Search

Rationale: COPD and bronchiectasis are commonly reported together. Studies report varying impacts of co-diagnosis on outcomes, which may be related to different definitions of disease used across studies. Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) associated with bronchiectasis and its relationship with clinical outcomes. We further investigated the impact of implementing the standardized ROSE criteria (radiological bronchiectasis [R], obstruction [FEV 1 /FVC ratio <0.7; O], symptoms [S], and exposure [⩾10 pack-years of smoking; E]), an objective definition of the association of bronchiectasis with COPD. Methods: Analysis of the EMBARC (European Bronchiectasis Registry), a prospective observational study of patients with computed tomography-confirmed bronchiectasis from 28 countries. The ROSE criteria were used to objectively define the association of bronchiectasis with COPD. Key outcomes during a maximum of 5 years of follow-up were exacerbations, hospitalization, and mortality. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 16,730 patients with bronchiectasis were included; 4,336 had a clinician-assigned codiagnosis of COPD, and these patients had more exacerbations, worse quality of life, and higher severity scores. We observed marked overdiagnosis of COPD: 22.2% of patients with a diagnosis of COPD did not have airflow obstruction and 31.9% did not have a history of ⩾10 pack-years of smoking. Therefore, 2,157 patients (55.4%) met the ROSE criteria for COPD. Compared with patients without COPD, patients who met the ROSE criteria had increased risks of exacerbations and exacerbations resulting in hospitalization during follow-up (incidence rate ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.35; vs. incidence rate ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.90, respectively). Conclusions: The label of COPD is often applied to patients with bronchiectasis who do not have objective evidence of airflow obstruction or a smoking history. Patients with a clinical label of COPD have worse clinical outcomes.

Rationale: Chest computed tomography (CT) scans are essential to diagnose and monitor bronchiectasis (BE). To date, few quantitative data are available about the nature and extent of structural lung abnormalities (SLAs) on CT scans of patients with BE. Objectives: To investigate SLAs on CT scans of patients with BE and the relationship of SLAs to clinical features using the EMBARC (European Multicenter Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration) registry. Methods: CT scans from patients with BE included in the EMBARC registry were analyzed using the validated Bronchiectasis Scoring Technique for CT (BEST-CT). The subscores of this instrument are expressed as percentages of total lung volume. The items scored are atelectasis/consolidation, BE with and without mucus plugging (MP), airway wall thickening, MP, ground-glass opacities, bullae, airways, and parenchyma. Four composite scores were calculated: total BE (i.e., BE with and without MP), total MP (i.e., BE with MP plus MP alone), total inflammatory changes (i.e., atelectasis/consolidation plus total MP plus ground-glass opacities), and total disease (i.e., all items but airways and parenchyma). Measurements and Main Results: CT scans of 524 patients with BE were analyzed. Mean subscores were 4.6 (range, 2.3-7.7) for total BE, 4.2 (1.2-8.1) for total MP, 8.3 (3.5-16.7) for total inflammatory changes, and 14.9 (9.1-25.9) for total disease. BE associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia was associated with more SLAs, whereas chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with fewer SLAs. Lower FEV 1 , longer disease duration, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, and severe exacerbations were all independently associated with worse SLAs. Conclusions: The type and extent of SLAs in patients with BE are highly heterogeneous. Strong relationships between radiological disease and clinical features suggest that CT analysis may be a useful tool for clinical phenotyping.

Rationale: infection is associated with worse outcomes in bronchiectasis. Impaired neutrophil antimicrobial responses contribute to bacterial persistence. Gremubamab is a bivalent, bispecific monoclonal antibody targeting Psl exopolysaccharide and the type 3 secretion system component PcrV. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection is associated with worse outcomes in bronchiectasis. Impaired neutrophil antimicrobial responses contribute to bacterial persistence. Gremubamab is a bivalent, bispecific monoclonal antibody targeting Psl exopolysaccharide and the type 3 secretion system component PcrV. Objectives: by neutrophils from patients with bronchiectasis and to prevent P. aeruginosa by neutrophils from patients with bronchiectasis and to prevent P. aeruginosa isolates from a global bronchiectasis cohort ( Methods: P. aeruginosa isolates from a global bronchiectasis cohort ( n . Patients with bronchiectasis ( in vitro and in vivo . Patients with bronchiectasis ( n  = 11) and control subjects ( n  = 10) were enrolled, and the effect of gremubamab in peripheral blood neutrophil opsonophagocytic killing (OPK) assays against P. aeruginosa was evaluated. Serum antibody titers to Psl and PcrV were determined ( n  = 30; 19 chronic P. aeruginosa Psl and PcrV were conserved in isolates from chronically infected patients with bronchiectasis. Seventy-three of 100 isolates had a full P. aeruginosa infection), as was the effect of gremubamab treatment in OPK and anti-cytotoxic activity assays. Measurements and Main Results: gene, with 20 distinct full-length PcrV protein subtypes identified. PcrV subtypes were successfully bound by gremubamab and the monoclonal antibody-mediated potent protective activity against tested isolates. Gremubamab increased bronchiectasis patient neutrophil-mediated OPK (+34.6 ± 8.1%) and phagocytosis (+70.0 ± 48.8%), similar to effects observed in neutrophils from control subjects (OPK, +30.1 ± 7.6%). No evidence of competition between gremubamab and endogenous antibodies was found, with protection against psl locus, and 99 of 100 contained the pcrV Gremubamab enhanced bronchiectasis patient neutrophil phagocytosis and killing of P. aeruginosa -induced cytotoxicity and enhanced OPK demonstrated with and without addition of patient serum. Conclusions: Gremubamab enhanced bronchiectasis patient neutrophil phagocytosis and killing of P. aeruginosa and reduced virulence.

Background: International guidelines recommend airway clearance management as one of the important pillars of bronchiectasis treatment. However, the extent to which airway clearance is used for people with bronchiectasis in Europe is unclear. The aim of the study was to identify the use of airway clearance management in patients with bronchiectasis across different countries and factors influencing airway clearance use., Methods: This was a prospective observational study using data from the European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) Registry between January 2015 and April 2022. Prespecified options for airway clearance management were recorded, including airway clearance techniques, devices and use of mucoactive drugs., Results: 16 723 people with bronchiectasis from 28 countries were included in the study. The mean age was 67 years (interquartile range 57-74 years, range 18-100 years) and 61% were female. 72% of the participants reported daily sputum expectoration and 52% (95% CI 51-53%) of all participants reported using regular airway clearance management. Active cycle of breathing technique was used by 28% of the participants and airway clearance devices by 16% of participants. The frequency of airway clearance management and techniques used varied significantly between different countries. Participants who used airway clearance management had greater disease severity and worse symptoms, including a higher daily sputum volume, compared to those who did not use it regularly. Mucoactive drugs were also more likely to be used in participants with more severe disease. Access to specialist respiratory physiotherapy was low throughout Europe, but particularly low in Eastern Europe., Conclusions: Only a half of people with bronchiectasis in Europe use airway clearance management. Use of and access to devices, mucoactive drugs and specialist chest physiotherapy appears to be limited in many European countries., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: B. Hererro-Cortina reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from SEPAR (Spanish Respiratory Society), and has a leadership or fiduciary role in SEPAR. S. Aliberti reports grants from Insmed Incorporated, Chiesi, Fisher and Paykel, and GSK; royalties or licences from McGraw Hill; consulting fees from Insmed Incorporated, Insmed Italy, Insmed Ireland Ltd, Zambon Spa, AstraZeneca UK Ltd, AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical LP, CSL Behring GmbH, Grifols, Fondazione Internazionale Menarini, Moderna, Chiesi, MCD Italis Srl, Brahms, Physioassist SAS and GSK SpA; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from GSK SpA, Thermofisher Scientific, Insmed Italy, Insmed Ireland, Zambon and Fondazione Internazionale Menarini; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Insmed Incorporated, Insmed Italy, AstraZeneca UK Ltd and MSD Italia Srl. P.C. Goeminne reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Insmed, GSK and Chiesi; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Chiesi; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Boehringer, GSK and Pfizer. E. Polverino reports grants from Grifols; consulting fees from Insmed, Bayer, Chiesi and Zambon; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Bayer, Chiesi, Grifols, GSK, Insmed, Menarini and Zambon; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Insmed, Pfizer and Moderna. K. Dimakou reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Norma Hellas, Chiesi, AstraZeneca and Zambon; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Norma Hellas, Chiesi, AstraZeneca and Menarini, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Novartis, GSK and Chiesi. C.S. Haworth reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from 30 Technology, CSL Behring, Chisi, Insmed, Janssen, LifeArc, Meiji, Mylan, Pneumagen, Shionogi, Vertex and Zambon. M.R. Loebinger reports consulting fees from Armata, 30T, AstraZeneca, Parion, Insmed, Chiesi, Zambon, Electromed, Recode, AN2 and Boehringer Ingelheim; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Insmed; and is ERS Infection Group Chair. A. De Soyza reports grants from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GSK and Novartis; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Insmed, GSK, Boehringer, 30T and Bayer; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GSK and Novartis. M. Vendrell reports grants from Chiesi; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Insmed and Publi Creation; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Zambon, Chiesi, Novartis, Behring and Gebro; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Insmed; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or services from Insmed and Novartis. P.R. Burgel reports grants from GSK and Vertex; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Insmed, MSD, Vertex, Viatris and Zambon; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca and Chiesi. S. Sutharsan reports grants from Vertex, Galapagos, Insmed, Proteostasis and Corbus; consulting fees from Insmed, Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Boehringer Ingelheim; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim and Insmed. S. Škrgat reports honoraria for educational events, invited lectures and presentations supported by Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Medis, Berlin-Chemie and Chiesi; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca. D. Stolz reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from CSL Behring, Berlin-Chemie, Menarini, Novartis, GSK, AstraZeneca, Vifor, Merck, Chiesi and Sanofi; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for GSK and CSL Behring. P. Kauppi reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from Nordic Respiratory Academy; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Swedish Orphan Biovitrium; a leadership or fiduciary role for the Finnish Respiratory Society and Finnish Tuberculosis Foundation Grant Committee; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or services from Theravance. A. Bossios reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Chiesi; and is Secretary of Assembly 5 (Airway diseases, asthma, COPD and chronic cough) of the ERS, Vice-chair of the Nordic Severe Asthma Network (NSAN)-NORDSTAR and a member of the Steering Committee of the ERS CRC for severe asthma (SHARP). I. Clifton reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca and GSK; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, GSK and Infex Therapeutics. M.L. Crichton reports consulting fees from Boxer Capital LLC. P. Walker is Chair of the British Thoracic Society. D. Obradovic is President of the Serbian Society of Intensive Care Medicine. A. Amorim reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Zambon Group, and support for attending meetings and or/travel from Zambon Group, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis Farma. F. Blasi reports grants from AstraZeneca, Chiesi and Insmed; consulting fees from Menarini; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Guidotti, Grifols, Insmed, Menarini, Novartis, OM Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, Viatris, Vertex and Zambon. M. Jankovic Makek reports consulting fees from Insmed, Biomerieux and MSD; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Insmed, MSD, Pfizer and Teva; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, Pfizer and Berlin-Chemie. M. Shteinberg reports consulting fees from GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kamada and Zambon; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Insmed, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, AstraZeneca, Teva, Novartis, Kamada and Sanofi; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Novartis, Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK and Rafa; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Bonus Therapeutics, Israel; leadership or fiduciary roles for EMBARC Management, Israel Pulmonology Society Board and the Israel Society for TB and Mycobacterial Diseases; receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or services from Trudell Medical Int.; and is and Associate Editor of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. J.D. Chalmers reports grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Grifols, Insmed, LifeArc and Novartis; and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Insmed, Grifols, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Janssen, Antabio and Zambon. F.C. Ringshausen reports grants from German Center for Lung Research (DZL), German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), IMI (EU/EFPIA) and iABC Consortium (including Alaxia, Basilea, Novartis and Polyphor), Mukoviszidose Institute, Novartis, Insmed Germany, Grifols, Bayer and InfectoPharm; consulting fees from Parion, Grifols, Zambon, Insmed and Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from I!DE Werbeagentur GmbH, Interkongress GmbH, AstraZeneca, Insmed, Grifols and Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main; payment for expert testimony from Social Court Cologne; support for attending meetings and/or travel from German Kartagener Syndrome and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Patient Advocacy Group Mukoviszidose e.V.; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Insmed, Grifols and Shionogi; leadership or fiduciary roles as Coordinator of the ERN-LUNG Bronchiectasis Core Network, Chair of the German Bronchiectasis Registry PROGNOSIS, Member of the Steering Committee of the European Bronchiectasis Registry EMBARC, Member of the Steering Committee of the European Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease Registry EMBARC-NTM, Co-Speaker of the Medical Advisory Board of the German Kartagener Syndrome and PCD Patient Advocacy Group, Speaker of the Respiratory Infections and TB group of the German Respiratory Society, Speaker of the Cystic Fibrosis group of German Respiratory Society (DGP), principal investigator of the German Center for Lung Research, Member of the Protocol Review Committee of the PCD-CTN and Member of Physician Association of the German Cystic Fibrosis Patient Advocacy Group; and other financial or non-financial interests in AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celtaxsys, Corbus, Insmed, Novartis, Parion, University of Dundee, Vertex and Zambon. The remaining authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Background: Asthma is commonly reported in patients with a diagnosis of bronchiectasis., Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with bronchiectasis and asthma (BE+A) had a different clinical phenotype and different outcomes compared with patients with bronchiectasis without concomitant asthma., Methods: A prospective observational pan-European registry (European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration) enrolled patients across 28 countries. Adult patients with computed tomography-confirmed bronchiectasis were reviewed at baseline and annual follow-up visits using an electronic case report form. Asthma was diagnosed by the local investigator. Follow-up data were used to explore differences in exacerbation frequency between groups using a negative binomial regression model. Survival analysis used Cox proportional hazards regression., Results: Of 16,963 patients with bronchiectasis included for analysis, 5,267 (31.0%) had investigator-reported asthma. Patients with BE+A were younger, were more likely to be female and never smokers, and had a higher body mass index than patients with bronchiectasis without asthma. BE+A was associated with a higher prevalence of rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps as well as eosinophilia and Aspergillus sensitization. BE+A had similar microbiology but significantly lower severity of disease using the bronchiectasis severity index. Patients with BE+A were at increased risk of exacerbation after adjustment for disease severity and multiple confounders. Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use was associated with reduced mortality in patients with BE+A (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.95) and reduced risk of hospitalization (rate ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.67-0.86) compared with control subjects without asthma and not receiving ICSs., Conclusions: BE+A was common and was associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and improved outcomes with ICS use. Unexpectedly we identified significantly lower mortality in patients with BE+A., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A validated 4-point sputum colour chart can be used to objectively evaluate the levels of airway inflammation in bronchiectasis patients. In the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC), we tested whether sputum colour would be associated with disease severity and clinical outcomes., Methods: We used a prospective, observational registry of adults with bronchiectasis conducted in 31 countries. Patients who did not produce spontaneous sputum were excluded from the analysis. The Murray sputum colour chart was used at baseline and at follow-up visits. Key outcomes were frequency of exacerbations, hospitalisations for severe exacerbations and mortality during up to 5-year follow-up., Results: 13 484 patients were included in the analysis. More purulent sputum was associated with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ), worse quality of life, greater bacterial infection and a higher bronchiectasis severity index. Sputum colour was strongly associated with the risk of future exacerbations during follow-up. Compared to patients with mucoid sputum (reference group), patients with mucopurulent sputum experienced significantly more exacerbations (incident rate ratio (IRR) 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.38; p<0.0001), while the rates were even higher for patients with purulent (IRR 1.55, 95% CI 1.44-1.67; p<0.0001) and severely purulent sputum (IRR 1.91, 95% CI 1.52-2.39; p<0.0001). Hospitalisations for severe exacerbations were also associated with increasing sputum colour with rate ratios, compared to patients with mucoid sputum, of 1.41 (95% CI 1.29-1.56; p<0.0001), 1.98 (95% CI 1.77-2.21; p<0.0001) and 3.05 (95% CI 2.25-4.14; p<0.0001) for mucopurulent, purulent and severely purulent sputum, respectively. Mortality was significantly increased with increasing sputum purulence, hazard ratio 1.12 (95% CI 1.01-1.24; p=0.027), for each increment in sputum purulence., Conclusion: Sputum colour is a simple marker of disease severity and future risk of exacerbations, severe exacerbations and mortality in patients with bronchiectasis., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: S. Aliberti reports grants or contracts from Insmed Incorporated, Chiesi, Fisher & Paykel and GlaxoSmithKline, royalties or licences from McGraw Hill, consulting fees from Insmed Incorporated, Insmed Italy, Insmed Ireland Ltd, Zambon SpA, AstraZeneca UK Ltd, AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical LP, CSL Behring GmbH, Grifols, Fondazione Internazionale Menarini, Moderna, Chiesi, MCD Italia Srl, Brahms, PhysioAssist SAS and GlaxoSmithKline SpA, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from GlaxoSmithKline SpA, Thermofisher Scientific, Insmed Italy, Insmed Ireland, Zambon and Fondazione Internazionale Menarini, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Insmed Incorporated, Insmed Italy, AstraZeneca UK Ltd and MSD Italia Srl. F.C. Ringshausen reports grants or contracts from the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), IMI (EU/EFPIA), iABC Consortium (including Alaxia, Basilea, Novartis and Polyphor), Mukoviszidose Institute, Novartis, Insmed Germany, Grifols, Bayer and InfectoPharm, consulting fees from Parion, Grifols, Zambon, Insmed and Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from I!DE Werbeagentur GmbH, Interkongress GmbH, AstraZeneca, Insmed, Grifols and Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, payment for expert testimony from Social Court Cologne, support for attending meetings and/or travel from the German Kartagener Syndrome and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) Patient Advocacy Group Mukoviszidose eV, participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Insmed, Grifols and Shionogi, and leadership or fiduciary roles as Coordinator of the ERN-LUNG Bronchiectasis Core Network, Chair of the German Bronchiectasis Registry PROGNOSIS, Member of the SteerCo of the European Bronchiectasis Registry EMBARC, Member of the SteerCo of the European Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease Registry EMBARC-NTM, Co-Speaker of the Medical Advisory Board of the German Kartagener Syndrome and PCD Patient Advocacy Group, Speaker of the Respiratory Infections and TB group of the German Respiratory Society (DGP), Speaker of the Cystic Fibrosis group of German Respiratory Society (DGP), PI of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Member of the Protocol Review Committee of the PCD-CTN, and Member of the Physician Association of the German Cystic Fibrosis Patient Advocacy Group; F.C. Ringshausen has other financial or non-financial interests with AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celtaxsys, Corbus, Insmed, Novartis, Parion, University of Dundee, Vertex and Zambon. R. Dhar reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from LUPIN, CIPLA and Glenmark. C.S. Haworth reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from 30 Technology, CSL Behring, Chisi, Insmed, Janssen, LifeArc, Meiji, Mylan, Pneumagen, Shionogi, Vertex and Zambon. M.R. Loebinger reports consulting fees from Armata, 30T, AstraZeneca, Parion, Insmed, Chiesi, Zambon, Electromed, Recode, AN2 and Boehringer Ingelheim, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Insmed, and a leadership or fiduciary role as ERS Infection Group Chair. K. Dimakou reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Norma Hellas, Chiesi, AstraZeneca and Zambon, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Norma Hellas, Chiesi, AstraZeneca and Menarini, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline and Chiesi. M.L. Crichton reports consulting fees from Boxer Capital LLC. A. De Soyza reports grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Insmed, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer, 30T and Bayer, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis. M. Vendrell reports grants or contracts from Chiesi, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Insmed and Publi Creation, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Zambon, Chiesi, Novartis, Behring and Gebro, participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Insmed, and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from Insmed and Novartis. P-R. Burgel reports grants or contracts from GlaxoSmithKline and Vertex, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Insmed, MSD, Vertex, Viatris and Zambon, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca and Chiesi. S. Skrgat reports honoraria for educational events, invited lectures and presentations supported by Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Medis, Berlin-Chemie and Chiesi, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca. A. de Roux reports consulting fees from Adboard Insmed, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Insmed, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Berlin-Chemie and Boehringer Ingelheim, support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, and advisory board participation with Insmed. A. Bossios reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Chiesi, and leadership or fiduciary roles as Secretary of ERS Assembly 5 (Airway diseases, asthma, COPD and chronic cough), Vice-chair of the Nordic Severe Asthma Network (NSAN)-NORDSTAR and on the Steering Committee of ERS CRC Severe Asthma (SHARP). P. Kauppi reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from the Nordic Respiratory Academy, participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for the Swedish Orphan Biovitrium, leadership or fiduciary roles for the Finnish Respiratory Society and Finnish Tuberculosis Foundation Grant Committee, and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from Theravance. M. Murris reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Pfizer, payment for expert testimony from Vertex, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Zambon, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Zambon and Viatris. D. Obradovic reports a leadership or fiduciary role as president of the Serbian Society of Intensive Care Medicine. A. Amorim reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Zambon Group, and support for attending meetings and or/travel from Zambon Group, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis Farma. E. Van Braeckel reports grants or contracts from Insmed, Boehringer Ingelheim and Zambon. A. Shoemark reports consulting fees from Spirovant and Translate Bio, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Translate Bio, Ethris and Insmed, leadership or fiduciary roles in ERS CRCs (EMBARC, BEATPCD, AMR). M. Shteinberg reports consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kamada and Zambon, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Insmed, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Teva, Novartis, Kamada and Sanofi, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Novartis, Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline and Rafa, participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Bonus Therapeutics, Israel, leadership or fiduciary roles in EMBARC, Israel Pulmonology Society, and Israel Society for TB and Mycobacterial Diseases, receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from Trudell Medical International, and is Associate Editor of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. P.C. Goeminne reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Insmed, GlaxoSmithKline and Chiesi, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Chiesi, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Boehringer, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer. T. Welte reports grants from the German Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF), consulting fees and lecture honoraria from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Grifols, GlaxoSmithKline, Insmed, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi, leadership roles for the German Center for Lung Research (DZL) – Board of Directors, Novartis Foundation – Board of Directors, Chairman of the Board of Trustees for CAPNETZ Foundation, German Lung Foundation, German Sepsis Foundation, and is Past President of the ERS, German Society of Pneumology and German Sepsis Society. F. Blasi reports grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline and Insmed, consulting fees from Menarini, GlaxoSmithKline and Om Pharma, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Guidotti, Grifols, Insmed, Menarini, Novartis, OM Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, Viatris, Vertex and Zambon. E. Polverino reports grants or contracts from Grifols, consulting fees from Insmed, Bayer, Chiesi and Zambon, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Bayer, Chiesi, Grifols, GlaxoSmithKline, Insmed, Menarini and Zambon, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Insmed, Pfizer and Moderna. J.D. Chalmers reports grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Insmed, LifeArc and Novartis, and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Insmed, Grifols, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Janssen, Antabio and Zambon, and is Chief Editor of the European Respiratory Journal. The remaining authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: M. S. received grant support from GSK, Trudell Medical Int, consulting fees and/or honoraria from AstraZeneca, BI, Kamada, Sanofi, and Insmed. J. D. C. received grant support from AstraZeneca, Genentech, Gilead sciences, GSK, Grifols, Boehringer Ingelheim, Insmed, Novartis; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Insmed, Novartis, Pfizer, Grifols, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Antabio, Zambon. None declared (O. S., N. S., R. F., A. J., N. O., P. S., J. U. S. J., M. C., P. M., C. N. M., W. S.).

Background: Bronchiectasis is a heterogeneous, neglected disease with few multicentre studies exploring the causes, severity, microbiology, and treatment of the disease across Europe. This aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of bronchiectasis and compare between different European countries., Methods: EMBARC is an international clinical research network for bronchiectasis. We report on a multicentre, prospective, observational, non-interventional, cohort study (the EMBARC registry) conducted across 27 European countries and Israel. Comprehensive clinical data were collected from adult patients (aged ≥18 years) at baseline and annual follow-up visits using electronic case report form. Data from individual countries were grouped into four regions (the UK, northern and western Europe, southern Europe, and central and eastern Europe according to modified EU EuroVoc classification). Follow-up data were used to explore differences in exacerbation frequency between regions using a negative binomial regression model., Findings: Between Jan 12, 2015, and April 12, 2022, 16 963 individuals were enrolled. Median age was 67 years (IQR 57-74), 10 335 (60·9%) participants were female and 6628 (39·1%) were male. The most common cause of bronchiectasis in all 16 963 participants was post-infective disease in 3600 (21·2%); 6466 individuals (38·1%) were classified as idiopathic. Individuals with bronchiectasis experienced a median of two exacerbations (IQR 1-4) per year and 4483 (26·4%) patients had a hospitalisation for exacerbation in the previous year. When examining the percentage of all isolated bacteria, marked differences in microbiology were seen between countries, with a higher frequency of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and lower Haemophilus influenzae frequency in southern Europe, compared with higher H influenzae in the UK and northern and western Europe. Compared with other regions, patients in central and eastern Europe had more severe bronchiectasis measured by the Bronchiectasis Severity Index (51·3% vs 35·1% in the overall cohort) and more exacerbations leading to hospitalisations (57·9% vs 26·4% in the overall cohort). Overall, patients in central and eastern Europe had an increased frequency of exacerbations (adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1·12, 95% CI 1·01-1·25) and a higher frequency of exacerbations leading to hospitalisations (adjusted RR 1·71, 1·44-2·02) compared with patients in other regions. Treatment of bronchiectasis was highly heterogeneous between regions., Interpretation: Bronchiectasis shows important geographical variation in causes, microbiology, severity, and outcomes across Europe., Funding: European Union-European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations Innovative Medicines Initiative., Translations: For the Arabic, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Irish, Russian and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JC reports grants or contracts from Grifols; consulting fees from Antabio, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Glaxosmithkline, Grifols, Insmed, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Zambon; and leadership or fiduciary roles as Chair of European Respiratory Society (ERS) Bronchiectasis Guideline Task Force, Chief Editor of European Respiratory Journal, and Chair of EMBARC Clinical Research Collaboration. EP reports grants or contracts from Grifols; consulting fees from Bayer, Zambon, Pfizer, Chiesi, Shire, Shionogi, Insmed, Moderna, and Pfizer; payment for expert testimony from Chiesi; leadership or fiduciary roles as ERS Task Force for Bronchiectasis Guidelines, co-chair of EMBARC; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Zambon. FR reports grants or contracts from German Center for Lung Research (DZL), German Center for Infection Research (EU and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations [EFPIA]) and iABC Consortium (including Alaxia, Basilea, Novartis, and Polyphor), Mukoviszidose Institute, Novartis, Insmed Germany, Grifols, Bayer, and InfectoPharm, to the institution; consulting fees from Parion, Grifols, Zambon, Insmed, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from I!DE Werbeagentur, Interkongress, AstraZeneca, Insmed, Grifols, and Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main; payment for expert testimony from Social Court Cologne, to the institution; support for attending meetings or travel from German Kartagener Syndrome and PCD PAG, and Mukoviszidose; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Insmed, Grifols, and Shionogi; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy groups as Coordinator of the ERN-LUNG Bronchiectasis Core Network; Chair of the German Bronchiectasis Registry PROGNOSIS; Member of the SteerCo of the European Bronchiectasis Registry EMBARC; Member of the SteerCo of the European Non-tuberculous Mycobacterial registry EMBARC-NTM; Co-Speaker of the Medical Advisory Board of the German Kartagener Syndrome and PCD PAG; Speaker of the Respiratory Infections and tuberculosis group of the German Respiratory Society (DGP; Speaker of the Cystic Fibrosis group of DGP; Prinicipal Investigator for DZL; Member of the Protocol Review Committee of the PCD-CTN; Member of Physician Association of the German Cystic Fibrosis PAG; and fees for clinical trial participation paid to the institution from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celtaxsys, Corbus, Insmed, Novartis, Parion, University of Dundee, Vertex, and Zambon. ADS reports grants or contracts from Bayer, Gilead, Pfizer, Astrazeneca, and Novartis, outside of the submitted work; consulting fees from Boehringer, Bayer, Gilead, Pfizer, GSK, and Astrazeneca, outside of the submitted work; support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, and GSK; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Bayer. MV reports participation in EMBARC registry; grants or contracts from Chiesi; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Insmed and Publi creation; support for attending meetings or travel from Zambon, Chiesi, Novartis, Behring; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Insmed; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Insmed and Novartis. PRB reports grants or contracts from GSK and Vertex, to the institution; consulting fees from Insmed, Vertex, Viatris, and Zambon; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Insmed. CH reports grants or contracts from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR 2020, NIHR133876 Seven versus Fourteen Days Antibiotics for Patients with Bronchiectasis Requiring Intravenous Antibiotics to the institution and NIHR [2020–2023] Bronchodilators and corticosteroids in bronchiectasis) to the institution; consulting fees from 30 Technology, CSL Behring, Chiesi, Insmed, Janssen, LifeArc, Meiji, Mylan, Novartis, Pneumagen, Shionogi, and Zambon; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Zambon, Insmed, Chiesi, and 30 Technology. ML reports consulting fees from Armata, 30T, AstraZeneca, Parion, Insmed, Chiesi, Zambon, Electromed, Recode, AN2, and Savara; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Insmed; and the ERS Infection Group chair role. KD reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, and Norma Hellas; and upport for attending meetings or travel from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Pfizer, Norma Hellas, and Menarini. MM reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Pfizer; payment for expert testimony from Vertex; support for attending meetings or travel from Zambon; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Zambon, and Viatris. TW reports grants or contracts from German Ministry of Research and Education and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, and Insmed. FB reports grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Insmed; consulting fees from GSK, Menarini, OM Pharma; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Grifols, Insmed, Menarini, Novartis, Ompharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, Vertex, Viatris, and Zambon. MS reports grants or contracts from GSK and Trudell pharma; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcel, Kamada, Synchrony Medical, Trumed, and Zambon; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Kamada; support for attending meetings or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Kamada; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Bonus Biotherapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group with Israeli Pulmonology Society, Israeli Society for Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases, and EMBARC as unpaid management board member and ERJ, Chest as unpaid Editorial board member; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Trudell Medical International. JSE reports grants or contracts from EU FP7 with Novartis and Polyphor; and consulting fees from Vertex. PG reports payment or honoraria for a lecture on bronchiectasis from GSK. SA reports grants or contracts from Insmed, Chiesi, Fisher & Paykel, to the institution; royalties or licenses with McGraw Hill; consulting fees from Insmed Incorporated, Insmed Italy, Insmed Ireland, Zambon, AstraZeneca UK, AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical, CSL Behring, Grifols, Fondazione Charta, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici Spa, Zcube, MENARINI, MSD Italia, Physioassist SAS, and GlaxoSmithKline Spa; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from GlaxoSmithKline Spa, Thermofisher Scientific, Insmed Italy, Insmed Ireland, Zambon, and Fondazione Internazionale Menarini; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Insmed Incorporated, Insmed Italy, AstraZeneca UK, and MSD Italia. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Identifying risk factors for poor outcomes can help with risk stratification and targeting of treatment. Risk factors for mortality and exacerbations have been identified in bronchiectasis but have been almost exclusively studied in European and North American populations. This study investigated the risk factors for poor outcome in a large population of bronchiectasis patients enrolled in India., Methods: The European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) and Respiratory Research Network of India (EMBARC-India) registry is a prospective observational study of adults with computed tomography-confirmed bronchiectasis enrolled at 31 sites across India. Baseline characteristics of patients were used to investigate associations with key clinical outcomes: mortality, severe exacerbations requiring hospital admission, overall exacerbation frequency and decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s., Results: 1018 patients with at least 12-month follow-up data were enrolled in the follow-up study. Frequent exacerbations (≥3 per year) at baseline were associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 3.23, 95% CI 1.39-7.50), severe exacerbations (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.92-3.83), future exacerbations (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 3.08, 95% CI 2.36-4.01) and lung function decline. Coexisting COPD, dyspnoea and current cigarette smoking were similarly associated with a worse outcome across all end-points studied. Additional predictors of mortality and severe exacerbations were increasing age and cardiovascular comorbidity. Infection with Gram-negative pathogens (predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae ) was independently associated with increased mortality (HR 3.13, 95% CI 1.62-6.06), while Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection was associated with severe exacerbations (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.97) and overall exacerbation rate (IRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13-1.91)., Conclusions: This study identifies risk factors for morbidity and mortality among bronchiectasis patients in India. Identification of these risk factors may support treatment approaches optimised to an Asian setting., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M. Loebinger reports grants from AstraZeneca, Insmed and Grifols, outside the submitted work. F. Blasi reports grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini and Pfizer; consulting fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Zambon, Vertex, Viatris, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Guidotti, Insmed and Menarini, outside the submitted work. A. Shoemark reports grants from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. E. Polverino reports grants from Chiesi, Zambon, Shionogi, Teva, CSL Boehring, Insmed and Grifols, outside the submitted work. T. Welte reports grants from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. M. Shteinberg reports grants from Trudell, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Kamada, Vertex, Teva, Actelion and Rafa, outside the submitted work. S. Aliberti reports grants from Insmed, Chiesi and Fisher & Paykel; consulting fees from McGraw Hill, Insmed, Zambon, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Grifols, Fondazione Charta, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Zcube, Menarini and GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. S. Limaye reports grants from Glenmark, supporting the present manuscript. J.D. Chalmers reports grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Insmed, GlaxoSmithKline and Gilead Sciences; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Insmed, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Chiesi, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and Zambon, outside the submitted work. All other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Background: Recent randomised clinical trials in bronchiectasis have failed to reach their primary end-points, suggesting a need to reassess how we measure treatment response. Exacerbations, quality of life (QoL) and lung function are the most common end-points evaluated in bronchiectasis clinical trials. We aimed to determine the relationship between responses in terms of reduced exacerbations, improved symptoms and lung function in bronchiectasis., Methods: We evaluated treatment response in three randomised clinical trials that evaluated mucoactive therapy (inhaled mannitol), an oral anti-inflammatory/antibiotic (azithromycin) and an inhaled antibiotic (aztreonam). Treatment response was defined by an absence of exacerbations during follow-up, an improvement of QoL above the minimum clinically important difference and an improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) of ≥100 mL from baseline., Results: Cumulatively the three trials included 984 patients. Changes in FEV 1 , QoL and exacerbations were heterogeneous in all trials analysed. Improvements in QoL were not correlated to changes in FEV 1 in the azithromycin and aztreonam trials (r= -0.17, p=0.1 and r=0.04, p=0.4, respectively) and weakly correlated in the mannitol trial (r=0.22, p<0.0001). An important placebo effect was observed in all trials, especially regarding improvements in QoL. Clinical meaningful lung function improvements were rare across all trials evaluated, suggesting that FEV 1 is not a responsive measure in bronchiectasis., Conclusions: Improvements in lung function, symptoms and exacerbation frequency are dissociated in bronchiectasis. FEV 1 is poorly responsive and poorly correlated with other key outcome measures. Clinical parameters are poorly predictive of treatment response, suggesting the need to develop biomarkers to identify responders., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: O. Sibila has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Laserna has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Shoemark has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Perea has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Bilton has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.L. Crichton reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. De Soyza reports grants, travel support to attend international congresses and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chiesi, Grifols, GlaxoSmithKline, Insmed, Pfizer, Novartis, Medimmune and Zambon, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: W.G. Boersma has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Altenburg has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.D. Chalmers reports grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Boehringer Ingelheim and Insmed, grants from AstraZeneca and Bayer Healthcare, personal fees from Aradigm, Pfizer and Napp, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Bronchiectasis refers to both a clinical disease and a radiological appearance that has multiple causes and can be associated with a range of conditions. Disease heterogeneity and the absence of standardised definitions have hampered clinical trials of treatments for bronchiectasis and are important challenges in clinical practice. In view of the need for new therapies for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis to reduce the disease burden, we established an international taskforce of experts to develop recommendations and definitions for clinically significant bronchiectasis in adults to facilitate the standardisation of terminology for clinical trials. Systematic reviews were used to inform discussions, and Delphi processes were used to achieve expert consensus. We prioritised criteria for the radiological diagnosis of bronchiectasis and suggest recommendations on the use and central reading of chest CT scans to confirm the presence of bronchiectasis for clinical trials. Furthermore, we developed a set of consensus statements concerning the definitions of clinical bronchiectasis and its specific signs and symptoms, as well as definitions for chronic bacterial infection and sustained culture conversion. The diagnosis of clinically significant bronchiectasis requires both clinical and radiological criteria, and these expert recommendations and proposals should help to optimise patient recruitment into clinical trials and allow reliable comparisons of treatment effects among different interventions for bronchiectasis. Our consensus proposals should also provide a framework for future research to further refine definitions and establish definitive guidance on the diagnosis of bronchiectasis., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SA reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Insmed, Menarini, Zambon, and ZetaCube; and grants from Chiesi, Fisher & Paykel, and Insmed, outside of the submitted work. AFB reports personal fees from Wolters Kluwer and UpToDate, during the conduct of the study. FB reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Guidotti, Insmed, Menarini, Novartis, Pfizer, Vertex, and Zambon; and grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work. JDC reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Insmed, Janssen, Novartis, and Zambon; and grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Science, Insmed, and Novartis, outside of the submitted work. MLC reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside of the submitted work. ADS reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Forest Labs, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Insmed, Teva, and Zambon, outside of the submitted work. PCG reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline; and grants and non-financial support from Chiesi, outside of the submitted work. CSH reports personal fees from Aradigm, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Insmed, International Biophysics, Janssen, Meiji, Mylan, Novartis, Teva, and Zambon; and grants from Insmed, International Biophysics, and Teva, outside of the submitted work. MSM reports non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Insmed, and Zambon; and personal fees from Zambon, outside of the submitted work. MRL reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Grifols, and Insmed, outside of the submitted work. AEO'D reports personal fees from Electromed, Insmed, and Zambon; and grants from AstraZeneca, Insmed, Janssen, and Zambon, outside of the submitted work. EP reports grants from Chiesi and Grifols; and personal fees from CSL Behring, Chiesi, Shionogi, Insmed, Shire, Teva, and Zambon, during the conduct of the study. FCR reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celtaxsys, Chiesi, Corbus, Grifols, InfectoPharm, Insmed, Novartis, PARI, Parion, Polyphor, Vertex, and Zambon; grants from Bayer Healthcare, Grifols, InfectoPharm, Insmed, Novartis, and PARI; and non-financial support from PARI, outside of the submitted work. MS reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Kamada, Novartis, Teva, Vertex, and Zambon; grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; and non-financial support from Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, and Rafa, outside of the submitted work. HT reports personal fees from Insmed, Novartis, Thirona, and Vertex; and grants from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Insmed, and Novartis, outside of the submitted work. In addition, HT's institution, Erasmus MC, receives license fees for the chest CT image analysis PRAGMA-CF software developed by Thirona (Nijmegen, Netherlands) and by Resonance Health (Perth, Australia) and for the chest CT image analysis AA-method software co-developed by Erasmus MC and Thirona (Nijmegen, Netherlands). HT contributed to the development and validation of this software. GT reports grants from the US Bronchiectasis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria Research Registry (which is funded by the COPD Foundation); and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Cipla, outside of the submitted work. MV reports non-financial support from Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Zambon; and personal fees from Insmed, outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bronchiectasis is predominantly a neutrophilic inflammatory disease. There are no established therapies that directly target neutrophilic inflammation because little is understood of the underlying mechanisms leading to severe disease. Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation is a method of host defence that has been implicated in multiple inflammatory diseases. We aimed to investigate the role of NETs in disease severity and treatment response in bronchiectasis., Methods: In this observational study, we did a series of UK and international studies to investigate the role of NETs in disease severity and treatment response in bronchiectasis. First, we used liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to identify proteomic biomarkers associated with disease severity, defined using the bronchiectasis severity index, in patients with bronchiectasis (n=40) in Dundee, UK. Second, we validated these biomarkers in two cohorts of patients with bronchiectasis, the first comprising 175 patients from the TAYBRIDGE study in the UK and the second comprising 275 patients from the BRIDGE cohort study from centres in Italy, Spain, and UK, using an immunoassay to measure NETs. Third, we investigated whether pathogenic bacteria had a role in NET concentrations in patients with severe bronchiectasis. In a separate study, we enrolled patients with acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis (n=20) in Dundee, treated with intravenous antibiotics for 14 days and proteomics were used to identify proteins associated with treatment response. Findings from this cohort were validated in an independent cohort of patients who were admitted to the same hospital (n=20). Fourth, to assess the potential use of macrolides to reduce NETs in patients with bronchiectasis, we examined two studies of long-term macrolide treatment, one in patients with bronchiectasis (n=52 from the UK) in which patients were given 250 mg of azithromycin three times a week for a year, and a post-hoc analysis of the Australian AMAZES trial in patients with asthma (n=47) who were given 500 mg of azithromycin 3 times per week for a year., Findings: Sputum proteomics identified that NET-associated proteins were the most abundant and were the proteins most strongly associated with disease severity. This finding was validated in two observational cohorts, in which sputum NETs were associated with bronchiectasis severity index, quality of life, future risk of hospital admission, and mortality. In a subgroup of 20 patients with acute exacerbations, clinical response to intravenous antibiotic treatment was associated with successfully reducing NETs in sputum. Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection had a lessened proteomic and clinical response to intravenous antibiotic treatment compared with those without Pseudomonas infections, but responded to macrolide therapy. Treatment with low dose azithromycin was associated with a significant reduction in NETs in sputum over 12 months in both bronchiectasis and asthma., Interpretation: We identified NETs as a key marker of disease severity and treatment response in bronchiectasis. These data support the concept of targeting neutrophilic inflammation with existing and novel therapies., Funding: Scottish Government, British Lung Foundation, and European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC)., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Existing quality-of-life and symptom tools used in bronchiectasis trials are either not disease specific or are complex and have not been consistently responsive. We developed a simple patient-reported visual analogue outcome measure, the Bronchiectasis Impact Measure (BIM), for use in clinical research, including clinical trials., Methods: Patients with bronchiectasis attending a tertiary referral clinic in the east of Scotland were invited to complete the BIM questionnaire and the quality-of-life bronchiectasis questionnaire at baseline with repeat questionnaires after 2 weeks and 6 months. We assessed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness by evaluating change during an acute exacerbation., Results: 173 patients were included. The eight domains (cough, sputum, breathlessness, tiredness, activity, general health, control, exacerbations) showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.93). The intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated excellent reliability over a 2-week period: cough (0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.85), sputum (0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.90), dyspnoea (0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.87), tiredness (0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.91), activity (0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.89), general health (0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.87), control (0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.88) and exacerbation (0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.79). Domains correlated strongly with bronchiectasis severity and exacerbation history. Both distribution and patient-based methods estimated the minimal clinically important difference for each domain as 1.5 points on a 10-point scale. Statistically significant changes in all BIM domains were observed during an acute exacerbation., Conclusion: The BIM is a simple patient-reported outcome. This study validates the internal consistency, reliability, construct validity and response of the tool at acute exacerbation. Further validation of the tool is now required., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.L. Crichton reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: E.K. Dudgeon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Shoemark has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.D. Chalmers reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline and Insmed, personal fees from Chiesi, Novartis and Zambon, grants from Gilead Sciences, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2021.)

Introduction: Inhaled antibiotics may improve symptom scores, but it is not known which specific symptoms improve with therapy. Item-level analysis of questionnaire data may allow us to identify which specific symptoms respond best to treatment., Methods: Post hoc analysis of the AIR-BX1 studies and two trials of inhaled aztreonam versus placebo in bronchiectasis. Individual items from the quality of life bronchiectasis (QOL-B) respiratory symptom scale, were extracted as representing severity of nine distinct symptoms. Generalised linear models were used to evaluate changes in symptoms with treatment versus placebo from baseline to end of first on-treatment cycle and mixed models were used to evaluate changes across the full 16-week trial., Results: Aztreonam improved cough (difference 0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.37; p=0.002), sputum production (0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.44; p<0.0001) and sputum colour (0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.43; p<0.0001) versus placebo equating to a 20% improvement in cough and 25% improvement in sputum production and colour. Similar results were observed for cough, sputum production and sputum purulence across the trial duration (all p<0.05). Patients with higher sputum production and sputum colour scores had a greater response on the overall QOL-B (difference 4.82, 95% CI 1.12-8.53; p=0.011 for sputum production and 5.02, 95% CI 1.19-8.86; p=0.01 for sputum colour). In contrast, treating patients who had lower levels of bronchitic symptoms resulted in shorter time to next exacerbation (hazard ratio 1.83, 95% CI 1.02-3.28; p=0.042)., Conclusion: Baseline bronchitic symptoms predict response to inhaled aztreonam in bronchiectasis. More sensitive tools to measure bronchitic symptoms may be useful to better identify inhaled antibiotic responders and to evaluate patient response to treatment., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.L. Crichton has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Lonergan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.F. Barker has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: O. Sibila has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Goeminne has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Shoemark has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.D. Chalmers reports grants from Gilead, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Insmed and Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Chiesi, grants from Gilead, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)

Background: Recurrent bronchiectasis exacerbations are related to deterioration of lung function, progression of the disease, impairment of quality of life, and to an increased mortality. Improved detection of exacerbations has been accomplished in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through the use of patient completed diaries. These tools may enhance exacerbation reporting and identification. The aim of this study was to develop a novel symptom diary for bronchiectasis symptom burden and detection of exacerbations, named the BEST diary., Methods: Prospective observational study of patients with bronchiectasis conducted at Ninewells Hospital, Dundee. We included patients with confirmed bronchiectasis by computed tomography, who were symptomatic and had at least 1 documented exacerbation of bronchiectasis in the previous 12 months to participate. Symptoms were recorded daily in a diary incorporating cough, sputum volume, sputum colour, dyspnoea, fatigue and systemic disturbance scored from 0 to 26., Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the study. We identified 29 reported (treated exacerbations) and 23 unreported (untreated) exacerbations over 6-month follow-up. The BEST diary score showed a good correlation with the established and validated questionnaires and measures of health status (COPD Assessment Test, r = 0.61, p = 0.0037, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, r = - 0.52,p = 0.0015, St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, r = 0.61,p < 0.0001 and 6 min walk test, r = - 0.46,p = 0.037). The mean BEST score at baseline was 7.1 points (SD 2.2). The peak symptom score during exacerbation was a mean of 16.4 (3.1), and the change from baseline to exacerbation was a mean of 9.1 points (SD 2.5). Mean duration of exacerbations based on time for a return to baseline symptoms was 15.3 days (SD 5.7). A minimum clinically important difference of 4 points is proposed., Conclusions: The BEST symptom diary has shown concurrent validity with current health questionnaires and is responsive at onset and recovery from exacerbation. The BEST diary may be useful to detect and characterise exacerbations in bronchiectasis clinical trials.

Background: Although use of inhaled antibiotics is the standard of care in cystic fibrosis, there is insufficient evidence to support use of inhaled antibiotics in patients with bronchiectasis not due to cystic fibrosis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled antibiotics for the long-term treatment of adults with bronchiectasis and chronic respiratory tract infections., Methods: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials of inhaled-antibiotic use in adult patients with bronchiectasis and chronic respiratory tract infections. Eligible publications were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomised controlled trials of inhaled antibiotics were included if the patients were adults with stable bronchiectasis diagnosed by CT or bronchography, the trials had treatment a duration of at least 4 weeks, and their outcomes met at least one of the endpoints of interest. Studies in cystic fibrosis were excluded. Efficacy endpoints assessed were bacterial load, bacterial eradication from sputum, frequency of exacerbations, time to first exacerbation, proportion of patients with at least one exacerbation, frequency of severe exacerbations, quality of life, change in FEV 1 , 6-min walk distance, mortality, adherence to treatment, and sputum volume; safety endpoints were adverse events and bacterial resistance in sputum. Each study was independently reviewed for methodological quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool individual studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 . The review is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42019122892., Findings: 16 trials (n=2597 patients) were included for analysis. The mean reduction of colony forming units per g of sputum with inhaled antibiotics was -2·32 log units (95% CI -3·20 to -1·45; p<0·0001). Bacterial eradication was increased with inhaled antibiotic therapy (odds ratio [OR] 3·36, 1·63 to 6·91; p=0·0010). Inhaled antibiotics significantly reduced exacerbation frequency (rate ratio 0·81, 0·67 to 0·97; p=0·020). Time to first exacerbation was significantly prolonged with inhaled antibiotics (hazard ratio 0·83, 0·69 to 0·99; p=0·028). The proportion of patients with at least one exacerbation decreased (risk ratio 0·85, 0·74 to 0·97; p=0·015). There was a significant reduction in the frequency of severe exacerbations (rate ratio 0·43, 0·24 to 0·78; p=0·0050). The scores for neither the Quality of Life Bronchiectasis questionnaire nor St George's Respiratory Questionnaire improved above the minimal clinically important difference. The relative change in FEV 1 was a deterioration of 0·87% predicted value (-2·00 to 0·26%; p=0·13). Other efficacy endpoints were reported in only few studies or had few events. There was no difference in treatment-emergent adverse effects (OR 0·97, 0·67 to 1·40; p=0·85) or bronchospasm (0·99, 0·66 to 1·48; p=0·95). Emergence of bacterial resistance was evident at the end of the treatment period (risk ratio 1·91, 1·46 to 2·49; p<0·0001)., Interpretation: Inhaled antibiotics are well tolerated, reduce bacterial load, and achieve a small but statistically significant reduction in exacerbation frequency without clinically significant improvements in quality of life in patients with bronchiectasis and chronic respiratory tract infections., Funding: British Lung Foundation through the GSK/British Lung Foundation Chair of Respiratory Research and European Respiratory Society through the EMBARC2 consortium. EMBARC2 is supported by project partners Chiesi, Grifols, Insmed, Novartis, and Zambon., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bronchiectasis guidelines recommend long-term macrolide treatment for patients with three or more exacerbations per year without Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Randomised controlled trials suggest that long-term macrolide treatment can prevent exacerbations in adult patients with bronchiectasis, but these individual studies have been too small to do meaningful subgroup analyses. We did a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to explore macrolide benefit in subpopulations, including those in which macrolide therapy is not currently recommended., Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science from Jan 1, 2000, to Sept 30, 2018, to identify double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials of macrolide antibiotics in adult patients with bronchiectasis. We applied no language restrictions. Randomised controlled trials were eligible if treatment was defined a priori as long term and had a primary or secondary outcome of bronchiectasis exacerbations. Studies in patients with cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis were excluded. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was frequency of exacerbations requiring treatment with antibiotics. Secondary endpoints were time to first exacerbation, change in quality of life according to the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and change in FEV 1 . IPD meta-analysis was done using fixed effects models adjusting for age, sex, FEV 1 , and trial. We did prespecified subgroup analyses for each of the primary and secondary endpoints using one-step meta-analysis only. Subgroups were defined by age, sex, previous exacerbation frequency, smoking status, inhaled corticosteroid use at baseline, body-mass index at baseline, cause, C-reactive protein at baseline, baseline FEV 1 percentage of predicted, SGRQ total score, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in sputum culture at baseline. The meta-analysis is registered with the PROSPERO international register of systematic reviews, number CRD42018102908., Findings: Of 234 identified studies, we included three randomised controlled trials, and IPD was obtained for 341 participants. Macrolide antibiotics reduced the frequency of exacerbations (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·49, 95% CI 0·36 to 0·66; p<0·0001). We also found that macrolide treatment improved the time to first exacerbation (adjusted hazard ratio 0·46, 0·34 to 0·61; p<0·0001) and was associated with improved quality of life measured by the SGRQ (mean improvement 2·93 points, 0·03 to 5·83; p=0·048). Macrolides were not associated with a significant improvement in FEV 1 (67 mL at 1 year, -22 to 112; p=0·14). Effect estimates in prespecified subgroup analyses revealed a reduced frequency of exacerbations in all prespecified subgroups, including a high level of benefit in patients with P aeruginosa infection (IRR 0·36, 0·18-0·72; p=0·0044) and in patients with one to two exacerbations per year (0·37, 0·16-0·88; p=0·025). Studies were rated as low risk of bias across all domains., Interpretation: Long-term macrolide treatment significantly reduces the frequency of exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis, with similar benefits observed in all subgroups based on patient characteristics. This finding suggests that macrolides might be considered in patients in whom macrolides are not indicated according to the current guidelines, particularly if alternative approaches to reduce exacerbations have been unsuccessful. However, downsides of long-term macrolide treatment must also be taken into account., Funding: European Respiratory Society., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bronchiectasis is a common but neglected chronic lung disease. Most epidemiological data are limited to cohorts from Europe and the USA, with few data from low-income and middle-income countries. We therefore aimed to describe the characteristics, severity of disease, microbiology, and treatment of patients with bronchiectasis in India., Methods: The Indian bronchiectasis registry is a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study. Adult patients (≥18 years) with CT-confirmed bronchiectasis were enrolled from 31 centres across India. Patients with bronchiectasis due to cystic fibrosis or traction bronchiectasis associated with another respiratory disorder were excluded. Data were collected at baseline (recruitment) with follow-up visits taking place once per year. Comprehensive clinical data were collected through the European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration registry platform. Underlying aetiology of bronchiectasis, as well as treatment and risk factors for bronchiectasis were analysed in the Indian bronchiectasis registry. Comparisons of demographics were made with published European and US registries, and quality of care was benchmarked against the 2017 European Respiratory Society guidelines., Findings: From June 1, 2015, to Sept 1, 2017, 2195 patients were enrolled. Marked differences were observed between India, Europe, and the USA. Patients in India were younger (median age 56 years [IQR 41-66] vs the European and US registries; p<0·0001]) and more likely to be men (1249 [56·9%] of 2195). Previous tuberculosis (780 [35·5%] of 2195) was the most frequent underlying cause of bronchiectasis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common organism in sputum culture (301 [13·7%]) in India. Risk factors for exacerbations included being of the male sex (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1·17, 95% CI 1·03-1·32; p=0·015), P aeruginosa infection (1·29, 1·10-1·50; p=0·001), a history of pulmonary tuberculosis (1·20, 1·07-1·34; p=0·002), modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea score (1·32, 1·25-1·39; p<0·0001), daily sputum production (1·16, 1·03-1·30; p=0·013), and radiological severity of disease (1·03, 1·01-1·04; p<0·0001). Low adherence to guideline-recommended care was observed; only 388 patients were tested for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and 82 patients had been tested for immunoglobulins., Interpretation: Patients with bronchiectasis in India have more severe disease and have distinct characteristics from those reported in other countries. This study provides a benchmark to improve quality of care for patients with bronchiectasis in India., Funding: EU/European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations Innovative Medicines Initiative inhaled Antibiotics in Bronchiectasis and Cystic Fibrosis Consortium, European Respiratory Society, and the British Lung Foundation., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and reduces risk of future exacerbation in COPD when performed after an exacerbation. There have been no previous studies of post-exacerbation rehabilitation in bronchiectasis., Methods: Parallel group randomized controlled trial compared pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) to standard care (SC) in patients followed an antibiotic treated exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Patients were randomized following a 14 day course of antibiotics was completed. The primary outcome was 6-min walk distance (6 MW) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were time to the next exacerbation, St.Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, COPD CAT score, Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) and FEV1 at 8 and 12 weeks post exacerbation., Results: Forty eight patients were enrolled but only 27 had exacerbations within 12 months of enrolment. Nine patients received pulmonary rehabilitation and 18 received standard care. The 6 MW improved significantly from post-exacerbation to 8 weeks in both groups, with no significant difference between PR and SC- mean difference of 11 m (95% CI -34.3 to 56.3,p = 0.6). Time to the next exacerbation was not significantly different hazard ratio 0.83 (0.31-2.19, p = 0.7). No significant differences were seen between groups in terms of LCQ, CAT, FEV1 or SGRQ between groups. An analysis of probability based on the patients enrolled suggested > 1000 subjects are likely be required to have an > 80% probability of observing a statistically significant difference between PR and SC and any such differences would be likely to be too small to be clinically relevant., Conclusions: This pilot study identified no significant benefits associated with pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbations of bronchiectasis., Trial Registration: NCT02179983, registered on Clinicaltrials.gov 29th June 2014.

Bronchiectasis is an increasing clinical problem, but multiple recent clinical trials have failed to reach their primary end-point. Difficulties in achieving "positive" bronchiectasis trials is reflected in a lack of agreement from trialists and regulators on what are the optimal end-points.To evaluate the use of end-points in bronchiectasis trials, we conducted a systematic review of published bronchiectasis trials from 2008 to 2018 and extracted end-points used, definitions, methods of analysis and responsiveness.Our analysis shows that quality of life and exacerbation end-points are most frequently used. Trials using exacerbation end-points have been characterised by varying definitions, multiple methods of analysis and durations of follow-up. There are multiple quality of life tools for bronchiectasis (Quality of Life - Bronchiectasis questionnaire, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, etc. ). The majority of studies measure lung function ( e.g. forced expiratory volume in 1 s), but this is shown to be nonresponsive to the majority of interventions. Microbiology end-points frequently show statistically significant differences in phase 2 antibiotic studies but their correlation with clinical end-points is unknown.This systematic review demonstrates a need for guidance to standardise definitions and design features to improve reproducibility and increase the likelihood of demonstrating statistically significant benefits with new therapies., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.L. Crichton has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Aliberti has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.D. Chalmers reports grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline (research grants for COPD), grants and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim (research grants for COPD studies), grants from AstraZeneca (research grants for COPD), grants and personal fees from Pfizer (research grants for COPD), grants and personal fees from Bayer Healthcare (research into bronchiectasis), grants and personal fees from Grifols (research into bronchiectasis), personal fees from Napp (consulting), personal fees from Aradigm corporation (consulting), and grants and personal fees from Insmed, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2019.)

Background: Bronchiectasis is a heterogeneous disease which affects quality of life. Measuring symptoms and quality of life has proved challenging and research is limited by extrapolation of questionnaires and treatments from other diseases. The objective of this study was to identify the major contributors to quality of life in bronchiectasis and to evaluate existing health related quality of life questionnaires in bronchiectasis., Methods: Eight adults with bronchiectasis participated in one to one semi-structured interviews. These were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to identify core themes relevant to disease burden and impact. Participant views on current health related quality of life questionnaires were also surveyed., Results: Bronchiectasis symptoms are highly individual. Core themes identified were symptom burden, symptom variation, personal measurement, quality of life and control of symptoms. Themes contributing to quality of life were: social embarrassment, sleep disturbance, anxiety and modification of daily and future activities. Evaluation of 4 existing questionnaires established their individual strengths and weaknesses. A synthesis of the participants' perspective identified desirable characteristics to guide future tool development., Conclusions: This qualitative study has identified core themes associated with symptoms and quality of life in bronchiectasis. Current treatments and quality of life tools do not fully address or capture the burden of disease in bronchiectasis from the patients' perspective.

Introduction: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for bronchiectasis have experienced difficulties with recruitment and in reaching their efficacy end-points. To estimate the generalizability of such studies we applied the eligibility criteria for major RCTs in bronchiectasis to 6 representative observational European Bronchiectasis cohorts., Methods: Inclusion and exclusion criteria from 10 major RCTs were applied in each cohort. Demographics and outcomes were compared between patients eligible and ineligible for RCTs., Results: 1672 patients were included. On average 33.0% were eligible for macrolide trials, 15.0% were eligible for inhaled antibiotic trials, 15.9% for the DNAse study and 47.7% were eligible for a study of dry powder mannitol. Within these groups, some trials were highly selective with only 1-9% of patients eligible. Eligible patients were generally more severe with higher mortality during follow-up (mean 17.2 vs 9.0% for macrolide studies, 19.2%% vs 10.7% for inhaled antibiotic studies), and a higher frequency of exacerbations than ineligible patients. As up to 93% of patients were ineligible for studies, however, numerically more deaths and exacerbations occurred in ineligible patient across studies (mean 56% of deaths occurred in ineligible patients across all studies)., Conclusion: Our data suggest that patients enrolled in RCT's in bronchiectasis are only partially representative of patients in clinical practice. The majority of mortality and morbidity in bronchiectasis occurs in patients ineligible for many current trials., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)