1. Extending breast cancer screening beyond age 45-64 years in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
- Author
-
Tan N, Xia C, Yan X, Cao M, Yang F, He S, Zhang S, Cao M, Teng Y, Li Q, Wang J, and Chen W
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Middle Aged, China epidemiology, Aged, Adult, Age Factors, Mammography economics, Mammography methods, Mass Screening economics, Mass Screening methods, Overdiagnosis, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Breast Neoplasms diagnosis, Breast Neoplasms epidemiology, Breast Neoplasms economics, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Early Detection of Cancer economics, Early Detection of Cancer methods, Quality-Adjusted Life Years
- Abstract
The optimal breast cancer (BC) screening age in China remains uncertain. In this study, we evaluated the benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of lowering the screening starting age from 45 to 35 years and extending the stopping age from 64 to 79 years in Chinese women at an average risk of progressing BC. Biennial screening showed a lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to annual screening. Extending the screening age beyond 45-64 years in certain scenarios increased the number of false-positive results and each averted breast cancer deaths. Specifically, extending the starting age to 35 years reduced overdiagnosis rate to 10.8 % and had an incremental cost ratio of US$12,746 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), falling below the cost-effectiveness threshold of US$18,346 per QALY. Regarding the ceasing age, the status quo (age 64 years) was found to be the optimal choice as it was proved to yield the majority of benefits with reduced harm and be the only option under the cost-effectiveness threshold. In summary, biennial screening for average-risk women aged 35-64 years is the most cost-effective approach strategy, aligning with The National Health Commission's screening program for cervical and breast cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF