Search

Unlabelled: Secondary lymphedema is one of the most frequent long-term side effects affecting up to 30% of all breast cancer patients after local surgical and radiation treatment. Destruction of the lymphatic system causes a progressive and chronic condition with functional impairments and disabilities limiting patients in their daily activities and involving nearly all aspects of their quality of life. Also, problems in the occupational area may be caused by lymphedema. The need for improving oncological management for early diagnosis and referral for effective treatment of lymphedema is a major goal of breast cancer heath care while survival improves., Method: A systematic consensus process was performed involving all relevant partners and providers of lymphedema health care to develop a practical documentation concept and make recommendations according to the evidence of clinical studies and currently available guidelines., Results: A practical concept of documentation with defined assessment points was developed for evaluation and monitoring of lymphedema, which included the assessment of quality of life parameters with recognised instruments by the patient themselves. Consensus recommendations for the postoperative management, prevention, treatment and follow-up of breast cancer patients along a clinical algorithm for in- and outpatient care were finalized., Conclusion: With improved survival, long-term side effects with major impact on quality of life become a most important end point criteria of oncological treatment. The clearly defined documentation concept and the comprehensive recommendations for lymphedema management may assist clinicians and patients to make timely decisions about in- and outpatient health care practice to optimize the interface between acute medicine and rehabilitation. Patients' compliance with treatment and prevention routines will be as important as ensuring the continuity of care. A longitudinal prospective study evaluating the effectiveness and efficacy of the consensus recommendation is currently being implemented.

Background: Cancer-related fatigue is the most disabling symptom experienced by breast cancer patients following the cancer treatment. The positive effects of physical activity in the rehabilitation of breast cancer patients are documented in several studies. In a randomized controlled study the effects of a structured physical training program on fatigue and health-related quality of life were evaluated., Patients and Methods: 63 breast cancer patients with cancer-related chronic fatigue were randomized at the beginning of the inpatient rehabilitation. The control group received the standard complex rehabilitation program, the intervention group a structured physical training program and additional muscle strength and aerobic exercises. The effects of the treatment were evaluated by questionnaires at the start of rehabilitation (t1), end of rehabilitation (t2), and 3 months after t2 (t3). Isometric muscle strength and aerobic capacity were evaluated at t1 and t2., Results: There was an improvement of muscle strength at the end of rehabilitation for both groups. The increase from t1 to t2 was significantly higher for the training group. The scores for global quality of life, physical well-being, and functionality increased from t1 to t2, but further improvement in the follow-up (t3) was only observed in the training group. The cancer-related fatigue was significantly reduced in the training group from t1 to t3, however, not in the control group., Conclusions: Structured physical training programs initiated during inpatient rehabilitation and continuously practiced in the time thereafter can improve symptoms of chronic fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer patients.

Background: Major endpoint for the assessment of a complex inpatient rehabilitation program is the health-related quality of life. In a prospective longitudinal study we evaluated the subjective well-being of breast cancer patients by different methods., Patients and Methods: 183 breast cancer patients were asked to complete six different questionnaires at three different time points: t1: start of treatment, t2: end of treatment, t3: 3 months after t2., Results: In the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) we observed high mean scores for anxiety (8.73) and depression (5.55), as compared to a healthy control population (5.8 and 3.34, respectively). There was a significant improvement for both scores at t2 (6.84 and 4.77, respectively) and for anxiety at t3 (7.68). This was confirmed by the FBK questionnaire showing a significant decrease of the psychological distress in the t1/t2 and t1/t3 time periods as well. The global health score of the QLQ-C30 instrument increased significantly at the end of the rehabilitation and was maintained at the 3-month follow-up. This was true for most of the functional subscales as well. Older widowed women with 3-4 accompanying diseases had the most profit from the program. Using the Perceived Adjustment to Chronic Illness Scale (PACIS), we observed significantly less effort of coping with the illness at t2 and t3., Conclusions: At the end of a complex rehabilitation program for breast cancer patients, the health-related quality of life improved in several domains. While after a 3-month follow-up the scores were still better than before the treatment, anxiety and depression increased again. Therefore, the good results of the rehabilitation program should be maintained by continuous ambulatory treatment., (Copyright 2001 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg)

A rehabilitation program for women with high risk for breast cancer or known hereditary breast carcinoma is described. The rehabilitation uses complex and interdisciplinary therapeutic interventions to improve symptoms, functional deficits and disease and treatment related psychologic distress. An essential component of the rehabilitation is an educational program with up-to-date information about the possibilities and limitations of genetic testing and recommendations about primary and secondary prevention. Suggestions for risk reduction as primary prevention are discussed. This rehabilitation program should be implemented in an effective follow-up care for women genetically susceptible to breast cancer.