Search

In collaboration with SkyePharma, Novartis is developing a multidose dry powder inhaler formulation of indacaterol, a long-acting beta2 agonist and bronchodilator, for the potential treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In January 2006, Novartis expected phase III clinical trials to start in early 2006, with submission planned for 2007.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) accounts for a major workload in both primary and secondary care. It is characterised by progressive airflow obstruction which does not fully reverse to inhaled or oral pharmacotherapy. The diagnosis should be considered in any current or former smoker who has symptoms of breathlessness, wheeze, cough, sputum production and impaired exercise tolerance. From a pharmacological perspective, short-acting bronchodilators (anti-cholinergics and beta(2)-agonists) play a vital role in immediate relief of symptoms. However, in patients with persistent symptoms and exacerbations, long-acting bronchodilator therapy is advocated for regular use. Tiotropium is a newly introduced long-acting anti-cholinergic which facilitates once daily administration. This evidence based review article discusses the use of long acting bronchodilators in COPD with a particular emphasis on the putative benefits of tiotropium.

Despite the widespread use of inhaled corticosteroids, many asthmatic patients experience persistent symptoms. In such individuals, the addition of a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) is frequently more effective than doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroid. However, the role of additional therapy with a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) as an alternative to an LABA has been the focus of attention in recent studies. In order to determine the overall efficacy of the pharmacologic armamentarium used in asthma, it is imperative that a combination of end points, including lung function, airway hyperresponsiveness, effects on underlying inflammation, symptoms, and more long-term sequelae such as exacerbations, are assessed. This evidence-based systematic review outlines the pharmacologic properties of LABAs and LTRAs and the importance of evaluating end points in addition to lung function when assessing these drugs. We also highlight the results of all published studies that have performed direct comparisons of both LABAs and LTRAs as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids.

Aims: There are no data comparing the relative efficacy of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of ciclesonide (CIC) and fluticasone propionate (FP) on airway hyper-responsiveness, in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. We therefore elected to evaluate the comparative efficacy of HFA pressurized metered-dose inhaler formulations of CIC and FP, assessing methacholine challenge, in addition to exhaled nitric oxide, lung function, diary cards and quality of life., Methods: Nineteen mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients completed the study per protocol in randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover fashion. Patients were required to stop their usual inhaled corticosteroid therapy for the duration of the study. Patients were commenced instead on salmeterol (SM) 50 microg one puff twice daily + montelukast (ML) 10 mg once daily for 2-week washout periods prior to each randomized treatment, in order to prevent dropouts. Patients received 4 weeks of either CIC 200 microg two puffs once daily (08.00 h) + CIC-placebo (PL) two puffs once daily (20.00 h) + FP-PL two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h), or FP 125 microg two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h) + CIC-PL two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h). SM + ML were withheld for 72 h prior to post-washout visits and CIC or FP was withheld for 24 h prior to study visits., Results: There was no significant difference between CIC vs. FP for the primary outcome of methacholine PC20 as doubling dilution (dd) shift from respective baseline; mean difference: 0.4 dd (95% CI -0.4, 1.2). Moreover, there was no difference between treatments for the sequence of CIC first vs FP second; mean difference: 0.2 dd (95% CI -1.3, 1.7) or FP first vs CIC second; mean difference: 0.9 dd (95% CI -0.1, 1.8). There were also no differences for other secondary outcomes between treatments, either respective or irrespective of sequence, as change from baseline., Conclusions: There were no differences between 4 weeks of CIC 400 microg once daily and FP 250 microg twice daily on methacholine hyper-responsiveness in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. Longer-term studies are indicated to evaluate their relative efficacy on asthma exacerbations.

Aims: The relationship between beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphisms and bronchoprotective response with long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists is unknown., Methods: We retrospectively analysed data from six placebo-controlled randomized studies in corticosteroid treated asthmatics where formoterol or salmeterol were administered over a 1-2-week period, with prior 1-2 week washout, assessing the primary end point of methacholine PD20 and adenosine monophosphate PC20, following first and last dose, expressed as doubling dose difference from placebo., Results: There was no significant heterogeneity between the different studies. Patients who had homozygous or heterozygous genotypes containing the arginine-16 polymorphism (Arg16-Arg16 or Arg16-Gly16) had greater bronchoprotective subsensitivity compared with the homozygous glycine-16 genotype (Gly16-Gly16), amounting to a mean doubling dose difference of 1.49 (95% CI 0.50, 2.48), after the last dose. Subsensitivity of response was greater with formoterol than salmeterol after the last dose in all genotypes, especially with the arginine-16 polymorphism, amounting to a doubling dose difference of 3.00 (95% CI 1.01, 4.99) between formoterol and salmeterol., Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis showed that the arginine-16 polymorphism was associated with subsensitivity of response for bronchoprotection, which was greater for formoterol than salmeterol. A prospective study will be required in order to further evaluate these findings, particularly to assess whether these differences are mirrored by exacerbations.

Aims: Inhaled corticosteroids alone or in combination with long acting beta2-agonists are indicated for use in mild persistent asthmatics. We set out to evaluate effects on airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and airway calibre using hydrofluoroalkane fluticasone/salmeterol (FP/SM) vs. double the dose of fluticasone alone (FP)., Methods: Fourteen mild persistent asthmatics completed a randomized double-blind crossover study with 1-week run-in and washout periods prior to treatments. Subjects received 3 weeks of FP 250 microg or FP 125 microg/SM 25 microg as 1 puff twice daily. Methacholine PD20 and lung function were measured after both baseline and treatment periods., Results: There were no significant differences in baseline values prior to randomized treatments. Compared with pooled baseline, FP/SM and FP conferred improvements (P < 0.05) on methacholine PD20: 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.7, 3.2) and 1.6 (0.8-2.3) doubling dose improvements, respectively; between FP/SM vs. FP there was a 0.9 (0.4, 1.4) doubling dose difference (P < 0.05). For forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced mid-expiratory flow (FEF25-75) and morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), FP/SM but not FP conferred improvements (P < 0.05) compared with pooled baseline, with FP/SM being greater than FP (P < 0.05): differences in FEV1 of 7.2% (3.8, 10.6) predicted, FEF25-75 of 11.2% (6.3, 16.1) predicted, and morning PEF of 17 L x min(-1)(1-32)., Conclusions: FP/SM conferred improvements on AHR and airway calibre, while twice the dose of FP improved only AHR in patients with mild asthma. The differential effects of FP/SM and FP suggest separate but complementary actions of the two moieties on airway inflammation and smooth muscle stabilization. This may explain the beneficial effects of combination inhalers on exacerbations.

Objective: Current guidelines advocate adding a long acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) to an inhaled corticosteroid as an alternative to increasing the dose of the latter. Since it is unclear how this translates into effects on surrogate inflammatory markers, we evaluated the anti-inflammatory activity of fluticasone plus salmeterol in combination versus twice the dose of fluticasone alone., Methods: Fifteen mild-to-moderate asthmatics (mean FEV(1) 80% predicted) uncontrolled on inhaled corticosteroids (mean dose 470 microg) were randomised in a single-blind crossover fashion to receive 2 weeks each of fluticasone 250 microg plus salmeterol 50 microg in combination (FP+SM), 1 puff b.i.d., and fluticasone 500 microg (FP), 1 puff b.i.d. Prior to each randomised treatment, there was a 2-week run-in and washout period during which patients used their usual inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Measurements were made before and after randomised treatment periods. The primary outcome was airway hyper-responsiveness to adenosine monophosphate (AMP PC(20)), while secondary endpoints were exhaled tidal nitric oxide (NO), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and forced mid-expiratory flow (FEF(25-75))., Results: For AMP PC(20), FP alone but not FP+SM conferred a significant ( P<0.05) improvement amounting to 3.27 (95% CI 1.46-7.32) and 1.44 (95% CI 0.64-3.23) geometric mean fold shifts, respectively, from baseline, while the difference between treatments was significantly ( P<0.05) greater with FP alone: a 2.26-fold (95% CI 1.01-5.07) difference. Both FP alone and FP+SM conferred significant ( P<0.05) falls in NO from baseline: 2.33 (95% CI 1.71-3.19) and 1.49 (95% CI 1.09-2.03) geometric mean fold changes, respectively, while between treatments the reduction was significantly ( P<0.05) greater with FP alone: a 1.57-fold (95% CI 1.15-2.14) difference. Neither treatment significantly improved FEV(1) or FEF(25-75)., Conclusion: Double the dose of FP alone relative to FP+SM conferred superior effects on surrogate inflammatory markers but not on lung function. Long-term studies are required to evaluate whether these improvements on surrogate inflammatory markers translate into commensurate reductions in airway remodelling and exacerbations.

Background: Options for step-down therapy include use of inhaled corticosteroids alone or in combination with a long-acting beta2-agonist., Objective: We sought to evaluate step-down therapy with a fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (FP-SM) combination administered through a dry powder inhaler (DPI; Advair Diskus) versus a medium dose of hydrofluoroalkane 143a-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) administered through a breath-actuated pressurized metered-dose inhaler (QVAR Autohaler)., Methods: Thirty-nine patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma were treated with 1000 microg of DPI-administered BDP twice daily (DPI-BDP) for 4 weeks and then randomized to 200 microg of HFA-BDP twice daily (n = 20) or 100 microg of FP and 50 microg of SM twice daily (FM-SM; n = 19) for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design. We measured the provocative dose of methacholine producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (methacholine PD20) as the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes being lung function, surrogate inflammatory markers, diary card responses, quality of life, and safety., Results: There was a 0.9 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.2) doubling dose improvement in methacholine PD20 comparing asthma before versus after DPI-BDP. HFA-BDP maintained this improvement, whereas FP-SM produced a further significant improvement, amounting to a 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-2.1) doubling dose difference at 8 weeks for FP-SM versus HFA-BDP. Effects on FEV1, peak expiratory flow, and quality of life (symptoms and emotions) were similar to those on methacholine PD20, with a significant difference between FP-SM and HFA-BDP. Suppression of plasma and urinary cortisol and serum osteocalcin levels occurred with DPI-BDP, but values returned to baseline levels within 1 month of HFA-BDP or FP-SM administration., Conclusion: After high-dose inhaled corticosteroid, stepping down with the combination inhaler conferred further improvements in bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and clinical control, but not inflammatory markers, compared with that seen with a medium dose of inhaled corticosteroid.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease represents a major global health care burden for both primary and secondary care providers and is the most common respiratory condition necessitating hospital admission. Short-acting bronchodilators play a vital role in immediate relief of symptoms, while inhaled long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids are advocated for regular use in individuals with persistent symptoms and exacerbations. Theophylline is a nonspecific phosphodiesterase inhibitor and is usually reserved for patients with ongoing symptoms despite optimum inhaled bronchodilator treatment or when difficulty is encountered with inhaler devices. However, it is often not widely used mainly due to frequency of dose-related adverse effects, numerous drug interactions and narrow therapeutic index. This in turn has lead to the development of more selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors in an attempt to create a drug which patients can use with beneficial effects but without the problems associated with theophylline. Current data do indicate that phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors confer some benefits in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease when compared to placebo in terms of lung function, quality of life and exacerbations. They are also generally well tolerated. Further studies are required to determine fully their long-term beneficial and adverse effect profiles and ultimately where they might comfortably sit in management algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and related symptoms. These exacerbations can be caused by viruses, bacteria, or environmental pollutants. Oxygen therapy, bronchodilators, corticosteroids, antibiotics, aminophylline, respiratory stimulants, non-invasive ventilation, general hospital care, assisted hospital discharge, and other related topics are examined.

The article presents information on inhaled treatment for patients with chronic obstructive airways disease (COPD). According to the article, all patients with COPD should be prescribed a short acting bronchodilator. The article discusses long acting bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids, long acting anticholinergics, and adverse effects of these treatments.