Search

Purpose: To analyze serum estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) during letrozole treatment and their association to Quality of Life (QoL) and side-effects., Methods: Postmenopausal breast cancer patients starting adjuvant letrozole were eligible. Serum samples were taken at baseline, three, and 12 months. E2 and FSH were measured with routine chemiluminescent immunoassays. E2 and E1 were analyzed after trial completion with a highly sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (LC-MS/MS) with lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) of 5 pmol/L. QoL was measured at baseline and at 12 months with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 and the Women's Health questionnaires, and menopause-related symptoms with the modified Kupperman Index., Results: Of 100 screened patients 90 completed the trial. Baseline mean LC-MS/MS E2 and E1 were 12 pmol/L (range < 5-57) and 66 pmol/L (< 5-226), respectively. E2 levels measured by immunoassay and LC-MS/MS showed no correlation. E2 and E1 were completely suppressed by letrozole except for one occasion (E1 11 pmol/L at 3 months). Pain, side effects of systemic therapy, vasomotor symptoms, joint and muscle aches, and vaginal dryness increased during letrozole treatment. A high baseline E2 was significantly associated with increased aching joints and muscles, but not with the other side effects., Conclusions: Letrozole supresses E2 and E1 completely below the LLOQ of the LC-MS/MS in postmenopausal women. High pre-treatment E2 levels were associated with more joint and muscle pain during letrozole. Automated immunoassays are unsuitable for E2 monitoring during letrozole therapy due to poor sensitivity., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To analyze whether monitoring serum estradiol (E2) levels using a highly sensitive and specific liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method may identify patients with AI failure with E2 levels below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) after schwitching from tamoxifen to letrozole., Methods: In a prospective study of breast cancer patients switching to letrozole treatment after previous tamoxifen, plasma estrogen levels were measured at baseline and after 3- and 12-months using LC-MS/MS., Results: Forty-six patients were classified postmenopausal and entered into the final analysis. Thirty-nine (85%) patients had three- and 12-month E2 concentrations below the LLOQ (5 pmol/L). In the seven patients classified as AI-failures during letrozole treatment, serum E2-MS level rose above 5 pmol/L at 3 months with a mean E2-MS 77.5 pmol/L or 12 months with a mean E2-MS 21 pmol/L. None of the baseline variables i.e., age at diagnosis, age at study entry, age at menarche, BMI, endometrial thickness, total ovarian volume, baseline FSH, E2-IA, or E2-MS were significantly associated with the risk of AI failure in logistic regression. E2 levels at baseline measured by E2-IA did not significantly correlate to the levels measured by E2-MS., Conclusions: There is a relatively high risk of inadequate estrogen suppression in patients who switch from tamoxifen treatment to AIs. The use of sensitive and specific assays, such as LC-MS/MS methods, to monitor estrogen levels during AI treatment is essential to minimize the risk of a proceeding inefficient endocrine therapy.

Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease and hormonal factors are involved. Since national differences exist in the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) and other risk factors, associations between HT and breast cancer should be studied nationally. In Finland, estrogen-progestin therapy is associated with higher breast cancer risk than estrogen-only therapy. Also tibolone and levonorgestrel releasing intauterine device combined with estrogen are accompanied with an increased risk of breast cancer. Hormone therapy possibly promotes the growth of the existing undetectable cancer.

We examined the associations between various doses and routes of administration of norethisterone acetate (NETA) in estrogen-progestagen therapy (EPT) and the risk of breast cancer in Finland. All Finnish women with first invasive breast cancer diagnosed between the ages of 50-62 during 1995-2007 (n = 9,956) were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. For each case, 3 controls of the same age were retrieved from the Finnish Population Register. The use of estradiol+NETA-therapy by the cases and controls was traced from the national Medical Reimbursement Registry. The data were analyzed with multivariate conditional logistic regression, adjusting for parity, age at the first birth, and health care district. The continuous mode of NETA use tended to be associated with a higher rate ratio for breast cancer than the sequential use. The use of continuous "low" dose (NETA 0.5 mg + estradiol 1.0 mg) was associated with an increased rate ratio of breast cancer already in less than 3 years of use (odds ratio 1.94; 95% confidence interval 1.39-2.70) while a risk elevation for "high" dose (NETA 1.0 mg + estradiol 2.0 mg) was seen after 3 years use (1.71; 1.51-2.54). Oral and transdermal use of NETA were accompanied with comparable risks for breast cancer. In conclusion, the dose or route of administration of NETA in EPT do not modify the risks for breast cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) and the risk for breast cancer in recently postmenopausal Finnish women. All Finnish women with first invasive breast cancer diagnosed between the ages of 50 and 62 years during 1995-2007 (n = 9,956) were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. For each case, 3 controls of the same age were retrieved from the Finnish Population Register. The cases and controls were linked to the national medical reimbursement register to assess the use of HT. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer were calculated with conditional logistic regression analysis, adjusting for parity, age at the first birth and health care district. Estradiol-only therapy (991 users with breast cancer, n) or oral progestagen (n = 138) was not accompanied by an increased risk. Estradiol-progestagen therapy (EPT) (n = 1,731) was associated with an elevated risk in the whole series (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.27-1.46). The risk became detectable in less than 3 years of use. Continuous EPT use tended to be associated with a higher risk for breast cancer than the sequential EPT use. The use of tibolone (n = 80) (1.36; 1.15-1.96), a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) alone (n = 154) (1.45; 1.97-1.77) or as a complement to estradiol (n = 137) (2.15; 1.72-2.68) was also associated with an increased risk. The association between HT use and the risk for breast cancer shows a large variation between various forms of HT, and also the use of LNG-IUS may carry a risk.

Objective: To estimate the risk for breast cancer in Finnish women using postmenopausal estradiol (E2)-progestogen therapy., Methods: All Finnish women over 50 years using E2-progestogen therapy for at least 6 months in 1994-2005 (N=221,551) were identified from the national medical reimbursement register and followed up for breast cancer incidence (n=6,211 cases) through the Finnish Cancer Registry to the end of 2005. The risk for breast cancer in E2-progestogen therapy users was compared with that in the general population., Results: The standardized incidence ratio for all types of breast cancer was not elevated within the first 3 years of use, but it rose to 1.31 (95% confidence interval 1.20-1.42) for the use from 3-5 years and to 2.07 (1.84-2.30) with 10 or more years of use. Exposure to sequential progestogen for 5 years or more was accompanied with a lower risk elevation (1.78, 1.64-1.90) than exposure to continuous use (2.44, 2.17-2.72). Oral and transdermal use of E2-progestogen therapy was associated with comparable risk elevations for breast cancer. The use of norethisterone acetate was accompanied with a higher risk after 5 years of use (2.03, 1.88-2.18) than that of medroxyprogesterone acetate (1.64, 1.49-1.79). The risk of lobular breast cancer increased sooner than that for ductal cancer and was detectable for E2-progestogen therapy use less than 3 years (1.35, 1.18-1.53). There was no excess risk of breast cancer with distant metastases among E2-progestogen therapy users., Conclusion: The use of E2-progestogen therapy is associated with an increased risk for breast cancer after 3 years of use. The risk is lower for sequential than for continuous use, but comparable for oral and transdermal use. The risk elevation may not be uniform for all progestogens., Level of Evidence: II.

Objective: To evaluate whether the risk of estrogen-only therapy on breast cancer varies by dose, constituent, and route of administration., Methods: All Finnish women older than age 50 years using oral or transdermal estradiol (n=84,729), oral estriol (n=7,941), or vaginal estrogens (n=18,314) for at least 6 months during 1994-2001 were identified from the national medical reimbursement register. They were followed for breast cancer with the aid of the Finnish Cancer Registry to the end of 2002., Results: Altogether, 2,171 women with breast cancer were identified. The standardized incidence ratio of breast cancer with systemic estradiol for less than 5 years was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.80-1.04), and for estradiol use for 5 years or more, 1.44 (1.29-1.59). Oral and transdermal estradiol was accompanied by a similar risk of breast cancer. The risk was most prominent with the dose greater than 1.9 mg/d orally; whereas the risk associated with transdermal route was not dose-dependent. The standardized incidence ratio for the lobular type of breast cancer (1.58) was slightly higher than that for the ductal type (1.36). The use of estradiol was associated with both localized breast cancer (1.45; 1.26-1.66) and cancer spread to regional nodes (1.35; 1.09-1.65). The incidence of carcinoma in situ (n=32) was increased (2.43; 1.66-3.42) among estradiol users., Conclusion: Estradiol for 5 years or more, either orally or transdermally, means 2-3 extra cases of breast cancer per 1,000 women who are followed for 10 years. Oral estradiol use for less than 5 years, oral estriol, or vaginal estrogens were not associated with a risk of breast cancer., Level of Evidence: II-2.