Search

Objective: Pathologic tumor size assessment highly depends on the gross specimen size once microscopic cancer size exceeds its macroscopic size, in particular if the dimension along the plane of sectioning is the greatest. We hypothesize that the method by which the specimen size is estimated can yield significantly different tumor size measurements and thus affect breast cancer staging and treatment., Methods: The size in the plane of sectioning of 50 lumpectomies over 4 cm was examined by 5 methods: measured grossly in the fresh state and postfixation, and calculated from the gross measurements by 3 different methods. For 15 mastectomies, we measured and calculated the span of the middle 4 and 6 slices using 3 methods., Results: For all 50 lumpectomies, fresh measurement yielded the largest size. The difference in size of lumpectomies was greater with increasing specimen size ( P < .001). Using the method of adding 0.4 cm per each submitted sequential section yielded the smallest size in most cases. In mastectomies the span of the middle 4 and 6 slices was significantly larger if calculated from the average slice thickness based on the specimen size., Conclusion: The method of specimen size measurement has implications in estimation of tumor size and patient management. It is essential that pathologists be aware of the technique used and its limitations. For individual slice thickness, we highly recommend using the measurements obtained at the time of grossing rather than calculating the average slice thickness from the specimen size.

Context.—: The use of neoadjuvant therapy in the management of early-stage invasive breast cancer is increasing. Residual Cancer Burden and other similar tools use pathologic characteristics of post-neoadjuvant therapy breast tumors to determine long-term outcome. However, there are no standardized guidelines for the pathologic evaluation of these specimens in the routine clinical setting., Objective.—: To assess current practices among Canadian pathologists and pathology assistants with regard to the processing and reporting of post-neoadjuvant therapy breast specimens., Design.—: An electronic survey was distributed to pathologists and pathology assistants across Canada., Results.—: Sixty-three responses were obtained. A total of 48% (15 of 31) of surveyed pathologists reported familiarity with the Residual Cancer Burden tool. A total of 40% (25 of 63) of respondents reported a lack of routine use of specimen photography, and 35% (22 of 63) reported a lack of routine use of grossing diagrams. There was significant variation with respect to tumor bed sampling; the most common method was to submit 1 block per centimeter of tumor (20 of 63; 32%). There was also significant variation in the method of measuring residual tumor; the most common method was to measure the largest cross-section of residual tumor (16 of 32; 50%)., Conclusions.—: There is a need for standardization of the evaluation of post-neoadjuvant therapy breast specimens in the routine clinical setting in Canada. We recommend the routine use of specimen mapping, submitting the largest cross section of tumor bed in toto, reporting tumor size as per American Joint Committee on Cancer and Residual Cancer Burden guidelines, and routinely including measurements of residual tumor cellularity and in situ disease in the final pathology report as per Residual Cancer Burden guidelines., (© 2020 College of American Pathologists.)

Background/aim: Accurate and timely assessment of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) overexpression is pivotal for the identification of breast cancer (BC) patients that could benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. Currently approved tissue-based HER2 assays (tHER2) are limited to testing HER2 status on tumor samples obtained at a few points in time during the course of the disease. Herein, we assessed serum HER2 (sHER2) status longitudinally in 81 serial samples prospectively collected from 43 consenting patients pre- and post-therapy to revisit the idea of serum testing in the follow-up of BC patients., Patients and Methods: The cohort included 11 patients with early BC (EBC), 17 with locally advanced BC (LABC), and 15 with metastatic BC (MBC). sHER2 concentrations were measured using a quantitative ELISA-based technique, using 15 ng/ml as the cut-off for positivity., Results: At baseline, sHER2 was negative in all EBC patients while positive in 1 LABC and 5 MBC patients. Sixteen BC patients (10 LABC, 1 EBC, and 5 MBC) were tHER2 positive. sHER2 and tHER2 results were discordant in 14 patients. Among the 16 tHER2 positive patients, 9 LABC, 1 EBC and 2 MBC patients were sHER2 negative. Conversely, 2 MBC patients were sHER2 positive, despite being tHER2 negative. A rise or drop of sHER2 by >20% correlated with disease progression or pathological response to therapy, respectively., Conclusion: The study demonstrated the technical validity and feasibility of the sHER2 assay. Findings suggest that post initial tissue diagnosis (tHER2), sHER2 assay may supplement subsequent tissue tests to monitor disease status and response to therapy. Further studies to assess the role of HER2 targeted therapies in sHER-positive/tHER2-negative cases upon disease progression are warranted., (Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a neoplastic proliferation of mammary ductal epithelial cells confined to the ductal-lobular system, and a non-obligate precursor of invasive disease. While there has been a significant increase in the diagnosis of DCIS in recent years due to uptake of mammography screening, there has been little change in the rate of invasive recurrence, indicating that a large proportion of patients diagnosed with DCIS will never develop invasive disease. The main issue for clinicians is how to reliably predict the prognosis of DCIS in order to individualize patient treatment, especially as treatment ranges from surveillance only, breast-conserving surgery only, to breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy and/or hormonal therapy, and mastectomy with or without radiotherapy. We conducted a semi-structured literature review to address the above issues relating to "pure" DCIS. Here we discuss the pathology of DCIS, risk factors for recurrence, biomarkers and molecular signatures, and disease management. Potential mechanisms of progression from DCIS to invasive cancer and problems faced by clinicians and pathologists in diagnosing and treating this disease are also discussed. Despite the tremendous research efforts to identify accurate risk stratification predictors of invasive recurrence and response to radiotherapy and endocrine therapy, to date there is no simple, well-validated marker or group of variables for risk estimation, particularly in the setting of adjuvant treatment after breast-conserving surgery. Thus, the standard of care to date remains breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy, with or without hormonal therapy. Emerging tools, such as pathologic or biologic markers, may soon change such practice. Our review also includes recent advances towards innovative treatment strategies, including targeted therapies, immune modulators, and vaccines.

Background: Although the rate of carcinoma upgrade for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB) is variable, current standard treatment consists of surgical excision (SE) for all ADH CNB diagnoses. Our objective was to identify features of ADH on CNB that may stratify carcinoma upgrade risk on SE., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed cases diagnosed as ADH on CNB. An independent slide review and detailed analysis of radiological and clinical data was performed. Statistical analyses were used to identify predictors for upgrade. Using variables predictive of upgrade, a model to stratify the probability of upgrade of ADH diagnosed on CNB was constructed., Results: We identified 124 ADH cases with subsequent SE. Of these, 62 cases (50%) were upgraded to carcinoma. Features predictive of upgrade were as follows: diagnosis of "At least ADH", percentage of cores involved by ADH, radiologic lesion size, presence of ipsilateral carcinoma, and patient age. A 4-tiered predictive model using percentage of cores involved by ADH, histologic extent of ADH, radiologic lesion size, and patient age was constructed. This predictive model has a fair accuracy, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.76., Conclusion: We have identified several predictors of carcinoma upgrade for ADH diagnosed on CNB. Our predictive model may be used to stratify the risk of carcinoma upgrade on SE., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Shift toward minimizing axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast cancer post neoadjuvant therapy has led to the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes by frozen section intraoperatively to determine the need for axillary lymph node dissection. However, few studies have examined the accuracy of sentinel lymph node frozen section after neoadjuvant therapy. Our objective is to compare the accuracy of sentinel lymph node frozen section in patients with breast cancer with and without neoadjuvant therapy and to identify features that may influence accuracy., Design: We identified 161 sentinel lymph node frozen section from 77 neoadjuvant therapy patients and 255 sentinel lymph node frozen section from 88 non-neoadjuvant therapy patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 in 2 institutions. The frozen section diagnoses were compared to the final diagnoses, and clinicopathologic data were analyzed., Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of frozen section analysis were comparable between neoadjuvant therapy patients and non-neoadjuvant therapy patients (71.9% vs 50%, 100% vs 100%, and 88.3% vs 81.8%). Nine (11.7%) of 77 neoadjuvant therapy patients had discordant results, most often due to undersampling (tumor absent on frozen section slide). Four of these patients subsequently underwent axillary lymph node dissection. Discordant results (all false negatives) were significantly more likely in neoadjuvant therapy patients with Estrogen Receptor-positive/HER2-negative status, and in sentinel lymph node with pN1mic and pN0i+ deposits; age, preneoadjuvant therapy lymph node status, histotype, nuclear grade, tumor size, and response to neoadjuvant therapy showed no significant differences. For non-neoadjuvant therapy cases, large tumor size, lobular histotype, and sentinel lymph node with pN1mic and pN0i+ were associated with false-negative frozen section assessment., Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node frozen section diagnosis post-neoadjuvant therapy has comparable sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to the sentinel lymph node frozen section diagnosis in the non-neoadjuvant therapy setting.

Mammary fibroepithelial lesions encompass a wide spectrum of tumors ranging from an indolent fibroadenoma to potentially fatal malignant phyllodes tumor. The criteria used for their classification based on morphological assessment are often challenging to apply and there is no consensus as to what constitutes an adequate resection margin. We studied a retrospective cohort of 213 fibroepithelial lesions in 178 patients (80 fibroadenomas with unusual features and 133 phyllodes tumors: 63 benign, 41 borderline, and 29 malignant) in order to describe the spectrum of changes within each group, with special emphasis on margin evaluation. Outcome data were available for 153 fibroepithelial lesions in 139 patients (median 56 months, range 3-249 months). Positive final margin (tumor transected), age < 50 years and a predominantly myxoid stroma were statistically significant predictors of local recurrence, while age > 50, stromal overgrowth, diffuse marked atypia, necrosis and mitotic index of ≥ 10 per 10 HPF were predictive of distant metastases. Tumors with satellite/bulging nodules were at a significantly higher risk to have a final positive resection margin. Our findings highlight important aspects of the interpretation and reporting of fibroepithelial lesions: the amount of myxoid stroma and the presence of satellite nodules are clinically relevant and should be routinely assessed and reported; infiltrative border might not be a prerequisite for the diagnosis of malignant phyllodes tumor, while the presence of tumor necrosis, massive stromal overgrowth or mitotic index of ≥ 25 per 10 HPF is diagnostic of malignant phyllodes tumor. On the other hand, increased mitotic index outside of the range of the World Health Organization guidelines in the absence of other worrisome features should be treated with caution, as it can be found in benign tumors.

Objective: To identify quantitative histological features that can differentiate between low grade ductal carcinoma in situ (LG-DCIS) and classic type lobular carcinoma in situ (C-LCIS)., Study Design: Regions of solid intraductal proliferation from scanned hematoxylin and eosin images of LG-DCIS (20 cases) and C-LCIS (25 cases) were analyzed using Mercator Version 1.0 (ExploraNova, La Rochelle, France). The system detects structures based on optical density. Multiple variables were measured, including estimators of size (mean nuclear area), shape (form factor), and staining (grayscale value). We also calculated the percentage that nuclei, cytoplasm, and white space represent in the total gland surface area., Results: C-LCIS showed higher mean nuclear area, higher percentage of nuclear area, higher nuclear and cytoplasmic grayscale values, and lower percentage of cytoplasm area as compared to LG-DCIS. Combination of these variables using a random forest learning algorithm classified correctly 80% of LG-DCIS cases and 69% of C-LCIS cases., Conclusion: Morphometric analysis is potentially a useful ancillary tool in the distinction between low-grade ductal and lobular in situ proliferations of the breast.

Objectives: High-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (HG-DCIS) of the breast often shows tumor attenuation and reactive fibrosis. These changes, previously described as "regressive," have been paradoxically associated with an increased risk of invasive carcinoma. We aimed to further characterize the spectrum of the so-called regressive changes (RCs) in HG-DCIS., Methods: We reviewed 52 consecutive cases of HG-DCIS on biopsy specimens followed by excision. RCs were divided into early (stage 1) and advanced (stages 2 and 3) stages according to the degree of ductal fibrosis and tumor effacement. The presence of inflammation, hormone receptor status, and diagnosis on excision were recorded., Results: RCs were seen in 51 (98%) cases: 96%, 76.4%, and 39.2% cases showed stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Periductal T cells with a normal CD4/CD8 ratio were constantly seen. Advanced RCs and inflammation were more frequent in estrogen and progesterone receptor-negative tumors. RCs were not associated with invasion but correlated with a larger residual HG-DCIS volume on excision., Conclusions: Regression in HG-DCIS is frequent. It may reflect a targeted immune response to certain phenotypes, mainly hormone receptor-negative lesions. Nonetheless, RCs do not lead to complete tumor obliteration but correlate with aggressive tumor characteristics instead., (Copyright© by the American Society for Clinical Pathology.)

Objective: To identify morphometric features unique to flat epithelial atypia associated with cancer using digital image analysis., Study Design: Cases with diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia were retrieved and divided into 2 groups: flat epithelial atypia associated with invasive or in situ carcinoma (n = 31) and those without malignancy (n = 27). Slides were digitally scanned. Nuclear features were analyzed on representative images at 20x magnification using digital morphometric software., Results: Parameters related to nuclear shape and size (diameter, perimeter) were similar in both groups. However, cases with malignancy had significantly higher densitometric green (p = 0.02), red (p = 0.03), and grey (p = 0.02) scale levels as compared to cases without cancer. A mean grey densitometric level > 119.45 had 71% sensitivity and 70.4% specificity in detecting cases with concomitant carcinoma., Conclusion: Morphometry of features related to nuclear staining appears to be useful in predicting risk of concurrent malignancy in patients with flat epithelial atypia, when added to a comprehensive histopathologic evaluation.