1. Consequences of Discontinuing a 4/6 Cyclin D-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor During Endocrine Treatment in Hormone-Sensitive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in the Context of the COVID-19 Outbreak.
- Author
-
Martin S, Pflumio C, Trensz P, Schaff-Wendling F, Weindling MK, Fischbach C, Pierard L, Limacher JM, Nader R, Velten M, and Petit T
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 antagonists & inhibitors, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6 antagonists & inhibitors, Disease Progression, Hormones, Retrospective Studies, Neoplasm Metastasis, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Breast Neoplasms pathology, COVID-19, Protein Kinase Inhibitors administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: The impact of some hasty medical decision made during the first wave of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown. We have evaluated the consequences of one of these precautionary measures: the withdrawal of the cyclin D-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in patients whose metastatic disease was controlled by a combination of endocrine treatment and CDK 4/6i., Method: This study was noninterventional, retrospective, multicentric, and included 60 patients with HR+ HER2- metastatic disease. Their disease was controlled with the combination of endocrine treatment and CDK 4/6i. The CDK 4/6i was stopped for two months during the first COVID-19 outbreak. A univariate analysis was performed to assess the risk factors associated with disease progression., Results: During this therapeutic break, 22 (37 %) patients had a radiological and/or clinical disease progression. Among them, the CDK 4/6i was re-introduced to 16 patients (n = 16/22; 73 %). A new line of treatment (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) was initiated due to the rapid symptomatic tumor progression in four patients (n = 4/22; 18 %). Two patients (n = 2/22) died in visceral crisis before another anti-tumoral treatment was introduced. In univariate analysis, the presence of liver metastases increased the risk of metastatic disease progression during the withdrawal of the CDK 4/6 (OR = 6.6; 95 % CI 1.87-23.22; P= .0033)., Conclusion: Progression was observed in 37% of patients during the two-month treatment interruption of the CDK 4/6i. A prolonged CDK 4/6i treatment interruption in patients with clinical benefit on endocrine treatment does not seem to be a reasonable option in light of these results., Competing Interests: Disclosures T.P. reports grants from Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Pierre Fabre, but which were unrelated to the submitted work. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF