Search

Breast cancer stands as the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the primary cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide, including Italy. With the increasing number of survivors, many are enrolled in regular follow-up programs. However, adherence to recommendations from scientific societies (such as ASCO, ESMO, AIOM) for breast cancer follow-up management varies in daily clinical practice across different cancer centers, potentially resulting in unequal management and escalating costs. To address these concerns, the Italian Association of Multidisciplinary Oncology Groups (AIGOM) orchestrated a Consensus on early Breast Cancer follow-up utilizing the Estimate-Talk-Estimate methodology. Following the identification of 18 Items and 38 statements by a select Board, 46 out of 54 (85.1%) experts comprising a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional panel expressed their degree of consensus (Expert Panel). The Expert Panel underscores the potential for the multidisciplinary team to tailor follow-up intensity based on the individual risk of recurrence. In selected cases, the general practitioner may be recommended as the clinical lead for breast cancer follow-up, both after completion of adjuvant treatment and at early initiation of endocrine therapy in low-risk patients. Throughout follow-up, and alongside oncologic surveillance, the expert panel advises osteometabolic, cardiologic, and gynecologic surveillance for the early detection and management of early and late treatment toxicities. Moreover, preserving quality of life is emphasized, with provisions for psycho-oncologic support and encouragement to adopt protective lifestyle behaviors., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: None of the authors has any interests to report directly related to this manuscript. Outside the scope of this manuscript: Stefania Gori, Fiorenza De Rose, no conflict of interests to declare. Antonella Ferro, honoraria from Novartis, MDS, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Ely Lilly, Gentili. Alessandra Fabi grants from Astra Zeneca (steering committee); consulting fees from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Seagen, Gilead, MSD, Menarini; honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Gilead, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo Exact Sciences; travel grants from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Seagen, Gilead, MSD, Menarini; advisory board from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Seagen, Gilead, MSD, Menarini. Catia Angiolini, Giuseppe Azzarello, Maurizio Cancian, Michela Cinquini, Luca Arecco no conflict of interests to declare. Cynthia Aristei, grants from PRIN 2023, from the Ministry of University and Research. Project title “The microbiome in breast cancer therapy and its potential for pRobIOtics to improve treatment outcome. Acronym: BARRIO”. Daniela Bernardi, Laura Biganzoli, Anna Cariello no conflict of interests to declare. Laura Cortesi, report grants from Astra Zeneca, MSD, Pfizer; consulting fees and honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Gilead, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Daijchii Sanchio, Novartis; travel grants from Gilead, Pfizer, Daijchi Sanchio; Advisory Board from Astra Zeneca, MSD, Novartis. Elisabetta Cretella no conflict of interests to declare. Carmen Criscitiello, grants from Seagen, Gilead; consulting fees and honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, MSD; Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Roche. Ugo De Giorgi consulting fees from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Astrazeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck KGaA, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer; travel grants from Pfizer, Ipsen, Astrazeneca. Maria Carmen De Santis, Giuseppe Deledda, Massimo Dessena, Sara Donati, Arianna Dri, Gianluigi Ferretti no conflict of interests to declare. Jennifer Foglietta, honoraria from Novartis; travel grants from Roche, Sophos, Pfizer; Advisory Board from Menarini Stem Line. Davide Franceschini, Pierfrancesco Franco, Alessio Schirone no conflict of interests to declare. Daniele Generali, grants from LILT, University of Trieste, Novartis, Roche; consulting fees from Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Accord, Daiichi Dankyo; honoraria from Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Accord, Daiichi Dankyo, Astrazeneca, Istituto Gentili; travel grants from Roche, Menarini; Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid from Mednote. Lorenzo Gianni, travel grants from Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer; Advisory Board from Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Seagen. Stefano Giordani, Giovanni Grandi, Maria Cristina Leonardi, Stefano Magno, no conflict of interests to declare. Luca Malorni, consulting fees from Menarini, Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Roche; travel grants from Roche, Menarini, Celgene, IT Health Fusion; Advisory Board from Novartis. Carlotta Mantoan no conflict of interests to declare. Federica Martorana honoraria from Lilly, Daychii-Sankyo, Pfizer, Astra-Zeneca, Novartis; travel grants from Gilead, Roche, Pfizer, Lilly; advisory board from Amgen. Icro Meattini consulting fees from Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Seagen, Gilead, Menarini StemLine. Bruno Meduri, Laura Merlini, Federica Miglietta, Alessandra Modena, Fabrizio Nicolis, Isabella Palumbo, no conflict of interests to declare. Pietro Panizza honoraria and travel grants from Bayer AG. Francesca Angela Rovera, Piermario Salvini, Armando Santoro, Mario Taffurelli, no conflict of interests to declare. Angela Toss consulting fees and grants from Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Astrazeneca, Gilead, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo; travel grants from Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, Menarini, Astrazeneca. Paolo Tralongo, Monica Turazza, Matteo Valerio, Matteo Verzè no conflict of interests to declare. Patrizia Vici consulting fees from Lilly, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis; honoraria from EISAI, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer; travel grants from Roche, Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, IPSEN; advisory board from Pfizer, Novartis. Claudio Zamagni no conflict of interests to declare. Giuseppe Curigliano advisory board from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Ellipsis, Veracyte, Exact Science, Celcuity, Merck, BMS, Gilead, Sanofi, Menarini. Giovanni Pappagallo no conflict of interests to declare. Alberto Zambelli consulting fees Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, AstraZeneca, DaiichiSankyo, Seagen, ExactSciences, MSD, Gentili, Gilead; travel grants from Roche, DaiichiSankyo, AstraZeneca, Novartis; advisory board from Roche., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: During targeted treatment, HER2-positive breast cancers invariably lose HER2 DNA amplification. In contrast, and interestingly, HER2 proteins may be either lost or gained. To longitudinally and systematically appreciate complex/discordant changes in HER2 DNA/protein stoichiometry, HER2 DNA copy numbers and soluble blood proteins (aHER2/sHER2) were tested in parallel, non-invasively (by liquid biopsy), and in two-dimensions, hence HER2-2D., Methods: aHER2 and sHER2 were assessed by digital PCR and ELISA before and after standard-of-care treatment of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients (n=37) with the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1)., Results: As expected, aHER2 was invariably suppressed by T-DM1, but this loss was surprisingly mirrored by sHER2 gain, sometimes of considerable entity, in most (30/37; 81%) patients. This unorthodox split in HER2 oncogenic dosage was supported by reciprocal aHER2/sHER2 kinetics in two representative cases, and an immunohistochemistry-high status despite copy-number-neutrality in 4/5 available post-T-DM1 tumor re-biopsies from sHER2-gain patients. Moreover, sHER2 was preferentially released by dying breast cancer cell lines treated in vitro by T-DM1. Finally, sHER2 gain was associated with a longer PFS than sHER2 loss (mean PFS 282 vs 133 days, 95% CI [210-354] vs [56-209], log-rank test p=0.047), particularly when cases (n=11) developing circulating HER2-bypass alterations during T-DM1 treatment were excluded (mean PFS 349 vs 139 days, 95% CI [255-444] vs [45-232], log-rank test p=0.009)., Conclusions: HER2 gain is adaptively selected in tumor tissues and recapitulated in blood by sHER2 gain. Possibly, an increased oncogenic dosage is beneficial to the tumor during anti-HER2 treatment with naked antibodies, but favorable to the host during treatment with a strongly cytotoxic ADC such as T-DM1. In the latter case, HER2-gain tumors may be kept transiently in check until alternative oncogenic drivers, revealed by liquid biopsy, bypass HER2. Whichever the interpretation, HER2-2D might help to tailor/prioritize anti-HER2 treatments, particularly ADCs active on aHER2-low/sHER2-low tumors., Trial Registration: NCT05735392 retrospectively registered on January 31, 2023 https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov/search?term=NCT05735392., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Breast cancer stands as one of the foremost cause of cancer-related deaths globally, characterized by its varied molecular subtypes. Each subtype requires a distinct therapeutic strategy. Although advancements in treatment have enhanced patient outcomes, significant hurdles remain, including treatment toxicity and restricted effectiveness. Here, we explore the anticancer potential of novel 1,4-naphthoquinone/4-quinolone hybrids on breast cancer cell lines. The synthesized compounds demonstrated selective cytotoxicity against Luminal and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells, which represent the two main molecular types of breast cancer that depend most on cytotoxic chemotherapy, with potency comparable to doxorubicin, a standard chemotherapeutic widely used in breast cancer treatment. Notably, these derivatives exhibited superior selectivity indices (SI) when compared to doxorubicin, indicating lower toxicity towards non-tumor MCF10A cells. Compounds 11a and 11b displayed an improvement in IC 50 values when compared to their precursor, 1,4-naphthoquinone, for both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 and a comparable value to doxorubicin for MCF-7 cells. Also, their SI values were superior to those seen for the two reference compounds for both cell lines tested. Mechanistic studies revealed the ability of the compounds to induce apoptosis and inhibit clonogenic potential. Additionally, the irreversibility of their effects on cell viability underscores their promising therapeutic utility. In 3D-cell culture models, the compounds induced morphological changes indicative of reduced viability, supporting their efficacy in a more physiologically relevant model of study. The pharmacokinetics of the synthesized compounds were predicted using the SwissADME webserver, indicating that these compounds exhibit favorable drug-likeness properties and potential as antitumor agents. Overall, our findings underscore the promise of these hybrid compounds as potential candidates for breast cancer chemotherapy, emphasizing their selectivity and efficacy.

Breast cancer is still the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women aged 20-59 and metastatic breast cancer remains an incurable disease. The therapeutic paradigm of patients with HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer has been expanded by the introduction of the inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6. Three compounds, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, have already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use together with endocrine therapy; abemaciclib is also approved as a single agent. In the first-line setting, all three agents - together with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) - substantially prolonged progression-free survival. Hematologic toxicities are the most common adverse events associated with CDK4/6i, mainly with palbociclib and ribociclib. Due to the hematologic toxicity, the prescribing information of palbociclib (P) recommends monitoring complete blood counts before starting therapy and at the beginning of each cycle, as well as on day 15 of the first 2 cycles. However, there are no guidelines regarding the management of patients candidate to CDK4/6i who have bone marrow impairment. Neutropenia frequently occurs during the treatment with P, whereas thrombocytopenia represents a rare event. We here report a case of a 60-year-old woman with idiopathic thrombocytopenia treated with P plus letrozole, who presented a metabolic complete response.

Purpose: We assessed the immunogenicity and safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine in a large cohort of patients with cancer (CP)., Experimental Design: From March 1, 2021 to March 20, 2021, this prospective cohort study included 816 CP afferent to our institution and eligible for the vaccination. A cohort of 274 health care workers (HCW) was used as age- and sex-matched control group. BNT162b2 was administered as a two-dose regimen given 21 days apart. Blood samples to analyze anti-Spike (S) IgG antibodies (Ab) were collected prevaccination [timepoint (TP) 0], and at 3 weeks (TP1) and 7 weeks (TP2) after the first dose., Results: Patients characteristics: median age 62 (range, 21-97); breast/lung cancer/others (31/21/48%); active treatment/follow-up (90/10%). In the whole CP cohort, the serologic response rate (RR) and the titre of anti-S IgG significantly increased across the TPs; at TP2, the responders (IgG >15 AU/mL) were 94.2%. Active chemotherapy and chronic use of steroids were independent predictors of lower RR. Adverse events (AE) after the booster predicted higher likelihood of response (OR, 4.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-9.99; P = 0.003). Comparing the matched cohorts, the responders were significantly lower in CP than in HCW at TP1 (61.2% vs. 93.2%) and TP2 (93.3% vs. 100%), while the geometric mean concentration of IgG did not significantly differ at TP2 being significantly lower in CP (23.3) than in HCW (52.1) at TP1. BNT162b2 was well tolerated in CP; severe-grade AEs were 3.5% and 1.3% after the first and second doses, respectively., Conclusions: BNT162b2 assures serologic immunization without clinically significant toxicity in CP. The second dose is needed to reach a satisfactory humoral response., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Breast cancer is one of the main leading causes of women death. In recent years, attention has been focused on the role of lipoproteins, alterations of cholesterol metabolism and oxidative stress in the molecular mechanism of breast cancer. A role for high density lipoproteins (HDL) has been proposed, in fact, in addition to the role of reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), HDL exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, modulate intracellular cholesterol homeostasis, signal transduction and proliferation. Low levels of HDL-Cholesterol (HDL-C) have been demonstrated in patients affected by breast cancer and it has been suggested that low levels of HDL-C could represent a risk factor of breast cancer. Contrasting results have been observed by other authors. Recent studies have demonstrated alterations of the activity of some enzymes associated to HDL surface such as Paraoxonase (PON1), Lecithin-Cholesterol Acyltransferase (LCAT) and Phospholipase A2 (PLA2). Higher levels of markers of lipid peroxidation in plasma or serum of patients have also been observed and suggest dysfunctional HDL in breast cancer patients. The review summarizes results on levels of markers of oxidative stress of plasma lipids and on alterations of enzymes associated to HDL in patients affected by breast cancer. The effects of normal and dysfunctional HDL on human breast cancer cells and molecular mechanisms potentially involved will be also reviewed., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction: p53 and antiapoptotic B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 (BLC2) have been proposed as prognostic markers for early breast cancer (BC), although their relationship with conventional parameters and patient prognosis, as well as their distribution within the molecular BC subtypes remains uncertain., Patients and Methods: In this observational study, we analyzed the immunohistochemical expression of p53 and BLC2 in 1099 early BC patients surgically treated between 2000 and 2006 and followed for at least 5 years, also considering their association with pathologic factors and molecular subtypes, as well as their influence on disease-free survival., Results: p53 and BLC2 are distributed differently across molecular subtypes (P < .0001); in particular, p53 positivity and BLC2 negativity seems to be associated with more aggressive conventional tumor phenotypes. Moreover, BLC2 negativity seems to be a significant discriminating factor for disease-free survival (P = .003) according to Kaplan-Meier analysis, while p53 seems to have no discriminating effect. Among patients with discordant p53/BLC2 phenotype, the combination p53 + BLC2 - seems to be associated with the worst outcomes (P = .007) and significantly influenced the clinical course of node-negative patients treated only with hormone therapy (P = .004)., Conclusion: These two biomarkers, in addition to conventional pathologic factors and molecular subtype, could help define the risk and outcome of BC., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Breast cancer was one of the first malignancies to benefit from targeted therapy, i.e., treatments directed against specific markers. Inhibitors against HER2 are a significant example and they improved the life expectancy of a large cohort of patients. Research on new biomarkers, therefore, is always current and important. AXL, a member of the TYRO-3, AXL and MER (TAM) subfamily, is, today, considered a predictive and prognostic biomarker in many tumor contexts, primarily breast cancer. Its oncogenic implications make it an ideal target for the development of new pharmacological agents; moreover, its recent role as immune-modulator makes AXL particularly attractive to researchers involved in the study of interactions between cancer and the tumor microenvironment (TME). All these peculiarities characterize AXL as compared to other members of the TAM family. In this review, we will illustrate the biological role played by AXL in breast tumor cells, highlighting its molecular and biological features, its involvement in tumor progression and its implication as a target in ongoing clinical trials.

Aim: To investigate the toxicity of nab-paclitaxel (wNP)/nonpegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (wNPLD) combination in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients as first-line treatment. Materials & methods: Phase I, single-arm study in metastatic breast cancer patients naive to previous chemotherapy for advanced disease. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used to determine the safety. Primary endpoints were the identification of dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose. Results: In total, 12 patients (mean age: 52 years; median metastatic sites: 2) were enrolled and 97 cycles were completed. Maximum tolerated dose was wNP + wNPLD 25 mg/m 2 . The most common adverse events were neutropenia, nausea, diarrhea and mucositis. The objective response rate was 68% (response mean duration: 12.6 months). Conclusion: wNP/wNPLD combination constitutes an active regimen with mild toxicity.

Background: We reported the results of an Italian large retrospective analysis that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of T-DM1 in 'field-practice' breast cancer patients. We performed a sub-analysis to investigate the clinical activity of T-DM1 in patients with brain metastases (BMs)., Methods: The records of 87 adult women with HER2-positive breast cancer and BMs treated with T-DM1 were reviewed. Their clinical outcomes were compared with those of 216 patients without central nervous system (CNS) involvement., Results: Response to T-DM1 treatment in BMs was available for 53 patients in the BM group (60.9%): two patients reported a complete response (3.8%), 11 patients obtained partial response (20.7%; overall response rate: 24.5%), 16 patients had a stable disease (30.1%). Regarding extracranial disease, a total of 77 and 191 patients were evaluable for response in BM group and non-BM group, respectively. The overall response rate was 35.1% in the BM group and 38.3% in the non-BM group; disease control rate was 53.3% and 66.6%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 16 months (range: 1-55), median cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI: 5.4-8.6) in the BM group and 8 months (95% CI: 5.7-10.3) in the non-BM group. In the second-line setting, PFS was 5 (95% CI: 3.1-6.9) versus 11 (95% CI: 7.1-14.9) months (p = 0.01). Overall survival was 14 months (95% CI: 12.2-15.8) in the BM group and 32 months (95% CI: 24.4-39.6) in the non-BM group (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: T-DM1 is active in breast cancer patients with BMs., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This is a case report of a 40-year-old woman who, after conservative breast cancer treatment, developed a HER2 positive solitary brain metastasis in the left temporal lobe, without extracranial disease. She underwent surgery resection followed by stereotactic radiotherapy and, because of early brain progression, she was submitted to the first line therapy with pertuzumab, trastuzumab and weekly paclitaxel. After six months of treatment, a brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed a complete disappearance of brain recurrence, which persisted for more than 24 months., (Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Aim: We evaluated the outcomes of patients treated with ado-trastuzumab emantasine (T-DM1) after first-line pertuzumab/trastuzumab, compared with those receiving a trastuzumab-only-based regimen., Patients & Methods: Patients who received second-line T-DM1 after pertuzumab/trastuzumab (n = 34) were compared with those who received only trastuzumab (n = 73)., Results: Overall response rate was 33.3% in patients with prior pertuzumab and 57.1% in the remaining subjects. Disease control rate was 47 and 43%, respectively, and the clinical benefit rate was 43.3 and 71.1%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 5.0 and 11.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.14-3.58; p = 0.01)., Conclusion: Patients treated with T-DM1 who previously received pertuzumab present poorer clinical outcomes compared with those receiving a trastuzumab-only-based regimen in the first-line setting.

Objective: Lapatinib, a dual HER2/EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), associated to capecitabine represents the treatment of choice in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients in progression after trastuzumab-based therapy. Though lapatinib-based therapy prolongs the time to progression, its efficacy is often limited by the development of drug resistance. It is aimed to evaluate novel biomarkers predictive of lapatinib response, we analyzed EGFR protein and gene status in a series of 50 metastatic HER2-positive BC patients., Methods: Lapatinib was given at 1250 mg/day continuously and capecitabine at 2000 mg/m(2)/day every 3 weeks. EGFR protein expression and gene copy number (GCN) were assessed by immunohistochemistry and FISH, respectively. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis identified the value of > 3.36 EGFR copies/nucleus as the cut-off point able to discriminate responders versus non-responders., Results: A statistical significant correlation between EGFR GCN value > 3.36 and response to lapatinib (p = 0.01) was found. Cox regression analysis further supported these findings evidencing that HER2 score 3+ and EGFR GCN increase are positive predictor factors of lapatinib response., Conclusions: Though further investigations are needed to confirm these findings, EGFR GCN could be a suitable screening to identify the subset of BC patients particularly responsive to the dual TKI lapatinib.

Background: Data on efficacy of bevacizumab (B) beyond first-line taxane -including regimen (BT) as first-line treatment are lacking. Although preclinical results that anti-angiogenic agents combined with hormonal therapy (HT) could be active, no clinical data exist about combination of maintenance Bevacizumab (mBev) with HT., Methods: Thirty-five patients who experienced a response after first-line BT, were given mBev at the dose of 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Among 30 pts with hormonal receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), 20 (66.6%) received HT with mBev (mHTBev). Objective of the study was the outcome and safety of mBev and in two groups of patients receiving HT or not., Results: Complete response and partial response was achieved/maintained in 4 (11.4%) and 13 (37.1%) patients, respectively (overall response rate: 48.5%). Clinical benefit was obtained on 23 patients (65.7%). Median of mBev PFS and clinical benefit were 6.8 months (95% CI: 0.8-12.7) and 17.1 months (95% CI :12.2-21.9), respectively. Median PFS of patients who received mHTBev was longer than mBev without HT (13 months and 4.1 months, respectively, p = 0.05). The most common severe toxicities were proteinuria (11.4%) and hypertension (8.5%). No additional toxicity was observed with HTBev., Conclusion: Maintenance bevacizumab with or without anti-hormonal therapy in patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer is tolerable and associated with long-term clinical outcome; these results encourage the strategy of prolonging bevacizumab until progression in combination with anti-hormonal agents.

Background: Although the addition of bevacizumab significantly improves the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer, regulatory concerns still exist with regard to the magnitude of the benefits and the overall safety profile., Methods: A literature-based meta-analysis to quantify the magnitude of benefit and safety of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients was conducted. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were also performed to identify additional predictors of outcome and to assess the influence of trial design., Results: Five trials (3,841 patients) were gathered. A significant interaction according to treatment line was found for progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.027); PFS was significantly improved for 1(st) line (Hazard Ratio, HR 0.68, p < 0.0001), with a 1-yr absolute difference (AD) of 8.4% (number needed to treat, NNT 12). A non-significant trend was found in overall survival (OS), and in PFS for 2(nd) line. Responses were improved with the addition of bevacizumab, without interaction between 1(st) line (Relative Risk, RR 1.46, p < 0.0001) and 2(nd) line (RR 1.58, p = 0.05). The most important toxicity was hypertension, accounting for a significant AD of 4.5% against bevacizumab (number needed to harm, NNH 22). Other significant, although less clinically meaningful, adverse events were proteinuria, neurotoxicity, febrile neutropenia, and bleeding. At the meta-regression analysis for 1(st)-line, more than 3 metastatic sites (p = 0.032), no adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.00013), negative hormonal receptor status (p = 0.009), and prior anthracyclines-exposure (p = 0.019), did significantly affect PFS., Conclusions: Although with heterogeneity, the addition of bevacizumab to 1st-line chemotherapy significantly improves PFS, and overall activity. Hypertension should be weighted with the overall benefit on the individual basis.

Purpose: To analyze HER2 status in primary breast cancer (PBC) compared with correspondent metachronous metastases and to investigate whether BC phenotype may be predictive of change in HER2 expression., Experimental Design: HER2 was investigated by immunohistochemistry, silver in situ hybridization (SISH), and FISH, in a series of 137 tumors, building up a tissue microarray to concurrently analyze each single PBC and metastatic (MBC) on the same slide., Results: HER2 status was discordant in 14 cases (10%): 12 negative in PBC and positive in metastases and two positive in PBC and negative in metastases (P = 0.04). These findings were confirmed by a PCR based test termed Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). HER2 status changed in hormone receptor-positive BC more frequently than in negative ones (P = 0.002). In addition, we evaluated HER2 gene and chromosome 17 copy number by SISH in the 123 cases with unchanged HER2 status during progression. We found consistent HER2 gene copy number stability in the 100 nonamplified cases. Conversely, of the 23 amplified PBC, 13 (57%) demonstrated a significant increase in the HER2 gene and chromosome 17 copy number in their paired metastases (P = 0.01), as defined by SISH (k = 0.54, P < 0.0001) and MLPA. Patients who changed HER2 status from negative to positive, presented significant longer time to progression when treated with trastuzumab compared to those who were untreated (P = 0.04)., Conclusions: When feasible, HER2 reassessment in metastatic lesions should be carefully taken into account, especially for metastases coming from primary hormone receptor-positive BC.

Background: Intraoperative analysis of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is currently performed in patients with breast cancer (BC) undergoing surgery. Axillary node (AN) metastases are present in up to 60% of cases, but the risk is only 30% in patients with early stage (T1) BC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography (SSM), axillary ultrasonography (US) and US-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology together in detecting axillary metastases preoperatively and their potential role in reducing the number of SLN procedures., Patients and Methods: A series of 86 consecutive women (median age 57 years, range 30-72) with confirmed BC and clinically negative nodes (T1N0) underwent both SSM and US prior to surgery. US-guided FNA cytology was performed in all the patients with suspicious AN on US, or positive SSM and ultrasonographically visualized enlarged nodes., Results: Final pathology showed 4 pT1bN0, 1 pT1bN1, 60 pT1cN0 and 21 pT1cN1 BC. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 59.1%, 93.7% and 84.9% for SSM, 63.6%, 90.6% and 83.7% for US, and 72.7%, 97.8% and 90.7% for SSM and US together. Using FNA cytology the specificity reached 100%, but the sensitivity did not increase. A combined method using radioisotope and blue dye was used for SLN biopsy. The procedure was omitted in patients with FNA cytology showing AN metastases (N = 14, 16.3%) and they underwent level I-II axillary dissection, as well as those with positive SLN biopsy on frozen section (8 out of 72, 11.1%)., Conclusion: In patients with BC, preoperatively selected by SSM and US in whom US-guided axillary FNA cytology has shown the presence of AN metastases, the SLN biopsy can be avoided and AN dissection should be the primary procedure.

Though preclinical evidence supports the protracted use of trastuzumab to reach sustained anti-tumor activity, the activity of trastuzumab beyond disease progression remains controversial in HER-2 over-expressing (HER-2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. We retrospectively evaluated a total of 59 patients with HER-2 + MBC treated at our institution with trastuzumab-based therapies. Our results were added to those obtained in similar observational studies and summary estimates for overall response (OR) and clinical benefit (CB) to first and second trastuzumab-based lines were calculated. In our series of patients we observed an OR of 59.3% and 27% for first and second trastuzumab-based lines, respectively, with a corresponding CB of 83% and 62.2%, respectively. Time to first and second progression were 9.5 months and 6.7 months, respectively. The combined analysis showed an OR of 50% for first trastuzumab-based regimen and 21.2% for second trastuzumab-based line. The corresponding values for CB were 77.6% and 42.6%, respectively. A second trastuzumab-containing regimen beyond progression yields a considerable rate of OR and CB in HER-2 + MBC patients. Randomized trials are warranted.

Background: Preclinical evidence suggests that the cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme plays an important role in breast cancer progression. The aim of the present phase II study was to determine the activity and safety of the combination of the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib with capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients pretreated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes., Methods: Eligible patients received capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days and celecoxib 200 mg twice daily, continuously, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity., Results: About 42 pretreated MBC patients were enrolled into the study. Median number of previous chemotherapy lines for metastatic disease was 2 (0-3). Seven patients (19%) responded to treatment while disease stabilization occurred in 17 patients (40.5%). Overall, 20 patients (47.5%) achieved clinical benefit [objective responses (CR) plus stable disease (SD) >/=6 months]. Median time to progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) were 5.2 and 17.8 months, respectively. Treatment was very well tolerated: grade 3 toxicities were observed in only five patients, respectively, and no grade 4 adverse events were reported. Celecoxib was never discontinued for toxicity. Analysis of COX-2 expression in the 22 patients with available tissue revealed a significantly longer TTP and OS for patients whose tumors over-expressed COX-2., Conclusions: The combination of capecitabine and celecoxib is active and safe in far advanced MBC patients. Interestingly, this association resulted in a lower-than-expected toxicity, as compared to single-agent capecitabine. The clinical relevance of COX-2 as determinant of sensitivity to treatment with celecoxib should be further evaluated in larger series of patients.

The management of human epidermal receptor-2 (HER-2) negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is usually problematic, since no standard therapy exists in this setting. For some patients, combination chemotherapy represents a valuable approach, although its use is often limited by the risks of increased toxicity as well as impairments in quality of life (QoL) that often outweigh the marginal efficacy benefit. Against this background, the use of taxanes, either paclitaxel or docetaxel, in combination with gemcitabine as first-line treatment of HER-2 negative MBC is supported by the evidence of the single-agent activity of these drugs, beneficial pharmacological interactions, different mechanisms of action and largely non superimposable toxicity profiles. A number of phase II studies have explored the activity of a taxane plus gemcitabine in both chemonaïve and pretreated MBC patients, all showing remarkably high response rates and exceptional tolerability. In randomized phase III trials, the paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination showed significant improvements in objective responses, time to progression and overall survival, as compared to paclitaxel monotherapy, whereas the docetaxel and gemcitabine doublet demonstrated equal efficacy and better tolerability, as compared to docetaxel plus capecitabine. In addition to standard threeweekly dosing regimens, alternative schedules of administration of taxanes and gemcitabine doublets (weekly, twoweekly) might deserve further investigation due to their potential usefulness in reducing pharmacological toxicity while maintaining or increasing dose-intensity and clinical efficacy. Furthermore, uncertainty exists on which taxane should be preferred in combination with gemcitabine, since no head-to-head comparison between paclitaxel-gemcitabine and docetaxel-gemcitabine has been performed so far. Ongoing trials will address these issues and future investigations will also include the evaluation of bevacizumab, the monoclonal antibody targeted against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in combination with taxanes and gemcitabine doublets.

To summarise the advances in the hormonal treatment of post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer, this paper reviews the published literature regarding the randomised trials comparing aromatase inhibitors (AIs) versus tamoxifen as a first-line therapeutic choice, or AIs versus megestrole acetate (MEG) as a second-line option. The pooled analysis of these authors on AI versus MEG as a second-line option for post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer suggested that AIs do not add any significant benefit over MEG in terms of overall response rate (ORR) and time to progression. According to the Cochrane Database, use of an AI as a second-line therapy versus any other endocrine therapy (mostly MEG) has shown a significant benefit in terms of overall survival, but not for progression-free survival, clinical benefit (CB) or ORR. Concerning the authors' comparisons between AIs versus tamoxifen as a first-line endocrine option in post-menopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma, AIs seem to be superior to tamoxifen, with a significant benefit in terms of ORR, CB and time to progression being observed in favour of AIs over tamoxifen with fixed effects estimates. According to the Cochrane Database, there was an advantage to the use of AIs over tamoxifen in terms of progression-free survival and CB, but not for overall survival or ORR. With regards to toxicity, AIs show similar levels of hot flushes and arthralgia, increased risks of nausea, diarrhoea and vomiting, but a decreased risk of vaginal bleeding and thromboembolic events compared with other endocrine therapies. Weight gain, dyspnoea and peripheral oedema seem to be more frequent with MEG. At present, there is no proved overall survival difference in patients who are treated first with an AI and then with tamoxifen compared with the opposite sequence. In the metastatic setting, results are limited and are based on retrospective analyses.

Background: Axillary lymph node (AN) status is the primary prognostic discriminant in patients with breast cancer (BC). Although axillary dissection represents the method of choice for obtaining such information, less invasive procedures have been suggested. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography (SSM) in detecting AN involvement in patients with confirmed primary BC undergoing surgery., Patients and Methods: A series of 159 consecutive women (median age 54 years, range 36-78 years) with confirmed BC undergoing curative surgery were enrolled in the study. Each patient underwent SSM, from 4 to 12 days prior to surgery. According to the tumour staging, modified radical mastectomy was performed in 41 (25.8%) patients, while 118 (74.2%) patients underwent breast conserving surgery with dissection of the axilla. The results of SSM were compared against the final histological evaluation of the axillary nodes., Results: The final pathology showed 33 (20.8%) pT1b, 90 (56.6%) pT1c, and 36 (22.6%) pT2 breast carcinomas. The greatest diameter of the tumour ranged from 8 to 30 mm (median 16 mm). Sixty patients (37.7%) had axillary node metastases (N1), and 99 (60.3%) had negative nodes (NO). The age of the patients significantly correlated with both size of the tumour (R=0.24, p<0.01) and number of positive nodes (R=0.33, p<0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of SSM in detecting AN metastases were 81.4%, 91.0%, 84.2%, 91.0% and 87.4%, respectively. The sensitivity was higher in patients with three or more positive nodes (27 out of 28, 96.4%), while in patients with two (n=25) or one (n=7) positive nodes, the sensitivity decreased to 80% and 28.6%, respectively., Conclusion: SSM may be useful in patients undergoing surgery for BC when a preoperative assessment of axillary lymph node status is required. Unfortunately, the sensitivity of SSM in detecting node metestases in patients with BC is low when the number of involved nodes is two or less. This suggests that other imaging techniques should be used is conjunction with SSM, with the aim of increasing both sensitivity and specificity.

Objectives: The aromatase inhibitors Anastrozole, Letrozole (type 2 nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors: n-SAI) and Exemestane (type 1 steroidal aromatase inactivator) are used respectively as first- and second-line hormonal therapy in postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer women. Few clinical data are published on the sequential use of different classes of aromatase inhibitors., Methods: We report an analysis on 30 postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer women treated between January 2000 and May 2002 in 2 Italian Oncology Institutions with the hormonal sequence n-SAI (Anastrozole, Letrozole) --> Exemestane., Results: When receiving n-SAI (Anastrozole 8 patients and Letrozole 22 patients), 1 out of 30 women achieved a partial response, 20 of 30 patients no change (NC) > or =6 months. The analysis of the entire population treated with Exemestane showed an overall clinical benefit (CB) of 46.6 percent (14/30) with a median duration of 12 months (95%CI 6-25) and a median time to progression (TTP) of 4 months (95%CI 1-25)., Conclusions: These data confirm a partial lack of cross-resistance between n-SAI --> Exemestane given in sequence.

Purpose of Review: The principal effort of this review was to elucidate the role of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu expression in breast cancer, either as an independent prognostic factor or a predictive marker of response to antineoplastic therapy, in light of the most recent results obtained with the use of trastuzumab, in either the metastatic or the adjuvant setting., Recent Findings: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer is known to be associated with particularly aggressive disease and poor prognosis. On the other hand, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu overexpression may predict response to endocrine therapy or chemotherapy. Nevertheless, trastuzumab increases the clinical benefit of first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancers that overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Decades of randomized clinical trials on the front-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer have never been able to show so remarkable differences in survival as recent randomized trials comparing chemotherapy with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer have been able to do., Summary: In the pretrastuzumab era, retrospective analyses have shown that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression is an adverse prognostic factor associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence and death. In the trastuzumab era, this drug has changed the natural history of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, either in the metastatic or, according to the most recent evidences, in the adjuvant setting.

Increased serum level of troponin-T and myoglobin has been recently reported to be related to cumulative anthracycline exposure. Left ventricular ejection fraction seems accurate in monitoring systolic function according to the latest version of Toxicity Criteria by chemotherapeutics 3.0. From January 2002, 20 patients with untreated advanced breast cancer received epirubicin (25 mg/m/week) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m/week) for 24 weeks. Troponin-T, myoglobin and biochemical serum enzymes circulating levels were measured immediately before and 4 h after epirubicin administration every week. Patients underwent electrocardiography and echocardiography at weeks 0, 8, 16 and 24. The number of courses administered was 352 (median 18, range 4-24). Epirubicin median dose administered was 600 mg/m and paclitaxel median dose administered was 1760 mg/m. Troponin-T never overcame the upper normal limit; one patient experienced troponin-T elevation without any clinical or instrumental sign of cardiac failure. Myoglobin never significantly increased with the exception of a patient who underwent several abdominal fluid drainages. Creatine kinase MB and C-reactive protein never moved outside the upper normal limit. No symptomatic cardiac event was recorded. In 55 performed echocardiograms at weeks 0, 8, 16 and 24, neither left ventricular ejection fraction nor early peak flow/atrial flow velocity registered any significant decrease. No troponin-T or myoglobin serum elevations and Left ventricular ejection fraction/early peak flow/atrial flow velocity changes were registered in our series of nonsymptomatic women during epirubicin/paclitaxel weekly chemotherapy in the absence of clinical cardiac toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed, however, to understand whether the troponin-T or myoglobin circulating level measurement is able to detect subclinical, early-stage doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of axillary ultrasonography (US) and (99m)Tc-sestamibi scintimammography (SSM) in patients with breast cancer (BC) undergoing curative surgery., Methods: A series of 77 consecutive women (median age 54 years, range 36-70) with primary BC underwent both US and SSM from 2 to 15 (median 4) days prior to curative surgery. The results of imaging studies were compared against the final pathology. Breast-conserving surgery with axillary node (AN) dissection was performed in 49 (63.6%) patients, and modified radical mastectomy in 28 (36.4%) patients, according to the tumour staging., Results: Final pathology showed 5 pT1bN0, 1 pT1bN1, 28 pT1cN0, 19 pT1cN1, 7 pT2N0, and 17 pT2N1 BC. Overall, 719 AN were removed of which 106 (14.7%) were metastatized nodes (median 3, range 1-5 per patient). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 67.6%, 80.0%, and 74.0% for US, 78.4%, 85.0%, and 81.8% for SSM, and 91.9%, 92.5%, and 92.2% for US and SSM together, respectively. There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in the number of metastatized AN between patients with metastases correctly detected and undetected by both US (3.1+/-1.3 vs. 2.0+/-0.7) and SSM (3.2+/-1.3 vs. 1.7+/-0.7)., Conclusions: Although the results of each diagnostic tests are strictly dependent on the number of the metastatized AN, the combination of axillary US and SSM is a sensitive low-cost procedure that should be suggested in all patients with BC, when a preoperative evaluation of the AN status is required.

Purpose: We report on the effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on hemoglobin (Hb) value in early breast cancer patients receiving high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) adjuvant treatment., Methods: Five hundred and six stage I or stage II female breast cancer patients were treated with E 120 mg/m2 and C 600 mg/m2 with or without G-CSF and randomly assigned to receive in a factorial 2 x 2 design: EC; EC + lonidamine; EC + G-CSF; EC + lonidamine + G-CSF. Five consecutive G-CSF schedules tested 100 randomly assigned patients each: (1) 480 microg subcutaneously on days 8 to 14; (2) 480 microg on days 8, 10, 12, 14; (3) 300 microg on days 8 to 14; (4) 300 microg on days 8, 10, 12, and 14; and (5) 300 microg on days 8 and 12. The mean Hb level of 246 patients receiving EC plus G-CSF was compared with that of 240 patients receiving EC alone. The data presented are derived from an exploratory hypothesis-generating analysis., Results: The EC dose intensity did not statistically differ between the G-CSF and the control arm. From the third cycle onward, the mean Hb value resulted significantly lower in G-CSF arm compared with control at each time point of each cycle (P < .0001). No statistically significant difference in the mean Hb level was observed between schedule 5 and control. Of interest, from the second course onward, the mean Hb level tended to be lower in patients receiving seven or four G-CSF injections compared with those patients who received only two injections., Conclusion: Our data suggest that a G-CSF dose-related effect may play a role in worsening anemia in patients receiving adjuvant EC.

The purpose of this study was to estimate in all randomised trials the relative risk of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit (CB), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and toxicity of aromatase inhibitors (AI), compared with tamoxifen (Tam) as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer (PMBC) women. Prospective randomised studies were searched through computerised queries of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) abstract database. Relative risk, 95% confidence interval, and heterogeneity were derived according to the inverse variance and Mantel-Haenszel method and Q statistics. Six phase III prospective randomised trials including 2787 women were gathered. A significant advantage in ORR (P = 0.042), TTP (P = 0.007), and CB (P = 0.001) in favour of AI over Tam was detected at the fixed effects model. These results were not significant at the random effects model, owing to the significant heterogeneity. On the contrary, no difference was registered for OS (P = 0.743) with no significant heterogeneity. Regarding toxicity, Tam caused more frequently thromboembolic events (P = 0.005) and vaginal bleeding (P = 0.001) compared with AI. Aromatase inhibitors appear to be superior to Tam as first-line endocrine option in PMBC women. Owing to a component of variability between the six studies analysed, the random effects estimates differed from corresponding fixed ones. Investigators should assess heterogeneity of trial results before deriving summary estimates of treatment effect.

Background: The aim of the study was to assess the toxicity profile, activity in terms of response rate, time to progression, overall survival, and quality of life of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and gemcitabine combination in chemo-naïve and pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) women., Methods: Patients were eligible if they had disease progression to prior chemotherapy (anthracycline-including or not) for early breast cancer or MBC. Patients received PLD 25 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle., Results: Of 50 patients enrolled, 37 had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy (24 with an anthracycline) and 23 prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease (6 with an anthracycline). Two complete responses and 20 partial responses were achieved in 46 assessable patients (overall response rate: 47.8%). Responses were observed in 14 (46.6%) of 30 patients with previous anthracycline exposure. Median response duration was 7 months, median duration of clinical benefit 8 months, time to progression 7 months. At a median follow-up of 10 months, 79.4% patients were alive at 1 year. No neutropenic complication was observed. Non-hematological toxicities were mild. One patient previously treated with an anthracycline developed a transient decrease (26%) in the left ventricular ejection fraction, with cardiac function recovering within 6 months., Conclusion: Because of the non-overlapping toxicity profiles of both PLD and gemcitabine, this combination can be regarded as a reliable therapeutic option for patients who have failed previous treatments, including anthracycline, for MBC.

Purpose: To observe whether in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients with HER2-positive disease vinorelbine plus trastuzumab can produce different overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) from women with HER2-negative tumors treated with vinorelbine alone., Methods: Between June 2000 and January 2004, 68 consecutive women were enrolled: 33 patients received vinorelbine (V) alone, while 35 patients were given trastuzumab plus vinorelbine (T+V) according to HER2 expression determined by immunohistochemistry. In tumors scored +2, HER2 gene amplification was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization., Results: In patients treated with V (HER2-negative tumors) the ORR was 27.3%, while in those given T+V (HER2 positive tumors) the ORR was 51.4%. The median duration of response was 8 months for women treated with V and 10 months for those who received T+V. Patients given T+V had a longer TTP (9 months) and OS (27 months) than those receiving V alone (6 months and 22 months respectively). Toxicity was mild in both groups. Concerning cardiotoxicity in T+V group, 7 patients (20%) had left ventricular systolic disfunction., Conclusion: Our data suggest that trastuzumab can change the natural history of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. In fact, when treated with trastuzumab, women with HER2-positive disease had better prognosis than patients with HER2-negative tumors. Conducting a formal phase III trial comparing vinorelbine alone vs vinorelbine plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer women could be debatable.

Recent evidence suggests that young women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) require additional treatment because of the inadequacy of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate fluorouracil (CMF) alone. Herein we report our findings from 368 premenopausal patients given adjuvant anthracycline alone. Overall, patients had a significantly increasing risk of relapse and dying with decreasing age at diagnosis and ER-negative disease. Interestingly, ER expression was not a negative prognostic factor, even among women <35 years, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) tending to be higher in patients with ER-positive rather than -negative BC. The potential of combining anthracyclines and endocrine therapies is reviewed and discussed.