Search

Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P<0.00001) for an intake of 35-44 g per day alcohol, and 1.46 (1.33-1.61, P<0.00001) for >/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P<0.00001) for each additional 10 g per day intake of alcohol, i.e. for each extra unit or drink of alcohol consumed on a daily basis. This increase was the same in ever-smokers and never-smokers (7.1% per 10 g per day, P<0.00001, in each group). By contrast, the relationship between smoking and breast cancer was substantially confounded by the effect of alcohol. When analyses were restricted to 22 255 women with breast cancer and 40 832 controls who reported drinking no alcohol, smoking was not associated with breast cancer (compared to never-smokers, relative risk for ever-smokers=1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.07, and for current smokers=0.99, 0.92-1.05). The results for alcohol and for tobacco did not vary substantially across studies, study designs, or according to 15 personal characteristics of the women; nor were the findings materially confounded by any of these factors. If the observed relationship for alcohol is causal, these results suggest that about 4% of the breast cancers in developed countries are attributable to alcohol. In developing countries, where alcohol consumption among controls averaged only 0.4 g per day, alcohol would have a negligible effect on the incidence of breast cancer. In conclusion, smoking has little or no independent effect on the risk of developing breast cancer; the effect of alcohol on breast cancer needs to be interpreted in the context of its beneficial effects, in moderation, on cardiovascular disease and its harmful effects on cirrhosis and cancers of the mouth, larynx, oesophagus and liver.

This cross-sectional panel study determined the baseline knowledge about breast cancer and the attitudes on breast examination of nurses and midwives assigned at the different health centers in Metro Manila, and determined their sensitivity in detecting breast lumps after teaching them the Mamma-Care technique of breast examination, before they began to implement breast examination in the field. 225 nurses and midwives from a randomly selected 101 health centers in Metro Manila participated in a training seminar regarding breast cancer screening. They were given questionnaires to determine their baseline knowledge (multiple choice objective questionnaires) and attitudes (Liker-scale questionnaire) regarding their implementation of breast exam in the field. During the seminar, they were taught the Mamma-Care technique of breast examination with the aid of a videotape and lecture demonstration. They were then asked to examine silicone breast models which contain lumps of varying sizes (2 cm), mobility and hardness. Their sensitivity (through positive lumps detected by examination/total number of lumps in the breast model) in detecting lumps was then evaluated. Correct pretest knowledge on breast cancer symptoms, risk factors, treatment and screening were 83%, 64%, 86%, and 82%, respectively, which improved after training for 93%, 75%, 93%, and 92%, respectively. Trends in attitudes regarding implementation of breast exam were favorable. Sensitivity rates were 100% (33 nurses/midwives), 80% (48 n/m), 60% (n/m), 20% (17 n/m), and 0% (2 n/m). Overall sensitivity rate was 62%. Training and practice of skills among health center workers would enhance the Department of Health program on early detection of breast cancer in the Philippines.

Hospital visitor-companions are being used as a source of controls in an ongoing case-control study on breast cancer in the Philippines. As a tool for rapid epidemiologic assessment in obtaining research data for case-control studies, visitor-companions may serve as an alternative source of controls. To determine their generalizability and consistency, this proposed group was compared to neighbourhood controls and to hospital-patient controls. Hospital visitor-companions were comparable to neighbourhood controls in terms of cooperation in the interviews, height, weight, marital status, longest residence, education, cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, annual income, proportion with salaried jobs, ownership of house, land, and business, number of people living in the house, number of siblings, medical history, parity, menopausal status, breast feeding practices, and use of oral contraceptives. Neighbourhood controls however had longer interview durations than visitor-companion controls (p less than 0.05). Hospital-patient controls were less likely to breast feed, had lower alcohol intake, and had more exposure to chronic diseases and diagnostic x-ray than visitor-companion or neighbourhood controls (p less than 0.05). It was concluded that visitor-companions may usefully serve as an alternative source of controls for case-control studies when their limitations are taken into consideration during analysis.

The efficacy and tolerability of the combined scheme of administering high dose medroxyprogesterone acetate in advanced breast cancer is evaluated.