Search

The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard-of-care for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative (ER+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the impact of CDK4/6i on circulating immune cells and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients receiving CDK4/6i and ET (CDK4/6i+ET) remains poorly understood. This was a prospective cohort study including 44 patients with ER+/HER2- mBC treated with CDK4/6i+ET in either first or second line. Peripheral blood samples were collected before (baseline) and 3 months (t2) after therapy. Immune cell's subsets were quantified by flow cytometry, and microfluidic-captured CTCs were counted and classified according to the expression of cytokeratin and/or vimentin. Patients were categorized according to response as responders (progression-free survival [PFS] ≥ 6.0 months; 79.1%) and non-responders (PFS < 6.0 months; 20.9%). CDK4/6i+ET resulted in significant changes in the hematological parameters, including decreased hemoglobin levels and increased mean corpuscular volume, as well as reductions in neutrophil, eosinophil, and basophil counts. Specific immune cell subsets, such as early-stage myeloid-derived suppressor cells, central memory CD4+ T cells, and Vδ2+ T cells expressing NKG2D, decreased 3 months after CDK4/6i+ET. Additionally, correlations between the presence of CTCs and immune cell populations were observed, highlighting the interplay between immune dysfunction and tumor dissemination. This study provides insights into the immunomodulatory effects of CDK4/6i+ET, underscoring the importance of considering immune dynamics in the management of ER+/HER2- mBC.

Despite the high prevalence of TP53 pathogenic variants (PV) carriers in the South and Southeast regions of Brazil, germline genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer (HBC) is not available in the Brazilian public health system, and the prevalence of Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is not well established in other regions of Brazil. We assessed the occurrence of TP53 p.R337H carriers among women treated for breast cancer (BC) between January 2021 and January 2022 at public hospitals of Brasilia, DF, Brazil. A total of 180 patients who met at least one of the NCCN criteria for HBC underwent germline testing; 44.4% performed out-of-pocket germline multigene panel testing, and 55.6% were tested for the p.R337H variant by allelic discrimination PCR. The median age at BC diagnosis was 43.5 years, 93% had invasive ductal carcinoma, 50% had estrogen receptor-positive/HER2 negative tumors, and 41% and 11% were diagnosed respectively at stage III and IV. Two patients (1.11%) harbored the p.R337H variant, and cascade family testing identified 20 additional carriers. The TP53 p.R337H detection rate was lower than that reported in other studies from south/southeast Brazil. Nonetheless, identifying TP53 PV carriers through genetic testing in the Brazilian public health system could guide cancer treatment and prevention.

The landscape of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) resistance is still being elucidated and the optimal subsequent therapy to overcome resistance remains uncertain. Here we present the final results of a phase Ib/IIa, open-label trial (NCT02871791) of exemestane plus everolimus and palbociclib for CDK4/6i-resistant metastatic breast cancer. The primary objective of phase Ib was to evaluate safety and tolerability and determine the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase II dose (100 mg palbociclib, 5 mg everolimus, 25 mg exemestane). The primary objective of phase IIa was to determine the clinical benefit rate (18.8%, n = 6/32), which did not meet the predefined endpoint (65%). Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetic profiling (phase Ib), objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and progression free survival (phase IIa), and correlative multi-omics analysis to investigate biomarkers of resistance to CDK4/6i. All participants were female. Multi-omics data from the phase IIa patients (n = 24 tumor/17 blood biopsy exomes; n = 27 tumor transcriptomes) showed potential mechanisms of resistance (convergent evolution of HER2 activation, BRAF V600E ), identified joint genomic/transcriptomic resistance features (ESR1 mutations, high estrogen receptor pathway activity, and a Luminal A/B subtype; ERBB2/BRAF mutations, high RTK/MAPK pathway activity, and a HER2-E subtype), and provided hypothesis-generating results suggesting that mTOR pathway activation correlates with response to the trial's therapy. Our results illustrate how genome and transcriptome sequencing may help better identify patients likely to respond to CDK4/6i therapies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Nanomaterials' application in cancer therapy has been driven by their ability to encapsulate chemotherapeutic drugs as well as to reach the tumor site. Nevertheless, nanomedicines' translation has been limited due to their lack of specificity towards cancer cells. Although the nanomaterials' surface can be coated with targeting ligands, such has been mostly achieved through non-covalent functionalization strategies that are prone to premature detachment. Notwithstanding, cancer cells often establish resistance mechanisms that impair the effect of the loaded drugs. This bottleneck may be addressed by using near-infrared (NIR)-light responsive nanomaterials. The NIR-light triggered hyperthermic effect generated by these nanomaterials can cause irreversible damage to cancer cells or sensitize them to chemotherapeutics' action. Herein, a novel covalently functionalized targeted NIR-absorbing nanomaterial for cancer chemo-photothermal therapy was developed. For such, dopamine-reduced graphene oxide nanomaterials were covalently bonded with hyaluronic acid, and then loaded with doxorubicin (DOX/HA-DOPA-rGO). The produced nanomaterials showed suitable physicochemical properties, high encapsulation efficiency, and photothermal capacity. The in vitro studies revealed that the nanomaterials are cytocompatible and that display an improved uptake by the CD44-overexpressing breast cancer cells. Importantly, the combination of DOX/HA-DOPA-rGO with NIR light reduced breast cancer cells' viability to just 23 %, showcasing their potential chemo-photothermal therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The molecular underpinnings of HER2-low and HER2-0 (IHC 0) breast tumors remain poorly defined. Using genomic findings from 1039 patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer undergoing next-generation sequencing from 7/2013-12/2020, we compare results between HER2-low (n = 487, 47%) and HER2-0 tumors (n = 552, 53%). A significantly higher number of ERBB2 alleles (median copy count: 2.05) are observed among HER2-low tumors compared to HER2-0 (median copy count: 1.79; P = 2.36e-6), with HER2-0 tumors harboring a higher rate of ERBB2 hemideletions (31.1% vs. 14.5%). No other genomic alteration reaches significance after accounting for multiple hypothesis testing, and no significant differences in tumor mutational burden are observed between HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors (median: 7.26 mutations/megabase vs. 7.60 mutations/megabase, p = 0.24). Here, we show that the genomic landscape of HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors does not differ significantly, apart from a higher ERBB2 copy count among HER2-low tumors, and a higher rate of ERBB2 hemideletions in HER2-0 tumors., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The combination of endocrine therapy (ET) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors (CDK4/6i) was a hallmark in metastatic luminal breast cancer (BC). However, intrinsic and acquired resistance affects long-term efficacy. Here, we study the role of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) pathway in CDK4/6i resistance. We find that RANK overexpression in luminal BC is associated with intrinsic resistance to CDK4/6i, both in vitro and in mouse xenografts, and decreased proliferation rate and chronic interferon (IFN) γ response are highlighted as resistance drivers. Gene expression data from the NeoPalAna CDK4/6i clinical trial, and studies with palbociclib-resistant cell lines, show that RANK is upregulated after treatment with CDK4/6i, supporting a role in acquired resistance. Our study shows that RANK ligand (RANKL) inhibitors can restore sensitivity to CDK4/6i and prevent acquired resistance. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that pharmacological inhibition of the RANK pathway through RANKL blocking could represent an add-on to ET + CDK4/6i, warranting further clinical studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests S.C., L.C., and E.G.S. received research support from Amgen Inc. in the form of supplies. E.G.S. has received funding from Amgen Inc. A.M., C.A., and R.S. have received honoraria as consultants/speakers and/or travel/logistics support from Amgen, Novartis, and Pfizer. L.C. and S.C. are inventors on a patent application directed to combination treatment with RANK pathway inhibitors and CDK inhibitors., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Approximately 80% of all breast cancers (BCs) are currently categorized as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative [immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0, 1+, or 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH) negative]; approximately 60% of BCs traditionally categorized as HER2-negative express low levels of HER2. HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) status became clinically actionable with approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan to treat unresectable/metastatic HER2-low BC. Greater understanding of patients with HER2-low disease is urgently needed., Patients and Methods: This global, multicenter, retrospective study (NCT04807595) included tissue samples from patients with confirmed HER2-negative unresectable/metastatic BC [any hormone receptor (HR) status] diagnosed from 2014 to 2017. Pathologists rescored HER2 IHC-stained slides as HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) or HER2 IHC 0 after training on low-end expression scoring using Ventana 4B5 and other assays at local laboratories (13 sites; 10 countries) blinded to historical scores. HER2-low prevalence and concordance between historical scores and rescores were assessed. Demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were examined., Results: In rescored samples from 789 patients with HER2-negative unresectable/metastatic BC, the overall HER2-low prevalence was 67.2% (HR positive, 71.1%; HR negative, 52.8%). Concordance was moderate between historical and rescored HER2 statuses (81.3%; κ = 0.583); positive agreement was numerically higher for HER2-low (87.5%) than HER2 IHC 0 (69.9%). More than 30% of historical IHC 0 cases were rescored as HER2-low overall (all assays) and using Ventana 4B5. There were no notable differences between HER2-low and HER2 IHC 0 in patient characteristics, treatments received, or clinical outcomes., Conclusions: Approximately two-thirds of patients with historically HER2-negative unresectable/metastatic BC may benefit from HER2-low-directed treatments. Our data suggest that HER2 reassessment in patients with historical IHC 0 scores may be considered to help optimize selection of patients for treatment. Further, accurate identification of patients with HER2-low BC may be achieved with standardized pathologist training., Competing Interests: Disclosure All authors received nonfinancial support (assistance with manuscript preparation) from Articulate Science, LLC, and Helios Medical Communications Ltd funded by AstraZeneca. Additional disclosures are as follows: GV reports consulting or advisory fees from Agilent, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, and Roche; participation in speakers bureaus and data safety monitoring advisory boards for Agilent, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo and MSD Oncology, and Roche; personal travel fees from AstraZeneca and Roche; and grants from Roche. MB reports consulting or advisory fees from AstraZeneca and Roche Canada; and contracted research funding from Pfizer Canada. NN reports grants from Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly, Mochida, Novartis, and Pfizer; and participation in speakers bureaus for AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer. ET reports consulting or advisory fees from Daiichi Sankyo and Lilly; and fees for non-CME services from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, and Lilly. SB reports consulting or advisory fees from AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; and contracted research funding from AstraZeneca, Lilly, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. FPL reports consulting or advisory fees from Agendia, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Exact Sciences, GSK, MammaPrint, MSD, Myriad Genetics, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, and Veracyte; contracted research funding from AstraZeneca, MammaPrint, MSD, Myriad Genetics, Roche, and Veracyte; and personal travel fees from AstraZeneca and Seagen. NH reports participation in speakers bureaus for AstraZeneca, Chugai, Genomic Health, Kirin, Novartis, and Pfizer. JS reports research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; and partnerships with Roche. RTS reports consulting and non-CME service fees from AstraZeneca, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer. AMB reports consulting or advisory fees from AbbVie, Agendia, Bayer, Biotheranostics, Coherus BioSciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Eisai, Genentech/Roche, General Electric, Gilead Sciences, Immunomedics, Merck, Michael J. Hennessy Associates, Myriad Genetics, Novartis, OncLive, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Seagen, and Tyme; and contracted research funding from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Merck, Novartis, and Puma Biotechnology. CSO reports consulting or advisory fees from Roche and Seagen; and participation in speakers bureaus for Lilly. FS reports no conflict of interests. GH reports being a shareholder in Rhythm Biosciences Limited. DV reports a consulting or advisory role with OPEN Health; employment with AstraZeneca and may own stock or stock options in that company. GDJ reports a consulting or advisory role with AstraZeneca/MedImmune. AM is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo and may own stock or stock options in that company. AL and VGM are employees of AstraZeneca and may own stock or stock options in that company. Data sharing Data underlying the findings described in this manuscript may be obtained in accordance with AstraZeneca’s data sharing policy described at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Data for studies directly listed on Vivli can be requested through Vivli at www.vivli.org. Data for studies not listed on Vivli could be requested through Vivli at https://vivli.org/members/enquiries-about-studies-not-listed-on-the-vivli-platform/. AstraZeneca Vivli member page is also available outlining further details: https://vivli.org/ourmember/astrazeneca/. Disclaimers Medical writing support was funded by AstraZeneca in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP) guidelines (http://www.ismpp.org/gpp-2022). The manuscript was reviewed for medical accuracy by AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo; however, the authors retained full control of the content and made the final decisions for all aspects of this article., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Photothermal therapy has emerged as a new promising strategy for the management of cancer, either alone or combined with other therapeutics, such as chemotherapy. The use of nanoparticles for multimodal therapy can improve treatment performance and reduce drug doses and associated side effects. Here we propose the development of a novel multifunctional nanosystem based on solid lipid nanoparticles co-loaded with gold nanorods and mitoxantrone and functionalized with folic acid for dual photothermal therapy and chemotherapy of breast cancer. Nanoparticles were produced using an economically affordable method and presented suitable physicochemical properties for tumor passive accumulation. Upon Near-Infrared irradiation (808 nm, 1.7 W cm -2 , 5 min), nanoparticles could effectively mediate a temperature increase of >20 °C. Moreover, exposure to light resulted in an enhanced release of Mitoxantrone. Furthermore, nanoparticles were non-hemolytic and well tolerated by healthy cells even at high concentrations. The active targeting strategy was found to be successful, as shown by the greater accumulation of the functionalized nanoparticles in MCF-7 cells. Finally, the combined effects of chemotherapy, light-induced drug release and photothermal therapy significantly enhanced breast cancer cell death. Overall, these results demonstrate that the developed lipid nanosystem is an efficient vehicle for breast cancer multimodal therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Nano-sized materials have been widely explored in the biomedicine field, especially due to their ability to encapsulate drugs intended to be delivered to cancer cells. However, systemically administered nanomaterials face several barriers that can hinder their tumor-homing capacity. In this way, researchers are now focusing their efforts in developing technologies that can deliver the nanoparticles directly into the tumor tissue. Particularly, hydrogels assembled using Thiol-Maleimide Michael type additions are emerging for this purpose due to their capacity to incorporate high nanoparticles' doses in a compact 3D structure as well as good chemical selectivity, biocompatibility, and straightforward preparation. Nevertheless, such hydrogels have been mostly prepared using synthetic polymers, which is not ideal due to their poor biodegradability. In this work, a novel natural polymer-based Thiol-Maleimide hydrogel was produced for application in breast cancer chemo-photothermal therapy. To obtain natural polymers compatible with this crosslinking chemistry, Hyaluronic acid was endowed with Thiol groups and deacetylated Chitosan was grafted with Maleimide groups. Parallelly, Doxorubicin loaded Dopamine-reduced graphene oxide (DOX/DOPA-rGO) was prepared for attaining Near Infrared (NIR) light responsive chemo-photothermal nanoagents. By simply mixing Hyaluronic Acid-Thiol, deacetylated Chitosan-Maleimide and DOX/DOPA-rGO, Thiol-Maleimide crosslinked hydrogels incorporating this nanomaterial could be assembled (DOX/DOPA-rGO@TMgel). When breast cancer cells were incubated with DOPA-rGO@TMgel and exposed to NIR light (photothermal therapy), their viability was reduced to about 59 %. On the other hand, DOX/DOPA-rGO@TMgel (chemotherapy) reduced cancer cells' viability to 50 %. In stark contrast, the combined action of DOX/DOPA-rGO@TMgel and NIR light decreased breast cancer cells' viability to just 21 %, highlighting its chemo-photothermal potential., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We aimed to report on long-term outcomes of patients with small, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab and to establish potential biomarkers to predict prognosis., Methods: In this open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients aged 18 years or older, with small (≤3 cm), node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were recruited from 16 institutions in 13 cities in the USA. Eligible patients were given intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 ) with intravenous trastuzumab (loading dose of 4 mg/kg, subsequent doses 2 mg/kg) weekly for 12 weeks, followed by trastuzumab (weekly at 2 mg/kg or once every 3 weeks at 6 mg/kg) for 40 weeks to complete a full year of trastuzumab. The primary endpoint was 3-year invasive disease-free survival. Here, we report 10-year survival outcomes, assessed in all participants who received protocol-defined treatment, with exploratory analyses using the HER2DX genomic tool. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00542451, and is closed to accrual., Findings: Between Oct 29, 2007, and Sept 3, 2010, 410 patients were enrolled and 406 were given adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab and included in the analysis. Mean age at enrolment was 55 years (SD 10·5), 405 (99·8%) of 406 patients were female and one (0·2%) was male, 350 (86·2%) were White, 28 (6·9%) were Black or African American, and 272 (67·0%) had hormone receptor-positive disease. After a median follow-up of 10·8 years (IQR 7·1-11·4), among 406 patients included in the analysis population, we observed 31 invasive disease-free survival events, of which six (19·4%) were locoregional ipsilateral recurrences, nine (29·0%) were new contralateral breast cancers, six (19·4%) were distant recurrences, and ten (32·3%) were all-cause deaths. 10-year invasive disease-free survival was 91·3% (95% CI 88·3-94·4), 10-year recurrence-free interval was 96·3% (95% CI 94·3-98·3), 10-year overall survival was 94·3% (95% CI 91·8-96·8), and 10-year breast cancer-specific survival was 98·8% (95% CI 97·6-100). HER2DX risk score as a continuous variable was significantly associated with invasive disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] per 10-unit increment 1·24 [95% CI 1·00-1·52]; p=0·047) and recurrence-free interval (1·45 [1·09-1·93]; p=0·011)., Interpretation: Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab is a reasonable treatment standard for patients with small, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. The HER2DX genomic tool might help to refine the prognosis for this population., Funding: Genentech., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SMT has received grant support (paid to institution) from AstraZeneca, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Genentech (Roche), Gilead, Exelixis, BMS, Eisai, NanoString, Cyclacel, Sanofi, Seagen, and Eli Lilly; and has received consulting or advisory board fees (paid to self) from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Genentech (Roche), Gilead, BMS, Eisai, Sanofi, SeaGen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Athenex, OncoPep, Kyowa Kirin Pharma, CytomX, Certara, Mersana Therapeutics, Ellipses Pharma, 4D Pharma, OncoSec, Infinity Therapeutics, BeyondSpring Pharma, OncXerna, Zymeworks, Zentalis, ARC Therapeutics, Reveal Genomics, Blueprint Medicines, Myovant, Umoja Biopharma, Stemline (Menarini), and Artios Biopharma. PT has received consulting or advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Lilly and has received payment or honoraria for educational events from AstraZeneca and Daiichi-Sankyo. NT has received honoraria for a Clinical Research Workshop at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. LP is an employee of Reveal Genomics and has a patent (EP 20 382 679.7—in vitro method for the prognosis of patients suffering from HER2-positive breast cancer). GV has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, GSK, Pierre Fabre, and Pfizer and has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca. CTD has received research funding from Genentech (Roche) and Puma and has received consulting fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, Gilead, Seagen, and Genentech (Roche). DAY has received funding (paid to institution) for the present manuscript from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; grant support (paid to institution) from Ambrx, Amgen, BIOMARIN, Biothera Pharmaceuticals, Clovis Pharma, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Lilly, Genentech (Roche), G1 Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Innocrin Pharmaceuticals, Macrogenics, MedImmune, Medivation, Merck, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pfizer, and Polyphor; and has received consulting fees (paid to institution) from AstraZeneca, Athenex, bioTheranostics, G1 Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Immunomedics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis. PKM has received support (paid to institution) for the present manuscript from Genentech; has participated on a data safety monitoring board for Genentech (Roche); has stock or stock options in Veracyte; and was a full-time employee of Veracyte at time of manuscript submission. KSA has received funding (paid to institution) for the present manuscript from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute for data management support. HSR has received grant funding (paid to UC Regents only) from Ambrx, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Genentech (Roche), Gilead Sciences, GSK, Lilly, Merck & Co, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, OBI Pharma, Pfizer, Pionyr Immunotherapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Oncology, and Veru; has received consulting fees from Puma, Napo Pharmaceuticals, and Blueprint; and has received support for attending meetings and travel from Merck, AstraZeneca, and Gilead. MJE has reported a PAM50 Bioinformatics for Prosigna royalty-bearing license to Veracyte; and and has been an employee of AstraZeneca since March 7, 2022 (AstraZeneca had no role in this study and the author's involvement in this study preceded his employment with AstraZeneca). LAC has received research funding (paid to institution) from Syndax, Novartis, NanoString Technologies, Seattle Genetics, Veracyte, and AstraZeneca and declares participation in uncompensated consulting activities for Eisai (to self), Sanofi (to self), Lilly (to self), Seagen (to self), Novartis (to institution), G1 Therapeutics (to institution), Genentech (Roche; to institution), GSK (to institution), AstraZeneca (to institution), and Daiichi-Sankyo (to institution). RBS has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Libbs, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, and Roche; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or education events from AstraZeneca, Libbs, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, and Roche; has received support for attending meetings and travel from Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD, and Roche; has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Roche; and is a member of the Clinical Research Committee of the Brazilian Society of Clinical Oncology. JGTZ has stock or stock options in Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF, iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF, iShares Biotechnology ETF, SPDR S&P Biotech ETF, Adaptive Biotechnologies, 2seventy bio, and bluebird bio. NW has received grant support from AstraZeneca; has received consulting fees from Relay Therapeutics, Flare Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, and Section 32; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Genentech; and has stock or stock options in Relay Therapeutics and Flare Therapeutics. AHP has received royalties from UpToDate. AGW has received grant support (paid to institution) from Macrogenics, Genentech, and Merck and has received consulting fees (paid to self) from AstraZeneca. CAH is Chief Executive Officer at the American Society of Clinical Oncology, which pays 100% of the author's personal annual earned income. IEK has received support for the present manuscript from Genentech (Roche); has received grant support from Macrogenics and Pfizer; has received consulting fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, Macrogenics, Roche, Seagen, and AstraZeneca; and has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Novartis, Merck, Daiichi-Sankyo, Macrogenics, Roche, Seagen, and AstraZeneca. AP has received funding for the present manuscript from Reveal Genomics; has received grants (paid to institution) from Roche, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Reveal Genomics; has received royalties or licenses from Reveal Genomics (paid to institution); has received consulting fees (paid to self) from Roche, Novartis, Daiicki-Sankyo, and AstraZeneca; has patents licensed to Reveal Genomics: HER2DX, ERBB2, and DNADX genomic tools; and has stock or stock options in Reveal Genomics and Oncolytics Biotech. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have been recently developed and introduced into clinical practice., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with confirmed HR+/HER2 metastatic breast cancer treated with hormonal therapy in combination with ribociclib (R), palbociclib (P), or abemaciclib (A)., Outcomes: median progression-free survival (mPFS), time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD), and objective response rate (ORR)., Results: Between January 2016 - June 2021, 142 patients were treated with an CDK4/6i (79 P, 42 R, 21 A). The median age was 59 years and 67.6% had recurrent disease. Roughly 35.2%, 36.6%, 28.2% of the patients had 1, 2 or 3+ metastatic sites, respectively, and 55.6% of the patients received CDK4/6i as a first-line treatment. The mPFS was 28m(R) vs. 14m(P) vs. 6m(A) (P = 0.002), with a higher proportion of patients receiving R in the first-line setting. However, no difference was seen when the analysis was restricted to the first-line scenario (P = 0.193). Sixty-four patients required one dose reduction, and 19 patients required two. ORR was 76.2% (R) vs 62% (P) vs 42.9% (A). More patients achieved a complete response with R and P, with no difference in the incidence of partial response and stable disease. Adverse events occurred in 94.4% of the population, with the most common grade 3-4 AE being neutropenia (59.1%)., Conclusions: Our results confirm the efficacy and tolerability of CDK4/6i in routine clinical practice. This is the first real-world data describing and comparing the efficacy and toxicity of CDK4/6i in the Brazilian population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Authors MMQ, RS, LJCO, and AK have no conflicts to declare. Author KPS reported consultant fees from Eurofarma and as a speaker from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Lilly. Author MFR received honoraria from Bristol-Myers-Squibb. Author LLG reported receiving speaker bureau fees from the companies Novartis, AstraZeneca. Author RDML participates in clinical studies sponsored by the company Daiichi-Sankyo, Lilly, Roche, MSD, Bayer, GSK, Pfizer; as a speaker for AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, Lilly, Zodiac, United Medical, Grunenthal, Roche; participated in scientific events for the companies Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Fleury, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer. Author MRSC reported receiving advisory board and presentations fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD, Lilly, Gilead, BMS, Agendia, Janssen, Sanofi. Author RBS reported receiving speaker bureau fees from Agilant, AstraZeneca, Daichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck, Libbs and Roche; he has also served as a consultant/ advisor for AstraZeneca, Daichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Libbs, Roche, Merck and has received support for attending medical conferences from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Daichi-Sankyo, and Merck. Author MS reported consultant fees from MSD, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo and Novartis. Author TSC participates in clinical studies sponsored by the company Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS; and reported receiving speaker bureau fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Novartis, Libs. Author MSM declares advisory engagements, presentations and educational expenses for Pfizer, Lilly and Novartis. DAS participates in clinical studies sponsored by the company Lilly, as a speaker at events for AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Advisory, GSK, Roche; board advisory for Gilead. AKS participates as a sub investigator in clinical studies sponsored by the company Pfizer, Lilly, MSD, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche; as a speaker for Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, Roche, Janssen, Amgen, Grunenthal., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Aims: To address the limitations of IR780 by preparing hydrophilic polymer-IR780 conjugates and to employ these conjugates in the assembly of nanoparticles (NPs) intended for cancer photothermal therapy. Materials & methods: The cyclohexenyl ring of IR780 was conjugated for the first time with thiol-terminated poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PEtOx). This novel poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-IR780 (PEtOx-IR) conjugate was combined with D-α-tocopheryl succinate (TOS), leading to the assembly of mixed NPs (PEtOx-IR/TOS NPs). Results: PEtOx-IR/TOS NPs displayed optimal colloidal stability as well as cytocompatibility in healthy cells at doses within the therapeutic range. In turn, the combination of PEtOx-IR/TOS NPs and near-infrared light reduced heterotypic breast cancer spheroid viability to just 15%. Conclusion: PEtOx-IR/TOS NPs are promising agents for breast cancer photothermal therapy.

Background: In early trials, hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to paclitaxel were common, thus prompting the administration of antihistamines and corticosteroids before every paclitaxel dose. We tested the safety of omitting corticosteroids after cycle 2 during the paclitaxel portion of the dose-dense (DD) doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC)-paclitaxel regimen., Patients, Materials, and Methods: In this prospective, single-arm study, patients who completed four cycles of DD-AC for stage I-III breast cancer received paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 every 2 weeks for four cycles. Patients received a standard premedication protocol containing dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and a histamine H2 blocker prior to the first two paclitaxel cycles. Dexamethasone was omitted in cycles three and four if there were no HSRs in previous cycles. We estimated the rate of grade 3-4 HSRs., Results: Among 127 patients enrolled, 125 received more than one dose of protocol therapy and are included in the analysis. Fourteen (11.2%; 90% confidence interval, 6.9%-20.0%) patients had any-grade HSRs, for a total of 22 (4.5%; 3.1%-6.4%) HSRs over 486 paclitaxel cycles. Any-grade HSRs occurred in 1.6% (0.3%-5.0%), 6.5% (3.3%-11.3%), 7.4% (3.9%-12.5%), and 2.6% (0.7%-6.6%) of patients after paclitaxel cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Dexamethasone use was decreased by 92.8% in cycles 3 and 4. Only one patient experienced grade 3 HSR in cycles 3 or 4, for a rate of grade 3/4 HSR 0.4% (0.02%-2.0%) (1/237 paclitaxel infusions). That patient had grade 2 HSR during cycle 2, and the subsequent grade 3 event occurred despite usual dexamethasone premedication. A sensitivity analysis restricted to patients not known to have received dexamethasone in cycles 3 and 4 found that any-grade HSRs occurred in 2.7% (3/111; 0.7%-6.8%) and 0.9% (1/109; 0.05%-4.3%) of patients in cycle 3 and 4, respectively., Conclusion: Corticosteroid premedication can be safely omitted in cycles 3 and 4 of dose-dense paclitaxel if HSRs are not observed during cycles 1 and 2., Implications for Practice: Because of the potential for hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to paclitaxel, corticosteroids are routinely prescribed prior to each dose, on an indefinite basis. This prospective study, including 125 patients treated with 486 paclitaxel cycles, demonstrates that corticosteroids can be safely omitted in future cycles if HSRs did not occur during cycles 1 and 2 of paclitaxel and that this strategy reduces the use of corticosteroids in cycles 3 and 4 by 92.8% relative to current standard of care., (© 2021 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.)

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. The conventional chemotherapeutic regimens used in the treatment of this disease often lead to severe side-effects and reduced efficacy. In this study, a novel drug delivery system for the chemotherapeutic drug mitoxantrone (Mito) was developed using solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN). The production of the SLN was carried out using an organic-solvent-free, low-cost method and optimized using a Box-Behnken design. SLN presented adequate size for cancer-related applications, more than 90% of EE% and remained stable for at least 6 months. A much higher drug release was obtained at acidic pH (mimicking the endosomal compartment) than plasmatic pH, highlighting the potential of the nanosystem for tumor drug delivery. Additionally, SLN were non-hemolytic and cytocompatible, even at high concentrations of lipid. A significantly higher anti-cancer efficacy was obtained for Mito-loaded SLN comparing to the free drug at different concentrations in MCF-7 2D models. Finally, the nanoformulation was evaluated in heterotypic breast cancer spheroids showing capacity to penetrate the tridimensional structure and ability to induce a high anti-tumoral effect, similarly to the free drug. Overall, these results support that the developed SLN are effective Mito nanocarriers for the treatment of breast cancer., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have minimal therapeutic effect in hormone receptor-positive (HR+ ) breast cancer. We present final overall survival (OS) results (n = 88) from a randomized phase 2 trial of eribulin ± pembrolizumab for patients with metastatic HR+ breast cancer, computationally dissect genomic and/or transcriptomic data from pre-treatment tumors (n = 52) for molecular associations with efficacy, and identify cytokine changes differentiating response and ICI-related toxicity (n = 58). Despite no improvement in OS with combination therapy (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.59-1.55, p = 0.84), immune infiltration and antigen presentation distinguished responding tumors, while tumor heterogeneity and estrogen signaling independently associated with resistance. Moreover, patients with ICI-related toxicity had lower levels of immunoregulatory cytokines. Broadly, we establish a framework for ICI response in HR+ breast cancer that warrants diagnostic and therapeutic validation. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03051659., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers minimally invasive means to repeatedly interrogate tumor genomes, providing opportunities to monitor clonal dynamics induced by metastasis and therapeutic selective pressures. In metastatic cancers, ctDNA profiling allows for simultaneous analysis of both local and distant sites of recurrence. Despite the promise of ctDNA sampling, its utility in real-time genetic monitoring remains largely unexplored., Methods: In this exploratory analysis, we characterize high-frequency ctDNA sample series collected over narrow time frames from seven patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, each undergoing treatment with Cabozantinib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (NCT01738438, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01738438 ). Applying orthogonal whole exome sequencing, ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing, and 396-gene targeted panel sequencing, we analyzed 42 plasma-derived ctDNA libraries, representing 4-8 samples per patient with 6-42 days between samples. Integrating tumor fraction, copy number, and somatic variant information, we model tumor clonal dynamics, predict neoantigens, and evaluate consistency of genomic information from orthogonal assays., Results: We measured considerable variation in ctDNA tumor faction in each patient, often conflicting with RECIST imaging response metrics. In orthogonal sequencing, we found high concordance between targeted panel and whole exome sequencing in both variant detection and variant allele frequency estimation (specificity = 95.5%, VAF correlation, r = 0.949), Copy number remained generally stable, despite resolution limitations posed by low tumor fraction. Through modeling, we inferred and tracked distinct clonal populations specific to each patient and built phylogenetic trees revealing alterations in hallmark breast cancer drivers, including TP53, PIK3CA, CDK4, and PTEN. Our modeling revealed varied responses to therapy, with some individuals displaying stable clonal profiles, while others showed signs of substantial expansion or reduction in prevalence, with characteristic alterations of varied literature annotation in relation to the study drug. Finally, we predicted and tracked neoantigen-producing alterations across time, exposing translationally relevant detection patterns., Conclusions: Despite technical challenges arising from low tumor content, metastatic ctDNA monitoring can aid our understanding of response and progression, while minimizing patient risk and discomfort. In this study, we demonstrate the potential for high-frequency monitoring of evolving genomic features, providing an important step toward scalable, translational genomics for clinical decision making.

Chemo-photothermal therapy (chemo-PTT) mediated by nanomaterials holds a great potential for cancer treatment. However, the tumor uptake of the systemically administered nanomaterials was recently found to be below 1%. To address this limitation, the development of injectable tridimensional polymeric matrices capable of delivering nanomaterials directly into the tumor site appears to be a promising approach. In this work, an injectable in situ forming ionotropically crosslinked chitosan-based hydrogel co-incorporating IR780 loaded nanoparticles (IR/BPN) and Doxorubicin (DOX) loaded nanoparticles (DOX/TPN) was developed for application in breast cancer chemo-PTT. The produced hydrogels (IR/BPN@Gel and IR/BPN+DOX/TPN@Gel) displayed suitable physicochemical properties and produced a temperature increase of about 9.1 °C upon exposure to Near Infrared (NIR) light. As importantly, the NIR-light exposure also increased the release of DOX from the hydrogel by 1.7-times. In the in vitro studies, the combination of IR/BPN@Gel with NIR light (photothermal therapy) led to a reduction in the viability of breast cancer cells to 35%. On the other hand, the non-irradiated IR/BPN+DOX/TPN@Gel (chemotherapy) only diminished cancer cells' viability to 85%. In contrast, the combined action of IR/BPN+DOX/TPN@Gel and NIR light reduced cancer cells' viability to about 9%, demonstrating its potential for breast cancer chemo-PTT., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Metastatic breast cancer remains an incurable disease, and new therapies are needed. One major limitation of chemotherapy is the toxicity associated with higher dose exposure. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a complex and evolving class of agents specifically designed with the objective of delivering antineoplastic medicines in the most precise and selectively targeted way. ADCs are composed of four key components: (1) the target antigen, (2) an antibody construct, (3) a payload (most commonly a cytotoxic agent), and (4) a linker moiety that couples the payload and the antibody. In this review, we discuss the clinical development of ADCs for the treatment of breast cancer, focusing on two recently FDA-approved agents, trastuzumab deruxtecan and sacituzumab govitecan, and discuss the ongoing efforts exploring new agents. Finally, we summarize the current portfolio of clinical trials that could change the algorithm of treatment for early and advanced breast cancer.

Aim: Enhance the colloidal stability and photothermal capacity of graphene oxide (GO) by functionalizing it with sulfobetaine methacrylate (SBMA)-grafted bovine serum albumin (BSA; i.e., SBMA- g -BSA) and by loading IR780, respectively. Materials & methods: SBMA- g -BSA coating and IR780 loading into GO was achieved through a simple sonication process. Results: SBMA- g -BSA-functionalized GO (SBMA-BSA/GO) presented an adequate size distribution and cytocompatibility. When in contact with biologically relevant media, the size of the SBMA-BSA/GO only increased by 8%. By loading IR780 into SBMA-BSA/GO, its photothermal capacity increased by twofold. The combination of near infrared light with SBMA-BSA/GO did not induce photocytotoxicity on breast cancer cells. In contrast, the interaction of IR780-loaded SBMA-BSA/GO with near infrared light caused the ablation of cancer cells. Conclusion: IR780-loaded SBMA-BSA/GO displayed an improved colloidal stability and phototherapeutic capacity.

Purpose: In contrast to recurrence after initial diagnosis of stage I-III breast cancer [recurrent metastatic breast cancer (rMBC)], de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) represents a unique setting to elucidate metastatic drivers in the absence of treatment selection. We present the genomic landscape of dnMBC and association with overall survival (OS)., Experimental Design: Targeted DNA sequencing (OncoPanel) was prospectively performed on either primary or metastatic tumors from 926 patients (212 dnMBC and 714 rMBC). Single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variations, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in treatment-naïve dnMBC primary tumors were compared with primary tumors in patients who ultimately developed rMBC, and correlated with OS across all dnMBC., Results: When comparing primary tumors by subtype, MYB amplification was enriched in triple-negative dnMBC versus rMBC (21.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.0005, q = 0.111). Mutations in KMTD2, SETD2 , and PIK3CA were more prevalent, and TP53 and BRCA1 less prevalent, in primary HR + /HER2 - tumors of dnMBC versus rMBC, though not significant after multiple comparison adjustment. Alterations associated with shorter OS in dnMBC included TP53 (wild-type: 79.7 months; altered: 44.2 months; P = 0.008, q = 0.107), MYC (79.7 vs. 23.3 months; P = 0.0003, q = 0.011), and cell-cycle (122.7 vs. 54.9 months; P = 0.034, q = 0.245) pathway genes. High TMB correlated with better OS in triple-negative dnMBC ( P = 0.041)., Conclusions: Genomic differences between treatment-naïve dnMBC and primary tumors of patients who developed rMBC may provide insight into mechanisms underlying metastatic potential and differential therapeutic sensitivity in dnMBC. Alterations associated with poor OS in dnMBC highlight the need for novel approaches to overcome potential intrinsic resistance to current treatments., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Importance: Prior studies have shown that only a small proportion of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) experience benefit from programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors given as monotherapy. There are data suggesting that activity may be greater with combination strategies., Objective: To compare the efficacy of eribulin plus pembrolizumab vs eribulin alone in patients with HR-positive, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative MBC., Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter phase 2 randomized clinical trial of patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative MBC who had received 2 or more lines of hormonal therapy and 0 to 2 lines of chemotherapy., Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to eribulin, 1.4 mg/m2 intravenously, on days 1 and 8 plus pembrolizumab, 200 mg/m2 intravenously, on day 1 of a 21-day cycle or eribulin alone. At time of progression, patients in the eribulin monotherapy arm could cross over and receive pembrolizumab monotherapy., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses assessed the association between PFS and PD-L1 status, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor mutational burden (TMB), and genomic alterations., Results: Eighty-eight patients started protocol therapy; the median (range) age was 57 (30-76) years, median (range) number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (0-2), and median (range) number of prior lines of hormonal therapy was 2 (0-5). Median follow-up was 10.5 (95% CI, 0.4-22.8) months. Median PFS and ORR were not different between the 2 groups (PFS, 4.1 vs 4.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.50-1.26; P = .33; ORR, 27% vs 34%, respectively; P = .49). Fourteen patients started crossover treatment with pembrolizumab; 1 patient experienced stable disease. All-cause adverse events occurred in all patients (grade ≥3, 65%) including 2 treatment-related deaths in the combination group, both from immune-related colitis in the setting of sepsis, attributed to both drugs. The PD-L1 22C3 assay was performed on archival tumor samples in 65 patients: 24 (37%) had PD-L1-positive tumors. Analysis indicated that PD-L1 status, TILs, TMB, and genomic alterations were not associated with PFS., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative MBC, the addition of pembrolizumab to eribulin did not improve PFS, ORR, or OS compared with eribulin alone in either the intention-to-treat or PD-L1-positive populations. Further efforts to explore the benefits of adding checkpoint inhibition to chemotherapy among less heavily pretreated patients are needed., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03051659.

Opinion Statement: Currently, only patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer whose tumors are PD-L1 positive are eligible for receiving immunotherapy. Other studies have explored new combinations with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in different disease settings and populations. Data from neoadjuvant trials testing the addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to standard treatment are promising and have led to increases in pathologic complete response rates; however, data on survival outcomes are still immature. There is still much work needed to optimize benefits of immunotherapy in breast cancer and correlative studies in patients treated with immunotherapy are urgently needed to inform the best strategies for further development.

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether combining pembrolizumab with palliative radiation therapy (RT) improves outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) metastatic breast cancer (MBC)., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had HR + /human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative MBC; were candidates for RT to ≥ 1 bone, soft tissue, or lymph node lesion; and had ≥ 1 lesion outside the RT field. Patients received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously 2 to 7 days prior to RT and on day 1 of repeating 21-day cycles. RT was delivered to a previously unirradiated area in 5 treatments each of 4 Gy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. The study used a 2-stage design: 8 women were enrolled into the first stage, and if at least 1 of 8 patients experienced an objective response, 19 more would be enrolled. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory endpoints included association of overall response rate with programmed death-ligand 1 status and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes., Results: Eight patients were enrolled in stage 1. The median age was 59 years, and the median prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease was 2. There were no objective responses, and the study was closed to further accrual. The median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% confidence interval, 0.4-2.1 months), and the median overall survival was 2.9 months (95% confidence interval, 0.9-3.6 months). All-cause adverse events occurred in 87.5% of patients, including just 1 grade 3 event (elevation of aspartate aminotransferase)., Conclusions: RT combined with pembrolizumab did not produce an objective response in patients with heavily pre-treated HR + MBC. Future studies should consider alternative radiation dosing and fractionation in patients with less heavily pre-treated HR + MBC., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

New insights about nanomaterials' biodistribution revealed their ability to achieve tumor accumulation by taking advantage from the dynamic vents occurring in tumor's vasculature. This paradigm-shift emphasizes the importance of extending nanomaterials' blood circulation time to enhance their tumor uptake. The classic strategy to improve nanomaterials' stability during circulation relies on their functionalization with poly(ethylene glycol). However, recent reports have been showing that PEGylated nanomaterials can suffer from the accelerated blood clearance phenomenon, emphasizing the importance of developing novel coatings for functionalizing the nanomaterials. To address this limitation, the modification of natural carriers' surface to enhance their stability appears to be a promising strategy. Herein, sulfobetaine methacrylate (SBMA)-functionalized bovine serum albumin (BSA) was synthesized for the first time to investigate the capacity of this modification to improve the resulting nanoparticles' physicochemical properties, colloidal stability and in vitro performance. This novel polymer was then employed in the formulation of nanoparticles loaded with IR780 for application in breast cancer phototherapy (IR/SBMA-BSA NPs). When compared to their non-functionalized equivalents, the IR/SBMA-BSA NPs presented a neutral surface charge and a higher stability in biologically relevant media. Due to these features, the IR/SBMA-BSA NPs could achieve a 1.9-fold greater uptake by breast cancer cells than IR/BSA NPs. Furthermore, the IR/SBMA-BSA NPs were cytocompatible towards normal cells and reduced breast cancer cells' viability up to 42%. The phototherapy mediated by IR/SBMA-BSA NPs could further decrease cancer cells' viability to about 12%. Overall, the IR/SBMA-BSA NPs have enhanced features that propel their application in breast cancer phototherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: High tumor mutation burden (TMB) can benefit immunotherapy for multiple tumor types, but the prevalence of hypermutated breast cancer is not well described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, mutational patterns, and genomic profile of hypermutated breast cancer., Patients and Methods: We used de-identified data from individuals with primary or metastatic breast cancer from six different publicly available genomic studies. The prevalence of hypermutated breast cancer was determined among 3969 patients' samples that underwent whole exome sequencing or gene panel sequencing. The samples were classified as having high TMB if they had ≥10 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb). An additional eight patients were identified from a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute cohort for inclusion in the hypermutated cohort. Among the patients with high TMB, the mutational patterns and genomic profiles were determined. A subset of patients was treated with regimens containing PD-1 inhibitors., Results: The median TMB was 2.63 mut/Mb. The median TMB significantly varied according to the tumor subtype (HR-/HER2- >HER2+ >HR+/HER2-, P < 0.05) and sample type (metastatic > primary, P = 2.2 × 10 -16 ). Hypermutated tumors were found in 198 patients (5%), with enrichment in metastatic versus primary tumors (8.4% versus 2.9%, P = 6.5 × 10 -14 ). APOBEC activity (59.2%), followed by mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd; 36.4%), were the most common mutational processes among hypermutated tumors. Three patients with hypermutated breast cancer-including two with a dominant APOBEC activity signature and one with a dominant MMRd signature-treated with pembrolizumab-based therapies derived an objective and durable response to therapy., Conclusion: Hypermutation occurs in 5% of all breast cancers with enrichment in metastatic tumors. Different mutational signatures are present in this population with APOBEC activity being the most common dominant process. Preliminary data suggest that hypermutated breast cancers are more likely to benefit from PD-1 inhibitors., Competing Interests: Disclosure RB-S has served as an advisor/consultant to Eli Lilly and Roche and has received honoraria from Eli Lilly, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squib, Novartis, and Pfizer. RB-S received travel, accommodations, or expenses from Roche. SMT receives institutional research funding from Novartis, Genentech, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Merck, Exelixis, Eisai, Bristol Meyers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Cyclacel, Immunomedics, Odonate, and Nektar. SMT has served as an advisor/consultant to Novartis, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Merck, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Puma, Genentech, Immunomedics, Nektar, Tesaro, and NanoString. EPW receives consulting fees from InfiniteMD and Leap Therapeutics, honoraria from Genentech, Roche, Tesaro, Lilly, and institutional research funding from Genentech. NUL has received institutional research funding from Genentech, Cascadian Therapeutics, Array Biopharma, Novartis, and Pfizer (all institutional). N.W. was previously a stockholder and consultant for Foundation Medicine, has been a consultant/advisor for Novartis and Eli Lilly, and has received sponsored research support from Novartis and Puma Biotechnology. None of these entities had any role in the conceptualization, design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The specific genes and molecules that drive physiological angiogenesis differ from those involved in pathological angiogenesis, suggesting distinct mechanisms for these seemingly related processes. Unveiling genes and pathways preferentially associated with pathologic angiogenesis is key to understanding its mechanisms, thereby facilitating development of novel approaches to managing angiogenesis-dependent diseases. To better understand these different processes, we elucidated the transcriptome of the mouse retina in the well-accepted oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) model of pathological angiogenesis. We identified 153 genes changed between normal and OIR retinas, which represent a molecular signature relevant to other angiogenesis-dependent processes such as cancer. These genes robustly predict the survival of breast cancer patients, which was validated in an independent 1,000-patient test cohort (40% difference in 15-year survival; p = 2.56 x 10-21). These results suggest that the OIR model reveals key genes involved in pathological angiogenesis, and these may find important applications in stratifying tumors for treatment intensification or for angiogenesis-targeted therapies., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: The number of people living with the side effects of breast cancer treatment (eg, loss of muscular mass and muscular strength, upper-limb mobility and disability, lymphedema, cardiac toxicity, and reduced quality of life) is increasing yearly. These consequences can be improved through exercise, specially combining resistance and aerobic training. Previous exercise trials have not been consistent in applying training principles and standardized reporting, and this partly explains the variability in obtained results. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a 12-week supervised resistance exercise program combined with home-based aerobic exercise, compared with home-based aerobic exercise only, on muscular strength and several aspects of health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors. To maximize transparency, replicability, and clinical applicability, the intervention is described following the consensus on exercise reporting template., Methods: This study is a parallel-group randomized controlled trial in which 60 female breast cancer survivors, who have completed central treatments of the disease in the last 5 years, will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group that will perform a total of 24 progressive resistance training sessions for 12 weeks (ie, 2 weeks of individual training and 10 weeks of micro-group training) and will be requested to undertake 10,000 steps/d, or a control group that will be requested to undertake 10,000 steps/d, only. Outcomes will be evaluated at baseline and at week 12. Primary outcome measure is peak isometric muscular strength of the lower- and upper-body, assessed with several exercises through an electromechanical dynamometer. Secondary outcomes include cardiorespiratory fitness, upper-joint mobility and disability, health-related quality of life, cancer-related fatigue, depression, life satisfaction, and presence of lymphedema., Discussion: This study aims to investigate the extent to which a 12-week supervised and progressive resistance exercise program, in addition to home-based aerobic physical activity, might improve muscular strength and health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors. The comprehensive description of the intervention will likely contribute to enhancing exercise prescription in this population., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN14601208.

IR780 is a near infrared (NIR) dye with a huge potential to be applied in cancer phototherapy and imaging. However, IR780 poor water solubility and acute cytotoxicity limit its direct use in cancer theragnostic. Herein, a novel Hyaluronic acid (HA)-based amphiphilic polymer was used, for the first time, in the preparation of polymeric nanoparticles (HPN) encapsulating IR780 aimed to be applied in breast cancer therapy. Furthermore, HPN co-encapsulating IR780 and Doxorubicin (DOX) were also produced in order to further enhance the therapeutic effectiveness of this nanoformulation. The results revealed that HPN were able to successfully encapsulate IR780 (IR-HPN) and the IR780-DOX combination (IR/DOX-HPN). Furthermore, the encapsulation of IR780 in HPN improved its absorption at 808 nm by about 2.2-fold, thereby enhancing its photothermal potential, as well as its cytocompatibility. The 2D in vitro cell uptake studies demonstrated that the nanostructures displayed a higher internalization by breast cancer cells than by normal cells. In addition, the assays performed in 3D in vitro models of breast cancer revealed that HPN can penetrate into spheroids. Furthermore, the 3D in vitro studies also demonstrated that the combined application of IR-HPN and NIR light was unable to induce cytotoxicity on spheroids. In contrast, IR/DOX-HPN produced a decrease on spheroids cells' viability, and their combination with NIR light induced an even stronger therapeutic effect, thus revealing the potential of these nanoparticles for cancer chemo-phototherapy., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous data suggest that the immune microenvironment plays a critical role in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive breast cancer; however, there is little known about the immune profiles of small HER2-positive tumors. In this study, we aimed to characterize the immune microenvironment of small HER2-positive breast cancers included in the Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer (APT) trial and to correlate the immune markers with pathological and molecular tumor characteristics., Patients and Methods: The APT trial was a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study of paclitaxel and trastuzumab in patients with node-negative HER2-positive breast cancer. The study included 406 patients with HER2-positive, node-negative breast cancer, measuring up to 3 cm. Exploratory analysis of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (by immunohistochemistry), and immune gene signatures using data generated by nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA), and their association with pathological and molecular characteristics was carried out., Results: Of the 406 patients, 328 (81%) had at least one immune assay carried out: 284 cases were evaluated for TIL, 266 for PD-L1, and 213 for immune gene signatures. High TIL (≥60%) were seen with greater frequency in hormone-receptor (HR) negative, histological grades 2 and 3, as well in HER2-enriched and basal-like tumors. Lower stromal PD-L1 (≤1%) expression was seen with greater frequency in HR-positive, histological grade 1, and in luminal tumors. Both TIL and stromal PD-L1 were positively correlated with 10 immune cell signatures, including Th1 and B cell signatures. Luminal B tumors were negatively correlated with those signatures. Significant correlation was seen among these immune markers; however, the magnitude of correlation did not indicate a monotonic relationship between them., Conclusion: Immune profiles of small HER2-positive breast cancers differ according to HR status, histological grade, and molecular subtype. Further work is needed to explore the implication of these findings on disease outcome., Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00542451., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Significant advances have occurred in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer that have changed its natural history. The addition of trastuzumab to standard therapy has dramatically improved the prognosis for patients with early stage, HER2-positive breast cancer to unprecedented survival outcomes. Yet, long-term follow-up data from adjuvant pivotal trials indicate that 15-24% of patients still develop recurrent disease. Most of the research has focused on the addition of novel anti-HER2 drugs to standard therapy, including studies evaluating the monoclonal antibody pertuzumab; the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1); the selective, reversible HER2/epidermal growth factor receptor kinase inhibitor lapatinib; or the irreversible pan-HER2 inhibitor neratinib. Dual HER2 blockade has improved overall survival remarkably in metastatic breast cancer; however, in patients with early stage disease, it has led to small benefits in progression-free survival. Moreover, biologic heterogeneity within HER2-positive disease may determine response to treatment and prognosis. Different subgroups of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer may benefit from different therapeutic approaches. Thus, there is ongoing work to optimize and de-escalate treatment in patients who may do just as well with less therapy and can avoid unnecessary treatments and their related toxicities. The objective of this review is to summarize the background and latest evidence on the current management of early stage, HER2-positive breast cancer and to present novel perspectives on its management., (© 2018 American Cancer Society.)

PEGylated graphene oxide (GO) nanomaterials have been showing promising results in cancer therapy, due to their drug loading and photothermal capacities. However, the recent reports regarding the immunogenicity of poly(ethylene glycol) based coatings highlight the importance of investigating alternative materials to functionalize GO. Herein, GO derivatives were functionalized for the first time with an amphiphilic polymer based on poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) and were co-loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) and D-α-Tocopherol succinate (TOS) to be applied in chemo-phototherapy of breast cancer cells. The results revealed that POxylated GO displays the required properties for application in cancer therapy. Moreover, the screening of different DOX:TOS combination ratios showed that the 1:3 DOX:TOS molar ratio produces an optimal synergistic therapeutic effect towards breast cancer cells. Furthermore, this drug ratio had a lower impact on normal cells. POxylated GO was then loaded with this drug combination in order to assess its chemo-phototherapeutic potential. The delivery of DOX:TOS by POxylated GO to cancer cells induced a stronger therapeutic effect than that attained with the free drug combination. Furthermore, an even greater cytotoxicity towards cancer cells was achieved by exposing DOX:TOS loaded POxylated GO to near infrared radiation. Overall, POxylated GO is a promising drug delivery and phototherapeutic agent., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The decision to offer adjuvant therapy to patients with early-stage cancer relies on factors related to the risk of disease recurrence, degree of benefit with the proposed therapy and the associated risk of toxicities. For patients with stages II and III HER2-positive breast cancer, administering 1 year of trastuzumab plus comprehensive chemotherapy is the standard of care. However, the pivotal adjuvant trials had very few older patients and patients with small HER2-positive tumors. In this review, we will discuss the clinical data regarding strategies to de-escalate adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with early stage HER2-positive disease.

Tumors develop numerous strategies to fine-tune inflammation and avoid detection and eradication by the immune system. The identification of mechanisms leading to local immune dysregulation is critical to improve cancer therapy. We here demonstrate that Interleukin-1 receptor 8 (IL-1R8 - previously known as SIGIRR/TIR8), a negative regulator of Toll-Like and Interleukin-1 Receptor family signaling, is up-regulated during breast epithelial cell transformation and in primary breast tumors. IL-1R8 expression in transformed breast epithelial cells reduced IL-1-dependent NF-κB activation and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, inhibited NK cell activation and favored M2-like macrophage polarization. In a murine breast cancer model (MMTV-neu), IL-1R8-deficiency reduced tumor growth and metastasis and was associated with increased mobilization and activation of immune cells, such as NK cells and CD8+ T cells. Finally, immune-gene signature analysis in clinical specimens revealed that high IL-1R8 expression is associated with impaired innate immune sensing and T-cell exclusion from the tumor microenvironment. Our results indicate that high IL-1R8 expression acts as a novel immunomodulatory mechanism leading to dysregulated immunity with important implications for breast cancer immunotherapy.

Introduction: The necessity of using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) during dose-dense (DD) paclitaxel (T) after doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) is unclear., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including patients with stage I-III breast cancer treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute with adjuvant DD-ACT between January 2011 and December 2013. Descriptive analyses evaluating patterns of G-CSF utilization during T were performed., Results: Overall, 156 patients were treated with DD-ACT by 26 providers. The majority of patients (135, 87%) received at least one dose of G-CSF during T (group 1), 17% of these patients received it in only one cycle and 48% received it in all four cycles. Reasons for omitting G-CSF included high baseline absolute neutrophil count and pain. Twenty-one (13%) patients did not receive any G-CSF during T (group 2). Respectively, 94% and 90% of patients completed the treatment in groups 1 and 2. There were no cases of treatment cessation due to neutropenia. Six percent of patients in group 1 had at least one treatment delay. There were no treatment delays reported in group 2. Variation in the use of G-CSF by provider and by patient was found, with 11 providers choosing not to use G-CSF in at least one patient., Conclusions: We identified substantial variation in the use of G-CSF within the practice. However, omission of G-CSF was not associated with treatment delays or adverse events. Prospective studies are warranted to formally test whether routine G-CSF is necessary during dose-dense T therapy., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate factors associated with non identification of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in lymphoscintigraphy of breast cancer patients and analyze the relationship with SLN metastases., Material and Methods: A single-center, cross-sectional and retrospective study was performed. Forty patients with lymphoscintigraphy without sentinel lymph node identification (negative lymphoscintigraphy - NL) were enrolled. The control group included 184 patients with SLN identification (positive lymphoscintigraphy - PL). Evaluated factors were age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, histology, localization, preoperative breast lesion hookwire (harpoon) marking and SLN metastases. The statistical analysis was performed with uni- and multivariate logistic regression models and matched-pairs analysis., Results: Age (p=0.036) or having BMI (p=0.047) were the only factors significantly associated with NL. Being ≥60 years with a BMI ≥30 increased the odds of having a NL 2 and 3.8 times, respectively. Marking with hookwire seems to increase the likelihood of NL, but demonstrated statistical significance is lacking (p=0.087). The other tested variables did not affect the examination result. When controlling for age, BMI and marking with the harpoon, a significant association between lymph node metastization and NL was not found (p=0.565)., Conclusions: The most important factors related with non identification of SLN in the patients were age, BMI and marking with hook wire. However, only the first two had statistical importance. When these variables were controlled, no association was found between NL and axillary metastases., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and SEMNIM. All rights reserved.)

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has practical and theoretical advantages over adjuvant chemotherapy strategy in breast cancer (BC) management. Moreover, metronomic delivery has a more favorable toxicity profile. The present study examined the feasibility of neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy in two cohorts [HER2+ (TraQme) and HER2- (TAME)] of locally advanced BC. Twenty patients were prospectively enrolled (TraQme, n=9; TAME, n=11). Both cohorts received weekly paclitaxel at 100 mg/m(2) during 8 weeks followed by weekly doxorubicin at 24 mg/m(2) for 9 weeks in combination with oral cyclophosphamide at 100 mg/day (fixed dose). The HER2+ cohort received weekly trastuzumab. The study was interrupted because of safety issues. Thirty-six percent of patients in the TAME cohort and all patients from the TraQme cohort had stage III BC. Of note, 33% from the TraQme cohort and 66% from the TAME cohort displayed hormone receptor positivity in tumor tissue. The pathological complete response rates were 55% and 18% among patients enrolled in the TraQme and TAME cohorts, respectively. Patients in the TraQme cohort had more advanced BC stages at diagnosis, higher-grade pathological classification, and more tumors lacking hormone receptor expression, compared to the TAME cohort. The toxicity profile was also different. Two patients in the TraQme cohort developed pneumonitis, and in the TAME cohort we observed more hematological toxicity and hand-foot syndrome. The neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy regimen evaluated in this trial was highly effective in achieving a tumor response, especially in the HER2+ cohort. Pneumonitis was a serious, unexpected adverse event observed in this group. Further larger and randomized trials are warranted to evaluate the association between metronomic chemotherapy and trastuzumab treatment.

In recent years, a number of new molecules - commonly known as biological therapies - have been approved or are in late stages of regulatory evaluation for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. These innovative compounds have improved treatment efficacy and have probably contributed to the increase in survival length observed in some breast cancer subtypes. However, these agents are not deprived of toxicity, which can impair quality of life and may occasionally be life-threatening. In this article, we reviewed the most common toxicities associated with these drugs and provided a number of practical recommendations on their optimal clinical management., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Minimally invasive surgical techniques have extended to all the fields of surgery. Breast surgery can also benefit from these concepts because of their special characteristics, reduction of aggressiveness, avoiding or hiding scars. The aim of our work is to introduce a new surgical approach for the resection of a large volume of breast parenchyma, including complete subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction using a pure muscular latissimus dorsi flap, with or without prosthetic material, through a minimal cutaneous incision., Patients and Method: Retrospective analysis of our series of 5 cases using our surgical technique which allows us to establish proper indications. We analyse the technical details, complications and results., Results: Five patients were operated using this technique (1 giant hamartoma, 1 multicentred in situ carcinoma with Paget's disease, 1 multicentred infiltrating carcinoma and 2 malignant tumours arising in the external part of the breast). We performed oncological resections (2 partial resections and 3 complete subcutaneous mastectomies) including sentinel lymph node biopsy or total axillary lymphadenectomy. After a mean follow-up of 10 months no local relapses were found and the cosmetic results were excellent., Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgical techniques through a posterior axillary line vertical incision enable total or partial subcutaneous mastectomy and a breast reconstruction, using muscular flaps or prosthetic material, to be performed.

Aim: To evaluate the use of local transdermic anesthetics in fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in breast lesions., Methods: Prospective randomized study of 119 patients having breast lesions, all being indicated for FNAB. The patients were divided into three groups: 40 patients entered in the active group (lidocaine + prilocaine); 40 patients underwent the placebo group (aqueous extract of Triticum vulgaris); and a control group of 39 women in whom FNAB was performed without the administration of any substance. Both the anesthetic and placebo were administered an hour before FNAB. Pain was quantified through a visual analogic scale of pain. The type of pain was also classified in terms of occurrence: only during the puncture, only during the movements and both., Results: The visual linear analogic scale of pain showed an average of 3.3 in the active group, 3.5 in the placebo and 4.0 in the control group (NS). Analysis of the type of pain which was referred by the patient showed that 15% of the patients in the active group, 12.5% of those in the placebo group and 5.1% in the control group did not refer to any sensation of pain. Pain, when felt, was similar in all three groups (p < 0.4)., Conclusions: Both the quantification and the type of pain referred to were similar in all three groups. However, there was a tendency of the patient to refer to less pain when the active substance or the placebo were used, when results were compared to the control group.