Search

Background: Tissue stiffness, dictated by organisation of interstitial fibrillar collagens, increases breast cancer risk and contributes to cancer progression. Tamoxifen is a standard treatment for receptor-positive breast cancer and is also aproved for primary prevention. We investigated the effect of tamoxifen and its main metabolites on the breast tissue collagen organisation as a proxy for stiffness and explored the relationship between mammographic density (MD) and collagen organisation., Material and Methods: This sub-study of the double-blinded dose-determination trial, KARISMA, included 83 healthy women randomised to 6 months of 20, 10, 5, 2.5, and 1 mg of tamoxifen or placebo. Ultrasound-guided core-needle breast biopsies collected before and after treatment were evaluated for collagen organisation by polarised light microscopy., Results: Tamoxifen reduced the amount of organised collagen and overall organisation, reflected by a shift from heavily crosslinked thick fibres to thinner, less crosslinked fibres. Collagen remodelling correlated with plasma concentrations of tamoxifen metabolites. MD change was not associated with changes in amount of organised collagen but was correlated with less crosslinking in premenopausal women., Conclusions: In this study of healthy women, tamoxifen decreased the overall organisation of fibrillar collagens, and consequently, the breast tissue stiffness. These stromal alterations may play a role in the well-established preventive and therapeutic effects of tamoxifen. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03346200. Registered November 1st, 2017. Retrospectively registered., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the ethics review board of Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (2016/65-31/2) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent prior to participating in the study. The trial is registered in https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT03346200). EudraCT number: 2016-000882-22. Registration date 1st, 2017. Retrospectively registered. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Despite known benefits of physical activity in reducing breast cancer risk, its impact on mammographic characteristics remain unclear and understudied. This study aimed to investigate associations between pre-diagnostic physical activity and mammographic features at breast cancer diagnosis, specifically mammographic breast density (MBD) and mammographic tumor appearance (MA), as well as mode of cancer detection (MoD)., Methods: Physical activity levels from study baseline (1991-1996) and mammographic information from the time of invasive breast cancer diagnosis (1991-2014) of 1116 women enrolled in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study cohort were used. Duration and intensity of physical activity were assessed according to metabolic equivalent of task hours (MET-h) per week, or World Health Organization (WHO) guideline recommendations. MBD was dichotomized into low-moderate or high, MA into spiculated or non-spiculated tumors, and MoD into clinical or screening detection. Associations were investigated through logistic regression analyses providing odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in crude and multivariable-adjusted models., Results: In total, 32% of participants had high MBD at diagnosis, 37% had non-spiculated MA and 50% had clinical MoD. Overall, no association between physical activity and MBD was found with increasing MET-h/week or when comparing women who exceeded WHO guidelines to those subceeding recommendations (OR adj 1.24, 95% CI 0.78-1.98). Likewise, no differences in MA or MoD were observed across categories of physical activity., Conclusions: No associations were observed between pre-diagnostic physical activity and MBD, MA, or MoD at breast cancer diagnosis. While physical activity is an established breast cancer prevention strategy, it does not appear to modify mammographic characteristics or screening detection., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Tamoxifen prevents recurrence of breast cancer and is also approved for preventive, risk-reducing, therapy. Tamoxifen alters the breast tissue composition and decreases the mammographic density. We aimed to test if baseline breast tissue composition influences tamoxifen-associated density change. This biopsy-based study included 83 participants randomised to 6 months daily intake of placebo, 20, 10, 5, 2.5, or 1 mg tamoxifen. The study is nested within the double-blinded tamoxifen dose-determination trial Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer Intervention (KARISMA) Study. Ultrasound-guided core-needle breast biopsies were collected at baseline before starting treatment. Biopsies were quantified for epithelial, stromal, and adipose distributions, and epithelial and stromal expression of proliferation marker Ki67, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR). Mammographic density was measured using STRATUS. We found that greater mammographic density at baseline was positively associated with stromal area and inversely associated with adipose area and stromal expression of ER. Premenopausal women had greater mammographic density and epithelial tissue, and expressed more epithelial Ki67, PR, and stromal PR, compared to postmenopausal women. In women treated with tamoxifen (1-20 mg), greater density decrease was associated with higher baseline density, epithelial Ki67, and stromal PR. Women who responded to tamoxifen with a density decrease had on average 17% higher baseline density and a 2.2-fold higher PR expression compared to non-responders. Our results indicate that features in the normal breast tissue before tamoxifen exposure influences the tamoxifen-associated density decrease, and that the age-associated difference in density change may be related to age-dependant differences in expression of Ki67 and PR., (© 2024 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Background: Long-term insulin exposure has been implicated in breast cancer etiology, but epidemiological evidence remains inconclusive. The aims of this study were to investigate the association of insulin therapy with mammographic density (MD) as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer and to assess associations with long-term elevated circulating insulin levels using a genetic score comprising 18 insulin-associated variants., Methods: We used data from the KARolinska MAmmography (Karma) project, a Swedish mammography screening cohort. Insulin-treated patients with type 1 (T1D, n = 122) and type 2 (T2D, n = 237) diabetes were identified through linkage with the Prescribed Drug Register and age-matched to 1771 women without diabetes. We assessed associations with treatment duration and insulin glargine use, and we further examined MD differences using non-insulin-treated T2D patients as an active comparator. MD was measured using a fully automated volumetric method, and analyses were adjusted for multiple potential confounders. Associations with the insulin genetic score were assessed in 9437 study participants without diabetes., Results: Compared with age-matched women without diabetes, insulin-treated T1D patients had greater percent dense (8.7% vs. 11.4%) and absolute dense volumes (59.7 vs. 64.7 cm 3 ), and a smaller absolute nondense volume (615 vs. 491 cm 3 ). Similar associations were observed for insulin-treated T2D, and estimates were not materially different in analyses comparing insulin-treated T2D patients with T2D patients receiving noninsulin glucose-lowering medication. In both T1D and T2D, the magnitude of the association with the absolute dense volume was highest for long-term insulin therapy (≥ 5 years) and the long-acting insulin analog glargine. No consistent evidence of differential associations by insulin treatment duration or type was found for percent dense and absolute nondense volumes. Genetically predicted insulin levels were positively associated with percent dense and absolute dense volumes, but not with the absolute nondense volume (percentage difference [95% CI] per 1-SD increase in insulin genetic score = 0.8 [0.0; 1.6], 0.9 [0.1; 1.8], and 0.1 [- 0.8; 0.9], respectively)., Conclusions: The consistency in direction of association for insulin treatment and the insulin genetic score with the absolute dense volume suggest a causal influence of long-term increased insulin exposure on mammographic dense breast tissue.