Search

This paper demonstrates trends in bridge structural deficiency and evaluates the operational structural performance of various types of bridge structural design and/or construction. The study analyzes the database of the National Bridge Inventory and derives data based on actual bridge deck areas, rather than discrete bridge counts. Based on the concept of structural deficiency and the objective of life-cycle expectancy for uninterrupted service life, the multiple-criteria diagnostic analysis determines condition, durability, longevity, and equivalent performance. For some bridge types, the results reflect limited remaining service life before structural deficiency is reached. Average service life is only 56% of life-cycle expectancy. The relatively higher condition performance contrasts with the significantly poor performance of durability and the relatively lower longevity. The equivalent structural performance of some bridge types is low. Overall, the study provides an indication of the current average potential, which serves as a basis for predicting future performance under similar operational conditions. The systems approach supports more objective design, maintenance, and decision-making practices, leading to more effective operation and management and more sustainable infrastructure solutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper demonstrates the analysis of the deterioration trends of the various types of bridge structural design and/or construction in the entire U.S. National Bridge Inventory, to derive and compare operational structural performances. The approach considers the trends of the proportional accumulation of deterioration by bridge types, based on the concept of structural deficiency and the objective of life-cycle expectancy at the serviceability limit states. The analysis determines the rate and pattern of the deterioration trends. The multiple-criteria diagnostic approach integrates the rate and pattern performances with the condition, durability, and longevity performances to determine the overall equivalent structural performances using prioritized weights. This study produces the most comprehensive national network-level comparative basis of the operational structural performances of bridge types under the actual circumstances. The deterioration trend performances of most bridge types are relatively lower. Also, the overall equivalent structural performances of almost all bridge types are lower. The analysis also helps identify critical accumulation of deterioration for bridge types, suggesting focused improvement efforts necessary for existing and future bridges. The most common stringer/multibeam or girder bridges have relatively higher and faster accumulation of deterioration, generating a below average trend and equivalent structural performances. The results help predict future performances and improve effectiveness of bridge types for sustainable service life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]