Search

In people with COPD, pulmonary gas-exchange efficiency may be impaired because of abnormal alveolar ventilation (V˙A), capillary perfusion (Q˙c), or both. Both have been reported in early and mild stages of the disease. Such derangements often accompany significant clinical consequences such as activity-related dyspnea and exercise intolerance. Although much attention has been paid to pharmacologic treatment of mechanical abnormalities in COPD (eg, bronchodilators to deflate the lungs), increasing neurochemical afferent activity, secondary to gas-exchange inefficiency, has remained elusive as a therapeutic target. Hence, in this invited review, we first summarize how dyspnea, leading to poor exercise tolerance in COPD, may be explained by an increased venous admixture resulting from low V˙A/Q˙c, or wasted ventilation related to high V˙A/Q˙c, or both. We review the conflicting evidence supporting current treatments for gas-exchange inefficiency and exercise tolerance that act primarily on V˙A (bronchodilators, antiinflammatory medications) or Q˙c (oral and inhaled vasodilators, almitrine, and supplemental oxygen). Finally, to address the current knowledge and health care gaps, we propose two independent clinical research foci that may lead to a better understanding of the role of pulmonary gas-exchange inefficiency and activity-related dyspnea in COPD: (1) enhanced and deeper phenotyping of patients with COPD with V˙A/Q˙c abnormalities and (2) evaluation of existing and novel pharmacologic treatments to improve gas-exchange inefficiency, exertional dyspnea, and exercise tolerance across the spectrum of COPD severity., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: COPD is associated with nighttime respiratory symptoms, poor sleep quality, and increased risk of nocturnal death. Overnight deterioration of inspiratory capacity (IC) and FEV 1 have been documented previously. However, the precise nature of this deterioration and mechanisms by which evening bronchodilation may mitigate this occurrence have not been studied., Research Question: What is the effect of evening dosing of dual, long-acting bronchodilation on detailed nocturnal respiratory mechanics and inspiratory neural drive (IND)?, Study Design and Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study assessed the effects of evening long-acting bronchodilation (aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate: 400/12 μg) or placebo on morning trough IC (12 h after the dose; primary outcome) and serial overnight measurements of spirometry, dynamic respiratory mechanics, and IND (secondary outcomes). Twenty participants with COPD (moderate/severe airway obstruction and lung hyperinflation) underwent serial measurements of IC, spirometry, breathing pattern, esophageal and transdiaphragmatic pressures, and diaphragm electromyography (diaphragmatic electromyography as a percentage of maximum; IND) at 6 time points from 0 to 12 h after the dose and compared with sleeping IND., Results: Compared with placebo, evening bronchodilation was not associated with increased morning trough IC 12 h after the dose (P = .48); however, nadir IC (lowest IC, independent of time), peak IC, area under the curve for 12 h after the dose, and IC for 10 h after the dose were improved (P < .05). During placebo, total airways resistance, lung hyperinflation, IND, and tidal esophageal and transdiaphragmatic pressure swings all increased significantly overnight compared with baseline evening values; however, each of these parameters improved with bronchodilator treatment (P < .05) with no change in ventilation or breathing pattern., Interpretation: Respiratory mechanics significantly deteriorated at night during placebo. Although the morning trough IC was unchanged, evening bronchodilator treatment was associated consistently with sustained overnight improvements in dynamic respiratory mechanics and inspiratory neural drive compared with placebo CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02429765., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Exertional dyspnea is a cardinal feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a major cause of activity limitation. Although dual bronchodilation is more effective than bronchodilator monotherapy at improving resting pulmonary function, it is unclear to which extent this translates into superior relief of exertional dyspnea., Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial comparing indacaterol 110 µg/glycopyrronium 50 µg once daily (OD) with tiotropium 50 µg OD in patients with moderate to severe COPD and resting hyperinflation (functional residual capacity >120% of predicted value). The primary outcome was Borg dyspnea score at the end of a 3-min constant speed shuttle test after 3 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in Borg dyspnea score after the first dose of study medication, expiratory flows and lung volumes. Statistical analysis was conducted using a cross-over analysis of variance model with repeated measurements., Results: A total of 50 patients with COPD and a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 54 ± 11% (mean ± SEM) predicted participated in the cross-over phase of the trial. Compared with baseline, there was a decrease in dyspnea after the first dose of medication with indacaterol/glycopyrronium [mean -1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.49 to -0.52] but not with tiotropium alone (mean -0.36, 95% CI -0.81 to 0.08). The reduction in dyspnea after the first dose was statistically significant between the two treatments (mean difference of -0.64, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.17). Despite indacaterol/glycopyrronium providing further bronchodilation and lung deflation throughout the trial, the reduction in dyspnea was not sustained at 3 weeks of treatment (mean between-treatment difference at 3 weeks of 0.09, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.61)., Conclusion: In comparison with bronchodilator monotherapy, indacaterol/glycopyrronium provided greater immediate exertional dyspnea relief, although this difference was not sustained after 3 weeks of therapy despite evidence of further bronchodilation and lung deflation. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Background: Hyperinflation has been associated with negative cardiocirculatory consequences in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These abnormalities are likely to worsen when the demands for O 2 increase, e.g., under the stress of exercise. Thus, pharmacologically-induced lung deflation may improve cardiopulmonary interactions and exertional cardiac output leading to higher limb muscle blood flow and oxygenation in hyperinflated patients with COPD., Methods: 20 patients (residual volume = 201.6 ± 63.6% predicted) performed endurance cardiopulmonary exercise tests (75% peak) 1 h after placebo or tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 μg via the Respimat® inhaler (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany). Cardiac output was assessed by signal-morphology impedance cardiography. Near-infrared spectroscopy determined quadriceps blood flow (indocyanine green dye) and intra-muscular oxygenation., Results: Tiotropium/olodaterol was associated with marked lung deflation (p < 0.01): residual volume decreased by at least 0.4 L in 14/20 patients (70%). The downward shift in the resting static lung volumes was associated with less exertional inspiratory constraints and dyspnoea thereby increasing exercise endurance by ~50%. Contrary to our premises, however, neither central and peripheral hemodynamics nor muscle oxygenation improved after active intervention compared to placebo. These results were consistent with those found in a subgroup of patients showing the largest decrements in residual volume (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: The beneficial effects of tiotropium/olodaterol on resting and operating lung volumes are not translated into enhanced cardiocirculatory responses to exertion in hyperinflated patients with COPD. Improvement in exercise tolerance after dual bronchodilation is unlikely to be mechanistically linked to higher muscle blood flow and/or O 2 delivery., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The 3-min constant speed shuttle test (CSST) was used to examine the effect of tiotropium/olodaterol compared with tiotropium at reducing activity-related breathlessness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).This was a randomised, double-blind, two-period crossover study including COPD patients with moderate to severe pulmonary impairment, lung hyperinflation at rest and a Mahler Baseline Dyspnoea Index <8. Patients received 6 weeks of tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 µg and tiotropium 5 µg in a randomised order with a 3-week washout period. The speed for the 3-min CSST was determined for each patient such that an intensity of breathing discomfort ≥4 ("somewhat severe") on the modified Borg scale was reached at the end of a completed 3-min CSST.After 6 weeks, there was a decrease in the intensity of breathlessness (Borg dyspnoea score) at the end of the 3-min CSST from baseline with both tiotropium (mean -0.968, 95% CI -1.238- -0.698; n=100) and tiotropium/olodaterol (mean -1.325, 95% CI -1.594- -1.056; n=101). The decrease in breathlessness was statistically significantly greater with tiotropium/olodaterol versus tiotropium (treatment difference -0.357, 95% CI -0.661- -0.053; p=0.0217).Tiotropium/olodaterol reduced activity-related breathlessness more than tiotropium in dyspnoeic patients with moderate to severe COPD exhibiting lung hyperinflation., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: F. Maltais reports research support from Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, AstraZeneca, Grifols and Novartis, advisory board participation for Boehringer Ingelheim and GSK, and speaking engagements for Boehringer Ingelheim, Grifols and Novartis. Conflict of interest: J-L. Aumann has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A-M. Kirsten reports institutional compensation for clinical trials from Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study; has lectured for Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca and Berlin-Chemie, and reports institutional compensation for clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, GSK, Novartis, Chiesi, Bayer Healthcare and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: É. Nadreau has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Macesic is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: X. Jin is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: A. Hamilton is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: D.E. O'Donnell reports grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and GSK, during the conduct of the study; and personal fees for serving on speaker bureaus, consultation panels and advisory boards from Almirall, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Novartis and Pfizer, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2019.)

This randomized, double-blind, crossover study aimed to determine if acute treatment with inhaled bronchodilators, by improving regional lung hyperinflation and ventilation distribution, would reduce dead space-to-tidal volume ratio (V D /V T ); thus contributing to improved exertional dyspnea in COPD. Twenty COPD patients (FEV 1  = 50 ± 15% predicted; mean ± SD) performed pulmonary function tests and symptom-limited constant-work rate exercise at 75% peak-work rate (with arterialized capillary blood gases) after nebulized bronchodilator (BD; ipratropium 0.5mg + salbutamol 2.5 mg) or placebo (PL; normal saline). After BD versus PL: Functional residual capacity decreased by 0.4L (p = .0001). Isotime during exercise after BD versus PL (p < .05): dyspnea decreased: 1.2 ± 1.9 Borg-units; minute ventilation increased: 3.8 ± 5.5 L/min; IC increased: 0.24 ± 0.28 L and V T increased 0.19 ± 0.16 L. There was no significant difference in arterial CO 2 tension or V D /V T , but alveolar ventilation increased by 3.8 ± 5.5 L/min (p = .02). Post-BD improvements in respiratory mechanics explained 51% of dyspnea reduction at a standardized exercise time. Bronchodilator-induced improvements in respiratory mechanics were not associated with reduced wasted ventilation - a residual contributory factor to exertional dyspnea during exercise in COPD., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This substudy of a large, randomized, controlled trial (NCT01072396) examined tiotropium (18 μg qd) effects on dynamic hyperinflation during constant work rate treadmill exercise. Areas-under-the-spontaneous expiratory flow-volume (SEFV)-curves were compared in 20 COPD patients and 16 age-matched untreated controls, using rectangular area ratio (RAR) between peak intrabreath and end-expiratory flow. Seven patients exhibited SEFV curve concavity with RAR ≤ 0.5 (RAR low ) in ≥1 test without tiotropium; (mean ± SD FEV 1 : 1.60 ± 0.59 L; 63.4 ± 14.0%predicted). In RAR low patients, tiotropium increased end-exercise inspiratory capacity (IC, 2.10 ± 0.05 vs. 1.89 ± 0.05 L, tiotropium vs. placebo; p = 0.045) and RAR (0.57 ± 0.02 vs. 0.53 ± 0.02; p < 0.001). Patients without SEFV curve concavity with RAR > 0.5 (n = 13; RAR high ), had higher screening FEV 1 (2.15 ± 0.47 L; 79.6 ± 10.1%predicted) versus RAR low patients and no difference in end-exercise IC and RAR between tiotropium and placebo (IC: 2.24 ± 0.03 vs. 2.17 ± 0.03 L; RAR: 0.63 ± 0.005 vs. 0.62 ± 0.005). RAR and%predicted IC at peak exercise were positively correlated in RAR low patients (R 2  = 0.43, p = 0.0002). Tiotropium increased exercise RAR in GOLD 1-2 patients with SEFV curve concavity., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim to evaluate the efficacy of longacting bronchodilators on exercise capacity in COPD patients., Methods: The endpoints were the efficacy of long-acting bronchodilators (altogether, and by single classes) vs. placebo in modifying endurance time (ET), inspiratory capacity (IC) and dyspnea during exercise, taking into consideration the outcomes according to different patients’ inclusion criteria and exercise methodology., Results: Twenty-two studies were deemed eligible for analysis. Weighted mean increase in ET resulted of 67 s (95% CI ranges from 55 to 79). For isotime IC and dyspnea during exercise, weighted improvements were 195 ml (162–229), and − 0.41 units (− 0.56 to − 0.27), respectively. The increase in trough IC was 157 ml (138–175). We found a trend in favour of LAMA compared to LABA in terms of ET. In the 11 studies which reported a value of functional residual capacity > 120% as inclusion criterion, weighted mean increase in endurance time was 94 s (65 to 123); however we did not find any significant correlation between ET and mean trough IC (P: 0.593). The improvement of ET in the 5 studies using walking as exercise methodology resulted of 58 s (− 4 to 121)., Conclusions: Long-acting bronchodilators improve exercise capacity in COPD. The main effect of long-acting bronchodilators seems to be a increase of basal IC rather than a modification of dynamic hyperinflation during exercise. The efficacy in terms of endurance time seems higher in studies which enrolled patients with hyperinflation, with a similar efficacy on walking or cycling.

This randomized, double-blind, crossover study examined the physiological rationale for using a dual long-acting bronchodilator (umeclidinium/vilanterol (UME/VIL)) versus its muscarinic-antagonist component (UME) as treatment for dyspnea and exercise intolerance in moderate COPD. After each 4-week treatment period, subjects performed pulmonary function and symptom-limited constant-work rate cycling tests with diaphragm electromyogram (EMGdi), esophageal (Pes), gastric (Pga) and transdiaphragmatic (Pdi) pressure measurements. Fourteen subjects completed the study. Both treatments improved spirometry and airway resistance. UME/VIL had larger increases in FEV 1 (+0.14±0.23L, p<0.05) but no added reduction in lung hyperinflation compared with UME. Isotime during exercise after UME/VIL versus UME (p<0.05): "unpleasantness of breathing" fell 0.8±1.3 Borg units; mean expiratory flow and ventilation increased; Pdi and Pga decreased. There were no treatment differences in endurance time, breathing pattern, operating lung volumes, inspiratory neural drive (EMGdi) or respiratory muscle effort (Pes swings) during exercise. UME/VIL compared with UME was associated with reduced breathing unpleasantness reflecting improved airway and respiratory muscle function during exercise., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Bronchodilator therapy represents a potentially valuable therapeutic option to increase exercise tolerance and enhance lung function in mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)., Objectives: To determine effects of tiotropium on pulmonary hyperinflation and exercise tolerance in patients with symptomatic Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 1 and 2 COPD who experienced inspiratory capacity decrease greater than or equal to 100 ml during incremental and constant work rate treadmill exercise., Methods: This 22-week, randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study evaluated the efficacy of once-daily tiotropium bromide (18 μg) versus placebo in patients with GOLD 1 and 2 COPD. Primary endpoint was between-group (tiotropium vs. placebo) difference in inspiratory capacity at isotime (i.e., at the time the shortest test ended) during constant work rate treadmill exercise from baseline to the end of a 6-week treatment period. Key secondary endpoints included differences in exercise duration and exertional dyspnea. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events., Measurements and Main Results: Study population comprised 48 patients with GOLD 1 COPD and 78 patients with GOLD 2 COPD. Resting inspiratory capacity significantly improved with tiotropium versus placebo in the overall (P < 0.0001), GOLD 1 (P = 0.0183), and GOLD 2 (P < 0.0001) groups. Isotime inspiratory capacity was significantly enhanced during exercise in the overall (P = 0.0087) and GOLD 2 (P = 0.0494) groups after tiotropium versus placebo. Tiotropium versus placebo significantly enhanced exercise duration in the GOLD 2 group (P = 0.0070) but not in the GOLD 1 or overall patient groups. In the overall group, increase in exercise duration seen with tiotropium was well correlated with the increase in isotime inspiratory capacity (r = 0.463, P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Resting and exercise hyperinflation were ameliorated by bronchodilator therapy with tiotropium in the overall GOLD 1 plus 2 COPD group. Exercise tolerance was enhanced in GOLD 2, but not GOLD 1, COPD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01072396).

Background: The relationship between patient-reported symptoms and objective measures of lung function is poorly understood., Aim: To determine the association between responsiveness to bronchodilator and respiratory symptoms in random population samples., Methods: 4669 people aged 40 years and older from 8 sites in Canada completed interviewer-administered respiratory questionnaires and performed spirometry before and after administration of 200 ug of inhaled salbutamol. The effect of anthropometric variables, smoking exposure and doctor-diagnosed asthma (DDA) on bronchodilator responsiveness in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and in forced vital capacity (FVC) were evaluated. Multiple logistic regression was used to test for association between quintiles of increasing changes in FEV1 and in FVC after bronchodilator and several respiratory symptoms., Results: Determinants of bronchodilator change in FEV1 and FVC included age, DDA, smoking, respiratory drug use and female gender [p<0.005 to p<0.0001 ]. In subjects without doctor-diagnosed asthma or COPD, bronchodilator response in FEV1 was associated with wheezing [p for trend<0.0001], while bronchodilator response for FVC was associated with breathlessness. [p for trend <0.0001]., Conclusions: Bronchodilator responsiveness in FEV1 or FVC are associated with different respiratory symptoms in the community. Both flow and volume bronchodilator responses are useful parameters which together can be predictive of both wheezing and breathlessness in the general population.

Rationale: Combination therapy with corticosteroid and long-acting β(2)-agonists (LABA) in a single inhaler is associated with superior effects on airway function and exercise performance in COPD compared with LABA monotherapy. The physiological effects of adding inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy to maintenance bronchodilator therapy (long-acting anticholinergics and LABA singly or in combination) in COPD are unknown., Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study (NCT00387036) to compare the effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate 500 μg (FP500) twice-daily and placebo (PLA) on airway function during rest and exercise, measured during constant work rate cycle exercise at 75% of maximum incremental cycle work rate, in 17 patients with COPD (FEV(1) ≤ 70% predicted)., Results: After treatment with FP500 compared to PLA, there were significant increases in post-dose measurements of FEV(1) (+115 mL, P = 0.006) and the FEV(1)/FVC ratio (+2.5%, P = 0.017), along with decreases in plethysmographic residual volume (-0.32L; P = 0.031), functional residual capacity (-0.30L, P = 0.033), and total lung capacity (-0.30L, P = 0.027) but no changes in vital capacity or inspiratory capacity (IC). Post-treatment comparisons demonstrated a significant improvement in endurance time by 188 ± 362 s with FP500 (P = 0.047) with no concomitant increase in dyspnea intensity. End-inspiratory and end-expiratory lung volumes were reduced at rest and throughout exercise with FP500 compared with PLA (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Inhaled FP500 monotherapy was associated with consistent and clinically important improvements in FEV(1), static lung volumes, dynamic operating lung volumes, and exercise endurance when added to established maintenance long-acting bronchodilator therapy in patients with moderate to severe COPD., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, once-daily ultra long-acting β(2)-agonist (ultra-LABA) for the treatment of COPD. This study investigated the effect of indacaterol on exercise endurance, and on lung hyperinflation during exercise and at rest in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD., Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study (3-week treatment, 3-week washout between treatments), patients were randomized to receive indacaterol 300 μg once-daily or matching placebo. The primary efficacy variable was exercise endurance time after 3 weeks of treatment, measured through constant-load cycle ergometry testing performed at 75% of the peak work rate in a screening incremental exercise test., Results: Of 90 patients randomized (mean age: 62.8 years; post-bronchodilator FEV(1): 61.2% predicted and FEV(1)/FVC: 51.6%), 74 completed the study. Pre-treatment exercise tolerance averaged 459 s. Improvement in exercise endurance time was higher with indacaterol 300 μg than with placebo both after the first dose (treatment difference: 101 s; p < 0.001) and after 3 weeks (treatment difference: 111 s; p = 0.011). In addition, indacaterol increased end-exercise inspiratory capacity (IC) versus placebo after 3 weeks (0.28 L, p = 0.002). Significant improvements were also observed in resting IC (0.17 L, p = 0.001), FEV(1) (0.25 L, p < 0.001) and FVC (0.26 L, p < 0.001) with indacaterol compared with placebo at 75 min post-dose after 3 weeks., Conclusion: In conclusion, indacaterol treatment improved the ability of patients with COPD to exercise. In addition, the improvements observed in resting and end-exercise IC indicate reductions in lung hyperinflation after 3 weeks treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00620022)., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Dyspnea is the most distressing symptom experienced by those suffering from advanced stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Activity-related dyspnea in COPD is multifactorial but is associated with increased central neural drive, impaired dynamic respiratory mechanics and abnormal respiratory muscle function. Each of these components can potentially be targeted for pharmacotherapy. Recent advances in the pharmacotherapy of COPD include the development of new long-acting bronchodilators which, when combined, provide sustained improvements in dyspnea. Additionally, novel applications of older therapies such as opiates, furosemide, helium-oxygen, and statins show early promise as dyspnea-relieving interventions in COPD. Effective pharmacological manipulation of the affective dimension of dyspnea remains an important challenge. In this review of the recent literature in this field, we highlight the main advances that have been achieved., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The natural history of lung hyperinflation in patients with airway obstruction is unknown. In particular, little information exists about the extent of air trapping and its reversibility to bronchodilator therapy in those with mild airway obstruction. We completed a retrospective analysis of data from individuals with airway obstruction who attended our pulmonary function laboratory and had plethysmographic lung volume measurements pre- and post-bronchodilator (salbutamol). COPD was likely the predominant diagnosis but patients with asthma may have been included. We studied 2,265 subjects (61% male), age 65 ± 9 years (mean ± SD) with a post-bronchodilator FEV(1)/FVC <0.70. We examined relationships between indices of airway obstruction and lung hyperinflation, and measured responses to bronchodilation across subgroups stratified by GOLD criteria. In GOLD stage I, vital capacity (VC) and inspiratory capacity (IC) were in the normal range; pre-bronchodilator residual volume (RV), functional residual capacity (FRC) and specific airway resistance were increased to 135%, 119% and 250% of predicted, respectively. For the group as a whole, RV and FRC increased exponentially as FEV(1) decreased, while VC and IC decreased linearly. Regardless of baseline FEV(1), the most consistent improvement following bronchodilation was RV reduction, in terms of magnitude and responder rate. In conclusion, increases (above normal) in airway resistance and plethysmographic lung volumes were found in those with only minor airway obstruction. Indices of lung hyperinflation increased exponentially as airway obstruction worsened. Those with the greatest resting lung hyperinflation showed the largest bronchodilator-induced volume deflation effects. Reduced air trapping was the predominant response to acute bronchodilation across severity subgroups.

Respiratory mechanical abnormalities in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may impair cardiodynamic responses and convective oxygen delivery during exercise, resulting in slower ventilatory, pulmonary gas exchange (PGE), and heart rate (HR) kinetics compared with normal. We reasoned that bronchodilators and the attendant reduction of operating lung volumes should accelerate ventilatory, PGE, and HR kinetics in the transition from rest to high-intensity exercise. Twelve clinically stable COPD patients undertook constant-work rate cycle testing at 75% of each individual's maximum work capacity after receiving either combined nebulized bronchodilators (BD) or placebo (PL), randomly. Mean response time (MRT) and amplitude of slow component for oxygen uptake (V'O(2)), carbon dioxide production (V'CO(2)), ventilation (V'(E)), and HR together with operating dynamic end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) were measured. Resting and exercise EELV decreased significantly by 0.38 L after BD compared with PL. After BD, V'O(2), V'CO(2), V'(E), and HR MRT accelerated (p < 0.05) by an average of 12, 22, 27, and 22 s, respectively (i.e., 15, 18, 22 and 27%, respectively). The slow component for V'O(2) declined by an average of 55 ml/min compared with PL. Speeded MRT for V'O(2) correlated with indices of reduced lung hyperinflation, such as resting EELV (r = -0.64, p = 0.025) and EELV at isotime (r = -0.77, p = 0.0032). The results confirm an important interaction between abnormal dynamic respiratory mechanics and indices of cardio-circulatory function in the rest-to-exercise transition in COPD patients.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major respiratory illness in Canada that is both preventable and treatable. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of this complex condition continues to grow and our ability to offer effective treatment to those who suffer from it has improved considerably. The purpose of the present educational initiative of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) is to provide up to date information on new developments in the field so that patients with this condition will receive optimal care that is firmly based on scientific evidence. Since the previous CTS management recommendations were published in 2003, a wealth of new scientific information has become available. The implications of this new knowledge with respect to optimal clinical care have been carefully considered by the CTS Panel and the conclusions are presented in the current document. Highlights of this update include new epidemiological information on mortality and prevalence of COPD, which charts its emergence as a major health problem for women; a new section on common comorbidities in COPD; an increased emphasis on the meaningful benefits of combined pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies; and a new discussion on the prevention of acute exacerbations. A revised stratification system for severity of airway obstruction is proposed, together with other suggestions on how best to clinically evaluate individual patients with this complex disease. The results of the largest randomized clinical trial ever undertaken in COPD have recently been published, enabling the Panel to make evidence-based recommendations on the role of modern pharmacotherapy. The Panel hopes that these new practice guidelines, which reflect a rigorous analysis of the recent literature, will assist caregivers in the diagnosis and management of this common condition.

Lung hyperinflation commonly accompanies expiratory flow-limitation in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and contributes importantly to dyspnea and activity limitation. It is not surprising, therefore, that lung hyperinflation has become an important therapeutic target in symptomatic COPD patients. There is increasing evidence that acute dynamic increases in lung hyperinflation, under conditions of worsening expiratory flow-limitation and increased ventilatory demand (or both) can seriously stress cardiopulmonary reserves, particularly in patients with more advanced disease. Our understanding of the physiological mechanisms of dynamic lung hyperinflation during both physical activity and exacerbations in COPD continues to grow, together with an appreciation of its serious negative mechanical and sensory consequences. In this review, we will discuss the basic pathophysiology of COPD during rest, exercise and exacerbation so as to better understand how this can be pharmacologically manipulated for the patient's benefit. Finally, we will review current concepts of the mechanisms of symptom relief and improved exercise endurance following pharmacological lung volume reduction.

During constant-work-rate exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dyspnea increases steeply once inspiratory reserve volume (IRV) falls to a critical level that prevents further expansion of tidal volume (Vt). We studied the effects of this mechanical restriction on the quality and intensity of exertional dyspnea and examined the impact of an anticholinergic bronchodilator. In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, 18 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 s = 40 +/- 3%predicted; mean +/- SE) inhaled tiotropium 18 mug or placebo once daily for 7-10 days each. Pulmonary function tests and symptom-limited cycle exercise at 75% of each patient's maximal work capacity were performed 2 h after dosing. Dyspnea intensity (Borg scale), operating lung volumes, breathing pattern, and esophageal pressure (n = 11) were measured during exercise. Dynamic hyperinflation reached its maximal value early in exercise and was associated with only mild increases in dyspnea intensity and the effort-displacement ratio, which is defined as the ratio between tidal swings of esophageal pressure (expressed relative to maximum inspiratory pressure) and Vt (expressed relative to predicted vital capacity). After a minimal IRV of 0.5 +/- 0.1 liter was reached, both dyspnea and the effort-displacement ratio rose steeply until an intolerable level was reached. Tiotropium did not alter dyspnea-IRV relationships, but the increase in resting and exercise inspiratory capacity was associated with an improved effort-displacement ratio throughout exercise. Once a critically low IRV was reached during exercise, dyspnea rose with the disparity between respiratory effort and the Vt response. Changes in dyspnea intensity after tiotropium were positively correlated with changes in this index of neuromechanical coupling.

Study Objective: To examine the effect of fluticasone propionate, 250 microg/salmeterol, 50 microg combination (FSC 250/50) twice daily on lung hyperinflation and associated measures of exercise performance in patients with COPD., Design: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study., Patients: Eligible patients were > or = 40 years old with a diagnosis of COPD, prealbuterol FEV(1) < 70% of predicted, FEV1/FVC ratio > or = 0.70, and functional residual capacity (FRC) > or = 120% of predicted normal., Interventions: Patients were randomized to FSC 250/50; salmeterol, 50 microg; or placebo twice daily for 8 weeks. Predose and postdose spirometry, plethysmography, and constant-load cycle cardiopulmonary exercise test evaluations were compared. The primary comparison was FSC 250/50 with placebo. The salmeterol group was included for exploratory comparisons with FSC 250/50., Results: A total of 185 patients (mean baseline FEV1 of 41% predicted) were enrolled. At rest, FSC 250/50 significantly reduced postdose FRC and increased inspiratory capacity (IC) compared with placebo (differences of - 0.35 +/- 0.12 L and 0.33 +/- 0.06 L [mean +/- SE], respectively, at week 8; p > or = 0.003) and increased exercise endurance time (difference, 132 +/- 45 s; p = 0.004). At a standardized time during exercise (isotime), FSC 250/50 increased postdose IC by 0.20 +/- 0.05 L over placebo with associated improvements in tidal volume and minute ventilation (p < 0.05 vs placebo at week 8). Improvement in exercise time was significantly correlated with the increase in IC (r = 0.45, p < 0.001) but not FEV1 (r = 0.23, p = 0.08). Predose comparisons of FSC 250/50 with salmeterol and placebo favored FSC 250/50., Conclusion: We conclude that FSC 250/50 decreases lung hyperinflation at rest and during exercise with an associated increase in exercise endurance time when compared with placebo.

Bronchodilator therapy forms the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic patients with COPD. Long-acting bronchodilators, which maintain sustained airway patency over a 24-hour period, represent an advance in therapy. Tiotropium bromide is a new long-acting inhaled anticholinergic agent with superior pharmacodynamic properties compared with the short-acting anticholinergic, ipratropium bromide. Tiotropium bromide has been consistently shown to have a greater impact than ipratropium bromide on clinically important outcome measures such as health status. The mechanisms of clinical benefit with tiotropium bromide are multifactorial, but improved airway function, which enhances lung emptying and allows sustained deflation of over-inflated lungs, appears to explain improvements in dyspnea and exercise endurance in COPD. Inhaled tiotropium bromide therapy has also been associated with reduction in acute exacerbations of COPD as well as reduced hospitalizations. The safety profile of tiotropium bromide is impressive: dry mouth is the most common adverse event and rarely necessitates termination of the drug. No tachyphylaxis to tiotropium bromide has been demonstrated in clinical trials lasting up to 1 year. There is preliminary information that the combination of long-acting anticholinergics and long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists provides additive physiological and clinical benefits. According to recent international guidelines, long-acting bronchodilators should be considered early in the management of symptomatic patients with COPD in order to achieve effective symptom alleviation and reduction in activity limitation. Tiotropium bromide, because of its once-daily administration and its established efficacy and tolerability profile, has emerged as an attractive therapeutic option for this condition.

Objectives: Current criteria use FEV(1) to assess bronchodilator responsiveness, despite its insensitivity and inability to predict improvement in symptoms or exercise tolerance. Response in lung volumes remains largely unexplored even though volume parameters, such as inspiratory capacity (IC), closely correlate with functional improvements. Therefore, we assessed the response of lung volumes (i.e., by IC, total lung capacity [TLC], functional residual capacity [FRC], residual volume [RV], and FVC) to salbutamol and the relationship of these changes to improvements in the spirometry in these patients., Design: A retrospective review of data extracted from a large database of patients who were undergoing spirometry and static lung volume measurements before and after the administration of 200 microg salbutamol., Patients: Patients with an FEV(1)/FVC ratio of < 85% of predicted values were defined as being severely hyperinflated (SH) if TLC was > 133% of predicted and as being moderately hyperinflated (MH) if TLC was 115 to 133% of predicted., Results: Two hundred eighty-one SH patients and 676 MH patients were identified. Salbutamol significantly reduced the mean (+/- SEM) TLC (SH patients, 222 +/- 23 mL; MH patients, 150 +/- 10 mL; p < 0.001), FRC (SH patients, 442 +/- 26 mL; MH patients, 260 +/- 39 mL; p < 0.001), and RV (SH patients, 510 +/- 28 mL; MH patients, 300 +/- 14 mL; p < 0.001) and increased both the IC (SH patients, 220 +/- 15 mL; MH patients, 110 +/- 11 mL; p < 0.001) and FVC (SH patients, 336 +/- 21 mL; MH patients, 204 +/- 13 mL; p < 0.001). FEV(1) improved in a minority of patients (SH patients, 33%; MH patients, 26%), but if lung volume measurements are also considered, the overall bronchodilator response may improve to up to 76% of the SH group and up to 62% of the MH group. Changes in volumes correlated poorly with changes in maximal airflows., Conclusions: Bronchodilators reduce hyperinflation. Measurements of lung volumes before and after bronchodilators add sensitivity when examining for bronchodilator responsiveness.

BackgroundExercise tolerance is an important endpoint in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) clinical trials. Little is known about the comparative measurement properties of constant work rate cycle ergometry (CWRCE) and the endurance shuttle walking test (ESWT). The objective of this sub-analysis of the TORRACTO® study was to directly compare the endurance measurement properties of CWRCE and ESWT in patients with COPD in a multicentre, multinational setting. We predicted that both tests would be similarly reliable, but that the ESWT would be more responsive to bronchodilation than CWRCE.MethodsThis analysis included 151 patients who performed CWRCE and ESWT at baseline and week 6 after receiving once-daily placebo, tiotropium/olodaterol (T/O) 2.5/5 μg or T/O 5/5 μg. Reproducibility was assessed by comparing their respective performance at baseline and week 6 in the placebo group. Responsiveness to bronchodilation was assessed by comparing endurance time at week 6 with T/O with baseline values and placebo. The locus of symptom limitation and end-exercise Borg scales for breathing and leg discomfort for both tests were also analysed.ResultsThe intraclass correlation coefficients for CWRCE and ESWT were 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.71] and 0.75 (95% CI 0.63-0.84). More patients were limited by breathing discomfort during the ESWT than during CWRCE, whereas more patients were limited by leg discomfort or breathing/leg discomfort during CWRCE than the ESWT (p

Two replicate, double-blind, 6-week, incomplete-crossover studies (MORACTO 1 and 2) assessed the effects of tiotropium/olodaterol on inspiratory capacity and exercise endurance time in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.For each patient, four of five treatments were administered once daily for 6 weeks, with a 21-day washout between treatments: tiotropium/olodaterol 2.5/5 µg or 5/5 µg, tiotropium 5 µg, olodaterol 5 µg or placebo, all via the Respimat inhaler. Primary outcomes were inspiratory capacity prior to exercise and exercise endurance time during constant work-rate cycle ergometry to symptom limitation at 75% of peak incremental work rate after 6 weeks (2 h post-dose).295 and 291 patients were treated in MORACTO 1 and 2, respectively. Tiotropium/olodaterol 2.5/5 and 5/5 µg provided significant improvements in inspiratory capacity versus placebo and monotherapies (p

This randomized, double-blind, crossover study examined the physiological rationale for using a dual long-acting bronchodilator (umeclidinium/vilanterol (UME/VIL)) versus its muscarinic-antagonist component (UME) as treatment for dyspnea and exercise intolerance in moderate COPD. After each 4-week treatment period, subjects performed pulmonary function and symptom-limited constant-work rate cycling tests with diaphragm electromyogram (EMGdi), esophageal (Pes), gastric (Pga) and transdiaphragmatic (Pdi) pressure measurements. Fourteen subjects completed the study. Both treatments improved spirometry and airway resistance. UME/VIL had larger increases in FEV 1 (+0.14 ± 0.23 L, p < 0.05) but no added reduction in lung hyperinflation compared with UME. Isotime during exercise after UME/VIL versus UME (p < 0.05): “unpleasantness of breathing” fell 0.8 ± 1.3 Borg units; mean expiratory flow and ventilation increased; Pdi and Pga decreased. There were no treatment differences in endurance time, breathing pattern, operating lung volumes, inspiratory neural drive (EMGdi) or respiratory muscle effort (Pes swings) during exercise. UME/VIL compared with UME was associated with reduced breathing unpleasantness reflecting improved airway and respiratory muscle function during exercise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and often progressive inflammatory disease of the airways that is both preventable and treatable. It is well established that those with mild-to-moderate disease severity represent the majority of patients with COPD, yet this subpopulation is relatively under-studied. Because of an insidious pre-clinical phase, COPD is both under-diagnosed and under-treated. Recent studies have confirmed that even patients with mild, grade 1 COPD [i.e. those with a reduced forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1)/forced vital capacity ratio but normal FEV 1], have measurable physiological impairment with increased morbidity and a higher risk of mortality compared with non-smoking healthy controls. Beyond the imperative of smoking cessation—the pivotal intervention in all COPD stages—the role of pharmacotherapy for prevention of disease progression has yet to be established. The main objective of this review is to provide a concise overview of the heterogeneous pathophysiology of COPD with only mild airway obstruction on spirometry and obstacles for early diagnosis. We emphasize that the absence of sufficiently powered trials involving a large number of patients precludes definitive recommendations in support of (or against) long-term pharmacological treatment in mild COPD. Despite these limitations, we present a rationale for earlier pharmacological intervention derived from recent physiological studies performed in symptomatic patients with mild COPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, once-daily ultra long-acting β2-agonist (ultra-LABA) for the treatment of COPD. This study investigated the effect of indacaterol on exercise endurance, and on lung hyperinflation during exercise and at rest in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study (3-week treatment, 3-week washout between treatments), patients were randomized to receive indacaterol 300 μg once-daily or matching placebo. The primary efficacy variable was exercise endurance time after 3 weeks of treatment, measured through constant-load cycle ergometry testing performed at 75% of the peak work rate in a screening incremental exercise test. Results: Of 90 patients randomized (mean age: 62.8 years; post-bronchodilator FEV1: 61.2% predicted and FEV1/FVC: 51.6%), 74 completed the study. Pre-treatment exercise tolerance averaged 459 s. Improvement in exercise endurance time was higher with indacaterol 300 μg than with placebo both after the first dose (treatment difference: 101 s; p < 0.001) and after 3 weeks (treatment difference: 111 s; p = 0.011). In addition, indacaterol increased end-exercise inspiratory capacity (IC) versus placebo after 3 weeks (0.28 L, p = 0.002). Significant improvements were also observed in resting IC (0.17 L, p = 0.001), FEV1 (0.25 L, p < 0.001) and FVC (0.26 L, p < 0.001) with indacaterol compared with placebo at 75 min post-dose after 3 weeks. Conclusion: In conclusion, indacaterol treatment improved the ability of patients with COPD to exercise. In addition, the improvements observed in resting and end-exercise IC indicate reductions in lung hyperinflation after 3 weeks treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00620022). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditional spirometry, while of unquestionable diagnostic utility, provides imprecise information about the nature and extent of physiological impairment or the resultant clinical consequences in any given patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The corollary is that exclusive reliance on spirometric forced expiratory flow rates as the primary outcome measure for the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy can lead to significant underestimation of clinical benefit. Recognition of the limitations of routinely used physiological parameters has prompted a search for additional simple and reliable tests for use in clinical trials. Among these, the spirometric inspiratory capacity (IC) shows early promise as a useful, clinically relevant outcome measure that complements traditional expiratory flow measurements. Consistent improvements in IC after bronchodilator therapy signify reduction in lung hyperinflation and can occur in the setting of minimal or no change in maximal expiratory flow rates, particularly in patients with more severe disease. Moreover, improved IC has been shown to correlate well with improvement in important clinical outcomes such as dyspnea and exercise endurance in patients with moderate to severe COPD. This review charts the evolving experience with this novel parameter in the clinical trial setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Current criteria use FEV[sub 1] to assess bronchodilator responsiveness, despite its insensitivity and inability to predict improvement in symptoms or exercise tolerance. Response in lung volumes remains largely unexplored even though volume parameters, such as inspiratory capacity (IC), closely correlate with functional improvements. Therefore, we assessed the response of lung volumes (ie, by IC, total lung capacity [TLC], functional residual capacity [FRC], residual volume [RV], and FVC) to salbutamol and the relationship of these changes to improvements in the spirometry in these patients. Design: A retrospective review of data extracted from a large database of patients who were undergoing spirometry and static lung volume measurements before and after the administration of 200 µg salbutamol. Patients: Patients with an FEV[sub 1]/FVC ratio of < 85% of predicted values were defined as being severely hyperinflated (SH) if TLC was > 133% of predicted and as being moderately hyperinflated (MH) if TLC was 115 to 133% of predicted. Results: Two hundred eighty-one SH patients and 676 MH patients were identified. Salbutamol significantly reduced the mean (± SEM) TLC (SH patients, 222 ± 23 mL; MH patients, 150 ± 10 mL; p < 0.001), FRC (SH patients, 442 ± 26 mL; MH patients, 260 ± 39 mL; p < 0.001), and RV (SH patients, 510 ± 28 mL; MH patients, 300 ± 14 mL; p < 0.001) and increased both the 1C (SH patients, 220 ± 15 mL; MH patients, 110 ± 11 mL; p < 0.001) and FVC (SH patients, 336 ± 21 mL; MH patients, 204 ± 13 mL; p < 0.001). FEV[sub 1] improved in a minority of patients (SH patients, 33%; MH patients, 26%), but if lung volume measurements are also considered, the overall bronchodilator response may improve to up to 76% of the SH group and up to 62% of the MH group. Changes in volumes correlated poorly with changes in maximal airflows. Conclusions: Bronchodilators reduce... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the original publication [1] is an incorrect sentence in the abstract under Conclusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]