Search

There is controversy whether high-dose chemotherapy and a blood cell or bone marrow autotransplant is a better treatment than conventional-dose chemotherapy for women with local/regional or metastatic breast cancer. Subject selection and time-to-treatment biases make definitive comparison impossible. Recent results of randomized trials are contradictory.Determine appropriateness of high-dose chemotherapy and a blood cell or bone marrow autotransplant in women with breast cancer. PANELISTS: Nine breast cancer experts from diverse geographic sites and practice settings.Boolean MEDLINE searches of 'breast cancer' and 'chemotherapy' and/or 'blood cell' or 'bone marrow transplants'.We used a modified Delphi-panel group judgement process. Clinical variables were permuted to define 2058 clinical settings. Each panelist rated appropriateness of high-dose therapy and an autotransplant versus conventional therapy on a 9-point ordinal scale (1: most inappropriate, 9: most appropriate). An appropriateness index was developed based on median rating and amount of disagreement. The relationship of appropriateness indices to the permuted clinical variables was considered by analysis of variance and recursive partitioning.In women with local/regional breast cancer autotransplants were rated: 1) appropriate in those withor = 10 cancer-involved lymph nodes; 2) uncertain in those with 4-9 cancer-involved nodes; and 3) inappropriate in women withor = 3 cancer-involved lymph nodes. In women with metastatic breast cancer autotransplants were rated: 1) appropriate in those with metastases to 'favorable' sites (skin, lymph node, pleura) and a complete or partial response to chemotherapy; 2) uncertain in women with metastases to 'unfavorable' sites (lung, liver, or central nervous system) and a complete response to chemotherapy or those with bone metastases and a complete or partial response or stable disease after chemotherapy; and 3) inappropriate in other settings.

The Southwest Oncology Group has completed a study of 213 women with the first recurrence of breast cancer. Eligibility included a radical or modified radical mastectomy for cure and recurrence which had received no other form of therapy. Patients were started on tamoxifen (TAM) 20 mg daily (Phase I). Failures, or responders who subsequently failed, had an oophorectomy if the ovaries were intact, and TAM was continued (Phase II). During Phase III, eligible patients underwent an adrenalectomy, and lastly, in Phase IV, patients received chemotherapy. Responses to TAM were seen in 40% of 56 premenopausal patients, 46% of 95 postmenopausal women, and 44% of 62 patients without intact ovaries. Oophorectomy plus TAM gave responses only in premenopausal women who failed to respond on TAM or in postmenopausal patients who had a prior response to TAM. Adrenalectomy was successful in 7 of 21 patients. Chemotherapy resulted in 13% complete and 47% partial responses. Median overall survival was 108, 155, and 115 weeks, respectively, for the three patient groups. The authors believe that until results with chemotherapy improve significantly, hormonal therapy is the preferred first-line management of recurrent breast cancer.

Activation and inhibition of estrogen and progestin receptor functions by endogenous biological factors present in the cytosol preparations were demonstrated by assaying mixed cytosol preparations from human breast tumors and immature rabbit uteri. Both activation and inhibition of receptor-hormone binding reaction could be observed by tumor-rabbit uterus or tumor-tumor combinations. The activation of tumor progestin receptor by rabbit uterus cytosol was markedly profound.

The relatively short survival following chemotherapy in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the breast and the introduction of antiestrogens has led to renewed interest in the hormonal therapy of breast cancer. Pritchard et al. (Cancer Treat. Rep., 64: 787-796, 1980) have recently stated that response to the antiestrogen tamoxifen (TAM) strongly predicts a subsequent response to oophorectomy in premenopausal patients. The Southwest Oncology Group administered TAM to pre- and postmenopausal women with first recurrence of breast cancer. Following response and subsequent relapse, or after no response, patients underwent an oophorectomy while continuing on TAM. None of 14 premenopausal patients who responded to TAM had a response to oophorectomy plus TAM, while 5 of 22 had a remission with oophorectomy plus TAM after initially failing with TAM alone. The reverse was seen in postmenopausal women; 4 of 18 responders to TAM subsequently responded to oophorectomy plus TAM, but none of 18 TAM failures responded to oophorectomy plus TAM. These results suggest that in the premenopausal women the TAM dose may be insufficient to block all estrogen action and that oophorectomy, by removing the major source of estrogen, can result in a more effective antiestrogen action of TAM leading to a response. No explanation is readily available for the results in postmenopausal patients.

Patients with advanced breast cancer who had not previously received chemotherapy were treated on a three-arm prospective study: adriamycin day 1 plus 5-FU on day 1 and 8 (AF), adriamycin day 1, plus 5-FU day 1 and 8, and cyclophosphamide day 1 (AFC), and adriamycin day 1 plus 5-FU day 1 and 8, cyclophosphamide day 1 and methotrexate day 1 (AFCM). These courses were repeated every 21 days. The response rate was 44/105 (42%) AF, 44/103 (43%) AFC and 52/105 (49%) AFCM. The length of response was 22, 33 and 35 weeks, respectively, for AF, AFC and AFCM (P = 0.21). The median survival, 64 weeks, was equal in all three limbs. The major toxicity was leukopenia. Twenty-eight percent developed a WBC of less than 2,000/microliter, which resulted in seven deaths (2.2%).