Search

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) options could overcome barriers to oral PrEP persistence during pregnancy and postpartum. We evaluated long-acting PrEP preferences among oral PrEP-experienced pregnant and postpartum women in South Africa and Kenya, countries with high PrEP coverage with pending regulatory approvals for long-acting injectable cabotegravir and the dapivirine vaginal ring (approved in South Africa, under review in Kenya). METHODS: From September 2021 to February 2022, we surveyed pregnant and postpartum women enrolled in oral PrEP studies in South Africa and Kenya. We evaluated oral PrEP attitudes and preferences for long-acting PrEP methods in multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for maternal age and country. RESULTS: We surveyed 190 women in South Africa (67% postpartum; median age 27 years [IQR = 22-32]) and 204 women in Kenya (79% postpartum; median age 29 years [IQR = 25-33]). Seventy-five percent of participants reported oral PrEP use within the last 30 days. Overall, forty-nine percent of participants reported negative oral PrEP attributes, including side effects (21% South Africa, 30% Kenya) and pill burden (20% South Africa, 25% Kenya). Preferred PrEP attributes included long-acting method, effectiveness, safety while pregnant and breastfeeding, and free medication. Most participants (75%, South Africa and Kenya) preferred a potential long-acting injectable over oral PrEP, most frequently for a longer duration of effectiveness in South Africa (87% South Africa, 42% Kenya) versus discretion in Kenya (5% South Africa, 49% Kenya). Eighty-seven percent of participants preferred oral PrEP over a potential long-acting vaginal ring, mostly due to concern about possible discomfort with vaginal insertion (82% South Africa, 48% Kenya). Significant predictors of long-acting PrEP preference included past use of injectable contraceptive (aOR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.34, 4.57), disliking at least one oral PrEP attribute (aOR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.80) and preferring infrequent PrEP use (aOR = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.94, 2.65). CONCLUSIONS: Oral PrEP-experienced pregnant and postpartum women expressed a theoretical preference for long-acting injectable PrEP over other modalities, demonstrating potential acceptability among a key population who must be at the forefront of injectable PrEP rollout. Reasons for PrEP preferences differed by country, emphasizing the importance of increasing context-specific options and choice of PrEP modalities for pregnant and postpartum women.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in South Africa are at a higher risk of acquiring HIV. Despite the increasing availability of daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention, knowledge on PrEP use during pregnancy and postpartum periods at antenatal care (ANC) facilities remains inadequate. METHODS: Data from HIV-uninfected pregnant women in Cape Town, South Africa, were used in this study. These women aged 16-24 years were enrolled in the PrEP in pregnancy and postpartum (PrEP-PP) cohort study during their first ANC visit. Using the PrEP cascade framework, the outcomes of the study were PrEP initiation (prescribed tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine at baseline), continuation (returned for prescription), and persistence [quantifiable tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) in dried blood samples]. The two primary exposures of this study were risk perception for HIV and baseline HIV risk score (0-5), which comprised condomless sex, more than one sexual partner, partner living with HIV or with unknown serostatus, laboratory-confirmed sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and hazardous alcohol use before pregnancy (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test for Consumption score ≥ 3). Logistic regression was used to examine the association between HIV risk and PrEP, adjusting for a priori confounders. RESULTS: A total of 486 pregnant women were included in the study, of which 16% were adolescents (aged 16-18 years) and 84% were young women (aged 19-24 years). The adolescents initiated ANC later than the young women [median = 28 weeks (20-34) vs. 23 weeks (16-34), p = 0.04]. Approximately 41% of the AGYW were diagnosed with sexually transmitted infection at baseline. Overall, 83% of the AGYW initiated PrEP use during their first ANC. The percentage of PrEP continuation was 63% at 1 month, 54% at 3 months, and 39% at 6 months. Approximately 27% consistently continued PrEP use through 6 months, while 6% stopped and restarted on PrEP use at 6 months. With a higher risk score of HIV (≥2 vs. ≤1), the AGYW showed higher odds of PrEP continuation [adjusted odds ratio: 1.85 (95% CI: 1.12-3.03)] through 6 months, adjusting for potential confounders. Undergoing the postpartum period (vs. pregnant) and having lower sexual risk factors were found to be the barriers to PrEP continuation. TFV-DP concentration levels were detected among 49% of the AGYW, and 6% of these women had daily adherence to PrEP at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: AGYW were found to have high oral PrEP initiation, but just over one-third of these women continued PrEP use through 6 months. Pregnant AGYW who had a higher risk of acquiring HIV (due to condomless sex, frequent sex, and STIs) were more likely to continue on PrEP use through the postpartum period. Pregnant and postpartum AGYW require counseling and other types of support, such as community delivery and peer support to improve their effective PrEP use through the postpartum period. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03826199.

IntroductionDaily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can reduce HIV acquisition. However, prevention effectiveness requires daily adherence prior to and during periods of sexual activity. Little is known about pharmacologic measures of PrEP adherence during pregnancy and postpartum and the factors related to optimal adherence during periods of sexual activity in this population.MethodsBetween August 2019 and October 2021, we enrolled pregnant women without HIV at their first antenatal care visit followed-up through 12 months postpartum. Eligible women ≥16 years old received HIV prevention counselling and were offered oral PrEP (TDF-FTC). We quantified tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) in dried blood spots in women who reported taking PrEP in the past 30 days (at quarterly follow-up visits). We used regression models with generalized estimating equations to evaluate correlates of TFV-DP (any vs. none, and ≥2 vs. 5/month vs. no sex or

HIV incidence among pregnant and postpartum women remains high in South Africa. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use remains suboptimal in this population, particularly during the postpartum period when women's engagement with routine clinic visits outside PrEP decreases. Key barriers to sustained PrEP use include the need for ongoing contact with the health facility and suboptimal counseling around effective PrEP use. Stepped Care to Optimize PrEP Effectiveness in Pregnant and Postpartum women (SCOPE-PP), is a two-stepped unblinded, individually randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims to optimize peripartum and postpartum PrEP use by providing a stepped package of evidence-based interventions. We will enroll 650 pregnant women (> 25 weeks pregnant) who access PrEP at a busy antenatal clinic in Cape Town at the time of recruitment and follow them for 15 months. We will enroll and individually randomize pregnant women > 16 years who are not living with HIV who are either on PrEP or interested in starting PrEP during pregnancy. In step 1, we will evaluate the impact of enhanced adherence counselling and biofeedback (using urine tenofovir tests for biofeedback) and rapid PrEP collection (to reduce time required) on PrEP use in early peripartum compared to standard of care (SOC) (n = 325 per arm). The primary outcome is PrEP persistence per urine tenofovir levels and dried blood spots of tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) after 6-months. The second step will enroll and individually randomize participants from Step 1 who discontinue taking PrEP or have poor persistence in Step 1 but want to continue PrEP. Step 2 will test the impact of enhanced counseling and biofeedback plus rapid PrEP collection compared to community PrEP delivery with HIV self-testing on PrEP use (n = up to 325 postpartum women). The primary outcome is PrEP continuation and persistence 6-months following second randomization (~ 9-months postpartum). Finally, we will estimate the cost effectiveness of SCOPE-PP vs. SOC per primary outcomes and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted in both Step 1 and 2 using micro-costing with trial- and model-based economic evaluation. This study will provide novel insights into optimal strategies for delivering PrEP to peripartum and postpartum women in this high-incidence setting. NCT05322629 : Date of registration: April 12, 2022.

IntroductionPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe and effective prevention strategy to reduce women's risk of HIV in pregnancy and postpartum. Effective PrEP protection requires daily PrEP adherence, but little is known about maternal PrEP continuation and factors that influence PrEP use.MethodsThe PrEP in pregnancy and postpartum (PrEP-PP) study enrolled consenting pregnant, HIV-negative women at first antenatal care (ANC) visit with follow-up through 12 months postpartum. Eligible and consenting women and girls ≥16 years received HIV prevention counselling and were offered PrEP. Interviewers collected socio-demographic and behavioural data from participants at each visit. We analysed the proportion of women who initiated PrEP and the proportion who continued PrEP after 3 months with associated correlates by estimating the prevalence ratio adjusting for a priori confounders.ResultsBetween August 2019 and October 2021, we enrolled 1201 pregnant women (median gestation 21 weeks; age 26 years); 84% of women initiated PrEP at their first ANC visit (n = 1014); 55% were married or cohabiting. Overall, 66% of women on PrEP returned for a repeat prescription at 1 month; 58% returned at 3 months (n = 493 of 844). Almost one-half of women on PrEP reported a side effect at 1 month, mostly nausea/vomiting. Women on PrEP in the first and second trimesters had higher odds of reporting side effects (aOR 2.61; 95% CI 1.17-5.84) versus postpartum women. Women who reported side effects continued with PrEP less than those who did not report side effects (aPR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.77-0.97). Women with ≥1 previous pregnancy (aPR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.57-1.01) or were postpartum (aPR 0.85; 95% CI 0.75-0.97) were less likely to continue PrEP compared to women who were primigravid or pregnant. Women who reported having an HIV+ partner (aPR = 1.45; 95% CI 1.13-1.85) or high HIV risk perception (aPR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.01-1.41) were more likely to continue on PrEP than those who had HIV-negative partners or low risk perception.ConclusionsPrEP initiation and early continuation were high in this setting, compared to other studies in women. Being postpartum and experiencing side effects were associated with lower PrEP continuation, presenting opportunities for counselling on early transient side effects. Interventions for postpartum women on PrEP are needed.

BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is safe and effective in postpartum women. Human immunodeficiency virus self-testing (HIVST) for male partners combined with biofeedback counseling through real-time adherence measures may improve PrEP use among postpartum women.MethodsBetween August 2020 and April 2021, we randomized postpartum women who initiated PrEP in pregnancy 1:1 to the intervention group (HIVST + biofeedback counseling after urine tenofovir test) or to standard of care ([SOC] facility-based human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] tests and routine counseling without biofeedback). The outcomes of interest were PrEP adherence in the past 48-72 hours via urine tenofovir tests and partner HIV testing, measured 1-month after randomization. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of partners who tested for HIV and the discrepancy between self-reported PrEP adherence and urine tenofovir result.ResultsWe enrolled 106 women (median age = 26 years). At enrollment, 72% of women reported missing 5 of last week) with no tenofovir in urine test was lower in the intervention group (17% vs 46%; RR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.17-0.67; P = .03). No social or clinical adverse events were reported in the intervention arm.ConclusionsThe HIVST for partners and biofeedback counseling increased levels of recent PrEP adherence, pointing to the importance of these interventions to support PrEP use in this population.

Introduction: Daily oral pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can reduce HIV acquisition. However, prevention effectiveness requires daily adherence prior to and during periods of sexual activity. Little is known about pharmacologic measures of PrEP adherence during pregnancy and postpartum and the factors related to optimal adherence during periods of sexual activity in this population. Methods: Between August 2019 and October 2021, we enrolled pregnant women without HIV at their first antenatal care visit followed‐up through 12 months postpartum. Eligible women ≥16 years old received HIV prevention counselling and were offered oral PrEP (TDF‐FTC). We quantified tenofovir‐diphosphate (TFV‐DP) in dried blood spots in women who reported taking PrEP in the past 30 days (at quarterly follow‐up visits). We used regression models with generalized estimating equations to evaluate correlates of TFV‐DP (any vs. none, and ≥2 vs. <2 doses/week), adjusting for maternal age and pregnancy status. Results and discussion: In 382 women who started PrEP in pregnancy, returned for follow‐up and reported PrEP use in the past 30 days, the median age was 27 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 23–32), and the median time on PrEP was 168 days (IQR = 84–252 days). Half of the samples had quantifiable TFV‐DP at any time point (52%), declining from 67% of pregnant women 3 months post‐initiation to 31% of postpartum women by 12 months. Overall, 72% had concentrations corresponding to <2 doses/week; 25% ≥2 doses/week; 3% 7 doses/week. Concentrations were lower in postpartum versus pregnancy (age‐adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35–0.54). The correlation of self‐reported adherence and TFV‐DP ranged from –0.07 in pregnancy to 0.25 in postpartum women. Variables associated with having quantifiable TFV‐DP included partner living with HIV/unknown serostatus (aOR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.01–2.22), and reported frequency of sexual activity in the past month (aOR sex >5/month vs. no sex or <5 times/month = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.58–2.82) adjusting for age and pregnancy versus postpartum status. TFV‐DP concentrations declined over follow‐up time (aOR for 6 vs. 3 months = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.36–0.67). Conclusions: Objectively measured adherence to PrEP was low overall and did not correlate with self‐reported use. There is an urgent need for objective adherence measures to support clinical decision‐making as well as adherence support interventions as part of PrEP services for pregnant and postpartum women at risk of HIV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]