shortening against low pressure., Conclusions: LBBB reduces workload on the RV free wall because of abnormal septal motion and delayed activation of the LV lateral wall. Restoring septal and LV function by CRT increases workload in RV free wall and may explain why patients with RV failure respond poorly to CRT. (Contractile Reserve in Dyssynchrony: A Novel Principle to Identify Candidates for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [CRID-CRT]; NCT02525185)., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We investigated whether tachycardia in left bundle branch block (LBBB) decreases left ventricular (LV) diastolic distensibility and increases diastolic pressures due to incomplete relaxation, and if cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) modifies this response. Thirteen canines were studied at baseline heart rate (120 beats/min) and atrial paced tachycardia (180 beats/min) before and after induction of LBBB and during CRT. LV and left atrial pressures (LAP) were measured by micromanometers and dimensions by sonomicrometry. The time constant τ of exponential pressure decay and degree of incomplete relaxation at mitral valve opening (MVO) and end diastole (ED) based on extrapolation of the exponential decay were assessed. Changes in LV diastolic distensibility were investigated using the LV transmural pressure-volume (PV) relation. LBBB caused prolongation of τ ( P < 0.03) and increased the degree of incomplete relaxation during tachycardia at MVO ( P < 0.001) and ED ( P = 0.08) compared with normal electrical activation. This was associated with decreased diastolic distensibility seen as upward shift of the PV relation at MVO by 18.4 ± 7.0 versus 12.0 ± 5.0 mmHg, at ED by 9.8 ± 2.3 versus 4.7 ± 2.3 mmHg, and increased mean LAP to 11.4 ± 2.7 versus 8.5 ± 2.6 mmHg, all P < 0.006. CRT shifted the LV diastolic PV relation downwards during tachycardia, reducing LAP and LV diastolic pressures ( P < 0.03). Tachycardia in LBBB reduced LV diastolic distensibility and increased LV diastolic pressures due to incomplete relaxation, whereas CRT normalized these effects. Clinical studies are needed to determine whether a similar mechanism contributes to dyspnea and exercise intolerance in LBBB and if effects of CRT are heart rate dependent. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Compared with normal electrical conduction, tachycardia in left bundle branch block resulted in incomplete relaxation during filling, particularly of the late activated left ventricular lateral wall. This further resulted in reduced left ventricular diastolic distensibility and elevated diastolic pressures and thus amplified the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in this setting.

Objectives: This study sought to investigate how regional left ventricular (LV) function modifies septal motion in left bundle branch block (LBBB)., Background: In LBBB, the interventricular septum often has marked pre-ejection shortening, followed by immediate relengthening (rebound stretch). This motion, often referred to as septal flash, is associated with positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)., Methods: In 10 anesthetized dogs, we induced LBBB by radiofrequency ablation and occluded the circumflex (CX) (n = 10) and left anterior descending (LAD) (n = 6) coronary arteries, respectively. Myocardial dimensions were measured by sonomicrometry and myocardial work by pressure-segment length analysis. In 40 heart failure patients with LBBB, including 20 with post-infarct scar and 20 with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, myocardial strain was measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography and myocardial work by pressure-strain analysis. Scar was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement., Results: During LBBB, each animal showed typical septal flash with pre-ejection shortening and rebound stretch, followed by reduced septal systolic shortening (p < 0.01). CX occlusion caused LV lateral wall dysfunction and abolished septal flash due to loss of rebound stretch (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, CX occlusion restored septal systolic shortening to a similar level as before induction of LBBB and substantially improved septal work (p < 0.001). LAD occlusion, however, accentuated septal flash by increasing rebound stretch (p < 0.05). Consistent with the experimental findings, septal flash was absent in patients with LV lateral wall scar due to lack of rebound stretch (p < 0.001), and septal systolic shortening and septal work far exceeded values in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p < 0.0001). Septal flash was present in most patients with anteroseptal scar., Conclusions: LV lateral wall dysfunction and scar abolished septal flash and markedly improved septal function in LBBB. Therefore, function and scar in the LV lateral wall should be taken into account when septal motion is used to evaluate dyssynchrony., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the hypothesis that patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) are hypersensitive to elevated afterload., Background: Epidemiological data suggest that LBBB can provoke heart failure in patients with hypertension., Methods: In 11 asymptomatic patients with isolated LBBB and 11 age-matched control subjects, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were measured by echocardiography. Systolic arterial pressure was increased by combining pneumatic extremity constrictors and handgrip exercise. To obtain more insight into mechanisms of afterload response, 8 anesthetized dogs with left ventricular (LV) micromanometer and dimension crystals were studied during acutely induced LBBB and aortic constriction. Regional myocardial work was assessed by LV pressure-dimension analysis., Results: Consistent with normal afterload dependency, elevation of systolic arterial pressure by 38 ± 12 mm Hg moderately reduced LVEF from 60 ± 4% to 54 ± 6% (p < 0.01) in control subjects. In LBBB patients, however, a similar blood pressure increase caused substantially larger reduction in LVEF (p < 0.01), from 56 ± 6% to 42 ± 7% (p < 0.01). There were similar findings for GLS. In the dog model, aortic constriction abolished septal shortening (p < 0.02), and septal work decreased to negative values (p < 0.01). Therefore, during elevated systolic pressure, the septum made no contribution to global LV work, as indicated by net negative work, and instead absorbed energy from work done by the LV lateral wall., Conclusions: Moderate elevation of arterial pressure caused marked reductions in LVEF and GLS in patients with LBBB. This reflects a cardiodepressive effect of elevated afterload in the dyssynchronous ventricle and was attributed to loss of septal function., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: There are conflicting data and no consensus on how to measure acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study investigates, which contractility indices are best markers of acute CRT response., Methods and Results: In eight anaesthetized dogs with left bundle branch block, we measured left ventricular (LV) pressure by micromanometer and end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) by sonomicrometry. Systolic function was measured as LV ejection fraction (EF), peak rate of LV pressure rise (LV dP/dtmax) and as a gold standard of contractility, LV end-systolic elastance (Ees), and volume axis intercept (V0) calculated from end-systolic pressure-volume relations (ESPVR). Responses to CRT were compared with inotropic stimulation by dobutamine. Both CRT and dobutamine caused reduction in ESV (P < 0.01) and increase in LV dP/dtmax (P < 0.05). Both interventions shifted the ESPVR upwards indicating increased contractility, but CRT which reduced V0 (P < 0.01), caused no change in Ees. Dobutamine markedly increased Ees, which is the typical response to inotropic stimulation. Preload (EDV) was decreased (P < 0.01) by CRT, and there was no change in EF. When adjusting for the reduction in preload, CRT increased EF (P = 0.02) and caused a more marked increase in LV dP/dtmax (P < 0.01)., Conclusion: Increased contractility by CRT could not be identified by Ees, which is a widely used reference method for contractility. Furthermore, reduction in preload by CRT attenuated improvement in contractility indices such as EF and LV dP/dtmax. These results suggest that changes in LV volume may be more sensitive markers of acute CRT response than conventional contractility indices.

Aims: An abnormal large leftward septal motion prior to ejection is frequently observed in left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients. This motion has been proposed as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Our goal was to investigate factors that influence its magnitude., Methods and Results: Left (LVP) and right ventricular (RVP) pressures and left ventricular (LV) volume were measured in eight canines. After induction of LBBB, LVP and, hence, the transmural septal pressure (P LV-RV = LVP-RVP) increased more slowly (P < 0.01) during the phase when septum moved leftwards. A biventricular finite-element LBBB simulation model confirmed that the magnitude of septal leftward motion depended on reduced rise of P LV-RV . The model showed that leftward septal motion was decreased with shorter activation delay, reduced global or right ventricular (RV) contractility, septal infarction, or when the septum was already displaced into the LV at end diastole by RV volume overload. Both experiments and simulations showed that pre-ejection septal hypercontraction occurs, in part, because the septum performs more of the work pushing blood towards the mitral valve leaflets to close them as the normal lateral wall contribution to this push is lost., Conclusions: Left bundle branch block lowers afterload against pre-ejection septal contraction, expressed as slowed rise of P LV-RV , which is a main cause and determinant of the magnitude of leftward septal motion. The motion may be small or absent due to septal infarct, impaired global or RV contractility or RV volume overload, which should be kept in mind if this motion is to be used in evaluation of CRT response., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

During left bundle branch block (LBBB), electromechanical delay (EMD), defined as time from regional electrical activation (REA) to onset shortening, is prolonged in the late-activated left ventricular lateral wall compared with the septum. This leads to greater mechanical relative to electrical dyssynchrony. The aim of this study was to determine the mechanism of the prolonged EMD. We investigated this phenomenon in an experimental LBBB dog model (n = 7), in patients (n = 9) with biventricular pacing devices, in an in vitro papillary muscle study (n = 6), and a mathematical simulation model. Pressures, myocardial deformation, and REA were assessed. In the dogs, there was a greater mechanical than electrical delay (82 ± 12 vs. 54 ± 8 ms, P = 0.002) due to prolonged EMD in the lateral wall vs. septum (39 ± 8 vs.11 ± 9 ms, P = 0.002). The prolonged EMD in later activated myocardium could not be explained by increased excitation-contraction coupling time or increased pressure at the time of REA but was strongly related to dP/dt at the time of REA (r = 0.88). Results in humans were consistent with experimental findings. The papillary muscle study and mathematical model showed that EMD was prolonged at higher dP/dt because it took longer for the segment to generate active force at a rate superior to the load rise, which is a requirement for shortening. We conclude that, during LBBB, prolonged EMD in late-activated myocardium is caused by a higher dP/dt at the time of activation, resulting in aggravated mechanical relative to electrical dyssynchrony. These findings suggest that LV contractility may modify mechanical dyssynchrony.

Background: In a majority of patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB), there is abnormal leftward motion of the interventricular septum during the preejection phase. This motion was considered to be passive, caused by early rise in right ventricular (RV) pressure, and has therefore been excluded from most indices of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. If considered active, however, the leftward motion reflects onset of septal activation and should be included. We therefore investigated if the motion was a passive response to pressure changes or caused by active contraction., Methods and Results: LBBB was induced in 8 anesthetized dogs with micromanometers. Cardiac dimensions were measured by sonomicrometry and echocardiography. Induction of LBBB resulted in preejection leftward motion of the septum, simultaneously with shortening of septal segments (P<0.01). In each experiment, preejection septal shortening occurred against rising LV pressure, consistent with active contraction. Furthermore, the LV pressure-segment length relationships were shifted upward (P<0.01) relative to the passive elastic curve, indicating stiffening of septal myocardium, confirming an active mechanism. Initially, RV pressure increased faster than LV pressure, suggesting that the leftward septal motion may have a passive pressure component. However, the passive component appeared to play a minor role. The magnitude of preejection septal shortening was modified by load alterations., Conclusions: Leftward preejection motion of the septum during LBBB is mainly a result of active septal contraction, whereas alterations in diastolic ventricular pressures modulate the amplitude of this motion. The findings imply that the preejection phase should be included when assessing LV dyssynchrony.

Background: Better clinical tools for measuring left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony are needed. The present study investigates if onset of active myocardial force generation (AFG) may serve as a measure of electrical dyssynchrony., Methods and Results: In anesthetized dogs, we evaluated left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by 2 different approaches. First, we measured timing of peak myocardial shortening velocity and strain. Second, we measured the first sign of tension development by onset AFG as defined by the myocardial pressure-segment length loop upward shift from its passive-elastic state. Electrical dyssynchrony was measured by intramyocardial electromyograms (IM-EMG). Dyssynchrony was quantified as peak intersegment time difference and as standard deviation of timing for 6 to 8 myocardial segments. During baseline, reduced preload and myocardial ischemia shortening velocity and strain indicated segmental mechanical heterogeneity, whereas onset AFG and onset R in IM-EMG indicated synchronous activation of all segments. After induction of left bundle-branch block, all methods indicated dyssynchrony. Peak intersegment time difference for shortening velocity and strain showed weak correlations (r=0.17 and 0.16) and weak agreements (mean differences, -48+/-27 ms and -28+/-27 ms, respectively) with IM-EMG. Onset AFG by pressure-segment length loops, however, correlated well with IM-EMG (r=0.93), and agreement was good (mean difference, -0.6+/-6.8 ms). Results were similar for standard deviation of timing. Onset AFG from pressure-strain analysis by echocardiography showed accuracy similar to sonomicrometry., Conclusions: Onset AFG was an accurate marker of myocardial electrical activation and was superior to shortening velocity and strain. Identification of electrical dyssynchrony by onset AFG may be feasible clinically using left ventricular pressure-strain analysis.

Measurement of cardiac function using pressure-volume conductance catheter technique in mice and rats. The extensive testing of the 12 selected simple single-beat contractility indices in the paper by Ahmadian et al. (2022) also serves as a convenient overview of these different indices, which might act to increase their use in more studies. [Extracted from the article]