Search

This study aimed to evaluate the significance of chemotherapy (CT) among metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC), and to compare the survival outcomes between triple negative MpBC (MpBC-TNBC) and triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC-TNBC). SEER database was indexed to identify female unilateral primary MpBC diagnosed from 2010 to 2017. Patients were classified into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with response (NAC-response), NAC-no response, adjuvant chemotherapy, and no CT. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Cox regression was used to evaluate the independent prognostic factors. A 1:4 propensity score matching method was adopted to balance baseline differences. Altogether 1186 MpBC patients were enrolled, among them 181 received NAC, 647 received adjuvant CT and 358 did not receive any CT. Chemotherapy was an independent favorable prognostic factor. NAC-response and adjuvant CT had a significant or an obvious trend of survival improvement compared with NAC-no response or no CT. MpBC-TNBC was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor compared with IDC-TNBC. Among them, there was significant or trend of survival improvement among all TNBCs receiving NAC or adjuvant CT compared with no CT. Chemotherapy was of important significance to MpBC prognosis and should be integrated in comprehensive treatment for MpBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is one of the most rare and aggressive subtypes of primary breast cancer (BC). Our study aimed to explore hub genes related to the pathogenesis of IBC, which could be considered as novel molecular biomarkers for IBC diagnosis and prognosis. Material and Methods. Two datasets from gene expression omnibus database (GEO) were selected. Enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network for the DEGs were performed. We analyzed the prognostic values of hub genes in the Kaplan-Meier Plotter. Connectivity Map (CMap) and Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) was used to find candidate small molecules capable to reverse the gene status of IBC. Results. 157 DEGs were selected in total. We constructed the PPI network with 154 nodes interconnected by 128 interactions. The KEGG pathway analysis indicated that the DEGs were enriched in apoptosis, pathways in cancer and insulin signaling pathway. PTEN, PSMF1, PSMC6, AURKB, FZR1, CASP9, CASP6, CASP8, BAD, AKR7A2, ZNF24, SSX2IP, SIGLEC1, MS4A4A, and VSIG4 were selected as hub genes based on the high degree of connectivity. Six hub genes (PSMC6, AURKB, CASP9, BAD, ZNF24, and SSX2IP) that were significantly associated with the prognosis of breast cancer. The expression of CASP9 protein was associated with prognosis and immune cells infiltration of breast cancer. CASP9- naringenin (NGE) is expected to be the most promising candidate gene-compound interaction for the treatment of IBC. Conclusion. Taken together, CASP9 can be used as a prognostic biomarker and a novel therapeutic target in IBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To summarize the regulatory role of mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA network associated with endocrine therapy resistance (ETR) in breast cancer. Methods: We analyzed the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), differentially expressed lncRNAs (DELs), and differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) in long-term estrogen-deprived (LTED) estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells (LTED MCF7) (modeling relapse on endocrine therapy) and MCF7 cells in the presence of estrogen (E2) (modeling a patient at primary diagnosis) by mining GSE120929 and GSE120930 datasets. The mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA network was constructed by multiple bioinformatic tools. The prognosis of genes from the network was validated in breast cancer patients with following systemic treatment (endocrine therapy) by GEPIA, Kaplan–Meier plotter and UALCAN database. Results: Totally, 769 DEGs, 33 DEMs, and 10 DELs were selected. The mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA network was established including 60 mRNA nodes, 6 miRNA nodes and 3 lncRNA nodes. A significant module containing 3 nodes and 3 edges was calculated based on the mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA network. The hub genes in the network are ABCG2, ESR1 and GJA1. ESR1/miR-130b-3p/HOTAIR are significantly correlated with the prognosis of breast cancer patients with endocrine therapy. Conclusion: This study provides a novel ETR-related mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA network. Further, we suggest that ESR1/miR-130b-3p/HOTAIR may be promising targets for clinical treatment of endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are controversies in the comparison of overall survival between invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast ( IMPC) and invasive ductal carcinoma ( IDC). The objective of this study was to compare the long-term survival outcome between non-metastatic IMPC and IDC. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was searched to identify women with non-metastatic IMPC and IDC diagnosed between 2001 and 2013. Comparisons of patient and tumor characteristics were performed using Pearson's chi-square. The propensity score matching method was applied with each IMPC matched to one IDC. Breast cancer-specific survival ( BCSS) and overall survival ( OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and compared across groups using the log-rank statistic. Multivariate analysis was performed through Cox models. IMPC was presented with aggressive clinical presentations such as larger tumor, more positive lymph nodes, and more advanced stage compared with IDC. A higher rate of estrogen receptor ( ER)/progesterone receptor ( PR) positivity was also observed in IMPC. With a median follow-up of 64 months, IMPC had a better BCSS ( P = 0.031) and OS ( P = 0.012) compared with IDC. In a case-control analysis IMPC was still an independent favorable prognostic factor for BCSS ( HR = 0.410, P < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.293-0.572) and OS ( HR = 0.497, P < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.387-0.637). In subgroup analysis, IMPC always showed a better survival outcome compared with IDC except in AJCC stage I and histologic grade I disease. IMPC has a better long-term survival outcome compared with IDC in spite of its highly aggressive clinical presentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends of surgical treatments among young patients in T 1 N 0-1 M 0 stage based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients aged less than 40 y diagnosed between 1998 and 2015 were enrolled, with tumors in T 1 N 0-1 M 0 stage and not located in the central area. Differences in clinical-pathological characteristics were evaluated using chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to measure the various factors associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). Independent prognostic factors were evaluated by Cox model. The total rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was 51.6%, which declined from 64.5% in 1998 to 39.6% in 2015. The total rate of CPM was 22.7%, which increased from 3.7% in 1998 to 38.7% in 2014 despite a decline to 32.7% in 2015. Meanwhile, the rate of reconstruction increased in line with that of CPM, from 9.4% in 1998 to 35.0% in 2015. There was a trend of increasing use of implant-based reconstruction. Significant higher odds of CPM were found in recent year of diagnosis between 2010 and 2015 and in implant-based reconstruction. Patients undergoing CPM had similar survival outcomes compared with those undergoing BCS and unilateral mastectomy, whereas those undergoing BCS had better survival outcomes compared with those undergoing unilateral mastectomy. A trend of growing preference for CPM and reconstruction was observed among young patients in early stage in recent years without survival benefits. Efforts should be made to promote efficient communication and evidence-based decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]