Search

Background: Women on aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as part of their breast cancer treatment often experience difficult to control side effects. Although there are several medications to manage the side effects of AI therapy, many of them are associated with their own risk, particularly sedation. The objective of this study was to describe the prescribing practices for side effect managing (SE) medications among women with breast cancer on AI therapy and to assess for combinations of medications that may present a clinical risk to patients. Methods: Retrospective data analysis using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data of all women aged 66–90 years with stage I–III hormone positive breast cancer diagnosed between 2008 and 2014 who initiated AI therapy within 12 months of their diagnosis. We determined the percentage of patients prescribed an SE medication in the 12 months prior and in the 24 months after the initiation of AI therapy. We calculated the number of prescriptions and the number of days of overlapping (i.e., >1 SE) prescriptions, and examined predictors of overlapping prescriptions. Results: The use of SE medications was pervasive and increased after initiation of AI therapy. The most commonly prescribed medications were opiates (55.1%), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (22.6%), benzodiazepines (18.4%), tramadol (17.7%) and gabapentin (14.6%). In total 15.5% of patients had overlapping prescriptions; among those, 36.2% had three overlapping prescriptions. Prior use was the strongest predictor of overlapping prescriptions with an odds ratio of 7.9 (95% confidence interval: 7.17–8.77). Conclusion: Among women on AI therapy, the use of SE medications is common and many have overlapping prescriptions raising concern for potential harm from polypharmacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: One-third to one-half of patients prescribed adjuvant endocrine therapy are nonadherent during the recommended 5-year endocrine therapy course. This study investigated whether poor pharmacy synchronization of medication fills (requiring refills on different days) acts as a barrier to adherence.Methods: A cohort of older women with stage 0 to III endocrine receptor-positive breast cancer in 2011 was identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result-Medicare claims-linked cancer registry. Women with endocrine therapy and at least 1 other medication fill were identified, and the 3-month synchronization of their fills was calculated as 1 minus the quotient of the number of pharmacy visits and the number of filled medications. Regression models were used to examine the association between synchronization (in quartiles adjusted for the number of medications) and adherence to endocrine therapy (defined as a medication possession ratio ≥80%) over the subsequent year.Results: During the 3 months after the first endocrine therapy prescription, the study cohort of 3212 women had a mean of 8.6 pharmacy visits (standard deviation, 4.7) with a mean synchronization of 0.3 (standard deviation, 0.2). Those in the third (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.59) and fourth (most) medication number-adjusted synchronization quartiles (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.86) were more likely to be adherent than those in the least. Multivariate model predictions showed that the proportion of patients who were adherent over 1 year varied from 68.9% in the least synchronized quartile to 76.6% in the most synchronized one.Conclusions: Prescription refill synchronization is strongly associated with adherence to endocrine therapy. Efforts to improve adherence should address this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) for breast cancer reduces mortality, but one-third to one-half of patients discontinue it early or are nonadherent.Objective: We developed a pilot single-site study of patients with evidence of early nonadherence to AET to assess the feasibility of a novel, clinical pharmacist-led intervention targeting symptom and medication management.Methods: Patients with prescription fill records showing nonadherence were enrolled in a single-arm feasibility study. Automated reminders were sent by e-mail or text with a link to symptom monitoring assessments weekly for 1 month and monthly until 6 months. Clinical oncology pharmacists used guideline-based symptom management and other medication management tools to support adherence and ameliorate symptoms reported on the assessments. Patient-reported outcome assessments included physical, mental, and social health domains and self-efficacy to manage symptoms and medications. Feasibility outcomes included completion of symptom reports and pharmacist recommendations.Results: Of 19 participants who were nonadherent who enrolled and completed initial assessments, 18 completed all final study procedures, with 14 completing all assessments and no patient missing more than 3 assessments. All 18 participants reported at least one of 3 symptom types, and the majority reported attempting pharmacist recommendations. Patient-reported measures of physical, mental, and social health and self-efficacy improved, and 44% of the patients became adherent.Conclusion: An intervention using pharmacists in an oncology practice to systematically monitor and manage symptoms shows promise to reduce symptoms, enhance support and self-efficacy, and improve adherence to AET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The effect of advanced practice provider (APP) involvement in oncology care on cancer-specific outcomes is unknown. We examined the association between team-based APP–physician care during chemotherapy and chemotherapy-related adverse events (AEs) among women with breast cancer. Methods: We performed separate nested case-control analyses in two national cohorts of women who received chemotherapy for incident breast cancer. Cohorts were identified from Medicare (≥ 65 years of age) and MarketScan (18 to 64 years of age) data. Cases experienced a chemotherapy-related AE (emergency room visit and/or hospitalization). Controls were matched 1:1 on the basis of each patient's age, comorbidities, census region, state's APP scope of practice regulations, and observation period from chemotherapy initiation to first AE. APP exposure (any outpatient claim billed by an APP during the observation period) was assessed for each matched pair member. Results: Among the 1,948 cases in the Medicare cohort, 225 (12%) had APP exposure before the first chemotherapy-related AE, compared with 213 controls (11%; P =.54). Among the 725 cases in the MarketScan cohort, 52 (7%) had APP exposure compared with 65 controls (9%; P =.21). In the matched case-control analysis, there was no association between outpatient APP exposure during chemotherapy and AEs in either cohort (Medicare: OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.30]; MarketScan: OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.50 to 1.14]). Conclusion: Our results suggest that team-based APP-physician care that includes an APP who is billing independently, at least for certain patients receiving chemotherapy, may be a viable strategy to safely leverage the scarce oncology workforce to increase access and delivery of cancer care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]