Search

SUMMARY Background Cinematic Rendering (CR) is a recently introduced post-processing 3D-visualization imaging tool. The aim of this study was to assess its clinical value in the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) or muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps, and to compare it to maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. The study presents the first application of CR for perforator mapping prior to autologous breast reconstruction. Methods Two senior surgeons independently analyzed CR and MIP images based on computed tomography angiography (CTA) datasets of 20 patients in terms of vascular pedicle characteristics, the possibility to harvest a DIEP or MS-TRAM flap, and the side of the flap harvest. We calculated inter- and intra-observer agreement in order to examine the accordance of both image techniques. Results We observed a good inter- and intra-observer agreement concerning the type of flap and the side of the flap harvest. However, the agreement on the pedicle characteristics varies depending on the considered variable. Both investigators identified a significantly higher number of perforators with MIP compared to CR (observer one p Conclusion The current study serves as an explorative study, showing first experiences with CR in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction. In addition to MIP images, CR might improve the surgeon's understanding of the individual's anatomy. Future studies are required to compare CR with other 3D visualization tools and its possible effects on operative parameters.

Mobile smartphone thermal imaging (MTI) devices correlate with blood flow, which makes them appealing adjuncts during reconstructive surgery. MTI was assessed in the setting of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) free flaps. We hypothesized that MTI can be a surrogate for blood flow to identify microvascular flow insufficiencies.Nineteen patients underwent 30 DIEAP flaps for breast reconstruction. Images were obtained preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at instances of concern for flap viability. Three groups were evaluated: normal DIEAP flaps (NDFs), flaps with arterial insufficiency (AI), and flaps with venous congestion (VC).All flaps were successful. There were significant temperature increases from max ischemia (24.5 ± 2.1°C) to 1 min after anastomosis (27.2 ± 1.6°C, P 0.001). NDFs continued to warm until the final MTI was taken when leaving the operating room. There were no differences between MTI flap temperatures before transfer to the chest and after completion of microanastomosis. With questionable flap viability, VC and AI temperatures were found to be significantly colder than the NDF group (28.3 ± 1.9°C versus 32.2 ± 1.8°C, P = 0.003) in the VC group and (27.2 ± 0.7°C versus 32.2 ± 1.8°C, P = 0.001) in the AI group. After correction of the identified flow insufficiency, VC and AI rewarmed and temperatures were no different compared with NDF.MTI recognizes microanastomotic failure and is a practical adjunct in the evaluation of free flap perfusion.

Summary: Gestational gigantomastia (GGM) is a rare condition characterized by a massive overgrowth of breast tissue during pregnancy. Surgical sanction may be required when conservative measures fail. In this study, we report the case of a 29-year-old woman who presented with an evolutive GGM responsible for physical and emotional distress, despite medical treatment. A multidisciplinary decision was made to induce delivery at 32 weeks. In the postdelivery period, the patient developed breast wounds, complicated with septic cardiomyopathy. An emergency bilateral mastectomy was then carried out, together with banking of both nipple-areola complexes. Thereafter, delayed bilateral 2-stage breast reconstruction was started at 12 months with subcutaneous tissue expanders, later on followed by implants removal and autologous reconstruction with bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps and bilateral nipple replantation.

Summary Background Perforator flaps yield the best results for the patient with the least morbidity, and they should be considered the gold standard in head and neck reconstruction. Although deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered as the gold standard in breast reconstruction, its use in head and neck reconstructive surgery does not seem so widespread. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the use, applications and results of the DIEP flap in the head and neck area. Methods Search was conducted in different indexed databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Scielo and Web of Science) and through meta-searcher Trip Database with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap AND head neck keywords. Studies on animal and human experiments published in peer-reviewed journals, where investigators assessed the use of DIEP flap, according to the Koshima criteria, in the head and neck area were considered. Results A total of 31 articles and 185 flaps with 95% of survival were found. Thrombosis or venous stasis is the most frequent cause of flap loss and 16.1% presented some type of complication, the most frequent being the dehiscence. The most use was in the reconstruction of glossectomy defect secondary to squamous cell carcinoma (30.51%), being able potentially to re-establish sensory innervation in oral cavity. The assessment of risk bias (National Institutes of Health) highlights the lack of uniformity, with no standardisation of the outcome variable collection and monitoring. Discussion By virtue of its versatility, reliable vascular supply and high flap survival rate, the DIEP flap reconstruction could be an option in complicated 3-dimensional head and neck defects while maintaining the standard of low donor site morbidity.

BACKGROUND The internal mammary artery/vein (IMA/V) are commonly used recipients for free flap breast reconstruction, but requires costal cartilage resection and limits future use of the IMA. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the thoracoacromial artery/vein (TAA/V) as recipients for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction compared with using the IMA/V. METHODS Medical charts of patients who underwent free DIEP flap breast reconstruction using the TAA/V or the IMA/V as recipient vessels were reviewed. Patient and vessel characteristics, time for vessel preparation and anastomosis, and postoperative pain were compared between TAA/V and IMA/V groups. RESULTS Thirty-four patients were included; 12 in TAA/V group, and 22 in IMA/V group. There was no flap failure in both groups. There were statistically significant differences between TAA/V and IMA/V groups in vessel preparation time (10.9 ± 3.7 min vs. 24.1 ± 6.0 min, p

Introduction When a Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery flap is not suitable, the Profunda Artery Perforator (PAP) flap can be a good alternative for autologous breast reconstruction. Popularity of the PAP flap is expanding, but it is still only slowly being adopted worldwide. We report our experience with 116 consecutive PAP flaps showing refinements and evolution of the technique towards improvement in outcomes and patients' satisfaction. Methods We prospectively collected data from consecutive PAP flap breast reconstructions performed from 2016 to 2019. Patients' demographics, pre-, intra-, postoperative data and revision procedures were analyzed. The BREAST-Q and a specific questionnaire investigating outcomes at the donor site were completed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Results One-hundred and sixteen PAP flaps were performed in 86 patients, 64 unilateral and 22 bilateral breast reconstructions. Mean body mass index was 24.72 kg/m2 (range 18.9-29.2) and mean flap weight was 251.30g (range 152g – 455g). Complications included donor site hematoma (1.7%), seroma (2.6%), fat necrosis (1.7%) and wound dehiscence (2.6%). No arterial/venous thrombosis nor flap losses were recorded. Patients reported high satisfaction in all BREAST-Q domains, with mean postoperative scores being higher than preoperative ones, suggesting a positive effect in quality of life and satisfaction. Scores were significant in the satisfaction with breast domain (p= 0.0016). Conclusions Breast reconstruction with PAP flap yields a high success, low complications and excellent cosmetic outcomes in the breast and donor sites. It improves patients' satisfaction and quality of life; hence it can be considered an excellent option for autologous breast reconstruction.

The gold standard for autologous reconstruction in the post-mastectomy patient remains the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, although many women may not be candidates for abdominally based free tissue transfer. In this scenario, there are several other donor site options based from the thigh (transverse and diagonal upper gracilis flaps, profunda artery perforator flap, lateral thigh flap) and trunk (lumbar artery perforator flap, superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps). This study will review the history, relevant anatomy, surgical technique and outcomes for alternative flaps in autologous reconstruction. Additionally, preoperative imaging (CTA, MRA) and novel applications (stacking flaps, neurotization) in breast reconstructive microsurgery will be discussed.

For survivors of breast cancer lymphedema is their greatest survivorship burden. Modern surgical techniques to treat lymphedema are effective at reducing limb volume, symptoms of lymphedema, episodes of cellulitis, and improving patient quality of life. Physiologic procedures, including lymphovenous bypass (LVB) and vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT), restore physiological lymphatic function within the affected extremity. In patients with post-mastectomy breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema that desire breast reconstruction, microvascular abdominal flap breast reconstruction can be combined with superficial inguinal (groin) VLNT to provide breast reconstruction and treatment of lymphedema in a single operation. This article reviews the indications, preoperative assessment, surgical technique, outcomes, and tips and pearls for performing this procedure.

INTRODUCTION Venous congestion is the most common vascular complication of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps. Adding a second venous drainage by anastomosing a flap vein and a recipient vein (super-drainage) is considered the solution of choice. Evidence to support this procedure, had not yet been confirmed by an analysis of the literature. We aimed to provide this evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched the literature (MedLine, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar), for studies discussing venous congestion and venous super-drainage in DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. Thirteen of the 35 articles compared results between one or two venous anastomoses. Meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Pooled risk ratio (RRs) for congestion, fat necrosis, partial necrosis, and total necrosis with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effect model with the Mantel-Haenszel method. The need to return to surgery (95% CI) was estimated with a random effect model using the DerSimonian and Liard method. RESULTS We showed a statistically significant advantage of super-drainage to reduce the venous congestion of the flap (RR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.34, p-value

Background: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. When the abdomen is not available, alternative donor sites can be found at the buttock, the lumbar region, or the thighs. These flaps are referred to as second-choice flaps. This study compares the superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap and the lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap to the DIEP flap using patient-reported outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was performed reviewing the records of 417 women who underwent a free flap breast reconstruction with either a DIEP, an LAP, or an SGAP flap, between 2006 and 2018. Patients were asked to fill out the BREAST-Q questionnaire, and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed and correlated to the demographic information. Results: The response rate was 54.5 percent, with 50 LAP, 153 DIEP, and 25 SGAP flap patients participating. When questioned about their satisfaction with breasts and satisfaction with outcome, all three procedures were rated similarly high. When comparing the physical well-being of the donor site and appearance of the donor site, LAP flap patients reported significantly lower scores than DIEP and SGAP flap patients. Conclusions: Patients who undergo LAP or SGAP flap breast reconstruction seem similarly satisfied with the appearance and outcome of their free flap breast reconstruction compared with DIEP flap patients. The donor-site morbidity and its impact on the patient's well-being in SGAP and LAP flap patients have been underestimated. Despite more donor-site discomfort, the LAP and SGAP flaps are feasible alternatives whenever the DIEP flap is not possible.

Background Several patient-related factors have been identified with regard to the safety and efficacy of breast reconstructions. Using the largest database available in Europe, the presented study investigated the impact of cigarette smoking on deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) free-flap breast reconstructions. Methods In total, 3,926 female patients underwent 4,577 free DIEP-flap breast reconstructions after malignancies in 22 different German breast cancer centers. The cases were divided into two groups: nonsmokers (NS) and smokers (S). Impact of smoking on surgical complications, controlled for covariates, and cluster effects within the cancer centers were analyzed by using generalized linear mixed models. Results Overall, there was no significant difference between the groups of patients regarding the rate of total flap loss. However, the rate of partial flap loss (0.9 vs. 3.2%, p Conclusion Our findings suggest that successful free tissue transfer can be achieved in smokers despite higher rates of partial flap losses and wound-healing disturbances. However, patients with a history of smoking requiring DIEP flap reconstruction should be critically evaluated preoperatively, informed in detail about the higher risk of complications and encouraged to quit smoking prior to surgery.

Background The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is the commonest flap used for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. It is performed as a unilateral (based on one [unipedicled] or two [bipedicled] vascular pedicles) or bilateral procedure following unilateral or bilateral mastectomies. No previous studies have comprehensively analyzed analgesia requirements and hospital stay of these three forms of surgical reconstruction. Methods A 7-year retrospective cohort study (2008–2015) of a single-surgeon’s DIEP-patients was conducted. Patient-reported pain scores, patient-controlled morphine requirements and recovery times were compared using non-parametric statistics and multivariable regression. Results The study included 135 participants: unilateral unipedicled (n=84), unilateral bipedicled (n=24) and bilateral unipedicled (n=27). Univariate comparison of the three DIEP types showed a significant difference in 12-hour postoperative morphine requirements (P=0.020); bipedicled unilateral patients used significantly less morphine than unipedicled (unilateral) patients at 12 (P=0.005), 24 (P=0.020), and 48 (P=0.046) hours. Multivariable regression comparing these two groups revealed that both reconstruction type and smoking status were significant predictors for 12-hour postoperative morphine usage (P=0.038 and P=0.049, respectively), but only smoking, remained significant at 24 (P=0.010) and 48 (P=0.010) hours. Bilateral reconstruction patients’ mean hospital stay was 2 days longer than either unilateral reconstruction (P Conclusions Although all three forms of DIEP flap breast reconstruction had similar postoperative pain measures, a novel finding of our study was that bipedicled DIEP flap harvest might be associated with lower early postoperative morphine requirements. Bilateral and bipedicled procedures in appropriate patients might therefore be undertaken without significantly increased pain/morbidity compared to unilateral unipedicled reconstructions.

Background The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical features of the internal mammary vessels (IMVs) at the second and third intercostal spaces (ICSs) with regard to their use as recipient vessels in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Methods A total of 38 consecutive DIEP breast reconstructions in 36 patients were performed using IMVs as recipient vessels between March 2017 and August 2018. The intraoperative findings and postoperative complications were analyzed. Anatomical analyses were performed using intraoperative measurements and computed tomography (CT) angiographic images. Results CT angiographic analysis revealed the mean diameter of the deep inferior epigastric artery to be 2.42±0.27 mm, while that of the deep inferior epigastric vein was 2.91±0.30 mm. A larger mean vessel diameter was observed at the second than at the third ICS for both the internal mammary artery (2.26±0.32 mm vs. 1.99±0.33 mm, respectively; P=0.001) and the internal mammary vein (IMv) (2.52±0.46 mm vs. 2.05±0.42 mm, respectively; P Conclusions The IMVs at the second ICS had more favorable anatomic features for use as recipient vessels in DIEP flap breast reconstruction than those at the third ICS.

As deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap surgery is gaining popularity, more patients including BRCA-positive patients need simultaneous laparoscopic surgery. We share our experience on a patient who underwent concurrent laparoscopic hysterectomy during flap elevation with a novel method. A patient diagnosed with a right breast cancer also required laparoscopic hysterectomy due to multiple uterine myoma. After perforator mapping was performed, flap elevation through external oblique fascia level was carried out first, sparing the periumbilical perforator and superficial inferior epigastric vein. Three ports were inserted for laparoscopy on posterior fascia level in the periumbilical area, left upper quadrant area and suprapubic area. The surgery was completed without any complication, gas leaks or vascular injury with the advantage of reduced risk of vascular damage and less surgical incision.

Background Total extraperitoneal laparoscopically assisted harvest of the deep inferior epigastric vessels permits a decrease in myofascial dissection in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction. The authors present a reliable technique that further decreases donor-site morbidity in autologous breast reconstruction. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of female subjects presenting to the senior surgeon (S.K.K.) from March of 2018 to March of 2019 for autologous breast reconstruction after a newly diagnosed breast cancer. The operative technique is summarized as follows: a supraumbilical camera port is placed at the medial edge of the rectus muscle to enter the retrorectus space; the extraperitoneal plane is developed using a balloon dissector and insufflation; two ports are placed through the linea alba below the umbilicus to introduce dissection instruments; the deep inferior epigastric vessels are dissected from the underside of the rectus muscle; muscle branches and the superior epigastric are ligated using a Ligasure; and the deep inferior epigastric pedicle is ligated and the vessels are delivered through a minimal fascial incision. The flap(s) is transferred to the chest for completion of the reconstruction. Results Thirty-three subjects totaling 57 flaps were included. All flaps were single-perforator deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps. Mean fascial incision length was 2.0 cm. Sixty percent of subjects recovered without narcotics. Mean length of stay was 2.5 days. Flap salvage occurred in one subject after venous congestion. Two pedicle transections occurred during harvest that required perforator-to-pedicle anastomosis. Conclusion Total extraperitoneal laparoscopically assisted harvest of the deep inferior epigastric pedicle is a reliable method that decreases the donor-site morbidity of autologous breast reconstruction. Clinical question/level of evidence Therapeutic, IV.

Perforator-based flaps have become a mainstay of autologous breast reconstruction practice. Despite available radiological investigations ranging from Doppler ultrasound (US) to CT angiography (CTA), finding and quantitatively assessing perforators remains a time-consuming, complex process. Infrared thermographic imaging (IRT) shows promise as a novel modality for preoperative localisation of perforator vessels. Thirteen women undergoing elective breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flaps were recruited between August 2017 and July 2018. All had CTA and Doppler US mapping of arterial perforators preoperatively as standard. Additional abdominal thermal images were taken using a FLIR ONE smartphone compatible camera. Thermal hotspots were compared with Doppler markings and CTA findings. Twenty-six flaps were analysed. Seventy perforators were marked by Doppler US, with a mean of 2.92 perforators per flap (± SEM 0.15, SD 0.72). Forty (57%) had a corresponding hotspot on IRT. Overall, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the number of perforators detected by Doppler US and IRT (r = 0.573, n = 26, p = 0.003) and kappa index 0.65. Eighty-four perforators were identified by CTA, with a mean of 3.5 perforators per flap (± SEM 0.14, SD 0.66). Fifty-eight (69%) had a corresponding hotspot on IRT. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the number of perforators detected by CTA and IRT (r = 0.504, n = 26, p = 0.012) and kappa index 0.60. Thermography is an inexpensive, portable, non-invasive imaging technique, which shows statistically significant correlation to CTA and Doppler US in mapping perforators. Level of evidence: Level IV, diagnostic study.

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has been widely used for approximately 30 years as an effective method for breast reconstruction, defect repair, and perineal reconstruction. However, few literatures have reported on thinned pedicle DIEP flaps for scrotal reconstruction. The present study presents a series of reconstruction of the scrotum using thinned pedicle DIEP flaps. Five patients with large scrotal skin defects were admitted to our hospital from October 2010 to December 2015. Among these patients, three patients had testes and spermatic cord exposure after accidental injury, while two patients had testes exposure after machine extrusion. All of these patients were repaired using thinned pedicle DIEP flaps. During the 12–24-month follow up, one patient experienced a bulky flap, and a subsequent thinned flap was successfully made. The other four flaps were successfully transplanted with good esthetic and functional results. All donor sites were primarily closed; there was no functional disturbance, such as dysuria and abdominal hernia, and the sensation of these flaps partially recovered after 6 months. The thinned pedicle DIEP flap is robust, reliable, and resilient, and offers good-quality skin cover and cushion to the testes. This flap can be considered a good choice for scrotal reconstruction.

Background This study aims to characterize the effect of laser-assisted indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on fat necrosis and flap failure in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Methods A retrospective review was performed on 1000 free flaps for breast reconstruction at a single center from 2010 to 2017. Indocyanine green angiography was used after completion of recipient-site anastomoses to subjectively assess for areas of hypoperfusion. A multivariable logistical analysis was conducted with 24 demographic and surgical factors and their effects on fat necrosis and flap failure. Results Five hundred six DIEP flaps were included in the statistical analyses. Thirteen percent of flaps had fat necrosis. Indocyanine green angiography was used for 200 flaps and was independently associated with a decrease in the odds of fat necrosis (OR, 0.38; p = 0.004). There was no reduction in flap failure rates when using indocyanine green angiography (OR, 1.15; p = 0.85). However, there was a decrease in flap loss with increasing venous coupler diameter (OR, 0.031 per 1-mm increase; p = 0.012). The 84.9-g higher weight of resected tissue before inset without indocyanine green angiography versus the weight of the tissue resected with indocyanine green angiography was statistically significant (p = 0.01). Per single incident of fat necrosis, our cohort underwent an additional 0.69 revision procedures, 1.22 imaging studies, 0.77 biopsies, and 1.7 additional oncologic office visits. Conclusion Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography decreases the odds of fat necrosis, saves volume when flap trimming at inset, and can significantly reduce the postoperative surveillance burden in DIEP-based breast reconstruction. Clinical question/level of evidence Therapeutic, III.

The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship of BMI and abdominal wall thickness (AWT) with the diameter of the dominant deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) as well as DIEA branching pattern in preoperatively performed computed tomography angiography (CTA).We conducted a retrospective study including all patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction with available CTAs from November 2013 to April 2018 in our department. The caliber-strongest DIEP was detected after passage of the rectus fascia as well as the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and correlated with the AWT 5 cm above and below the umbilicus, lateral at the level of the umbilicus and at the level of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), and with BMI.Seventy-seven patients met the inclusion criteria (age: 47.3 ± 8.9 years). We observed a significant relationship (p 0.05) between DIEP (mean ∅ = 2.98 mm) and BMI (r = 0.353), the AWT supra- and infraumbilical (r ≥ 0.32), and the AWT lateral at the level of the umbilicus and ASIS (r ≥ 0.25). In addition, there was a highly significant correlation (p 0.01) between SIEA and BMI (r = 0.389) and between the AWT lateral at the level of ASIS (r ≥ 0.41).We demonstrated a correlation of the diameter of the dominant DIEP with both BMI and AWT. Focusing on the diameter, in patients with a high AWT at the level of the ASIS, the SIEA, if present, may represent an alternative therapeutic option.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting (AFG) has been established over the past two decades as an additive technique during and after breast reconstruction. Complete reconstruction of the breast mound with AFG alone represents an exceptional technique that has been published mostly in case reports or in studies with limited cases. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of three different techniques for breast reconstruction on the recovery of skin sensitivity at the reconstructed breast. METHODS: The study included 30 patients after mastectomy following breast cancer. Three groups were examined: A) breast reconstruction by autologous fat grafting (AFG), B) breast reconstruction by deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) and C) breast reconstruction by expander/implant (TE). Biometric data were compared; sensitivity tests were performed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. The non-operated, healthy contralateral breasts of the patients were used as a reference. RESULTS: While the traditional reconstruction techniques by microsurgical anastomosed perforator flap or expander/implant showed a strongly decreased or completely missing sensitivity of the skin, the tests after reconstruction by AFG represented high values of sensory recovery, which came close to the reference group of non-operated breasts. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare skin sensitivity after AFG-based reconstruction to established techniques for breast reconstruction. We could demonstrate in a limited group of patients, that breast reconstruction by autologous fat grafting can achieve higher values of skin sensitivity compared to traditional techniques.

SUMMARY One key component of a successful autologous breast reconstruction is insetting the flap to accurately resemble an aesthetic breast. The authors describe a novel technique used to shape a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap into a coned breast mound before introducing it into the breast pocket. With the flap perfusing on the chest wall, an area of skin estimating the size and location of the skin paddle is marked. The skin to be buried is then deepithelialized. Once hemostasis is ensured, the shaping is performed. Two 2-0 polydioxanone sutures are anchored in the Scarpa fascia at the 10- and 2-o'clock positions and then run at the level of the Scarpa fascia to the 6-o'clock position. The two sutures are then cinched together to achieve the desired shape and then tied. The flap is then placed in the breast pocket and secured into place at the inferomedial and inferolateral corners, and at its cranial aspect. The size of the skin paddle can then be finalized. In the authors' series of 21 breast reconstructions in 11 patients using flap preshaping, they have not seen any compromise in flap perfusion, with one patient showing a small area of secondary fat necrosis. In addition, the flaps maintained their aesthetic breast shape throughout follow-up. The authors believe this technique for shaping inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps before inset into the breast pocket to be both safe and predictable, simplifying one of the more tedious aspects of autologous breast reconstruction.

Background Abdominal flap-based breast reconstruction is challenging in the overweight and obese population not only because of increased donor-site complications, but also because excessive flap thickness makes inset cumbersome, requiring thinning and remodeling that frequently result in aesthetically poor outcomes. Methods The authors started by studying 10 deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps with angiographic computed tomography. Then, they prospectively performed 21 breast reconstructions using a superficial thinning technique reliant on a constant suprafascial vessel as the pedicle for the remaining deep fat and compared the rate of complications with their previous experience using traditional flap thinning techniques. Results All samples studied showed a suprafascial division of the main perforator. Two constant branches were identified, one coursing over the Scarpa fascia and displaying a robust network of linking vessels with the subcutaneous and subdermal plexuses. That anatomical insight was used to develop a flap-thinning technique tested on 21 consecutive high-body mass index patients. A 7-year retrospective analysis (n = 164) showed no significant correlation between body mass index and incidence of complications except for a long-term upper pole step deformity that was associated with increasing body mass index (p = 0.001). No statistically significant difference in complications was found comparing high-body mass index patients from the retrospective group (n = 72) with the superficial thinning group, but a highly suggestive difference (p = 0.061) was found regarding the avoidance of the step deformity using the superficial thinning technique. Conclusion The presence of a constant suprafascial perforator branch makes superficial DIEP thinning a safe technique that facilitates inset and improves the reconstructed breast contour of obese patients. Clinical question/level of evidence Therapeutic, IV.

BACKGROUND Intraoperative venous congestion is a main complication in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap for breast reconstruction. We present a pedicle measuring technique to precisely predict the length of pedicle needed in DIEP free flap, to improve the outcome, and to reduce the risk of donor site morbidity and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS A single-center, open-label, prospective, randomized study was carried out to access efficacy and safety of a pedicle measuring technique in 389 patients. Each patient received a delayed breast reconstruction using free unipedicled DIEP flap, and internal mammary vessels were chosen as recipient vessels. During the surgery, the conventional DIEP flap technique was used in the control group, in which the course of the pedicle was fully dissected. In the measuring group, the flap in setting way was decided preoperatively, the distance (A) between the internal mammary vessels (a) and the point of DIEP perforator into the subcutaneous tissue (b) was measured, and then the length (B) of the perforator (c) and the main trunk (d) is measured and dissected to achieve 1 cm longer than A. RESULTS There are 180 and 209 patients enrolled in the control and measuring group, respectively. Venous congestion occurred in 15 patients (8.3%) in the control group, and 1 patient (0.5%) in the measuring group (P < 0.001). All the 16 patients were found venous thrombosis. Then successful free flap salvage surgeries were performed in 10 patients. Six patients (3.3%) had total flap necrosis due to recurrent venous thromboembolisms. Fat necrosis occurred in 16 patients (8.9%) in the control group, and 5 patients (2.4%) in the measuring group (P = 0.006). Partial flap necrosis was found in 12 patients (6.7%) in the control group, and in 3 patients (1.4%) in the measuring group (P = 0.008). Total flap necrosis occurred in 6 patients (3.3%) in the control group, but no (0%) patient in the measuring group (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Measurement of pedicle length for DIEP flap transferring in breast reconstruction is a reliable technique that could secure the DIEP free flap, reduce operative invasiveness, and lower the risk of complications considerably.

Background The superficial fascial system is routinely closed to alleviate tension at the abdominal donor site after harvest of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) for breast reconstruction. This is thought to decrease rates of wound dehiscence and improve contour postoperatively. There has been no comparative analysis on closure of the superficial fascial system and its effect on donor-site outcomes. Methods The authors retrospectively evaluated outcomes of DIEP flap breast reconstructions performed between 2017 and 2019. After May of 2018, the surgeons collectively agreed to stop closure of the superficial fascial system. All subsequent patients underwent closure of rectus abdominis fascia followed by skin closure. Patient demographic data and abdominal donor-site comorbidities were recorded between the superficial fascial system closure and no-superficial fascial system closure groups. Representative photographs of patients from the two groups were blindly assessed for scar appearance and contour using previously published grading scales. The results were compared. Results DIEP flap breast reconstruction was performed in 103 consecutive women. Among patients with abdominal donor-site reconstruction, 66 had superficial fascial system closure and 37 did not. There was not a significant difference in fat necrosis or wound dehiscence between the two groups (p = 0.29 and p = 0.39, respectively). Postoperative abdominal scar and contour were evaluated by 10 independent raters and showed no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion Omission of superficial fascial system closure resulted in no difference in wound dehiscence or fat necrosis rates and aesthetic appearance of the abdominal scar and contour. Clinical question/level of evidence Therapeutic, III.

Background The lumbar artery perforator flap is a second-choice flap in autologous breast reconstruction whenever a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is not possible. Ideal candidates are pear-shaped women who do not have enough bulk on the abdomen or thighs. Patient-reported “satisfaction with breasts” is excellent but we were curious about the donor site morbidity. Methods We performed a retrospective study of all lumbar flap breast reconstructions performed between 2010 and 2019. Patients were invited by e-mail and telephone to take part in a BREAST-Q survey. Results One hundred fifty-four flaps were performed in 110 patients. Sixty-three patients filled out the BREAST-Q questionnaire. The most frequently observed donor site complications are seroma (35.1%), dehiscence (8.4%), and hematoma (3.2%). Correction of the donor site scar was performed in 31.8% of patients, lipofilling of the donor flank in 5.2%, and liposuction of the contralateral flank in 18.3% of patients. Body mass index (BMI) was the only significant risk factor for donor site complications. Patient-reported “satisfaction with donor site appearance” was good but significantly lower for primary reconstructions compared with secondary and tertiary procedures. Flap weight significantly influences patient-reported “physical wellbeing of the donor site.” Ninety-seven percent of patients would recommend the surgery to someone in a similar position and would do it all over. Conclusion The lumbar artery perforator flap is a good alternative for breast reconstruction in selected patients. The donor site issues consist mainly of seromas, prolonged discomfort, and a scar that might be noticeable to others, but patient-reported satisfaction is very high.

SUMMARY Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap surgery is one of the most common techniques for breast reconstruction using abdominal tissue. Although the DIEP flap reduces donor-site morbidity when compared with the conventional free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap, violation of the anterior rectus sheath, rectus muscle, and motor nerves cannot be avoided. To further minimize tissue damage in the donor site, the use of a surgical robotic system for DIEP flap harvest with a totally extraperitoneal approach has been suggested. This totally extraperitoneal approach has a long learning curve because of the narrow preperitoneal space and the difficulty of converting a potential space to an actual space. Thus, the authors suggest a single-port robotic system optimized for narrow surgical spaces as a feasible option for DIEP flap harvest by a totally extraperitoneal approach, which has a shorter learning curve.

Breast reconstruction using a pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap is a well-established surgical procedure. Although studies suggest that transplanting this flap using a delayed method reduces the risk of partial flap necrosis, challenges persist. Hence, we present three cases of breast reconstruction using a pedicled TRAM flap with both delaying and supercharging. Patient age, excised tissue volume for mastectomy, and follow-up period were as follows: Case 1, 58 years, 429 cm(3), 5 months; Case 2, 35 years, 910 cm(3), 6 months; and Case 3, 56 years, 489 cm(3), 4 months. One patient (Case 2) required a large flap tissue volume to achieve breast symmetry, whereas the other two (Cases 1 and 3) had long, longitudinal scars from previous cesareans sections. In a delayed surgery, the flap was partially elevated with partial dissection and no ligation of the deep inferior epigastric artery and vein (DIEAV). An artificial dermis with a silicone membrane (Teldermis(®)) was used to prevent adhesion of the rectus abdominal muscles and DIEAV to the surrounding tissue. Supercharging was performed by anastomosis between the ipsilateral DIEAV and internal thoracic AV. Flaps in zones I–III and in half of zone IV for Case 2, and zones I–III for Cases 1 and 3, were transferred; all survived without infection. This method allowed the transferring of a larger tissue volume compared with the conventional pedicled TRAM flap-transfer method. Thus, it may be useful for patients who require larger tissue volume or high-risk patients.

Background Advancements in three-dimensional (3D) printing have enabled production of patient-specific guides to aid perforator mapping and pedicle dissection during abdominal flap harvest. We present our early experience using this tool to navigate deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) topography and evaluate its impact on operative efficiency and clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods Between January 2013 and December 2018, a total of 50 women underwent computed tomographic angiography (CTA)-guided perforator mapping prior to abdominal flap breast reconstruction, with (n = 9) and without (n = 41) 3D-printed vascular modeling (3DVM). Models were assessed for their accuracy in identifying perforator location and source-vessel anatomy, as determined by operative findings from 18 hemi-abdomens. The margin of error (MOE) for perforator localization using 3DVM was calculated and compared with CTA-derived measurements for the same patients. Flap harvest times, outcomes, and complications for patients who were preoperatively mapped using 3DVM versus CTA alone were analyzed. Results Overall, complete concordance was observed between 3DVM and operative findings with regards to perforator number, source-vessel origin, and DIEA branching pattern. By comparison, CTA interpretation of these parameters inaccurately identified branching pattern and perforator source-vessel origin in 28 and 33% of hemi-abdomens, respectively (p = 0.045 and p = 0.02). Compared with operative measurements, the average MOE for perforator localization using 3DVM was significantly lower than that obtained from CTA alone (0.81 vs. 8.71 mm, p Conclusion The results of this study support the accuracy of 3DVM for identifying DIEA topography and perforator location. Application of this technology may translate to enhanced operative efficiency and fewer perfusion-related complications for patients undergoing abdominal free flap breast reconstruction.

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. When the DIEP pedicle is damaged, alternative perforator flaps are harvested from sites with less donor tissue, such as the thigh. Pedicled superior epigastric artery perforator (SEAP) flaps have been recently described for reconstruction of inferior partial breast defects. The purpose of this report is to show the surgical technique of the free SEAP flap for reconstruction of the entire breast in two patients. The authors describe two patients where the DIEP pedicle was unavailable. The first patient was 53 years old, with body mass index (BMI) 22.7, while the second patient was 60 with BMI 32.4. The donor site was marked as for a DIEP, and two lateral row perforators were selected in each case. Flaps were designed to cross the midline, with adequate perfusion confirmed via indocyanine green angiography. Both flaps were rotated 90° counterclockwise for inset into the chest. Flap size and weight for the two patients were: 24 × 15 cm and 350 g; and 25 × 15 cm and 400 g. Both patients had a routine postoperative course without complications. Length of follow-up was 155 and 158 days, respectively. We believe that the free SEAP flap is a promising technique in select patients who require an alternative to the DIEP for autologous breast reconstruction.

Over the past several decades, technical advances in breast reconstruction have resulted in the development of flaps that are aimed at progressively decreasing abdominal wall morbidity. There is, however, ongoing controversy related to the superiority of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps over muscle-sparing TRAM (MS-TRAM) flaps. Hence, the question remains unanswered as to which approach should be considered the standard of care, and more importantly, whether the rate of DIEP flap utilization should be considered a quality metric in breast reconstruction. In this review article, we examine the literature pertaining to abdominal free tissue transfer in breast reconstruction from both donor site and flap characteristics as well as the resultant complications and morbidity. The impact on the donor site remains a prevailing principle for autologous breast reconstruction; thus, must be adequately respected when classifying what is left behind following flap harvest. The most commonly used nomenclature is too simplistic. This, in turn, leads to inadequate incorporation of critical variables, such as degree of muscular preservation, fascial involvement, mesh implantation, and segmental nerve anatomy. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support DIEP flap harvest as a quality indicator in breast reconstruction, as DIEP flap outcomes are not clearly superior when compared with MS-TRAM flaps.

Background The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is one of the most used free flaps for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Prolonged ischemia can result in (partial) flap loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between ischemia time and postoperative complications of DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Methods A retrospective study of all patients who received a breast reconstructionwith aDIEP flap atMaastricht University Medical Center in theNetherlands, between January 2010 and June 2017 (n = 677). The flaps were divided into two groups: flaps with an ischemia time less than 60 min and those with 60 min or more. Recipient site complications, in particular major complications equal to re-exploration, and partial or total flap loss were the primary outcome measures. Results In 23.9% of the 677 included DIEP flaps, the ischemia time was 60 min or longer. Within this group, a complication of the recipient site occurred in 30.9% of the flaps. A major complication occurred in 17.3% of the flaps with 60 min or more ischemia time.With regard to the flaps with less than 60-min ischemia time, a complication occurred in 22.1% of the cases of which 8.9%would be considered amajor complication. A significant association was found between ischemia time and major complications on univariate (p value = 0.003) and multivariate analyses (p value = 0.016). Conclusions This study demonstrates that an ischemia time less than 60 min is associated with a significantly lower risk of major recipient site complications compared to an ischemia time of 60 min or more. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic, risk/prognostic study.

We report a case of autologous breast reconstruction in which a thoracodorsal vessel was used as a recipient vessel after a hypoplastic internal mammary vessel was found on preoperative computed tomography (CT) angiography. A 46-year-old woman with no underlying disease was scheduled to undergo skin-sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. Preoperative CT angiography showed segmental occlusion of the right subclavian artery with severe atherosclerosis and calcification near the origin of the internal mammary artery, with distal flow maintained by collateral branches. The thoracodorsal artery was selected to be the recipient vessel because CT showed that it was of adequate size and was not affected by atherosclerosis. The patient experienced no postoperative complications, and the flap survived with no vascular complications. The breasts were symmetrical at a 6-month follow-up. This case highlights that preoperative vascular imaging modalities may help surgeons avoid using diseased vessels as recipient vessels in free flap breast reconstructions.

Background Adequate selection of recipient vessel to minimize recipient site morbidity is essential for a successful breast reconstruction. The authors explored the clinical use of the lateral thoracic vessels as recipient vessels in the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Methods This study included 63 patients with breast cancer. The age of patients ranged from 26 to 67 years (43.23 ± 8.63). All patients received an immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction using the lateral thoracic vessels as recipient vessels in the authors' department from 2014 May to 2018 September. The flap blood supply, complications, and outcomes were assessed. Results The patients were followed up for 6 to 29 months with satisfactory results. All the flaps had stable blood supply except for two cases, which had an event of partial skin necrosis and were repaired by debridement. Conclusions Lateral thoracic vessels are not only easy to explore but also have reliable blood supply, which present a safe and reliable choice for immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Background The deep inferior epigastric artery flap is an integral component of autologous breast reconstruction. The technical aspects of performing the flap have been well-established. A prior mathematical model suggested using the largest perforator and concluded that the inclusion of additional perforators may decrease resistance and increase flow, but at the downside of increased tissue trauma. Many complications may result from inadequate venous drainage of the flap and the same mathematical concepts may be applied. We attempt to give a mathematical model, based on the physics of flow and properties of circuits, to explain clinical observations regarding venous drainage of the flap and the complications that may arise. Methods We compare the different possible venous drainage systems of a perforator flap to a complex circuit with multiple resistances. Multiple venous perforators will be represented by resistances in parallel, while the deep and superficial drainage systems will be represented by a complex circuit loop. Results Drainage of the flap may be optimized through the deep drainage system if the venous perforators are of sufficient size. Inclusion of additional perforators may decrease resistance and enhance drainage. Salvage procedures may be necessary when the venous perforators are insufficient in size or when there are insufficient connections between the deep and superficial systems. Conclusion A single large sized vessel may provide adequate drainage in most DIEP flaps, while the use of multiple vessels may enhance drainage upon the encounter of smaller vessels. Salvage procedures may be needed to relieve venous congestion as the design of the venous system becomes more complicated.

Background There is a growing trend across health care to perform increasingly complex procedures in less acute settings. This shift has been fueled, in part, by enhanced recovery protocols, which have shortened hospital stays after major surgeries. We set out to determine the timing of microvascular complications after deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) free flap breast reconstruction in a high-volume practice using continuous flap monitoring technologies. Methods The medical charts of all patients who underwent breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps over 24 consecutive months were reviewed. Postoperatively, all flaps were monitored according to a protocol that included continuous tissue oximetry with near-infrared spectroscopy. The primary end points evaluated included any unplanned return to the operating room, time to takeback, and flap loss rate. Results A total of 196 patients underwent breast reconstruction with a total of 301 DIEP flaps. Five of the flaps (1.7%) were taken back to the operating room for microvascular issues, and nine (3.0%) were taken back for nonvascular issues. Of patients who were brought back for microvascular issues, all five (100.0%) were initially identified by continuous noninvasive monitoring and taken back to the operating room within the first 14 hours (range: 1.2–13.6 hours). In the series, the flap failure rate was 0.66% (n = 2). Conclusion All of the microvascular issues were detected in the initial 23 hours after surgery, leading to prompt flap salvage. The results of this study bring into question the need for lengthy flap monitoring protocols and suggest that shorter inpatient, or even observation admissions, may be reasonable, particularly when flap monitoring protocols incorporating continuous noninvasive flap monitoring are used.

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is one of the most used free flaps for the reconstruction of the breast after a mastectomy. Despite careful selection of the patients and preoperative imaging, difficulties in vascularization of the flap can occur in some cases. Although multiple vascular connections (bipedicled, turbocharged, or stacked) can be made in selected cases, there can still be venous congestion before the flap is transferred. Between 2016 and 2018, 4 cases in our series of 281 patients experienced such problems. Three of 4 patients had undergone preoperative imaging of the perforators by a magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomography angiography, in which a good perforator was seen. All 4 patients had a venous problem of blood circulation in the flap intraoperatively. The flaps were left to rest to decide on its venous status. Without improvement after this period of 20 to 30 minutes, the surgeons decided to withhold the translocation of the flap to the chest wall and sutured the flap back into the donor side. The final anastomosis of the DIEP flap occurred on average 8 days after the prefabrication. The translocation of the DIEP flap to the chest in this second operation went uncomplicated in all cases. Postoperatively, all patients had adequate arterial inflow and venous outflow of the flap. There were no postoperative complications. In case a DIEP flap shows venous problems before translocation, a delay procedure can be applied. In this way, the vascularization of the flap can be improved, and the translocation of the DIEP flap in a second operation can be successfully performed.

Introduction: deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP-flap) reconstruction provides the most acceptable aesthetic result among autologous breast reconstruction. However, a thorough preoperative assessment of the individual vascular anatomy of the deep lower epigastric vessels (DIEA/V) is still challlenging. Usage of CT(a) allows define individual anatomical features such as: intramuscular stroke, tortuosity of vessels and their branches which is an essential thing for reducing of the operation time, flap ischemia time, decreasing the complication rate. Material and methods: with the help of Radiology Department, we have launched a new protocol for planning of the DIEP flap surgery. As a preoperative preparation, we perform CT angiography (CTA) according to a specific protocol, which allows us to reduce the trauma of aponeurosis and the rectus abdominis muscle. Сonclusion: preoperative CT angiography, performed according to a special scanning and post-processing protocol, allows us to optimize the planning of the surgical intervention and improving the results of breast reconstruction. Detailed study of the topography of the vessels of the anterior abdominal wall leads to a decrease in tissue injury of the anterior abdominal wall. This article describes the importance of CT angiography, for the preoperative preparation (visualization) as a crucial step in preparing for the DIEP reconstruction of the breast.

Breast reconstruction by abdominal flap has evolved to ensure minimal donor-site morbidity with the description of Deep Inferior Epigastric artery Perforator flap (DIEP flap). Being of the same thickness and the same surface, the Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery flap (SIEA flap) does not require, for it harvesting, to open the abdominal fascia or to dissect through the muscles minimizing again donor-site sequelae. However, it is little used because of the variability of its vascularization and a higher failure rate than the DIEP in the literature. We believe that it is reasonable, in some cases, to harvest a SIEA flap instead of DIEP flap in mammary reconstruction. We present a technical note explaining our operative strategy for reliably taking a SIEA when the caliber of the vessels allows.