Search

Background Patients with centrally located tumours involving the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) who undergo breast-conserving treatment (BCT) are at high risk for breast deformity and asymmetry. Immediate oncoplastic breast reconstruction (OBR) can have a favourable impact on surgical outcome. Methods We retrospectively compared aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction among women treated with NAC lumpectomy and immediate OBR with patients treated with BCT alone. Aesthetic outcome was evaluated by independent observers, and patient satisfaction was assessed by the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Results A total of 24 patients were studied, 12 in each group. Demographics and oncological staging were similar in both groups, apart from mean age, hypertension and tumour size/lumpectomy weight. Patients in the OBR group had higher scores for aesthetic outcome and a higher degree of patient satisfaction from the surgical outcome compared to the patients in the BCT-alone group. Conclusions The immediate OBR approach in the treatment of centrally located tumours with NAC resection has clear advantages over BCT alone. This approach should be considered for and offered to suitable patients.

Background Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) is a widely accepted treatment for locally advanced breast cancer. Some patients require additional boost radiation to the internal mammary nodes as the part of regional nodal irradiation (RNI). Delayed breast reconstruction with an autologous free flap using the internal mammary vessels for microvascular flap anastomosis is a common practice for these patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of RNI on autologous microvascular breast reconstruction. Patients and Methods A retrospective study was performed on 57 patients (69 flaps) undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap for delayed breast reconstruction after radiation therapy. The study group included 37 patients (65%) who received PMRT and RNI to the internal mammary nodes. The control group included 20 patients (35%) who received PMRT alone. Early and delayed surgical complications, including wound complications, fat necrosis, and flap loss, were compared between the groups. Results The patient demographics in both groups were similar. Complication rate showed a higher trend in the study group for flap loss (8.3% versus 0%) and vascular anastomosis failure (5.6% versus 0%), but with no statistical difference (p = 0.54, 0.53, respectively). The control group showed a higher trend in fat necrosis (25% versus 8.3%, p = 0.11). Conclusions DIEP flap breast reconstructions with internal mammary vessels anastomosis should be performed with cautious in patients who had received RNI to internal mammary nodes because of potential added risk for surgical complications.