Search

Aim: Demand for nipple- and skin- sparing mastectomy (NSM/SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (BR) has increased at the same time as indications for post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) have broadened. The aim of the Oncoplastic Breast Consortium initiative was to address relevant questions arising with this clinically challenging scenario., Methods: A large global panel of oncologic, oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgeons, patient advocates and radiation oncologists developed recommendations for clinical practice in an iterative process based on the principles of Delphi methodology., Results: The panel agreed that surgical technique for NSM/SSM should not be formally modified when PMRT is planned with preference for autologous over implant-based BR due to lower risk of long-term complications and support for immediate and delayed-immediate reconstructive approaches. Nevertheless, it was strongly believed that PMRT is not an absolute contraindication for implant-based or other types of BR, but no specific recommendations regarding implant positioning, use of mesh or timing were made due to absence of high-quality evidence. The panel endorsed use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. It was acknowledged that the shape and size of reconstructed breasts can hinder radiotherapy planning and attention to details of PMRT techniques is important in determining aesthetic outcomes after immediate BR., Conclusions: The panel endorsed the need for prospective, ideally randomised phase III studies and for surgical and radiation oncology teams to work together for determination of optimal sequencing and techniques for PMRT for each patient in the context of BR., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Systemic treatments are tailored to breast cancer (BC) heterogeneity, which is not yet taken into account for radiotherapy (RT) personalization. The primary objective of this review is to summarize existing data suggesting BC subtypes and genetic assays are prognostic and predictive biomarkers useful for RT decision-making and to provide implications for their incorporation into future translational and clinical research. The evidence suggesting that BC subtypes also exhibit distinct "locoregional recurrence (LRR)" patterns is retrospective but consistent and validated in over fifteen studies. The HER-2 positive and triple negative subtypes are the most susceptible to locoregional failure. The high risk of the HER-2 positive subtype can be reversed with trastuzumab administration. Very little is known on the subtypes' intrinsic radiosensitivity properties. Genetic assays have assessed retrospectively signatures' prognostic and predictive value in patients' cohorts (several coming from prospective studies) for LRR risk and radiotherapy (RT) benefit. Further confirmation is needed before their introduction into clinical routine. Evidence on the use of molecular biomarkers for adjuvant RT tailoring is emerging but needs validation and introduction into prospective studies. The plethora of modern RT options (partial breast irradiation, hypofractionation), as well as recent evidence pointing towards more extensive radiotherapy, demand introduction of biological features into clinical trials to improve therapeutic decisions. Open questions, such as tailoring of irradiation after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in complete responders and the understanding of the interplay between local control, systemic recurrence and survival given modern systemic treatments, need to be addressed under the prism of biology within this heterogeneous disease. Intrinsic radiobiological properties within this heterogeneity need to be highlighted in order to further improve outcomes., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Due to the significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer seen in the last decades, increased survival rates and better outcomes of patients are being observed. The role of radiotherapy remains pivotal in the treatment of early breast cancer. In the adjuvant setting, whole breast irradiation remains the standard of care using a relatively well standardized radiation technique. The recent technology advances and 3D conformal radiotherapy allow for better volumes definition resulting to increased organ at risk--sparing and therefore treatment optimization. Sophisticated techniques and emerging options (such as accelerated partial breast irradiation) are not routinely used yet outside of a clinical trial. Moreover, new drugs and targeted therapies have recently been introduced to the clinical practice for treatment individualization according to the specific tumours' prognosis and/or prediction of the drugs' efficacy based on new biological tools. Regarding the synergistic effect of these molecules with ionizing radiation, rigorous prospective evaluation of combined therapy is important to ensure improved long-term benefit/risk ratio. In this review, the significant advances of radiotherapy and combined therapy in the new era of breast cancer management will be discussed., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The adjuvant setting of early breast cancer treatment is an evolving field where different modalities must be combined to improve outcomes; moreover, quality of life of breast cancer survivors emerges as a new important parameter to consider, thus implying a better understanding of toxicities of these modalities. We have conducted a review focusing on the latest literature of the past 3 years, trying to evaluate the existing data on the maximum acceptable delay of radiotherapy when given as sole adjuvant treatment after surgery and the optimal sequence of all these modalities with respect to each other. It becomes evident radiotherapy should be given as soon as possible and within a time frame of 6-20 weeks. Chemotherapy is given before radiotherapy and hormone therapy. However, radiotherapy should be started within 7 months after surgery in these cases. Hormone therapy with tamoxifen might be given safely concomitantly or sequentially with radiotherapy although solid data are still lacking. The concurrent administration of letrozole and radiotherapy seems to be safe, whereas data on trastuzumab can imply only that it is safe to use concurrently with radiotherapy. Randomized comparisons of hormone therapy and trastuzumab administration with radiotherapy need to be performed.

Purpose: The optimal sequence of modalities involved in breast cancer treatment with respect to radiotherapy and the maximum acceptable interval between radiotherapy and surgery need to be determined., Design: This review attempts a critical reading of the literature., Results: A delay of radiotherapy more than 8-12 weeks after surgery adversely affects local recurrence. Radiotherapy should be administered within 7 months after surgery, when chemotherapy is administered first. Several chemotherapy regimens can be safely administered concurrently with radiotherapy. The concurrent use of tamoxifen with chemotherapy should be avoided, but not with radiotherapy. Data is insufficient with regard to concurrent use of aromatase inhibitors with radiotherapy. The use of trastuzumab concomitantly with radiotherapy may enhance toxicities but may also improve its efficacy., Conclusions: Although the issue of radiotherapy delay and that of sequence with chemotherapy or tamoxifen are clarified, the sequence of radiotherapy with aromatase inhibitors and trastuzumab needs to be defined. Individual radiosensitivity may influence toxicity. New biologic markers have to be determined in the future for tailoring radiotherapy in breast cancer.

Purpose: Short radiotherapy schedules might be more convenient for patients and overloaded radiotherapy departments, provided late toxicity is not increased. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a hypofractionated and highly accelerated radiotherapy regimen supported with cytoprotection provided by amifostine in breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery., Methods and Materials: A total of 92 patients received 12 consecutive fractions of radiotherapy (3.5 Gy/fraction for 10 fractions) to the breast and/or axillary/supraclavicular area and 4 Gy/fraction for 2 fractions to the tumor bed). Amifostine at a dose of 1,000 mg/d was administered subcutaneously. The follow-up of patients was 30-60 months (median, 39)., Results: Using a dose individualization algorithm, 77.1% of patients received 1,000 mg and 16.3% received 750 mg of amifostine daily. Of the 92 patients, 13% interrupted amifostine because of fever/rash symptoms. Acute Grade 2 breast toxicity developed in 6.5% of patients receiving 1,000 mg of amifostine compared with 46.6% of the rest of the patients (p < .0001). The incidence of Grade 2 late sequelae was less frequent in the high amifostine dose group (3.2% vs. 6.6%; p = NS). Grade 1 lung fibrosis was infrequent (3.3%). The in-field relapse rate was 3.3%, and an additional 2.2% of patients developed a relapse in the nonirradiated supraclavicular area. c-erbB-2 overexpression was linked to local control failure (p = .01). Distant metastasis appeared in 13% of patients, and this was marginally related to more advanced T/N stage (p = .06)., Conclusion: Within a minimal follow-up of 2.5 years after therapy, hypofractionated and accelerated radiotherapy with subcutaneous amifostine cytoprotection has proved a well-tolerated and effective regimen. Longer follow-up is required to assess the long-term late sequelae.